History log of /freebsd-13.1/lib/libc/tests/stdlib/Makefile (Results 1 – 22 of 22)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0
# c1a3d7f2 19-Jan-2021 Alex Richardson <[email protected]>

Remove remaining uses of ${COMPILER_FEATURES:Mc++11}

All supported compilers have C++11 support so these checks can be replaced
with MK_CXX guards.
See also https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Remove remaining uses of ${COMPILER_FEATURES:Mc++11}

All supported compilers have C++11 support so these checks can be replaced
with MK_CXX guards.
See also https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252759

PR: 252759
Reviewed By: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28234

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.2.0
# 2d143336 24-Jun-2020 Mitchell Horne <[email protected]>

Enable long double tests on RISC-V

Some of the NetBSD contributed tests are gated behind the
__HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE flag. This flag seems to be defined only for
platforms whose long double is larger tha

Enable long double tests on RISC-V

Some of the NetBSD contributed tests are gated behind the
__HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE flag. This flag seems to be defined only for
platforms whose long double is larger than their double. I could not
find this explicitly documented anywhere, but it is implied by the
definitions in NetBSD's sys/arch/${arch}/include/math.h headers, and the
following assertion from the UBSAN code:

#ifdef __HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE
long double LD;
ASSERT(sizeof(LD) > sizeof(uint64_t));
#endif

RISC-V has 128-bit long doubles, so enable the tests on this platform,
and update the comments to better explain the purpose of this flag.

Reviewed by: ngie
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25419

show more ...


Revision tags: release/11.4.0
# 6507380f 20-Jan-2020 Edward Tomasz Napierala <[email protected]>

Add qsort_r(3) regression test.

MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23206


# 0d2fabfc 20-Jan-2020 Edward Tomasz Napierala <[email protected]>

Add qsort_s(3). Apart from the constraints, it also makes it easier
to port software written for Linux variant of qsort_r(3).

Reviewed by: kib, arichardson
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes
Sponsore

Add qsort_s(3). Apart from the constraints, it also makes it easier
to port software written for Linux variant of qsort_r(3).

Reviewed by: kib, arichardson
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23174

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.1.0
# 24612bfd 31-Aug-2019 Li-Wen Hsu <[email protected]>

Unskip test cases from netbsd-tests by defining __HAVE_FENV

This unskips:
- lib.libc.stdlib.strtod_test.strtod_round
- lib.msun.fe_round_test.t_nofe_round

In lib/msun/tests/Makefile only define

Unskip test cases from netbsd-tests by defining __HAVE_FENV

This unskips:
- lib.libc.stdlib.strtod_test.strtod_round
- lib.msun.fe_round_test.t_nofe_round

In lib/msun/tests/Makefile only define on fe_round_test.c because
lib.msun.ilogb_test.ilogb will get wrong results and needs more examination.

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

show more ...


Revision tags: release/11.3.0
# 0eb97cca 29-Mar-2019 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Allow users to override CSTD/CXXSTD on a per-prog basis

The current logic for CSTD/CXXSTD requires homogenity as far as the
supported C/C++ standards, which is a sensible default. However, when
deal

Allow users to override CSTD/CXXSTD on a per-prog basis

The current logic for CSTD/CXXSTD requires homogenity as far as the
supported C/C++ standards, which is a sensible default. However, when
dealing with differing versions of C++, some code may compile with C++11, but
not C++17 (for instance). So in order to avoid having people convert over their
code to the new standard, give the users the ability to specify the standard on
a per-program basis.

This will allow a user to override the supporting standard for a set of
programs, mixing C++11 with C++14 (for instance).

Reviewed by: asomers
Apprved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345708
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19738

show more ...


# bdbf3440 29-Mar-2019 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Revert r345706: the third time will be the charm

When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and rep

Revert r345706: the third time will be the charm

When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.

For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.

MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)

show more ...


# 760b1a81 29-Mar-2019 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Standardize `-std=c++* as `CXXSTD`

CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.

CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.

Thi

Standardize `-std=c++* as `CXXSTD`

CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.

CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.

This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.

As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.

Notes:

This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.

Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:

Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```

After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```

Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732

show more ...


# 752cabaa 29-Mar-2019 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Revert r345704

I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.

Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC afte

Revert r345704

I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.

Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC after: 2 months
MFC with: r345704

show more ...


# 9a41926b 29-Mar-2019 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

CXXSTD is the C++ analogue to CSTD.

CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.

This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, ori

CXXSTD is the C++ analogue to CSTD.

CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.

This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.

As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.

Notes:

This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.

Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:

Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```

After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```

Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732

show more ...


# 9303f819 31-Jan-2019 Kyle Evans <[email protected]>

libc/tests: Add test case for jemalloc/libthr bug fixed in r343566

Submitted by: Andrew Gierth (original reproducer; kevans massaged for atf)
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 2 weeks
X-MFC-with: r343566

libc/tests: Add test case for jemalloc/libthr bug fixed in r343566

Submitted by: Andrew Gierth (original reproducer; kevans massaged for atf)
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 2 weeks
X-MFC-with: r343566 (or after)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19027

show more ...


# 8c1c50ff 19-Dec-2018 Conrad Meyer <[email protected]>

Allow multi-byte thousands separators in strfmon(3)

PR: 234010
Reported by: Jon Tejnung <jon AT herrskogen.se>
Reviewed by: yuripv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18605


Revision tags: release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0, release/10.4.0, release/11.1.0
# 9851b340 30-Mar-2017 Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]>

Implement the memset_s(3) function as specified by the C11 ISO/IEC
9899:2011 Appendix K 3.7.4.1.

Other needed supporting types, defines and constraint_handler
infrastructure is added as specified in

Implement the memset_s(3) function as specified by the C11 ISO/IEC
9899:2011 Appendix K 3.7.4.1.

Other needed supporting types, defines and constraint_handler
infrastructure is added as specified in the C11 spec.

Submitted by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
Sponsored by: Juniper Networks
Discussed with: ed
MFC after: 3 weeks
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9903
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10161

show more ...


# 9527fa4f 12-Jan-2017 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Remove __HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE #define from t_strtod.c and place it in Makefile

This is to enable support in other testcases

Inspired by lib/msun/tests/Makefile .

MFC after: 1 week


Revision tags: release/11.0.1, release/11.0.0
# b585cd3e 06-Aug-2016 Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]>

Add __cxa_thread_atexit(3) API implementation.

This is the backing feature to implement C++11 thread storage duration
specified by the thread_local keyword. A destructor for given
thread-local obje

Add __cxa_thread_atexit(3) API implementation.

This is the backing feature to implement C++11 thread storage duration
specified by the thread_local keyword. A destructor for given
thread-local object is registered to be executed at the thread
termination time using __cxa_thread_atexit(). Libc calls the
__cxa_thread_calls_dtors() during exit(3), before finalizers and
atexit functions, and libthr calls the function at the thread
termination time, after the stack unwinding and thread-specific key
destruction.

There are several uncertainties in the API which lacks a formal
specification. Among them:
- is it allowed to register destructors during destructing;
we allow, but limiting the nesting level. If too many iterations
detected, a diagnostic is issued to stderr and thread forcibly
terminates for now.
- how to handle destructors which belong to an unloading dso;
for now, we ignore destructor calls for such entries, and
issue a diagnostic. Linux does prevent dso unload until all
threads with destructors from the dso terminated.
It is supposed that the diagnostics allow to detect real-world
applications relying on the above details and possibly adjust
our implementation. Right now the choices were to provide the slim
API (but that rarely stands the practice test).

Tests are added to check generic functionality and to specify some of
the above implementation choices.

Submitted by: Mahdi Mokhtari <mokhi64_gmail.com>
Reviewed by: theraven
Discussed with: dim (detection of -std=c++11 supoort for tests)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation (my involvement)
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential revisions: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7224,
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7427

show more ...


# 430f7286 04-May-2016 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Merge ^/user/ngie/release-pkg-fix-tests to unbreak how test files are installed
after r298107

Summary of changes:

- Replace all instances of FILES/TESTS with ${PACKAGE}FILES. This ensures that
na

Merge ^/user/ngie/release-pkg-fix-tests to unbreak how test files are installed
after r298107

Summary of changes:

- Replace all instances of FILES/TESTS with ${PACKAGE}FILES. This ensures that
namespacing is kept with FILES appropriately, and that this shouldn't need
to be repeated if the namespace changes -- only the definition of PACKAGE
needs to be changed
- Allow PACKAGE to be overridden by callers instead of forcing it to always be
`tests`. In the event we get to the point where things can be split up
enough in the base system, it would make more sense to group the tests
with the blocks they're a part of, e.g. byacc with byacc-tests, etc
- Remove PACKAGE definitions where possible, i.e. where FILES wasn't used
previously.
- Remove unnecessary TESTSPACKAGE definitions; this has been elided into
bsd.tests.mk
- Remove unnecessary BINDIRs used previously with ${PACKAGE}FILES;
${PACKAGE}FILESDIR is now automatically defined in bsd.test.mk.
- Fix installation of files under data/ subdirectories in lib/libc/tests/hash
and lib/libc/tests/net/getaddrinfo
- Remove unnecessary .include <bsd.own.mk>s (some opportunistic cleanup)

Document the proposed changes in share/examples/tests/tests/... via examples
so it's clear that ${PACKAGES}FILES is the suggested way forward in terms of
replacing FILES. share/mk/bsd.README didn't seem like the appropriate method
of communicating that info.

MFC after: never probably
X-MFC with: r298107
PR: 209114
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: buildworld, installworld, checkworld; buildworld, packageworld
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division

show more ...


Revision tags: release/10.3.0
# 43faedc1 02-Feb-2016 Glen Barber <[email protected]>

First pass to fix the 'tests' packages.

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation


# 459d04a5 22-Dec-2015 Ed Schouten <[email protected]>

Let tsearch()/tdelete() use an AVL tree.

The existing implementations of POSIX tsearch() and tdelete() don't
attempt to perform any balancing at all. Testing reveals that inserting
100k nodes into a

Let tsearch()/tdelete() use an AVL tree.

The existing implementations of POSIX tsearch() and tdelete() don't
attempt to perform any balancing at all. Testing reveals that inserting
100k nodes into a tree sequentially takes approximately one minute on my
system.

Though most other BSDs also don't use any balanced tree internally, C
libraries like glibc and musl do provide better implementations. glibc
uses a red-black tree and musl uses an AVL tree.

Red-black trees have the advantage over AVL trees that they only require
O(1) rotations after insertion and deletion, but have the disadvantage
that the tree has a maximum depth of 2*log2(n) instead of 1.44*log2(n).
My take is that it's better to focus on having a lower maximum depth,
for the reason that in the case of tsearch() the invocation of the
comparator likely dominates the running time.

This change replaces the tsearch() and tdelete() functions by versions
that create an AVL tree. Compared to musl's implementation, this version
is different in two different ways:

- We don't keep track of heights; just balances. This is sufficient.
This has the advantage that it reduces the number of nodes that are
being accessed. Storing heights requires us to also access all of the
siblings along the path.

- Don't use any recursion at all. We know that the tree cannot 2^64
elements in size, so the height of the tree can never be larger than
96. Use a 128-bit bitmask to keep track of the path that is computed.
This allows us to iterate over the same path twice, meaning we can
apply rotations from top to bottom.

Inserting 100k nodes into a tree now only takes 0.015 seconds. Insertion
seems to be twice as fast as glibc, whereas deletion has about the same
performance. Unlike glibc, it uses a fixed amount of memory.

I also experimented with both recursive and iterative bottom-up
implementations of the same algorithm. This iterative top-down version
performs similar to the recursive bottom-up version in terms of speed
and code size.

For some reason, the iterative bottom-up algorithm was actually 30%
faster for deletion, but has a quadratic memory complexity to keep track
of all the parent pointers.

Reviewed by: jilles
Obtained from: https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4412

show more ...


# eacae6dc 04-Dec-2015 Bryan Drewery <[email protected]>

Fix LDADD/DPADD that should be LIBADD.

Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division


# 98682851 08-Nov-2015 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Integrate tools/regression/lib/libc/stdlib into the FreeBSD test suite
as lib/libc/tests/stdlib

- Make the code a bit more style(9) compliant
- Convert a sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]) to nitems

MFC after:

Integrate tools/regression/lib/libc/stdlib into the FreeBSD test suite
as lib/libc/tests/stdlib

- Make the code a bit more style(9) compliant
- Convert a sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]) to nitems

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division

show more ...


# b2d48be1 12-Oct-2015 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Refactor the test/ Makefiles after recent changes to bsd.test.mk (r289158) and
netbsd-tests.test.mk (r289151)

- Eliminate explicit OBJTOP/SRCTOP setting
- Convert all ad hoc NetBSD test integration

Refactor the test/ Makefiles after recent changes to bsd.test.mk (r289158) and
netbsd-tests.test.mk (r289151)

- Eliminate explicit OBJTOP/SRCTOP setting
- Convert all ad hoc NetBSD test integration over to netbsd-tests.test.mk
- Remove unnecessary TESTSDIR setting
- Use SRCTOP where possible for clarity

MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Divison

show more ...


Revision tags: release/10.2.0, release/10.1.0
# 2f121787 04-Nov-2014 Enji Cooper <[email protected]>

Add reachover Makefiles for contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc; this adds approximately
500 new testcases

Various TODOs have been sprinkled around the Makefiles for items that even need
to be ported (mis

Add reachover Makefiles for contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc; this adds approximately
500 new testcases

Various TODOs have been sprinkled around the Makefiles for items that even need
to be ported (missing features), testcases have issues with building/linking, or
issues at runtime.

A variant of this code has been tested extensively on amd64 and i386
10-STABLE/11-CURRENT for several months without issue. It builds on other
architectures, but the code will remain off until I have prove it works on
virtual hardware or real hardware on other architectures

In collaboration with: pho, Casey Peel <[email protected]>
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division

show more ...