History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 285)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init
# 9df0b254 23-Jul-2022 Nuno Lopes <[email protected]>

[NFC] Switch a few uses of undef to poison as placeholders for unreachable code


# 44736c1d 18-Jul-2022 Kristina Bessonova <[email protected]>

[CloneFunction][DebugInfo] Avoid cloning DILexicalBlocks of inlined subprograms

If DISubpogram was not cloned (e.g. we are cloning a function that has other
functions inlined into it, and subprogram

[CloneFunction][DebugInfo] Avoid cloning DILexicalBlocks of inlined subprograms

If DISubpogram was not cloned (e.g. we are cloning a function that has other
functions inlined into it, and subprograms of the inlined functions are
not supposed to be cloned), it doesn't make sense to clone its DILexicalBlocks
as well. Otherwise we'll get duplicated DILexicalBlocks that may confuse
debug info emission in AsmPrinter.

I believe it also makes no sense cloning any DILocalVariables or maybe
other local entities, if their parent subprogram was not cloned, cause
they will be dangling and will not participate in futher emission.

Reviewed By: aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127102

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5
# b8c2781f 09-Jun-2022 Simon Moll <[email protected]>

[NFC] format InstructionSimplify & lowerCaseFunctionNames

Clang-format InstructionSimplify and convert all "FunctionName"s to
"functionName". This patch does touch a lot of files but gets done with

[NFC] format InstructionSimplify & lowerCaseFunctionNames

Clang-format InstructionSimplify and convert all "FunctionName"s to
"functionName". This patch does touch a lot of files but gets done with
the cleanup of InstructionSimplify in one commit.

This is the alternative to the less invasive clang-format only patch: D126783

Reviewed By: spatel, rengolin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126889

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1
# 47b3b768 01-Nov-2019 Serge Pavlov <[email protected]>

Implement inlining of strictfp functions

According to the current design, if a floating point operation is
represented by a constrained intrinsic somewhere in a function, all
floating point operatio

Implement inlining of strictfp functions

According to the current design, if a floating point operation is
represented by a constrained intrinsic somewhere in a function, all
floating point operations in the function must be represented by
constrained intrinsics. It imposes additional requirements to inlining
mechanism. If non-strictfp function is inlined into strictfp function,
all ordinary FP operations must be replaced with their constrained
counterparts.

Inlining strictfp function into non-strictfp is not implemented as it
would require replacement of all FP operations in the host function,
which now is undesirable due to expected performance loss.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69798

show more ...


# a494ae43 01-Mar-2022 serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>

Cleanup includes: TransformsUtils

Estimation on the impact on preprocessor output:
before: 1065307662
after: 1064800684

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-

Cleanup includes: TransformsUtils

Estimation on the impact on preprocessor output:
before: 1065307662
after: 1064800684

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120741

show more ...


# 4810051a 28-Jan-2022 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[Inline][Cloning] Reliably remove unreachable blocks during cloning (PR53206)

The pruning cloner already tries to remove unreachable blocks. The
original cloning process will simplify instructions a

[Inline][Cloning] Reliably remove unreachable blocks during cloning (PR53206)

The pruning cloner already tries to remove unreachable blocks. The
original cloning process will simplify instructions and constant
terminators, and only clone blocks that are reachable at that point.
However, phi nodes can only be simplified after everything has been
cloned. For that reason, additional blocks may become unreachable
after phi simplification.

The code does try to handle this as well, but only removes blocks
that don't have predecessors. It misses unreachable cycles. This
can cause issues if SEH exception handling code is part of an
unreachable cycle, as the inliner is not prepared to deal with that.

This patch instead performs an explicit scan for reachable blocks,
and drops everything else.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53206.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118449

show more ...


# 098a0d8f 30-Sep-2021 Hongtao Yu <[email protected]>

[CSSPGO] Unblock optimizations with pseudo probe instrumentation part 3.

This patch continues unblocking optimizations that are blocked by pseudo probe instrumentation.

Not exactly like DbgIntrinsi

[CSSPGO] Unblock optimizations with pseudo probe instrumentation part 3.

This patch continues unblocking optimizations that are blocked by pseudo probe instrumentation.

Not exactly like DbgIntrinsics, PseudoProbe intrinsic has other attributes (such as mayread, maywrite, mayhaveSideEffect) that can block optimizations. The issues fixed are:
- Flipped default param of getFirstNonPHIOrDbg API to skip pseudo probes
- Unblocked CSE by avoiding pseudo probe from clobbering memory SSA
- Unblocked induction variable simpliciation
- Allow empty loop deletion by treating probe intrinsic isDroppable
- Some refactoring.

Reviewed By: wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110847

show more ...


# 80ea2bb5 13-Aug-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NFC] Rename AttributeList::getParam/Ret/FnAttributes() -> get*Attributes()

This is more consistent with similar methods.


# ea014c5b 18-Jul-2021 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[Inline] Fix noalias addition on simplified instructions (PR50589)

When adding noalias/alias.scope metadata, we analyze the instructions
of the original callee, and then place metadata on the corres

[Inline] Fix noalias addition on simplified instructions (PR50589)

When adding noalias/alias.scope metadata, we analyze the instructions
of the original callee, and then place metadata on the corresponding
inlined instructions in the caller as provided by VMap. However, this
assumes that this actually a clone of the instruction, rather than
the result of simplification. If simplification occurred, the
instruction that VMap points to may not have any relationship as far
as ModRef behavior is concerned.

Fix this by tracking simplified instructions during cloning and then
only processing instructions that have not been simplified. This is
done with an additional map form original to cloned instruction,
into which we only insert if no simplification is performed. The
mapping in VMap can then be compared to this map. If they're the
same, the instruction hasn't been simplified. (I originally wanted
to only track a set of simplified instructions, but that wouldn't
work if the instruction only gets simplified afterwards, e.g. based
on rewritten phis.)

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50589.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106242

show more ...


# 59c33a0b 18-Jul-2021 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[Cloning] Remove unused parameter from CloneAndPruneFunctionInto() (NFC)


# 66ff1cbd 28-May-2021 dongAxis <[email protected]>

[NFC][Transforms][Utils] remove useless variable in CloneBasicBlock


# 520f70e9 23-Mar-2021 Luke Drummond <[email protected]>

[NFC] clang-format llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98957


# ab44ec1b 23-Mar-2021 Luke Drummond <[email protected]>

[NFC] Minor refactor

- Give unwieldy repeated expression a name
- Use a ranged `for` basic block iterator

Reviewed by: nikic, dexonsmith
Differential Revisision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98957


# 0448ddd1 23-Mar-2021 Luke Drummond <[email protected]>

[NFCI] cleanup CloneFunctionInto

Hoist early return for decl-only clones to before DIFinder
calculation.
Also fix an out of date assert message after invariants changed in
22a52dfddce.

Reviewed by:

[NFCI] cleanup CloneFunctionInto

Hoist early return for decl-only clones to before DIFinder
calculation.
Also fix an out of date assert message after invariants changed in
22a52dfddce.

Reviewed by: nikic, dexonsmith
Differential Revisision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98957

show more ...


# 01701646 15-Feb-2021 Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <[email protected]>

Transforms: Clone distinct nodes in metadata mapper unless RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs

This is a follow up to 22a52dfddcefad4f275eb8ad1cc0e200074c2d8a and a
revert of df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a9

Transforms: Clone distinct nodes in metadata mapper unless RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs

This is a follow up to 22a52dfddcefad4f275eb8ad1cc0e200074c2d8a and a
revert of df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a99fbb755903.

With this change, we only skip cloning distinct nodes in
MDNodeMapper::mapDistinct if RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs, dropping the
no-longer-needed local helper `cloneOrBuildODR()`. Skipping cloning in
other cases is unsound and breaks CloneModule, which is why the textual
IR for PR48841 didn't pass previously. This commit adds the test as:
Transforms/ThinLTOBitcodeWriter/cfi-debug-info-cloned-type-references-global-value.ll

Cloning less often exposed a hole in subprogram cloning in
CloneFunctionInto thanks to df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a99fbb755903's
test ThinLTO/X86/Inputs/dicompositetype-unique-alias.ll. If a function
has a subprogram attachment whose scope is a DICompositeType that
shouldn't be cloned, but it has no internal debug info pointing at that
type, that composite type was being cloned. This commit plugs that hole,
calling DebugInfoFinder::processSubprogram from CloneFunctionInto.

As hinted at in 22a52dfddcefad4f275eb8ad1cc0e200074c2d8a's commit
message, I think we need to formalize ownership of metadata a bit more
so that ValueMapper/CloneFunctionInto (and similar functions) can deal
with cloning (or not) metadata in a more generic, less fragile way.

This fixes PR48841.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96734

show more ...


# 5e7e499b 21-Feb-2021 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[JumpThreading] Clone noalias.scope.decl when threading blocks

When cloning instructions during jump threading, also clone and
adapt any declared scopes. This is primarily important when
threading l

[JumpThreading] Clone noalias.scope.decl when threading blocks

When cloning instructions during jump threading, also clone and
adapt any declared scopes. This is primarily important when
threading loop exits, because we'll end up with two dominating
scope declarations in that case (at least after additional loop
rotation). This addresses a loose thread from
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG2556b413a7b8#975012.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97154

show more ...


# 22a52dfd 11-Feb-2021 Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <[email protected]>

TransformUtils: Fix metadata handling in CloneModule (and improve CloneFunctionInto)

This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunct

TransformUtils: Fix metadata handling in CloneModule (and improve CloneFunctionInto)

This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunctionInto (although the latter
is still awkward when called within a module).

Ruiling Song pointed out in PR48841 that CloneModule was changed to
unsoundly use the RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs flag (renamed in
fa35c1f80f0ea080a7cbc581416929b0a654f25c for clarity). This flag papered
over a crash caused by other various changes made to CloneFunctionInto
over the past few years that made it unsound to use cloning between
different modules.

(This commit partially addresses PR48841, fixing the repro from
preprocessed source but not textual IR. MDNodeMapper::mapDistinctNode
became unsound in df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a99fbb755903 and this
commit does not address that regression.)

RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs is designed for the IRMover to use,
avoiding unnecessary clones of all referenced metadata when linking
between modules (with IRMover, the source module is discarded after
linking). It never makes sense to use when you're not discarding the
source. This commit drops its incorrect use in CloneModule.

Sadly, the right thing to do with metadata when cloning a function is
complicated, and this patch doesn't totally fix it.

The first problem is that there are two different types of referenceable
metadata and it's not obvious what to with one of them when remapping.

- `!0 = !{!1}` is metadata's version of a constant. Programatically it's
called "uniqued" (probably a better term would be "constant") because,
like `ConstantArray`, it's stored in uniquing tables. Once it's
constructed, it's illegal to change its arguments.
- `!0 = distinct !{!1}` is a bit closer to a global variable. It's legal
to change the operands after construction.

What should be done with distinct metadata when cloning functions within
the same module?

- Should new, cloned nodes be created?
- Should all references point to the same, old nodes?

The answer depends on whether that metadata is effectively owned by a
function.

And that's the second problem. Referenceable metadata's ownership model
is not clear or explicit. Technically, it's all stored on an
LLVMContext. However, any metadata that is `distinct`, that transitively
references a `distinct` node, or that transitively references a
GlobalValue is specific to a Module and is effectively owned by it. More
specifically, some metadata is effectively owned by a specific Function
within a module.

Effectively function-local metadata was introduced somewhere around
c10d0e5ccd12f049bddb24dcf8bbb7fbbc6c68f2, which made it illegal for two
functions to share a DISubprogram attachment.

When cloning a function within a module, you need to clone the
function-local debug info and suppress cloning of global debug info (the
status quo suppresses cloning some global debug info but not all). When
cloning a function to a new/different module, you need to clone all of
the debug info.

Here's what I think we should do (eventually? soon? not this patch
though):
- Distinguish explicitly (somehow) between pure constant metadata owned
by the LLVMContext, global metadata owned by the Module, and local
metadata owned by a GlobalValue (such as a function).
- Update CloneFunctionInto to trigger cloning of all "local" metadata
(only), perhaps by adding a bit to RemapFlag. Alternatively, split
out a separate function CloneFunctionMetadataInto to prime the
metadata map that callers are updated to call ahead of time as
appropriate.

Here's the somewhat more isolated fix in this patch:
- Converted the `ModuleLevelChanges` parameter to `CloneFunctionInto` to
an enum called `CloneFunctionChangeType` that is one of
LocalChangesOnly, GlobalChanges, DifferentModule, and ClonedModule.
- The code maintaining the "functions uniquely own subprograms"
invariant is now only active in the first two cases, where a function
is being cloned within a single module. That's necessary because this
code inhibits cloning of (some) "global" metadata that's effectively
owned by the module.
- The code maintaining the "all compile units must be explicitly
referenced by !llvm.dbg.cu" invariant is now only active in the
DifferentModule case, where a function is being cloned into a new
module in isolation.
- CoroSplit.cpp's call to CloneFunctionInto in CoroCloner::create
uses LocalChangeOnly, since fa635d730f74f3285b77cc1537f1692184b8bf5b
only set `ModuleLevelChanges` to trigger cloning of local metadata.
- CloneModule drops its unsound use of RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs
and special handling of !llvm.dbg.cu.
- Fixed some outdated header docs and left a couple of FIXMEs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96531

show more ...


# be23012d 07-Feb-2021 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[Transforms/Utils] Use range-based for loops (NFC)


# 8b9df70b 24-Jan-2021 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[Utils] Use NoAliasScopeDeclInst in a few more places (NFC)

In the cloning infrastructure, only track an MDNode mapping,
without explicitly storing the Metadata mapping, same as is done
during inlin

[Utils] Use NoAliasScopeDeclInst in a few more places (NFC)

In the cloning infrastructure, only track an MDNode mapping,
without explicitly storing the Metadata mapping, same as is done
during inlining. This makes things slightly simpler.

show more ...


# 659c7bcd 24-Jan-2021 Jeroen Dobbelaere <[email protected]>

[LoopRotate] Use llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl for duplicating noalias metadata as needed

Similar to D92887, LoopRotation also needs duplicate the noalias scopes when rotating a `@llvm.experi

[LoopRotate] Use llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl for duplicating noalias metadata as needed

Similar to D92887, LoopRotation also needs duplicate the noalias scopes when rotating a `@llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl` across a block boundary.
This is based on the version from the Full Restrict paches (D68511).

The problem it fixes also showed up in Transforms/Coroutines/ex5.ll after D93040 (when enabling strict checking with -verify-noalias-scope-decl-dom).

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94306

show more ...


# 77462964 24-Jan-2021 Jeroen Dobbelaere <[email protected]>

[LoopUnroll] Use llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl for duplicating noalias metadata as needed

This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39282. Compared to D90104, this version is ba

[LoopUnroll] Use llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl for duplicating noalias metadata as needed

This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39282. Compared to D90104, this version is based on part of the full restrict patched (D68484) and uses the `@llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl` intrinsic to track the location where !noalias and !alias.scope scopes have been introduced. This allows us to only duplicate the scopes that are really needed.

Notes:
- it also includes changes and tests from D90104

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92887

show more ...


# e53472de 21-Jan-2021 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[Transforms] Use llvm::append_range (NFC)


# 1da60f1d 17-Nov-2020 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[Transforms] Use pred_empty (NFC)


# 5e3fd471 21-Aug-2020 Amy Huang <[email protected]>

[Cloning] Fix to cloning DISubprograms.

When trying to enable -debug-info-kind=constructor there was an assert
that occurs during debug info cloning ("mismatched subprogram between
llvm.dbg.value va

[Cloning] Fix to cloning DISubprograms.

When trying to enable -debug-info-kind=constructor there was an assert
that occurs during debug info cloning ("mismatched subprogram between
llvm.dbg.value variable and !dbg attachment").
It appears that during llvm::CloneFunctionInto, a DISubprogram could be
duplicated when MapMetadata is called, and then added to the MD map again
when DIFinder gets a list of subprograms. This results in two different
versions of the DISubprogram.

This patch switches the order so that the DIFinder subprograms are
added before MapMetadata is called.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46784

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86185

show more ...


# 96d74530 25-Jul-2020 Roman Lebedev <[email protected]>

[Reduce] Argument reduction: do deal with function declarations

We can happily turn function definitions into declarations,
thus obscuring their argument from being elided by this pass.

I don't bel

[Reduce] Argument reduction: do deal with function declarations

We can happily turn function definitions into declarations,
thus obscuring their argument from being elided by this pass.

I don't believe there is a good reason to just ignore declarations.
likely even proper llvm intrinsics ones,
at worst the input becomes uninteresting.

The other question here is that all these transforms are all-or-nothing.
In some cases, should we be treating each use separately?

The main blocker here seemed to be that llvm::CloneFunctionInto()
does `&OldFunc->front()`, which inserts a nullptr into a densemap,
which is not happy about it and asserts.

show more ...


12345678910>>...12