[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suiteC++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters isju
[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suiteC++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters isjust slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowingboth std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the testsuite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
show more ...
Add include for 'test_macros.h' to all the tests that were missing them. Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.llvm-svn: 362252
Support tests in freestandingSummary:Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of oddmanners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve thatsituation. I
Support tests in freestandingSummary:Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of oddmanners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve thatsituation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding shouldbe, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that weneed to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and"freestanding the library subset".Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, usingclang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add: self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']Run the tests and they all fail.Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" propertyhas two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can'tcreate a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main justfalls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2leading to non-zero return code).Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests todeclare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling usto declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangledone), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124files, and I apologize.The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool: https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feedThis works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystemtests), etc.Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent furtherregressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++freestanding fairly well in libc++.<rdar://problem/47754795>Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWFSubscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commitsDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624llvm-svn: 353086
Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoto reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings thatdefeated my regular expressions.We understand that
Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoto reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings thatdefeated my regular expressions.We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the headerentirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with theFoundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVMproject under our new license, so you will see that the license headersinclude that license only. Some of our contributors have contributedcode under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy ofour old license notice in the top-level files in each project andrepository.llvm-svn: 351648
[libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warnings, null pointer deref.test/std/algorithms/alg.modifying.operations/alg.generate/generate_n.pass.cppSilence MSVC warning C4244. This is expected when passingfloatin
[libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warnings, null pointer deref.test/std/algorithms/alg.modifying.operations/alg.generate/generate_n.pass.cppSilence MSVC warning C4244. This is expected when passingfloating-point values for size.test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.members/to_ullong.pass.cpptest/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.members/to_ulong.pass.cppAvoid MSVC "warning C4293: '<<': shift count negative or too big,undefined behavior". MSVC sees (1ULL << N) and warns - being guardedby const bool canFit is insufficient. A small change to the codeavoids the warning without the need for a pragma.Remove a spurious printf() declaration from to_ullong.pass.cpp.Change ULL to UL in to_ulong.pass.cpp. The ULL suffix wasprobably copy-pasted.test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.general/ignore.pass.cppUse LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT for consistency with other files.test/support/container_test_types.hFix a null pointer dereference, found by MSVC /analyzewarning C6011 "Dereferencing NULL pointer 'm_expected_args'."Fixes D41030.llvm-svn: 320535
[libcxx] [test] Fix URLs in comments and make them HTTPS. NFC.llvm-svn: 310156
Implement LWG 2773 - std::ignore should be constexpr.In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensuresthat each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operatorsare constexpr.llvm-s
Implement LWG 2773 - std::ignore should be constexpr.In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensuresthat each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operatorsare constexpr.llvm-svn: 294165
Fix comment typos, strip trailing whitespace. Patch from [email protected]llvm-svn: 273357
Fix warning in tuple tests. The test suite should now run clean with most warnings enabledllvm-svn: 272822
[libcxx] Mark most tuple tests UNSUPPORTED for c++03 and c++98.Summary: No declaration for the type `tuple` is given in c++03 or c++98 modes. Mark all tests that use the actual `tuple` type as UNSU
[libcxx] Mark most tuple tests UNSUPPORTED for c++03 and c++98.Summary: No declaration for the type `tuple` is given in c++03 or c++98 modes. Mark all tests that use the actual `tuple` type as UNSUPPORTED.Reviewers: jroelofs, mclow.lists, danalbertReviewed By: danalbertSubscribers: cfe-commitsDifferential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5956llvm-svn: 229808
Move test into test/std subdirectory.llvm-svn: 224658