[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers

The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them
all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivale

[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers

The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them
all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivalent.

Reviewed By: shafik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103084

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

[linux] Remove all traces of signalfd(2)

Summary:
Signalfd is not used in the code anymore, and given that the same functionality can be achieved
with the new MainLoop class, it's unlikely we will n

[linux] Remove all traces of signalfd(2)

Summary:
Signalfd is not used in the code anymore, and given that the same functionality can be achieved
with the new MainLoop class, it's unlikely we will need it in the future. Remove all traces of
it.

Reviewers: tberghammer, ovyalov

Subscribers: tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17510

llvm-svn: 261631

show more ...

[linux] Use cmake to detect support process_vm_readv (bug #23918)

Summary:
Some old linux versions do not have process_vm_readv function defined. Even older versions do not
have even the __NR_proces

[linux] Use cmake to detect support process_vm_readv (bug #23918)

Summary:
Some old linux versions do not have process_vm_readv function defined. Even older versions do not
have even the __NR_process_vm_readv syscall number. We use cmake to detect these situations and
fallback appropriately: in the first case, we can issue the syscall manually, while it the latter
case, we need to drop fast memory read support completely.

Test Plan: linux test suite passes

Reviewers: ovyalov, Eugene.Zelenko

Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10727

llvm-svn: 240927

show more ...

[NativeProcessLinux] Use fast memory reads, if the system supports it

Summary:
Memory reads using the ptrace API need to be executed on a designated thread
and in 4-byte increments. The process_vm_r

[NativeProcessLinux] Use fast memory reads, if the system supports it

Summary:
Memory reads using the ptrace API need to be executed on a designated thread
and in 4-byte increments. The process_vm_read syscall has no such requirements
and it is about 50 times faster. This patch makes lldb-server use the faster
API if the target kernel supports it. Kernel support for this feature is
determined at runtime. Using process_vm_writev in the same manner is more
complicated since this syscall (unlike ptrace) respects page protection settings
and so it cannot be used to set a breakpoint, since code pages are typically
read-only. However, memory writes are not currently a performance bottleneck as
they happen much more rarely.

Test Plan: all tests continue to pass

Reviewers: ovyalov, vharron

Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10488

llvm-svn: 239924

show more ...

Get lldb-server building on android-9

Build lldb-server with an android-9 sysroot.

llvm-svn: 237078