|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
c34698a8 |
| 03-Feb-2022 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes
Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the "lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging inf
[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes
Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the "lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging infrastructure). This worked because Log.h included Logging.h, even though it should.
After the recent refactor, it became impossible the two files include each other in this direction (the opposite inclusion is needed), so this patch removes the workaround that was put in place and cleans up all files to include the right thing. It also renames the file to LLDBLog to better reflect its purpose.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
a007a6d8 |
| 31-Jan-2022 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Convert "LLDB" log channel to the new API
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
6c37984e |
| 29-Mar-2021 |
Michał Górny <[email protected]> |
[lldb] [gdb-remote server] Introduce new stop reasons for fork and vfork
Introduce three new stop reasons for fork, vfork and vforkdone events. This includes server support for serializing fork/vfor
[lldb] [gdb-remote server] Introduce new stop reasons for fork and vfork
Introduce three new stop reasons for fork, vfork and vforkdone events. This includes server support for serializing fork/vfork events into gdb-remote protocol. The stop infos for the two base events take a pair of PID and TID for the newly forked process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100196
show more ...
|
| #
5a5a94ed |
| 12-Apr-2021 |
Raphael Isemann <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Delete dead StackFrameList::Merge
That code is unused since it's check-in in 2010 (and I believe it would leak memory when called as it releases the passed unique_ptr), so let's delete it.
R
[lldb] Delete dead StackFrameList::Merge
That code is unused since it's check-in in 2010 (and I believe it would leak memory when called as it releases the passed unique_ptr), so let's delete it.
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100212
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
266bb78f |
| 04-Mar-2021 |
Jason Molenda <[email protected]> |
LanguageRuntime for 0th frame unwind, simplify getting pc-for-symbolication
Add calls into LanguageRuntime when finding the unwind method to use out of the 0th (currently executing) stack frame.
Al
LanguageRuntime for 0th frame unwind, simplify getting pc-for-symbolication
Add calls into LanguageRuntime when finding the unwind method to use out of the 0th (currently executing) stack frame.
Allow for the LanguageRuntimes to indicate if this stack frames should be treated like a zeroth-frame -- symbolication should be done based on the saved pc address, not decremented like normal ABI function calls.
Add methods to RegisterContext and StackFrame to get a pc value suitable for symbolication, to reduce the number of places in lldb where we decrement the saved pc values before symbolication.
<rdar://problem/70398009> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97644
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
17798c60 |
| 09-Jun-2020 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Fix -Wmissing-field-initializers in StackFrameList
The code is correct without these default values, but it is freaking the compiler out.
|
| #
0081149f |
| 02-Jun-2020 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb/DWARF] Fix PC value for artificial tail call frames for the "GNU" case
Summary: The way that the support for the GNU dialect of tail call frames was implemented in D80519 meant that the were r
[lldb/DWARF] Fix PC value for artificial tail call frames for the "GNU" case
Summary: The way that the support for the GNU dialect of tail call frames was implemented in D80519 meant that the were reporting very bogus PC values which pointed into the middle of an instruction: the -1 trick is necessary for the address to resolve to the right function, but we should still be reporting a more realistic PC value -- I say "realistic" and not "real", because it's very debatable what should be the correct PC value for frames like this.
This patch achieves that my moving the -1 from SymbolFileDWARF into the stack frame computation code. The idea is that SymbolFileDWARF will merely report whether it has provided an address of the instruction after the tail call, or the address of the call instruction itself. The StackFrameList machinery uses this information to set the "behaves like frame zero" property of the artificial frames (the main thing this flag does is it controls the -1 subtraction when looking up the function address).
This required a moderate refactor of the CallEdge class, because it was implicitly assuming that edges pointing after the call were real calls and those pointing the the call insn were tail calls. The class now carries this information explicitly -- it carries three mostly independent pieces of information: - an address of interest in the caller - a bit saying whether this address points to the call insn or after it - whether this is a tail call
Reviewers: vsk, dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, mgrang, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81010
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5 |
|
| #
03e29e2c |
| 18-Mar-2020 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[lldb/DWARF] Reland: Use DW_AT_call_pc to determine artificial frame address
Reland with changes: the test modified in this change originally failed on a Debian/x86_64 builder, and I suspect the cau
[lldb/DWARF] Reland: Use DW_AT_call_pc to determine artificial frame address
Reland with changes: the test modified in this change originally failed on a Debian/x86_64 builder, and I suspect the cause was that lldb looked up the line location for an artificial frame by subtracting 1 from the frame's address. For artificial frames, the subtraction must not happen because the address is already exact.
---
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail) calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
show more ...
|
| #
0a9b91c3 |
| 24-Mar-2020 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
Revert "[lldb/DWARF] Use DW_AT_call_pc to determine artificial frame address"
This reverts commit 6905394d153960ded3a7b884a9747ed2d4a6e8d8. The changed test is failing on Debian/x86_64, possibly bec
Revert "[lldb/DWARF] Use DW_AT_call_pc to determine artificial frame address"
This reverts commit 6905394d153960ded3a7b884a9747ed2d4a6e8d8. The changed test is failing on Debian/x86_64, possibly because lldb is subtracting an offset from the DW_AT_call_pc address used for the artificial frame:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/7171/steps/test/logs/stdio
/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/main.cpp:6:17: error: CHECK-NEXT: expected string not found in input // CHECK-NEXT: frame #1: 0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} a.out`func3() at main.cpp:14:3 [opt] [artificial] ^ <stdin>:3:2: note: scanning from here frame #1: 0x0000000000401127 a.out`func3() at main.cpp:13:4 [opt] [artificial]
show more ...
|
| #
6905394d |
| 18-Mar-2020 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[lldb/DWARF] Use DW_AT_call_pc to determine artificial frame address
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequenc
[lldb/DWARF] Use DW_AT_call_pc to determine artificial frame address
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail) calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
c0b1af68 |
| 09-Mar-2020 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Return Unwinder& from Thread::GetUnwinder
The function always returns a valid object. Let the return type reflect that, and remove some null checks.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
e05af081 |
| 04-Feb-2020 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[lldb/StackFrameList] Convert assert to defensive check in SynthesizeTailCallFrames
In order to synthesize tail call frames, the stack frame list must not be empty (otherwise, there is no "previous"
[lldb/StackFrameList] Convert assert to defensive check in SynthesizeTailCallFrames
In order to synthesize tail call frames, the stack frame list must not be empty (otherwise, there is no "previous" frame to infer a tail call from).
This case is hard to hit. To trigger it, we must first fail to push `unwind_frame_sp` because we either fail to get its SymbolContext, or given its SymbolContext the GetParentOfInlineScope call fails. This causes m_concrete_frames_fetched to be incremented while m_frames remains empty. Then, the next frame in the stack may fail within SynthesizeTailCallFrames. This crash arose during a kernel debugging session.
rdar://59147051
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
80814287 |
| 24-Jan-2020 |
Raphael Isemann <[email protected]> |
[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------
[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6 |
|
| #
4fdbc072 |
| 15-Sep-2019 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[DWARF] Handle call sites with indirect call targets
Split CallEdge into DirectCallEdge and IndirectCallEdge. Teach DWARFExpression how to evaluate entry values in cases where the current activation
[DWARF] Handle call sites with indirect call targets
Split CallEdge into DirectCallEdge and IndirectCallEdge. Teach DWARFExpression how to evaluate entry values in cases where the current activation was created by an indirect call.
rdar://57094085
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70100
show more ...
|
| #
c03c2e88 |
| 30-Sep-2019 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[StackFrameList][DFS] Turn a few raw pointers into references, NFC
llvm-svn: 373267
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5 |
|
| #
ff02109a |
| 10-Sep-2019 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[Function] Factor out GetCallEdgeForReturnAddress, NFC
Finding the call edge in a function which corresponds to a particular return address is a generic/useful operation.
llvm-svn: 371543
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
31e6dbe1 |
| 02-Aug-2019 |
Joseph Tremoulet <[email protected]> |
Fix PC adjustment in StackFrame::GetSymbolContext
Summary: Update StackFrame::GetSymbolContext to mirror the logic in RegisterContextLLDB::InitializeNonZerothFrame that knows not to do the pc decrem
Fix PC adjustment in StackFrame::GetSymbolContext
Summary: Update StackFrame::GetSymbolContext to mirror the logic in RegisterContextLLDB::InitializeNonZerothFrame that knows not to do the pc decrement when the given frame is a signal trap handler frame or the parent of one, because the pc may not follow a call in these frames. Accomplish this by adding a behaves_like_zeroth_frame field to lldb_private::StackFrame, set to true for the zeroth frame, for signal handler frames, and for parents of signal handler frames.
Also add logic to propagate the signal handler flag from UnwindPlan to the FrameType on the RegisterContextLLDB it generates, and factor out a helper to resolve symbol and address range for an Address now that we need to invoke it in four places.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, jfb
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: labath, dexonsmith, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64993
llvm-svn: 367691
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
63e5fb76 |
| 24-Jul-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style for
[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log) log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \ sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
8b3af63b |
| 10-Apr-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base
[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit, where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much. Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
d5b44036 |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers, before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by unique
Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers, before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to ::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
show more ...
|
| #
796ac80b |
| 11-Feb-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14, std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared a lot more readable compared
Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14, std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
ceff6644 |
| 11-Nov-2018 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Remove header grouping comments.
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdate
Remove header grouping comments.
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
4b36f791 |
| 05-Oct-2018 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
Add support for artificial tail call frames
This patch teaches lldb to detect when there are missing frames in a backtrace due to a sequence of tail calls, and to fill in the backtrace with artifici
Add support for artificial tail call frames
This patch teaches lldb to detect when there are missing frames in a backtrace due to a sequence of tail calls, and to fill in the backtrace with artificial tail call frames when this happens. This is only done when the execution history can be determined from the call graph and from the return PC addresses of calls on the stack. Ambiguous sequences of tail calls (e.g anything involving tail calls and recursion) are detected and ignored.
Depends on D49887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478
llvm-svn: 343900
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
33e51b14 |
| 07-Aug-2018 |
Vedant Kumar <[email protected]> |
[StackFrame] Add more clarifying comments to StackFrameList (NFC)
llvm-svn: 339205
|