History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64TargetMachine.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 269)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init
# f55dbfbd 22-Jul-2022 Shubham Narlawar <[email protected]>

[AArch64] Move SeparateConstOffsetFromGEPPass before LSR and enable EnableGEPOpt by default.

GEP's across basic blocks were not getting splitted due to EnableGEPOpt
which was turned off by default.

[AArch64] Move SeparateConstOffsetFromGEPPass before LSR and enable EnableGEPOpt by default.

GEP's across basic blocks were not getting splitted due to EnableGEPOpt
which was turned off by default. Hence, EarlyCSE missed the opportunity
to eliminate common part of GEP's. This can be achieved by simply
turning GEP pass on.
- This patch moves SeparateConstOffsetFromGEPPass() just before LSR.
- It enables EnableGEPOpt by default.

Resolves - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50528

Added an unit test.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128582

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6
# 7a47ee51 21-Jun-2022 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[llvm] Don't use Optional::getValue (NFC)


# e0e687a6 20-Jun-2022 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[llvm] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4
# 7c13ae64 04-May-2022 Adrian Tong <[email protected]>

Give option to use isCopyInstr to determine which MI is
treated as Copy instruction in MCP.

This is then used in AArch64 to remove copy instructions after taildup
ran in machine block placement

Dif

Give option to use isCopyInstr to determine which MI is
treated as Copy instruction in MCP.

This is then used in AArch64 to remove copy instructions after taildup
ran in machine block placement

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125335

show more ...


# 572fc7d2 23-May-2022 Andre Vieira <[email protected]>

[AArch64] Order STP Q's by ascending address

This patch adds an AArch64 specific PostRA MachineScheduler to try to schedule
STP Q's to the same base-address in ascending order of offsets. We have fo

[AArch64] Order STP Q's by ascending address

This patch adds an AArch64 specific PostRA MachineScheduler to try to schedule
STP Q's to the same base-address in ascending order of offsets. We have found
this to improve performance on Neoverse N1 and should not hurt other AArch64
cores.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125377

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# b4ad28da 11-Apr-2022 Momchil Velikov <[email protected]>

[CodeGen] Async unwind - add a pass to fix CFI information

This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CG

[CodeGen] Async unwind - add a pass to fix CFI information

This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CGA
aware) nature of the unwind tables.

Unlike the `CFIInstrInserer` pass, this one almost always emits only
`.cfi_remember_state`/`.cfi_restore_state`, which results in smaller
unwind tables and also transparently handles custom unwind info
extensions like CFA offset adjustement and save locations of SVE
registers.

This pass takes advantage of the constraints taht LLVM imposes on the
placement of save/restore points (cf. `ShrinkWrap.cpp`):

* there is a single basic block, containing the function prologue

* possibly multiple epilogue blocks, where each epilogue block is
complete and self-contained, i.e. CSR restore instructions (and the
corresponding CFI instructions are not split across two or more
blocks.

* prologue and epilogue blocks are outside of any loops

Thus, during execution, at the beginning and at the end of each basic
block the function can be in one of two states:

- "has a call frame", if the function has executed the prologue, or
has not executed any epilogue

- "does not have a call frame", if the function has not executed the
prologue, or has executed an epilogue

These properties can be computed for each basic block by a single RPO
traversal.

From the point of view of the unwind tables, the "has/does not have
call frame" state at beginning of each block is determined by the
state at the end of the previous block, in layout order.

Where these states differ, we insert compensating CFI instructions,
which come in two flavours:

- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the
initial one. This is done by a target specific hook and is
expected to be trivial to implement, for example it could be:
```
.cfi_def_cfa <sp>, 0
.cfi_same_value <rN>
.cfi_same_value <rN-1>
...
```
where `<rN>` are the callee-saved registers.

- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the one
created by the function prologue. These are the sequence:
```
.cfi_restore_state
.cfi_remember_state
```
In this case we also insert a `.cfi_remember_state` after the
last CFI instruction in the function prologue.

Reviewed By: MaskRay, danielkiss, chill

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114545

show more ...


# 1235aaef 06-Apr-2022 Craig Topper <[email protected]>

[AArch64][AMDGPU][WebAssembly] Use static_cast instead of a reinterpret_cast to downcast in parseMachineFunctionInfo. NFC

static_cast is a little safer here since the compiler will
ensure we're cast

[AArch64][AMDGPU][WebAssembly] Use static_cast instead of a reinterpret_cast to downcast in parseMachineFunctionInfo. NFC

static_cast is a little safer here since the compiler will
ensure we're casting to a class derived from
yaml::MachineFunctionInfo.

I believe this first appeared on AMDGPU and was copied to the
other two targets.

Spotted when it was being copied to RISCV in D123178.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123260

show more ...


# 0320115c 05-Apr-2022 Muhammad Omair Javaid <[email protected]>

Revert "[CodeGen] Async unwind - add a pass to fix CFI information"

This reverts commit 980c3e6dd223a8e628367144b8180117950bb364.

This commit had failing tests with clang crashing across various
AA

Revert "[CodeGen] Async unwind - add a pass to fix CFI information"

This reverts commit 980c3e6dd223a8e628367144b8180117950bb364.

This commit had failing tests with clang crashing across various
AArch64/Linux buildots.

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/3346

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114545

show more ...


# 980c3e6d 04-Apr-2022 Momchil Velikov <[email protected]>

[CodeGen] Async unwind - add a pass to fix CFI information

This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CF

[CodeGen] Async unwind - add a pass to fix CFI information

This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CFG
aware) nature of the unwind tables.

Unlike the `CFIInstrInserer` pass, this one almost always emits only
`.cfi_remember_state`/`.cfi_restore_state`, which results in smaller
unwind tables and also transparently handles custom unwind info
extensions like CFA offset adjustement and save locations of SVE
registers.

This pass takes advantage of the constraints that LLVM imposes on the
placement of save/restore points (cf. `ShrinkWrap.cpp`):

* there is a single basic block, containing the function prologue

* possibly multiple epilogue blocks, where each epilogue block is
complete and self-contained, i.e. CSR restore instructions (and the
corresponding CFI instructions are not split across two or more
blocks.

* prologue and epilogue blocks are outside of any loops

Thus, during execution, at the beginning and at the end of each basic
block the function can be in one of two states:

- "has a call frame", if the function has executed the prologue, or
has not executed any epilogue

- "does not have a call frame", if the function has not executed the
prologue, or has executed an epilogue

These properties can be computed for each basic block by a single RPO
traversal.

In order to accommodate backends which do not generate unwind info in
epilogues we compute an additional property "strong no call frame on
entry" which is set for the entry point of the function and for every
block reachable from the entry along a path that does not execute the
prologue. If this property holds, it takes precedence over the "has a
call frame" property.

From the point of view of the unwind tables, the "has/does not have
call frame" state at beginning of each block is determined by the
state at the end of the previous block, in layout order.

Where these states differ, we insert compensating CFI instructions,
which come in two flavours:

- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the
initial one. This is done by a target specific hook and is
expected to be trivial to implement, for example it could be:
```
.cfi_def_cfa <sp>, 0
.cfi_same_value <rN>
.cfi_same_value <rN-1>
...
```
where `<rN>` are the callee-saved registers.

- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the one
created by the function prologue. These are the sequence:
```
.cfi_restore_state
.cfi_remember_state
```
In this case we also insert a `.cfi_remember_state` after the
last CFI instruction in the function prologue.

Reviewed By: MaskRay, danielkiss, chill

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114545

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3
# ed98c1b3 09-Mar-2022 serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>

Cleanup includes: DebugInfo & CodeGen

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121332


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2
# c4b1a63a 25-Feb-2022 Jameson Nash <[email protected]>

mark getTargetTransformInfo and getTargetIRAnalysis as const

Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.

Reviewed By: wsmoses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1

mark getTargetTransformInfo and getTargetIRAnalysis as const

Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.

Reviewed By: wsmoses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120518

show more ...


# 371fcb72 17-Feb-2022 Roman Lebedev <[email protected]>

[SimplifyCFG][PhaseOrdering] Defer lowering switch into an integer range comparison and branch until after at least the IPSCCP

That transformation is lossy, as discussed in
https://github.com/llvm/l

[SimplifyCFG][PhaseOrdering] Defer lowering switch into an integer range comparison and branch until after at least the IPSCCP

That transformation is lossy, as discussed in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53853
and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85133#issuecomment-904185574

This is an alternative to D119839,
which would add a limited IPSCCP into SimplifyCFG.

Unlike lowering switch to lookup, we still want this transformation
to happen relatively early, but after giving a chance for the things
like CVP to do their thing. It seems like deferring it just until
the IPSCCP is enough for the tests at hand, but perhaps we need to
be more aggressive and disable it until CVP.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53853
Refs. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85133

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119854

show more ...


# f9270214 10-Feb-2022 Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]>

Reland "[clang-cl] Support the /JMC flag"

This relands commit b380a31de084a540cfa38b72e609b25ea0569bb7.

Restrict the tests to Windows only since the flag symbol hash depends on
system-dependent pat

Reland "[clang-cl] Support the /JMC flag"

This relands commit b380a31de084a540cfa38b72e609b25ea0569bb7.

Restrict the tests to Windows only since the flag symbol hash depends on
system-dependent path normalization.

show more ...


# b380a31d 10-Feb-2022 Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]>

Revert "[clang-cl] Support the /JMC flag"

This reverts commit bd3a1de683f80d174ea9c97000db3ec3276bc022.

Break bots:
https://luci-milo.appspot.com/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/clang-windows-x6

Revert "[clang-cl] Support the /JMC flag"

This reverts commit bd3a1de683f80d174ea9c97000db3ec3276bc022.

Break bots:
https://luci-milo.appspot.com/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/clang-windows-x64/b8822587673277278177/overview

show more ...


# bd3a1de6 10-Feb-2022 Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]>

[clang-cl] Support the /JMC flag

The introduction and some examples are on this page:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/announcing-jmc-stepping-in-visual-studio/

The `/JMC` flag enables these

[clang-cl] Support the /JMC flag

The introduction and some examples are on this page:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/announcing-jmc-stepping-in-visual-studio/

The `/JMC` flag enables these instrumentations:
- Insert at the beginning of every function immediately after the prologue with
a call to `void __fastcall __CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode(unsigned char *JMC_flag)`.
The argument for `__CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode` is the address of a boolean
global variable (the global variable is initialized to 1) with the name
convention `__<hash>_<filename>`. All such global variables are placed in
the `.msvcjmc` section.
- The `<hash>` part of `__<hash>_<filename>` has a one-to-one mapping
with a directory path. MSVC uses some unknown hashing function. Here I
used DJB.
- Add a dummy/empty COMDAT function `__JustMyCode_Default`.
- Add `/alternatename:__CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode=__JustMyCode_Default` link
option via ".drectve" section. This is to prevent failure in
case `__CheckForDebuggerJustMyCode` is not provided during linking.

Implementation:
All the instrumentations are implemented in an IR codegen pass. The pass is placed immediately before CodeGenPrepare pass. This is to not interfere with mid-end optimizations and make the instrumentation target-independent (I'm still working on an ELF port in a separate patch).

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118428

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2
# 52faad83 10-Dec-2021 Archibald Elliott <[email protected]>

[AArch64] Use Feature for A53 Erratum 835769 Fix

When this pass was originally implemented, the fix pass was enabled
using a llvm command-line flag. This works fine, except in the case of
LTO, where

[AArch64] Use Feature for A53 Erratum 835769 Fix

When this pass was originally implemented, the fix pass was enabled
using a llvm command-line flag. This works fine, except in the case of
LTO, where the flag is not passed into the linker plugin in order to
enable the function pass in the LTO backend.

Now LTO exists, the expectation now is to use target features rather
than command-line arguments to control code generation, as this ensures
that different command-line arguments in different files are correctly
represented, and target-features always get to the LTO plugin as they
are encoded into LLVM IR.

The fall-out of this change is that the fix pass has to always be added
to the backend pass pipeline, so now it makes no changes if the function
does not have the right target feature to enable it. This should make a
minimal difference to compile time.

One advantage is it's now much easier to enable when compiling for a
Cortex-A53, as CPUs imply their own individual sets of target-features,
in a more fine-grained way. I haven't done this yet, but it is an
option, if the fix should be enabled in more places.

Existing tests of the user interface are unaffected, the changes are to
reflect that the argument is now turned into a target feature.

Reviewed By: tmatheson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114703

show more ...


# 0395e015 07-Dec-2021 Cullen Rhodes <[email protected]>

[IR] Split vscale_range interface

Interface is split from:

std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> getVScaleRangeArgs()

into separate functions for min/max:

unsigned getVScaleRangeMin();
Optional<uns

[IR] Split vscale_range interface

Interface is split from:

std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> getVScaleRangeArgs()

into separate functions for min/max:

unsigned getVScaleRangeMin();
Optional<unsigned> getVScaleRangeMax();

Reviewed By: sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114075

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# dc84770d 15-Nov-2021 Amara Emerson <[email protected]>

[GlobalISel] Add a store-merging optimization pass and enable for AArch64.

This is a first attempt at a constant value consecutive store merging pass,
a counterpart to the DAGCombiner's store mergin

[GlobalISel] Add a store-merging optimization pass and enable for AArch64.

This is a first attempt at a constant value consecutive store merging pass,
a counterpart to the DAGCombiner's store merging optimization.

The high level goals of this pass:

* Have a simple and efficient algorithm. As close to linear time as we can get.
Thus, prioritizing scalability of the algorithm over merging every corner case
we can find. The DAGCombiner's store merging code has been the source of
compile time and complexity issues in the past and I wanted to avoid that.
* Don't introduce any new data structures for ordering memory operations. In MIR,
we don't have the concept of chains like we do in the DAG, and the instruction
order is stricter than enforcing ordering with graph edges. Although I
considered adding something similar, I couldn't justify the overhead.

The pass is current split into 3 main parts. The main store merging code focuses
on identifying candidate stores and managing the candidate group that's under
consideration for merging. Analyzing addressing of stores is a potentially
complex part and for now there's just a basic implementation to identify easy
cases. Finally, the other main bit of complexity is the alias analysis, which
tries to follow the same logic as the DAG's AA.

Currently this implementation only supports merging of constant stores. Stores
of arbitrary variables are technically possible with a very small change, but
the DAG chooses not to do this. Doing so here makes most code worse since
there's extra overhead in merging values into wider registers.

On AArch64 -Os, this optimization results in very minor savings on CTMark.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109131

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4
# 607fb1bb 22-Sep-2021 David Sherwood <[email protected]>

[AArch64] Always add -tune-cpu argument to -cc1 driver

This patch ensures that we always tune for a given CPU on AArch64
targets when the user specifies the "-mtune=xyz" flag. In the
AArch64Subtarge

[AArch64] Always add -tune-cpu argument to -cc1 driver

This patch ensures that we always tune for a given CPU on AArch64
targets when the user specifies the "-mtune=xyz" flag. In the
AArch64Subtarget if the tune flag is unset we use the CPU value
instead.

I've updated the release notes here:

llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

and added tests here:

clang/test/Driver/aarch64-mtune.c

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110258

show more ...


# 89b57061 08-Oct-2021 Reid Kleckner <[email protected]>

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually us

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.

This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454

show more ...


# 30caca39 07-Oct-2021 Jingu Kang <[email protected]>

Third Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation"

This reverts the revert commit fc36fb4d23a5e419cf33002c87c0082f682cb77b with
bug fixes.

Differential Revision: https://re

Third Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation"

This reverts the revert commit fc36fb4d23a5e419cf33002c87c0082f682cb77b with
bug fixes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109963

show more ...


# fc36fb4d 06-Oct-2021 David Spickett <[email protected]>

Revert "Second Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation""

This reverts commit 13f3c39f3658fa28cb008eb56a58d8e34697cd5d.

Due to test failures in stage 2 clang tests on AA

Revert "Second Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation""

This reverts commit 13f3c39f3658fa28cb008eb56a58d8e34697cd5d.

Due to test failures in stage 2 clang tests on AArch64 bots.

show more ...


# 13f3c39f 29-Sep-2021 Jingu Kang <[email protected]>

Second Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation"

This reverts the revert commit c07f7099690e8607d119227db1f80ee21eff3a3b with
bug fixes.

Differential Revision: https://r

Second Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation"

This reverts the revert commit c07f7099690e8607d119227db1f80ee21eff3a3b with
bug fixes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109963

show more ...


# 8a645fc4 29-Sep-2021 David Green <[email protected]>

[AArch64] Enable type promotion for AArch64

This enables the type promotion pass for AArch64, which acts as a
CodeGenPrepare pass to promote illegal integers to legal ones,
especially useful for rem

[AArch64] Enable type promotion for AArch64

This enables the type promotion pass for AArch64, which acts as a
CodeGenPrepare pass to promote illegal integers to legal ones,
especially useful for removing extends that would otherwise require
cross-basic-block analysis.

I have enabled this generally, for both ISel and GlobalISel. In some
quick experiments it appeared to help GlobalISel remove extra extends in
places too, but that might just be missing optimizations that are better
left for later. We can disable it again if required.

In my experiments, this can improvement performance in some cases, and
codesize was a small improvement. SPEC was a very small improvement,
within the noise. Some of the test cases show extends being moved out of
loops, often when the extend would be part of a cmp operand, but that
should reduce the latency of the instruction in the loop on many cpus.
The signed-truncation-check tests are increasing as they are no longer
matching specific DAG combines.

We also hope to add some additional improvements to the pass in the near
future, to capture more cases of promoting extends through phis that
have come up in a few places lately.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110239

show more ...


# c07f7099 29-Sep-2021 Sterling Augustine <[email protected]>

Revert "Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation""

This reverts commit 73a196a11c0e6fe7bbf33055cc2c96ce3c61ff0d.

Causes crashes as reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D

Revert "Recommit "[AArch64] Split bitmask immediate of bitwise AND operation""

This reverts commit 73a196a11c0e6fe7bbf33055cc2c96ce3c61ff0d.

Causes crashes as reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109963

show more ...


1234567891011