1# 2013-04-13 2# 3# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of 4# a legal notice, here is a blessing: 5# 6# May you do good and not evil. 7# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. 8# May you share freely, never taking more than you give. 9# 10#*********************************************************************** 11# 12# This file tests features of the name resolver (the component that 13# figures out what identifiers in the SQL statement refer to) that 14# were fixed by ticket [2500cdb9be]. 15# 16# See also tickets [1c69be2daf] and [f617ea3125] from 2013-08-14. 17# 18# Also a fuzzer-discovered problem on 2015-04-23. 19# 20 21set testdir [file dirname $argv0] 22source $testdir/tester.tcl 23 24# "ORDER BY y" binds to the output result-set column named "y" 25# if available. If no output column is named "y", then try to 26# bind against an input column named "y". 27# 28# This is classical SQL92 behavior. 29# 30do_test resolver01-1.1 { 31 catchsql { 32 CREATE TABLE t1(x, y); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(11,22); 33 CREATE TABLE t2(y, z); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(33,44); 34 SELECT 1 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y; 35 } 36} {0 1} 37do_test resolver01-1.2 { 38 catchsql { 39 SELECT 1 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y; 40 } 41} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}} 42do_test resolver01-1.3 { 43 catchsql { 44 CREATE TABLE t3(x,y); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(11,44),(33,22); 45 SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY y; 46 } 47} {0 {11 33}} 48do_test resolver01-1.4 { 49 catchsql { 50 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY y; 51 } 52} {0 {33 11}} 53 54# SQLite allows the WHERE clause to reference output columns if there is 55# no other way to resolve the name. 56# 57do_test resolver01-1.5 { 58 catchsql { 59 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY yy; 60 } 61} {0 {11 33}} 62do_test resolver01-1.6 { 63 catchsql { 64 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY 1; 65 } 66} {0 {11 33}} 67 68# The "ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase" form works the same as "ORDER BY y". 69# The "y" binds more tightly to output columns than to input columns. 70# 71# This is for compatibility with SQL92 and with historical SQLite behavior. 72# Note that PostgreSQL considers "y COLLATE nocase" to be an expression 73# and thus PostgreSQL treats this case as if it where the 3.x case below. 74# 75do_test resolver01-2.1 { 76 catchsql { 77 SELECT 2 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase; 78 } 79} {0 2} 80do_test resolver01-2.2 { 81 catchsql { 82 SELECT 2 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase; 83 } 84} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}} 85do_test resolver01-2.3 { 86 catchsql { 87 SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase; 88 } 89} {0 {11 33}} 90do_test resolver01-2.4 { 91 catchsql { 92 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase; 93 } 94} {0 {33 11}} 95do_test resolver01-2.5 { 96 catchsql { 97 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY yy COLLATE nocase; 98 } 99} {0 {11 33}} 100do_test resolver01-2.6 { 101 catchsql { 102 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY 1 COLLATE nocase; 103 } 104} {0 {11 33}} 105 106# But if the form is "ORDER BY expr" then bind more tightly to the 107# the input column names and only use the output column names if no 108# input column name matches. 109# 110# This is SQL99 behavior, as implemented by PostgreSQL and MS-SQL. 111# Note that Oracle works differently. 112# 113do_test resolver01-3.1 { 114 catchsql { 115 SELECT 3 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY +y; 116 } 117} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}} 118do_test resolver01-3.2 { 119 catchsql { 120 SELECT 2 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY +y; 121 } 122} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}} 123do_test resolver01-3.3 { 124 catchsql { 125 SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY +y; 126 } 127} {0 {33 11}} 128do_test resolver01-3.4 { 129 catchsql { 130 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY +y; 131 } 132} {0 {33 11}} 133do_test resolver01-3.5 { 134 catchsql { 135 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY +yy 136 } 137} {0 {11 33}} 138 139# This is the test case given in ticket [f617ea3125e9] (with table name 140# changed from "t1" to "t4". The behavior of (1) and (3) match with 141# PostgreSQL, but we intentionally break with PostgreSQL to provide 142# SQL92 behavior for case (2). 143# 144do_execsql_test resolver01-4.1 { 145 CREATE TABLE t4(m CHAR(2)); 146 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('az'); 147 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('by'); 148 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('cx'); 149 SELECT '1', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY m; 150 SELECT '2', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY m COLLATE binary; 151 SELECT '3', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY lower(m); 152} {1 x 1 y 1 z 2 x 2 y 2 z 3 z 3 y 3 x} 153 154########################################################################## 155# Test cases for ticket [1c69be2dafc28]: Make sure the GROUP BY binds 156# more tightly to the input tables in all cases. 157# 158# This first case case has been wrong in SQLite for time out of mind. 159# For SQLite version 3.7.17 the answer was two rows, which is wrong. 160# 161do_execsql_test resolver01-5.1 { 162 CREATE TABLE t5(m CHAR(2)); 163 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('ax'); 164 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('bx'); 165 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('cy'); 166 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS m FROM t5 GROUP BY m ORDER BY 1, 2; 167} {1 x 1 x 1 y} 168 169# This case is unambiguous and has always been correct. 170# 171do_execsql_test resolver01-5.2 { 172 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 GROUP BY m ORDER BY 1, 2; 173} {1 x 1 x 1 y} 174 175# This case is not allowed in standard SQL, but SQLite allows and does 176# the sensible thing. 177# 178do_execsql_test resolver01-5.3 { 179 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 GROUP BY mx ORDER BY 1, 2; 180} {1 y 2 x} 181do_execsql_test resolver01-5.4 { 182 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 183 GROUP BY substr(m,2,1) ORDER BY 1, 2; 184} {1 y 2 x} 185 186# These test case weere provided in the 2013-08-14 email from Rob Golsteijn 187# that originally reported the problem of ticket [1c69be2dafc28]. 188# 189do_execsql_test resolver01-6.1 { 190 CREATE TABLE t61(name); 191 SELECT min(name) FROM t61 GROUP BY lower(name); 192} {} 193do_execsql_test resolver01-6.2 { 194 SELECT min(name) AS name FROM t61 GROUP BY lower(name); 195} {} 196do_execsql_test resolver01-6.3 { 197 CREATE TABLE t63(name); 198 INSERT INTO t63 VALUES (NULL); 199 INSERT INTO t63 VALUES ('abc'); 200 SELECT count(), 201 NULLIF(name,'abc') AS name 202 FROM t63 203 GROUP BY lower(name); 204} {1 {} 1 {}} 205 206do_execsql_test resolver01-7.1 { 207 SELECT 2 AS x WHERE (SELECT x AS y WHERE 3>y); 208} {2} 209do_execsql_test resolver01-7.2 { 210 SELECT 2 AS x WHERE (SELECT x AS y WHERE 1>y); 211} {} 212 213 214 215 216finish_test 217