History log of /linux-6.15/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c (Results 1 – 25 of 203)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.15, v6.15-rc7, v6.15-rc6, v6.15-rc5, v6.15-rc4, v6.15-rc3, v6.15-rc2, v6.15-rc1, v6.14, v6.14-rc7
# 4769437d 14-Mar-2025 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>

arm64: Rely on generic printing of preemption model

__die() invokes later show_regs() -> show_regs_print_info() which prints
the current preemption model.
Remove it from the initial line.

Signed-of

arm64: Rely on generic printing of preemption model

__die() invokes later show_regs() -> show_regs_print_info() which prints
the current preemption model.
Remove it from the initial line.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.14-rc6, v6.14-rc5, v6.14-rc4, v6.14-rc3, v6.14-rc2, v6.14-rc1, v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4, v6.13-rc3, v6.13-rc2, v6.13-rc1, v6.12, v6.12-rc7, v6.12-rc6, v6.12-rc5
# 0c3beacf 23-Oct-2024 Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]>

asm-generic: introduce text-patching.h

Several architectures support text patching, but they name the header
files that declare patching functions differently.

Make all such headers consistently na

asm-generic: introduce text-patching.h

Several architectures support text patching, but they name the header
files that declare patching functions differently.

Make all such headers consistently named text-patching.h and add an empty
header in asm-generic for architectures that do not support text patching.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> # m68k
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Tested-by: kdevops <[email protected]>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Cain <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Stafford Horne <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.12-rc4, v6.12-rc3, v6.12-rc2
# 13840229 30-Sep-2024 Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>

arm64: mops: Handle MOPS exceptions from EL1

We will soon be using MOPS instructions in the kernel, so wire up the
exception handler to handle exceptions from EL1 caused by the copy/set
operation be

arm64: mops: Handle MOPS exceptions from EL1

We will soon be using MOPS instructions in the kernel, so wire up the
exception handler to handle exceptions from EL1 caused by the copy/set
operation being stopped and resumed on a different type of CPU.

Add a helper for advancing the single step state machine, similarly to
what the EL0 exception handler does.

Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 8ce71d27 01-Oct-2024 Mark Brown <[email protected]>

arm64/traps: Handle GCS exceptions

A new exception code is defined for GCS specific faults other than
standard load/store faults, for example GCS token validation failures,
add handling for this. Th

arm64/traps: Handle GCS exceptions

A new exception code is defined for GCS specific faults other than
standard load/store faults, for example GCS token validation failures,
add handling for this. These faults are reported to userspace as
segfaults with code SEGV_CPERR (protection error), mirroring the
reporting for x86 shadow stack errors.

GCS faults due to memory load/store operations generate data aborts with
a flag set, these will be handled separately as part of the data abort
handling.

Since we do not currently enable GCS for EL1 we should not get any faults
there but while we're at it we wire things up there, treating any GCS
fault as fatal.

Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.12-rc1, v6.11, v6.11-rc7, v6.11-rc6, v6.11-rc5
# 7f0ab607 22-Aug-2024 Joey Gouly <[email protected]>

arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults

If a memory fault occurs that is due to an overlay/pkey fault, report that to
userspace with a SEGV_PKUERR.

Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin

arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults

If a memory fault occurs that is due to an overlay/pkey fault, report that to
userspace with a SEGV_PKUERR.

Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[will: Add ESR.FSC check to data abort handler]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 3e9e67e1 24-Aug-2024 Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]>

arm64: Implement prctl(PR_{G,S}ET_TSC)

On arm64, this prctl controls access to CNTVCT_EL0, CNTVCTSS_EL0 and
CNTFRQ_EL0 via CNTKCTL_EL1.EL0VCTEN. Since this bit is also used to
implement various erra

arm64: Implement prctl(PR_{G,S}ET_TSC)

On arm64, this prctl controls access to CNTVCT_EL0, CNTVCTSS_EL0 and
CNTFRQ_EL0 via CNTKCTL_EL1.EL0VCTEN. Since this bit is also used to
implement various erratum workarounds, check whether the CPU needs
a workaround whenever we potentially need to change it.

This is needed for a correct implementation of non-instrumenting
record-replay debugging on arm64 (i.e. rr; https://rr-project.org/).
rr must trap and record any sources of non-determinism from the
userspace program's perspective so it can be replayed later. This
includes the results of syscalls as well as the results of access
to architected timers exposed directly to the program. This prctl
was originally added for x86 by commit 8fb402bccf20 ("generic, x86:
add prctl commands PR_GET_TSC and PR_SET_TSC"), and rr uses it to
trap RDTSC on x86 for the same reason.

We also considered exposing this as a PTRACE_EVENT. However, prctl
seems like a better choice for these reasons:

1) In general an in-process control seems more useful than an
out-of-process control, since anything that you would be able to
do with ptrace could also be done with prctl (tracer can inject a
call to the prctl and handle signal-delivery-stops), and it avoids
needing an additional process (which will complicate debugging
of the ptraced process since it cannot have more than one tracer,
and will be incompatible with ptrace_scope=3) in cases where that
is not otherwise necessary.

2) Consistency with x86_64. Note that on x86_64, RDTSC has been there
since the start, so it's the same situation as on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]>
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I233a1867d1ccebe2933a347552e7eae862344421
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.11-rc4, v6.11-rc3, v6.11-rc2, v6.11-rc1, v6.10, v6.10-rc7, v6.10-rc6, v6.10-rc5, v6.10-rc4
# 7a928b32 10-Jun-2024 Pierre-Clément Tosi <[email protected]>

arm64: Introduce esr_brk_comment, esr_is_cfi_brk

As it is already used in two places, move esr_comment() to a header for
re-use, with a clearer name.

Introduce esr_is_cfi_brk() to detect kCFI BRK s

arm64: Introduce esr_brk_comment, esr_is_cfi_brk

As it is already used in two places, move esr_comment() to a header for
re-use, with a clearer name.

Introduce esr_is_cfi_brk() to detect kCFI BRK syndromes, currently used
by early_brk64() but soon to also be used by hypervisor code.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Clément Tosi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.10-rc3, v6.10-rc2, v6.10-rc1, v6.9, v6.9-rc7, v6.9-rc6, v6.9-rc5, v6.9-rc4, v6.9-rc3, v6.9-rc2, v6.9-rc1, v6.8, v6.8-rc7, v6.8-rc6, v6.8-rc5, v6.8-rc4, v6.8-rc3, v6.8-rc2, v6.8-rc1, v6.7, v6.7-rc8, v6.7-rc7, v6.7-rc6, v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7
# d1e40f82 16-Oct-2023 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_1542419

We use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_WORKAROUND_1542419 but
this is not necessary and cpus_have_final_cap() would be prefer

arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_1542419

We use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_WORKAROUND_1542419 but
this is not necessary and cpus_have_final_cap() would be preferable.

For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than
it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap
test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it
will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some
race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the
subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different
branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative
sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static
branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there
are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between
cpucap detection and alternative patching.

Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and
migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(),
or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will
remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make
it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and
after alternative patching.

The ARM64_WORKAROUND_1542419 cpucap is detected and patched before any
userspace code can run, and the both __do_compat_cache_op() and
ctr_read_handler() are only reachable from exceptions taken from
userspace. Thus it is not necessary for either to use
cpus_have_const_cap(), and cpus_have_final_cap() is equivalent.

This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with
cpus_have_final_cap(), which will avoid generating code to test the
system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at
runtime. Using cpus_have_final_cap() clearly documents that we do not
expect this code to run before cpucaps are finalized, and will make it
easier to spot issues if code is changed in future to allow these
functions to be reached earlier.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3
# 2de451a3 22-Sep-2023 Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>

KVM: arm64: Add handler for MOPS exceptions

An Armv8.8 FEAT_MOPS main or epilogue instruction will take an exception
if executed on a CPU with a different MOPS implementation option (A or
B) than th

KVM: arm64: Add handler for MOPS exceptions

An Armv8.8 FEAT_MOPS main or epilogue instruction will take an exception
if executed on a CPU with a different MOPS implementation option (A or
B) than the CPU where the preceding prologue instruction ran. In this
case the OS exception handler is expected to reset the registers and
restart execution from the prologue instruction.

A KVM guest may use the instructions at EL1 at times when the guest is
not able to handle the exception, expecting that the instructions will
only run on one CPU (e.g. when running UEFI boot services in the guest).
As KVM may reschedule the guest between different types of CPUs at any
time (on an asymmetric system), it needs to also handle the resulting
exception itself in case the guest is not able to. A similar situation
will also occur in the future when live migrating a guest from one type
of CPU to another.

Add handling for the MOPS exception to KVM. The handling can be shared
with the EL0 exception handler, as the logic and register layouts are
the same. The exception can be handled right after exiting a guest,
which avoids the cost of returning to the host exit handler.

Similarly to the EL0 exception handler, in case the main or epilogue
instruction is being single stepped, it makes sense to finish the step
before executing the prologue instruction, so advance the single step
state machine.

Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1, v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3, v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7, v6.4-rc6, v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3, v6.4-rc2
# bb6e04a1 09-May-2023 Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

kasan: use internal prototypes matching gcc-13 builtins

gcc-13 warns about function definitions for builtin interfaces that have a
different prototype, e.g.:

In file included from kasan_test.c:31:

kasan: use internal prototypes matching gcc-13 builtins

gcc-13 warns about function definitions for builtin interfaces that have a
different prototype, e.g.:

In file included from kasan_test.c:31:
kasan.h:574:6: error: conflicting types for built-in function '__asan_register_globals'; expected 'void(void *, long int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
574 | void __asan_register_globals(struct kasan_global *globals, size_t size);
kasan.h:577:6: error: conflicting types for built-in function '__asan_alloca_poison'; expected 'void(void *, long int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
577 | void __asan_alloca_poison(unsigned long addr, size_t size);
kasan.h:580:6: error: conflicting types for built-in function '__asan_load1'; expected 'void(void *)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
580 | void __asan_load1(unsigned long addr);
kasan.h:581:6: error: conflicting types for built-in function '__asan_store1'; expected 'void(void *)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
581 | void __asan_store1(unsigned long addr);
kasan.h:643:6: error: conflicting types for built-in function '__hwasan_tag_memory'; expected 'void(void *, unsigned char, long int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
643 | void __hwasan_tag_memory(unsigned long addr, u8 tag, unsigned long size);

The two problems are:

- Addresses are passes as 'unsigned long' in the kernel, but gcc-13
expects a 'void *'.

- sizes meant to use a signed ssize_t rather than size_t.

Change all the prototypes to match these. Using 'void *' consistently for
addresses gets rid of a couple of type casts, so push that down to the
leaf functions where possible.

This now passes all randconfig builds on arm, arm64 and x86, but I have
not tested it on the other architectures that support kasan, since they
tend to fail randconfig builds in other ways. This might fail if any of
the 32-bit architectures expect a 'long' instead of 'int' for the size
argument.

The __asan_allocas_unpoison() function prototype is somewhat weird, since
it uses a pointer for 'stack_top' and an size_t for 'stack_bottom'. This
looks like it is meant to be 'addr' and 'size' like the others, but the
implementation clearly treats them as 'top' and 'bottom'.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 8cd076a6 09-May-2023 Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>

arm64: mops: handle single stepping after MOPS exception

When a MOPS main or epilogue instruction is being executed, the task may
get scheduled on a different CPU and restart execution from the prol

arm64: mops: handle single stepping after MOPS exception

When a MOPS main or epilogue instruction is being executed, the task may
get scheduled on a different CPU and restart execution from the prologue
instruction. If the main or epilogue instruction is being single stepped
then it makes sense to finish the step and take the step exception
before starting to execute the next (prologue) instruction. So
fast-forward the single step state machine when taking a MOPS exception.

This means that if a main or epilogue instruction is single stepped with
ptrace, the debugger will sometimes observe the PC moving back to the
prologue instruction. (As already mentioned, this should be rare as it
only happens when the task is scheduled to another CPU during the step.)

This also ensures that perf breakpoints count prologue instructions
consistently (i.e. every time they are executed), rather than skipping
them when there also happens to be a breakpoint on a main or epilogue
instruction.

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 8536ceaa 09-May-2023 Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>

arm64: mops: handle MOPS exceptions

The memory copy/set instructions added as part of FEAT_MOPS can take an
exception (e.g. page fault) part-way through their execution and resume
execution afterwar

arm64: mops: handle MOPS exceptions

The memory copy/set instructions added as part of FEAT_MOPS can take an
exception (e.g. page fault) part-way through their execution and resume
execution afterwards.

If however the task is re-scheduled and execution resumes on a different
CPU, then the CPU may take a new type of exception to indicate this.
This is because the architecture allows two options (Option A and Option
B) to implement the instructions and a heterogeneous system can have
different implementations between CPUs.

In this case the OS has to reset the registers and restart execution
from the prologue instruction. The algorithm for doing this is provided
as part of the Arm ARM.

Add an exception handler for the new exception and wire it up for
userspace tasks.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


# b925b431 16-May-2023 Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

arm64: hide unused is_valid_bugaddr()

When generic BUG() support is disabled, this function has no declaration
and no callers but causes a W=1 warning:

arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:950:5: error: no pr

arm64: hide unused is_valid_bugaddr()

When generic BUG() support is disabled, this function has no declaration
and no callers but causes a W=1 warning:

arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:950:5: error: no previous prototype for 'is_valid_bugaddr' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Add an #ifdef that matches the one around the declaration.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4-rc1, v6.3, v6.3-rc7
# 5ab6876c 12-Apr-2023 Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>

arm64/cpu: Mark cpu_park_loop() and friends __noreturn

In preparation for marking panic_smp_self_stop() __noreturn across the
kernel, first mark the arm64 implementation of cpu_park_loop() and
relat

arm64/cpu: Mark cpu_park_loop() and friends __noreturn

In preparation for marking panic_smp_self_stop() __noreturn across the
kernel, first mark the arm64 implementation of cpu_park_loop() and
related functions __noreturn.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/55787d3193ea3e295ccbb097abfab0a10ae49d45.1681342859.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3, v6.3-rc2, v6.3-rc1
# b61b82f8 20-Feb-2023 Sangmoon Kim <[email protected]>

arm64: pass ESR_ELx to die() of cfi_handler

Commit 0f2cb928a154 ("arm64: consistently pass ESR_ELx to die()") caused
all callers to pass the ESR_ELx value to die().

For consistency, this patch also

arm64: pass ESR_ELx to die() of cfi_handler

Commit 0f2cb928a154 ("arm64: consistently pass ESR_ELx to die()") caused
all callers to pass the ESR_ELx value to die().

For consistency, this patch also adds esr to die() call of cfi_handler.
Also, when CFI error occurs, die handlers can use ESR_ELx value.

Signed-off-by: Sangmoon Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.2, v6.2-rc8, v6.2-rc7
# 1d959312 01-Feb-2023 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>

efi: arm64: Wire up BTI annotation in memory attributes table

UEFI v2.10 extends the EFI memory attributes table with a flag that
indicates whether or not all RuntimeServicesCode regions were
constr

efi: arm64: Wire up BTI annotation in memory attributes table

UEFI v2.10 extends the EFI memory attributes table with a flag that
indicates whether or not all RuntimeServicesCode regions were
constructed with BTI landing pads, permitting the OS to map these
regions with BTI restrictions enabled.

So let's take this into account on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 25b84002 02-Feb-2023 Kees Cook <[email protected]>

arm64: Support Clang UBSAN trap codes for better reporting

When building with CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y on arm64, Clang encodes the UBSAN
check (handler) type in the esr. Extract this and actually report

arm64: Support Clang UBSAN trap codes for better reporting

When building with CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y on arm64, Clang encodes the UBSAN
check (handler) type in the esr. Extract this and actually report these
traps as coming from the specific UBSAN check that tripped.

Before:

Internal error: BRK handler: 00000000f20003e8 [#1] PREEMPT SMP

After:

Internal error: UBSAN: shift out of bounds: 00000000f2005514 [#1] PREEMPT SMP

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Cc: Yongqin Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
Cc: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.2-rc6
# a873bb49 27-Jan-2023 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: traps: attempt to dump all instructions

Currently dump_kernel_instr() dumps a few instructions around the
pt_regs::pc value, dumping 4 instructions before the PC before dumping
the instructio

arm64: traps: attempt to dump all instructions

Currently dump_kernel_instr() dumps a few instructions around the
pt_regs::pc value, dumping 4 instructions before the PC before dumping
the instruction at the PC. If an attempt to read an instruction fails,
it gives up and does not attempt to dump any subsequent instructions.

This is unfortunate when the pt_regs::pc value points to the start of a
page with a leading guard page, where the instruction at the PC can be
read, but prior instructions cannot.

This patch makes dump_kernel_instr() attempt to dump each instruction
regardless of whether reading a prior instruction could be read, which
gives a more useful code dump in such cases. When an instruction cannot
be read, it is reported as "????????", which cannot be confused with a
hex value,

For example, with a `UDF #0` (AKA 0x00000000) early in the kexec control
page, we'll now get the following code dump:

| Internal error: Oops - Undefined instruction: 0000000002000000 [#1] SMP
| Modules linked in:
| CPU: 0 PID: 261 Comm: kexec Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5+ #26
| Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
| pstate: 604003c5 (nZCv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
| pc : 0x48c00000
| lr : machine_kexec+0x190/0x200
| sp : ffff80000d36ba80
| x29: ffff80000d36ba80 x28: ffff000002dfc380 x27: 0000000000000000
| x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
| x23: ffff80000a9f7858 x22: 000000004c460000 x21: 0000000000000010
| x20: 00000000ad821000 x19: ffff000000aa0000 x18: 0000000000000006
| x17: ffff8000758a2000 x16: ffff800008000000 x15: ffff80000d36b568
| x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff80000d36b707 x12: ffff80000a9bf6e0
| x11: 00000000ffffdfff x10: ffff80000aaaf8e0 x9 : ffff80000815eff8
| x8 : 000000000002ffe8 x7 : c0000000ffffdfff x6 : 00000000000affa8
| x5 : 0000000000001fff x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : ffff80000a263008
| x2 : ffff80000a9e20f8 x1 : 0000000048c00000 x0 : ffff000000aa0000
| Call trace:
| 0x48c00000
| kernel_kexec+0x88/0x138
| __do_sys_reboot+0x108/0x288
| __arm64_sys_reboot+0x2c/0x40
| invoke_syscall+0x78/0x140
| el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0x100
| do_el0_svc+0x34/0x80
| el0_svc+0x34/0x140
| el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x140
| el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x1c0
| Code: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? (00000000)
| ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
| Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - Undefined instruction: Fatal exception
| Kernel Offset: disabled
| CPU features: 0x002000,00050108,c8004203
| Memory Limit: none

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.2-rc5, v6.2-rc4, v6.2-rc3, v6.2-rc2, v6.2-rc1, v6.1, v6.1-rc8, v6.1-rc7, v6.1-rc6, v6.1-rc5, v6.1-rc4, v6.1-rc3, v6.1-rc2
# 124c49b1 19-Oct-2022 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: armv8_deprecated: rework deprected instruction handling

Support for deprecated instructions can be enabled or disabled at
runtime. To handle this, the code in armv8_deprecated.c registers and

arm64: armv8_deprecated: rework deprected instruction handling

Support for deprecated instructions can be enabled or disabled at
runtime. To handle this, the code in armv8_deprecated.c registers and
unregisters undef_hooks, and makes cross CPU calls to configure HW
support. This is rather complicated, and the synchronization required to
make this safe ends up serializing the handling of instructions which
have been trapped.

This patch simplifies the deprecated instruction handling by removing
the dynamic registration and unregistration, and changing the trap
handling code to determine whether a handler should be invoked. This
removes the need for dynamic list management, and simplifies the locking
requirements, making it possible to handle trapped instructions entirely
in parallel.

Where changing the emulation state requires a cross-call, this is
serialized by locally disabling interrupts, ensuring that the CPU is not
left in an inconsistent state.

To simplify sysctl management, each insn_emulation is given a separate
sysctl table, permitting these to be registered separately. The core
sysctl code will iterate over all of these when walking sysfs.

I've tested this with userspace programs which use each of the
deprecated instructions, and I've concurrently modified the support
level for each of the features back-and-forth between HW and emulated to
check that there are no spurious SIGILLs sent to userspace when the
support level is changed.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# f5962add 19-Oct-2022 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: rework EL0 MRS emulation

On CPUs without FEAT_IDST, ID register emulation is slower than it needs
to be, as all threads contend for the same lock to perform the
emulation. This patch reworks

arm64: rework EL0 MRS emulation

On CPUs without FEAT_IDST, ID register emulation is slower than it needs
to be, as all threads contend for the same lock to perform the
emulation. This patch reworks the emulation to avoid this unnecessary
contention.

On CPUs with FEAT_IDST (which is mandatory from ARMv8.4 onwards), EL0
accesses to ID registers result in a SYS trap, and emulation of these is
handled with a sys64_hook. These hooks are statically allocated, and no
locking is required to iterate through the hooks and perform the
emulation, allowing emulation to occur in parallel with no contention.

On CPUs without FEAT_IDST, EL0 accesses to ID registers result in an
UNDEFINED exception, and emulation of these accesses is handled with an
undef_hook. When an EL0 MRS instruction is trapped to EL1, the kernel
finds the relevant handler by iterating through all of the undef_hooks,
requiring undef_lock to be held during this lookup.

This locking is only required to safely traverse the list of undef_hooks
(as it can be concurrently modified), and the actual emulation of the
MRS does not require any mutual exclusion. This locking is an
unfortunate bottleneck, especially given that MRS emulation is enabled
unconditionally and is never disabled.

This patch reworks the non-FEAT_IDST MRS emulation logic so that it can
be invoked directly from do_el0_undef(). This removes the bottleneck,
allowing MRS traps to be handled entirely in parallel, and is a stepping
stone to making all of the undef_hooks lock-free.

I've tested this in a 64-vCPU VM on a 64-CPU ThunderX2 host, with a
benchmark which spawns a number of threads which each try to read
ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 1000000 times. This is vastly more contention than will
ever be seen in realistic usage, but clearly demonstrates the removal of
the bottleneck:

| Threads || Time (seconds) |
| || Before || After |
| || Real | System || Real | System |
|---------++--------+---------++--------+---------|
| 1 || 0.29 | 0.20 || 0.24 | 0.12 |
| 2 || 0.35 | 0.51 || 0.23 | 0.27 |
| 4 || 1.08 | 3.87 || 0.24 | 0.56 |
| 8 || 4.31 | 33.60 || 0.24 | 1.11 |
| 16 || 9.47 | 149.39 || 0.23 | 2.15 |
| 32 || 19.07 | 605.27 || 0.24 | 4.38 |
| 64 || 65.40 | 3609.09 || 0.33 | 11.27 |

Aside from the speedup, there should be no functional change as a result
of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# dbfbd87e 19-Oct-2022 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: factor insn read out of call_undef_hook()

Subsequent patches will rework EL0 UNDEF handling, removing the need for
struct undef_hook and call_undef_hook. In preparation for those changes,
thi

arm64: factor insn read out of call_undef_hook()

Subsequent patches will rework EL0 UNDEF handling, removing the need for
struct undef_hook and call_undef_hook. In preparation for those changes,
this patch factors the logic for reading user instructions out of
call_undef_hook() and into a new user_insn_read() helper, matching the
style of the existing aarch64_insn_read() helper used for reading kernel
instructions.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# bff8f413 19-Oct-2022 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: factor out EL1 SSBS emulation hook

Currently call_undef_hook() is used to handle UNDEFINED exceptions from
EL0 and EL1. As support for deprecated instructions may be enabled
independently, th

arm64: factor out EL1 SSBS emulation hook

Currently call_undef_hook() is used to handle UNDEFINED exceptions from
EL0 and EL1. As support for deprecated instructions may be enabled
independently, the handlers for individual instructions are organised as
a linked list of struct undef_hook which can be manipulated dynamically.
As this can be manipulated dynamically, the list is protected with a
raw_spinlock which must be acquired when handling UNDEFINED exceptions
or when manipulating the list of handlers.

This locking is unfortunate as it serialises handling of UNDEFINED
exceptions, and requires RCU to be enabled for lockdep, requiring the
use of RCU_NONIDLE() in resume path of cpu_suspend() since commit:

a2c42bbabbe260b7 ("arm64: spectre: Prevent lockdep splat on v4 mitigation enable path")

The list of UNDEFINED handlers largely consist of handlers for
exceptions taken from EL0, and the only handler for exceptions taken
from EL1 handles `MSR SSBS, #imm` on CPUs which feature PSTATE.SSBS but
lack the corresponding MSR (Immediate) instruction. Other than this we
never expect to take an UNDEFINED exception from EL1 in normal
operation.

This patch reworks do_el0_undef() to invoke the EL1 SSBS handler
directly, relegating call_undef_hook() to only handle EL0 UNDEFs. This
removes redundant work to iterate the list for EL1 UNDEFs, and removes
the need for locking, permitting EL1 UNDEFs to be handled in parallel
without contention.

The RCU_NONIDLE() call in cpu_suspend() will be removed in a subsequent
patch, as there are other potential issues with the use of
instrumentable code and RCU in the CPU suspend code.

I've tested this by forcing the detection of SSBS on a CPU that doesn't
have it, and verifying that the try_emulate_el1_ssbs() callback is
invoked.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# 61d64a37 19-Oct-2022 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: split EL0/EL1 UNDEF handlers

In general, exceptions taken from EL1 need to be handled separately from
exceptions taken from EL0, as the logic to handle the two cases can be
significantly dive

arm64: split EL0/EL1 UNDEF handlers

In general, exceptions taken from EL1 need to be handled separately from
exceptions taken from EL0, as the logic to handle the two cases can be
significantly divergent, and exceptions taken from EL1 typically have
more stringent requirements on locking and instrumentation.

Subsequent patches will rework the way EL1 UNDEFs are handled in order
to address longstanding soundness issues with instrumentation and RCU.
In preparation for that rework, this patch splits the existing
do_undefinstr() handler into separate do_el0_undef() and do_el1_undef()
handlers.

Prior to this patch, do_undefinstr() was marked with NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(),
preventing instrumentation via kprobes. However, do_undefinstr() invokes
other code which can be instrumented, and:

* For UNDEFINED exceptions taken from EL0, there is no risk of recursion
within kprobes. Therefore it is safe for do_el0_undef to be
instrumented with kprobes, and it does not need to be marked with
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL().

* For UNDEFINED exceptions taken from EL1, either:

(a) The exception is has been taken when manipulating SSBS; these cases
are limited and do not occur within code that can be invoked
recursively via kprobes. Hence, in these cases instrumentation
with kprobes is benign.

(b) The exception has been taken for an unknown reason, as other than
manipulating SSBS we do not expect to take UNDEFINED exceptions
from EL1. Any handling of these exception is best-effort.

... and in either case, marking do_el1_undef() with NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()
isn't sufficient to prevent recursion via kprobes as functions it
calls (including die()) are instrumentable via kprobes.

Hence, it's not worthwhile to mark do_el1_undef() with
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). The same applies to do_el1_bti() and do_el1_fpac(),
so their NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() annotations are also removed.

Aside from the new instrumentability, there should be no functional
change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


# b3a0c010 19-Oct-2022 Mark Rutland <[email protected]>

arm64: allow kprobes on EL0 handlers

Currently do_sysinstr() and do_cp15instr() are marked with
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). However, these are only called for exceptions taken
from EL0, and there is no risk

arm64: allow kprobes on EL0 handlers

Currently do_sysinstr() and do_cp15instr() are marked with
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). However, these are only called for exceptions taken
from EL0, and there is no risk of recursion in kprobes, so this is not
necessary.

Remove the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() annotation, and rename the two functions to
more clearly indicate that these are solely for exceptions taken from
EL0, better matching the names used by the lower level entry points in
entry-common.c.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morse <[email protected]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1-rc1, v6.0, v6.0-rc7, v6.0-rc6, v6.0-rc5
# b26e484b 08-Sep-2022 Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>

arm64: Add CFI error handling

With -fsanitize=kcfi, CFI always traps. Add arm64 support for handling CFI
failures. The registers containing the target address and the expected type
are encoded in th

arm64: Add CFI error handling

With -fsanitize=kcfi, CFI always traps. Add arm64 support for handling CFI
failures. The registers containing the target address and the expected type
are encoded in the first ten bits of the ESR as follows:

- 0-4: n, where the register Xn contains the target address
- 5-9: m, where the register Wm contains the type hash

This produces the following oops on CFI failure (generated using lkdtm):

[ 21.885179] CFI failure at lkdtm_indirect_call+0x2c/0x44 [lkdtm]
(target: lkdtm_increment_int+0x0/0x1c [lkdtm]; expected type: 0x7e0c52a)
[ 21.886593] Internal error: Oops - CFI: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 21.891060] Modules linked in: lkdtm
[ 21.893363] CPU: 0 PID: 151 Comm: sh Not tainted
5.19.0-rc1-00021-g852f4e48dbab #1
[ 21.895560] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 21.896543] pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 21.897583] pc : lkdtm_indirect_call+0x2c/0x44 [lkdtm]
[ 21.898551] lr : lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO+0x3c/0x6c [lkdtm]
[ 21.899520] sp : ffff8000083a3c50
[ 21.900191] x29: ffff8000083a3c50 x28: ffff0000027e0ec0 x27: 0000000000000000
[ 21.902453] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffc2aa3d07e7b0 x24: 0000000000000002
[ 21.903736] x23: ffffc2aa3d079088 x22: ffffc2aa3d07e7b0 x21: ffff000003379000
[ 21.905062] x20: ffff8000083a3dc0 x19: 0000000000000012 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 21.906371] x17: 000000007e0c52a5 x16: 000000003ad55aca x15: ffffc2aa60d92138
[ 21.907662] x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: 2e2e2e2065707974 x12: 0000000000000018
[ 21.909775] x11: ffffc2aa62322b88 x10: ffffc2aa62322aa0 x9 : c7e305fb5195d200
[ 21.911898] x8 : ffffc2aa3d077e20 x7 : 6d20676e696c6c61 x6 : 43203a6d74646b6c
[ 21.913108] x5 : ffffc2aa6266c9df x4 : ffffc2aa6266c9e1 x3 : ffff8000083a3968
[ 21.914358] x2 : 80000000fffff122 x1 : 00000000fffff122 x0 : ffffc2aa3d07e8f8
[ 21.915827] Call trace:
[ 21.916375] lkdtm_indirect_call+0x2c/0x44 [lkdtm]
[ 21.918060] lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO+0x3c/0x6c [lkdtm]
[ 21.919030] lkdtm_do_action+0x34/0x4c [lkdtm]
[ 21.919920] direct_entry+0x170/0x1ac [lkdtm]
[ 21.920772] full_proxy_write+0x84/0x104
[ 21.921759] vfs_write+0x188/0x3d8
[ 21.922387] ksys_write+0x78/0xe8
[ 21.922986] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x2c
[ 21.923696] invoke_syscall+0x58/0x134
[ 21.924554] el0_svc_common+0xb4/0xf4
[ 21.925603] do_el0_svc+0x2c/0xb4
[ 21.926563] el0_svc+0x2c/0x7c
[ 21.927147] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0
[ 21.927985] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
[ 21.929133] Code: 728a54b1 72afc191 6b11021f 54000040 (d4304500)
[ 21.930690] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 21.930971] Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - CFI: Fatal exception

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

show more ...


123456789