[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type

* Adds a 'scalable' flag to VectorType
* Adds an 'ElementCount' class to VectorType to pass (possibly scalable) vector lengths, with overloaded operators.
* Modifie

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type

* Adds a 'scalable' flag to VectorType
* Adds an 'ElementCount' class to VectorType to pass (possibly scalable) vector lengths, with overloaded operators.
* Modifies existing helper functions to use ElementCount
* Adds support for serializing/deserializing to/from both textual and bitcode IR formats
* Extends the verifier to reject global variables of scalable types
* Updates documentation

See the latest version of the RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124396.html

Reviewers: rengolin, lattner, echristo, chandlerc, hfinkel, rkruppe, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, greened, sebpop

Reviewed By: hfinkel, sebpop

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32530

llvm-svn: 361953

show more ...

Add IR support, ELF section and user documentation for partitioning feature.

The partitioning feature was proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130583.html

This is m

Add IR support, ELF section and user documentation for partitioning feature.

The partitioning feature was proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130583.html

This is mostly just documentation. The feature itself will be contributed
in subsequent patches.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60242

llvm-svn: 361923

show more ...

[IR] allow fast-math-flags on select of FP values

This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086

We have been hackin

[IR] allow fast-math-flags on select of FP values

This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086

We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the
fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself.
This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are
needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because
that definition is based on the (return) value type.

Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms
to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test
diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying
an FMF guard value to 'select'.

For reference:
rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp
rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917

llvm-svn: 361401

show more ...

[ThinLTO] Auto-hide prevailing linkonce_odr only when all copies eligible

Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a templ

[ThinLTO] Auto-hide prevailing linkonce_odr only when all copies eligible

Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but
there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr),
and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was
marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to
weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked
with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due
to the explicit instantiation).

Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to
identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were
all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the
auto-hide in that case.

Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the
bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the
existing auto-hide test to check for this situation.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709

llvm-svn: 360466

show more ...

Add LLVM IR debug info support for Fortran COMMON blocks

COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly langua

Add LLVM IR debug info support for Fortran COMMON blocks

COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.

COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J

For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.

@alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33
!14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
!20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
!25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
!27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
!29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
!30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
!31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
!32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
!33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)

The DWARF generated for this is as follows.

DW_TAG_common_block:
DW_AT_name: alpha
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: common alpha
DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: i
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: j
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4

Patch by Eric Schweitz!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327

llvm-svn: 357934

show more ...

IR: Add immarg attribute

This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant,
and should not be replaced with a non-constant value.

Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrin

IR: Add immarg attribute

This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant,
and should not be replaced with a non-constant value.

Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrinsics that comments
indicate it should apply to. I scanned other target intrinsics, but I
don't see any obvious comments indicating which arguments are intended
to be only immediates.

This breaks one questionable testcase for the autoupgrade. I'm unclear
on whether the autoupgrade is supposed to really handle declarations
which were never valid. The verifier fails because the attributes now
refer to a parameter past the end of the argument list.

llvm-svn: 355981

show more ...

Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction

Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.

This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.

There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.

Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765

llvm-svn: 353563

show more ...

Revert "[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls"

This reverts commit cea84ab93aeb079a358ab1c8aeba6d9140ef8b47.

llvm-svn: 352069

[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls

Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before

[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls

Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.

Changes:
# UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
the `noreturn` attribute from a function
# ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute

Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```

The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.

rdar://problem/40723397

Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624

llvm-svn: 352003

show more ...

Reapply "IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw"

This reapplies commits r351778 and r351782 with
RISCV test fixes.

llvm-svn: 351850

Revert r351778: IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw

This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving th

Revert r351778: IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw

This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.

This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.

llvm-svn: 351796

show more ...

IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw

Add just fadd/fsub for now.

llvm-svn: 351778

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Revert "[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD"

Mistaken commit of something still under review!

This reverts commit r351453.

llvm-svn: 351455

[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD

Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
d

[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD

Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).

Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.

The index-based WPD will be sent as a follow-on.

Depends on D53890.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815

llvm-svn: 351453

show more ...

[LTO] Record whether LTOUnit splitting is enabled in index

Summary:
Records in the module summary index whether the bitcode was compiled
with the option necessary to enable splitting the LTO unit
(e

[LTO] Record whether LTOUnit splitting is enabled in index

Summary:
Records in the module summary index whether the bitcode was compiled
with the option necessary to enable splitting the LTO unit
(e.g. -fsanitize=cfi, -fwhole-program-vtables, or -fsplit-lto-unit).

The information is passed down to the ModuleSummaryIndex builder via a
new module flag "EnableSplitLTOUnit", which is propagated onto a flag
on the summary index.

This is then used during the LTO link to check whether all linked
summaries were built with the same value of this flag. If not, an error
is issued when we detect a situation requiring whole program visibility
of the class hierarchy. This is the case when both of the following
conditions are met:
1) We are performing LowerTypeTests or Whole Program Devirtualization.
2) There are type tests or type checked loads in the code.

Note I have also changed the ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to also gate the
module splitting on the value of this flag.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: ormris, mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53890

llvm-svn: 350948

show more ...

[ThinLTO] Compute synthetic function entry count

Summary:
This patch computes the synthetic function entry count on the whole
program callgraph (based on module summary) and writes the entry counts

[ThinLTO] Compute synthetic function entry count

Summary:
This patch computes the synthetic function entry count on the whole
program callgraph (based on module summary) and writes the entry counts
to the summary. After function importing, this count gets attached to
the IR as metadata. Since it adds a new field to the summary, this bumps
up the version.

Reviewers: tejohnson

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43521

llvm-svn: 349076

show more ...

[DebugInfo] IR/Bitcode changes for DISubprogram flags.

Packing the flags into one bitcode word will save effort in
adding new flags in the future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D5

[DebugInfo] IR/Bitcode changes for DISubprogram flags.

Packing the flags into one bitcode word will save effort in
adding new flags in the future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54755

llvm-svn: 347806

show more ...

Use llvm::copy. NFC

llvm-svn: 347126

[ThinLTO] Internalize readonly globals

An attempt to recommit r346584 after failure on OSX build bot.
Fixed cache key computation in ThinLTOCodeGenerator and added
test case

llvm-svn: 347033

[IR] Add a dedicated FNeg IR Instruction

The IEEE-754 Standard makes it clear that fneg(x) and
fsub(-0.0, x) are two different operations. The former is a bitwise
operation, while the latter is an a

[IR] Add a dedicated FNeg IR Instruction

The IEEE-754 Standard makes it clear that fneg(x) and
fsub(-0.0, x) are two different operations. The former is a bitwise
operation, while the latter is an arithmetic operation. This patch
creates a dedicated FNeg IR Instruction to model that behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53877

llvm-svn: 346774

show more ...

Revert "[ThinLTO] Internalize readonly globals"

This reverts commit 10c84a8f35cae4a9fc421648d9608fccda3925f2.

llvm-svn: 346768

[ThinLTO] Internalize readonly globals

This patch allows internalising globals if all accesses to them
(from live functions) are from non-volatile load instructions

Differential revision: https://r

[ThinLTO] Internalize readonly globals

This patch allows internalising globals if all accesses to them
(from live functions) are from non-volatile load instructions

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49362

llvm-svn: 346584

show more ...

[ThinLTO] Split NotEligibleToImport into legality and inlinability flags

Summary:
The NotEligibleToImport flag on the GlobalValueSummary was set if it
isn't legal to import (e.g. because it referenc

[ThinLTO] Split NotEligibleToImport into legality and inlinability flags

Summary:
The NotEligibleToImport flag on the GlobalValueSummary was set if it
isn't legal to import (e.g. because it references unpromotable locals)
and when it can't be inlined (in which case importing is pointless).

I split out the inlinable piece into a separate flag on the
FunctionSummary (doesn't make sense for aliases or global variables),
because in the future we may want to import for reasons other than
inlining.

Reviewers: davidxl

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53345

llvm-svn: 346261

show more ...

Emit template type and value parameter DIEs for template variables.

Summary:
Ensure the TemplateParam attribute of the DIGlobalVariable node is translated into the proper DIEs.

Resolves https://bug

Emit template type and value parameter DIEs for template variables.

Summary:
Ensure the TemplateParam attribute of the DIGlobalVariable node is translated into the proper DIEs.

Resolves https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22119

Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, aprantl, JDevlieghere, clayborg, whitequark, deadalnix

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #debug-info

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52057

llvm-svn: 343706

show more ...