History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 104)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# dcad6769 23-Mar-2022 Fangrui Song <[email protected]>

[CGSCC] Use make_early_inc_range. NFC


# ddc70237 16-Mar-2022 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Don't skip SCCs not in current RefSCC

With D107249 I saw huge compile time regressions on a module (150s ->
5700s). This turned out to be due to a huge RefSCC in
the module. As we ran the fu

[NewPM] Don't skip SCCs not in current RefSCC

With D107249 I saw huge compile time regressions on a module (150s ->
5700s). This turned out to be due to a huge RefSCC in
the module. As we ran the function simplification pipeline on functions
in the SCCs in the RefSCC, some of those SCCs would be split out to
their RefSCC, a child of the current RefSCC. We'd skip the remaining
SCCs in the huge RefSCC because the current RefSCC is now the RefSCC
just split out, then revisit the original huge RefSCC from the
beginning. This happened many times because many functions in the
RefSCC were optimizable to the point of becoming their own RefSCC.

This patch makes it so we don't skip SCCs not in the current RefSCC so
that we split out all the child RefSCCs on the first iteration of
RefSCC. When we split out a RefSCC, we invalidate the original RefSCC
and add the remainder of the SCCs into a new RefSCC in
RCWorklist. This happens repeatedly until we finish visiting all
SCCs, at which point there is only one valid RefSCC in
RCWorklist from the original RefSCC containing all the SCCs that
were not split out, and we visit that.

For example, in the newly added test cgscc-refscc-mutation-order.ll,
we'd previously run instcombine in this order:
f1, f2, f1, f3, f1, f4, f1

Now it's:
f1, f2, f3, f4, f1

This can cause more passes to be run in some specific cases,
e.g. if f1<->f2 gets optimized to f1<-f2, we'd previously run f1, f2;
now we run f1, f2, f2.

This improves kimwitu++ compile times by a lot (12-15% for various -O3 configs):
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=2371c5a0e06d22b48da0427cebaf53a5e5c54635&to=00908f1d67400cab1ad7bcd7cacc7558d1672e97&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121953

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3
# f98125ab 09-Mar-2022 Florian Hahn <[email protected]>

Revert "[PassManager] Add pretty stack entries before P->run() call."

This reverts commit 128745cc2681c284bc6d0150a319673a6d6e8424.

This increased compile-time unnecessarily. Revert this change and

Revert "[PassManager] Add pretty stack entries before P->run() call."

This reverts commit 128745cc2681c284bc6d0150a319673a6d6e8424.

This increased compile-time unnecessarily. Revert this change and follow
ups 2c7afadb4789 & add0c5856d5f.

http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=338dfcd60f843082bb589b287d890dbd9394eb82&to=128745cc2681c284bc6d0150a319673a6d6e8424&stat=instructions

show more ...


# 128745cc 09-Mar-2022 Florian Hahn <[email protected]>

[PassManager] Add pretty stack entries before P->run() call.

This patch adds PrettyStackEntries before running passes. The entries
include the pass name and the IR unit the pass runs on.

The inform

[PassManager] Add pretty stack entries before P->run() call.

This patch adds PrettyStackEntries before running passes. The entries
include the pass name and the IR unit the pass runs on.

The information is used the print additional information when a pass
crashes, including the name and a reference to the IR unit on which it
crashed. This is similar to the behavior of the legacy pass manager.

The improved stack trace now includes:

Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: bin/opt -loop-vectorize -force-vector-width=4 crash.ll
1. Running pass 'ModuleToFunctionPassAdaptor' on module 'crash.ll'
2. Running pass 'LoopVectorizePass' on function '@a'

Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120993

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2
# 71c3a551 28-Feb-2022 serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>

Cleanup includes: LLVMAnalysis

Number of lines output by preprocessor:
before: 1065940348
after: 1065307662

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Diff

Cleanup includes: LLVMAnalysis

Number of lines output by preprocessor:
before: 1065940348
after: 1065307662

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120659

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# e3e25b51 16-Nov-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Add option to prevent rerunning function pipeline on functions in CGSCC adaptor

In a CGSCC pass manager, we may visit the same function multiple times
due to SCC mutations. In the inliner pi

[NewPM] Add option to prevent rerunning function pipeline on functions in CGSCC adaptor

In a CGSCC pass manager, we may visit the same function multiple times
due to SCC mutations. In the inliner pipeline, this results in running
the function simplification pipeline on a function multiple times even
if it hasn't been changed since the last function simplification
pipeline run.

We use a newly introduced analysis to keep track of whether or not a
function has changed since the last time the function simplification
pipeline has run on it. If we see this analysis available for a function
in a CGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor, we skip running the function passes on
the function. The analysis is queried at the end of the function passes
so that it's available after the first time the function simplification
pipeline runs on a function. This is a per-adaptor option so it doesn't
apply to every adaptor.

The goal of this is to improve compile times. However, currently we
can't turn this on by default at least for the higher optimization
levels since the function simplification pipeline is not robust enough
to be idempotent in many cases, resulting in performance regressions if
we stop running the function simplification pipeline on a function
multiple times. We may be able to turn this on for -O1 in the near
future, but turning this on for higher optimization levels would require
more investment in the function simplification pipeline.

Heavily inspired by D98103.

Example compile time improvements with flag turned on:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=998dc4a5d3491d2ae8cbe742d2e13bc1b0cacc5f&to=5c27c913687d3d5559ef3ab42b5a3d513531d61c&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113947

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1
# 19867de9 03-May-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses

Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions

[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses

Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this
change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify,
then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be
preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation.

So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and
updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used.

This is part of an effort to investigate running the function
simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the
inliner pipeline.

However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR.
To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function
analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after
they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific
parts of the pipeline.

Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in
the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function
passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is
only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect.
For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline
runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes
(except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses).

Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss

D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for
some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917
shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major
memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes.
Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while
keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive.

Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304

show more ...


# 7175886a 03-Nov-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Make eager analysis invalidation per-adaptor

Follow-up change to D111575.
We don't need eager invalidation on every adaptor. Most notably,
adaptors running passes that use very few analyses,

[NewPM] Make eager analysis invalidation per-adaptor

Follow-up change to D111575.
We don't need eager invalidation on every adaptor. Most notably,
adaptors running passes that use very few analyses, or passes that
purely invalidate specific analyses.

Also allow testing of this via a pipeline string
"function<eager-inv>()".

The compile time/memory impact of this is very comparable to D111575.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=9a2eec512a29df45c90c2fcb741e9d5c693b1383&to=b9f20bcdea138060967d95a98eab87ce725b22bb&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113196

show more ...


# b8ce9737 11-Oct-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Add PipelineTuningOption to eagerly invalidate analyses

This trades off more compile time for less peak memory usage. Right now
it invalidates all function analyses after a module->function

[NewPM] Add PipelineTuningOption to eagerly invalidate analyses

This trades off more compile time for less peak memory usage. Right now
it invalidates all function analyses after a module->function or
cgscc->function adaptor.

https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=1fb24fe85a19ae71b00875ff6c96ef1831dcf7e3&to=cb28ddb063c87f0d5df89812ab2de9a69dd276db&stat=instructions
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=1fb24fe85a19ae71b00875ff6c96ef1831dcf7e3&to=cb28ddb063c87f0d5df89812ab2de9a69dd276db&stat=max-rss

For now this is just experimental.

See comments on why this may affect optimizations.

Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111575

show more ...


# 0db94812 17-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NFC] Remove FIXMEs about calling LLVMContext::yield()

Nobody has complained about this, and the documentation for
LLVMContext::yield() states that LLVM is allowed to never call it.

Reviewed By: as

[NFC] Remove FIXMEs about calling LLVMContext::yield()

Nobody has complained about this, and the documentation for
LLVMContext::yield() states that LLVM is allowed to never call it.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110008

show more ...


# 6cbb35dd 19-Jul-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Bail out of devirtualization wrapper if the current SCC is invalidated

The specific case that triggered this was when inlining a recursive
internal function into itself caused the recursion

[NewPM] Bail out of devirtualization wrapper if the current SCC is invalidated

The specific case that triggered this was when inlining a recursive
internal function into itself caused the recursion to go away, allowing
the inliner to mark the function as dead. The inliner marks the SCC as
invalidated but does not provide a new SCC to continue with.

This matches the implementations of ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor
and CGSCCPassManager.

Fixes PR50363.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106306

show more ...


# f7788e1b 21-May-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Revert "[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes"

This reverts commit d14d84af2f5ebb8ae2188ce6884a29a586dc0a40.

Causes unacceptable memory regressions.


# a52530dd 21-May-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Revert "[NPM] Do not run function simplification pipeline unnecessarily"

This reverts commit 97ab068034161fb35e5c9a7b293bf1e569cf077b.

Depends on D100917, which is to be reverted.


# 34a8a437 03-May-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Hide pass manager debug logging behind -debug-pass-manager-verbose

Printing pass manager invocations is fairly verbose and not super
useful.

This allows us to remove DebugLogging from pass

[NewPM] Hide pass manager debug logging behind -debug-pass-manager-verbose

Printing pass manager invocations is fairly verbose and not super
useful.

This allows us to remove DebugLogging from pass managers and PassBuilder
since all logging (aside from analysis managers) goes through
instrumentation now.

This has the downside of never being able to print the top level pass
manager via instrumentation, but that seems like a minor downside.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101797

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3
# 97ab0680 01-Mar-2021 Mircea Trofin <[email protected]>

[NPM] Do not run function simplification pipeline unnecessarily

The CGSCC pass manager interplay with the FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy is 'special' in the sense that the former will rerun the l

[NPM] Do not run function simplification pipeline unnecessarily

The CGSCC pass manager interplay with the FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy is 'special' in the sense that the former will rerun the latter if there are changes to a SCC structure; that being said, some of the functions in the SCC may be unchanged. In that case, the function simplification pipeline will be re-run, which impacts compile time[1].

This patch allows the function simplification pipeline be skipped if it was already run and the function was not modified since.

The behavior is currently disabled by default. This is because, currently, the rerunning of the function simplification pipeline on an unchanged function may still result in changes. The patch simplifies investigating and fixing those cases where repeated function pass runs do actually positively impact code quality, while offering an easy workaround for those impacted negatively by compile time regressions, and not impacting mainline scenarios.

[1] A [[ http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=eb37d3546cd0c6e67798496634c45e501f7806f1&to=ac722d1190dc7bbdd17e977ef7ec95e69eefc91e&stat=instructions | compile time tracker ]] run with the option enabled.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98103

show more ...


# d14d84af 03-May-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes

Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With th

[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes

Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this
change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify,
then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be
preserved.

So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, funcattrs, and
updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used.

Slight compile time improvements:
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=326da4adcb8def2abdd530299d87ce951c0edec9&to=8942c7669f330082ef159f3c6c57c3c28484f4be&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: mtrofin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100917

show more ...


# 92ccc6cb 12-Mar-2021 Mircea Trofin <[email protected]>

Reapply "[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes"

This reverts commit 11b70b9e3a7458b5b78c30020b56e8ca563a4801.

The bot failure was due to ArgumentPro

Reapply "[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes"

This reverts commit 11b70b9e3a7458b5b78c30020b56e8ca563a4801.

The bot failure was due to ArgumentPromotion deleting functions
without deleting their analyses. This was separately fixed in 4b1c807.

show more ...


# fa9d8ace 17-Mar-2021 Bardia Mahjour <[email protected]>

[CGSCC] Print CG node itself instead of its address

Fix the debug output from cgscc


# 11b70b9e 12-Mar-2021 Mircea Trofin <[email protected]>

Revert "[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes"

This reverts commit 5eaeb0fa67e57391f5584a3f67fdb131e93afda6.

It appears there are analyses that assu

Revert "[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes"

This reverts commit 5eaeb0fa67e57391f5584a3f67fdb131e93afda6.

It appears there are analyses that assume clearing - example:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/36/builds/5964

show more ...


# 5eaeb0fa 11-Mar-2021 Mircea Trofin <[email protected]>

[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes

Check with the analysis result by calling invalidate instead of clear on
the analysis manager.

Differential Re

[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes

Check with the analysis result by calling invalidate instead of clear on
the analysis manager.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98440

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2
# 468fa037 22-Feb-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Only verify LazyCallGraph under expensive checks

These verify calls are causing a lot of slowdown on some files, up to 8x.
The LazyCallGraph infra has been tested a lot over the years, so I'm fairly

Only verify LazyCallGraph under expensive checks

These verify calls are causing a lot of slowdown on some files, up to 8x.
The LazyCallGraph infra has been tested a lot over the years, so I'm fairly confident that we don't always need to run the verifys.

These verifies took >90% of total time in one of the compilations I looked at.

Reviewed By: thakis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97225

show more ...


# 4ed47858 23-Feb-2021 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[llvm] Use llvm::drop_begin (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2
# 2082b10d 16-Jan-2021 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[llvm] Use *::empty (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1
# 7fea561e 26-Dec-2020 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[CGSCC][Coroutine][NewPM] Properly support function splitting/outlining

Previously when trying to support CoroSplit's function splitting, we
added in a hack that simply added the new function's node

[CGSCC][Coroutine][NewPM] Properly support function splitting/outlining

Previously when trying to support CoroSplit's function splitting, we
added in a hack that simply added the new function's node into the
original function's SCC (https://reviews.llvm.org/D87798). This is
incorrect since it might be in its own SCC.

Now, more similar to the previous design, we have callers explicitly
notify the LazyCallGraph that a function has been split out from another
one.

In order to properly support CoroSplit, there are two ways functions can
be split out.

One is the normal expected "outlining" of one function into a new one.
The new function may only contain references to other functions that the
original did. The original function must reference the new function. The
new function may reference the original function, which can result in
the new function being in the same SCC as the original function. The
weird case is when the original function indirectly references the new
function, but the new function directly calls the original function,
resulting in the new SCC being a parent of the original function's SCC.
This form of function splitting works with CoroSplit's Switch ABI.

The second way of splitting is more specific to CoroSplit. CoroSplit's
Retcon and Async ABIs split the original function into multiple
functions that all reference each other and are referenced by the
original function. In order to keep the LazyCallGraph in a valid state,
all new functions must be processed together, else some nodes won't be
populated. To keep things simple, this only supports the case where all
new edges are ref edges, and every new function references every other
new function. There can be a reference back from any new function to the
original function, putting all functions in the same RefSCC.

This also adds asserts that all nodes in a (Ref)SCC can reach all other
nodes to prevent future incorrect hacks.

The original hacks in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87798 are no longer
necessary since all new functions should have been registered before
calling updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForPass.

This fixes all coroutine tests when opt's -enable-new-pm is true by
default. This also fixes PR48190, which was likely due to the previous
hack breaking SCC invariants.

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93828

show more ...


# 3285ee14 20-Dec-2020 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[Analysis, IR, CodeGen] Use llvm::erase_if (NFC)


12345