xref: /sqlite-3.40.0/test/orderby6.test (revision e99b9cdc)
1# 2014-03-21
2#
3# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
4# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
5#
6#    May you do good and not evil.
7#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
8#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
9#
10#***********************************************************************
11# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
12# focus of this file is testing that the block-sort optimization.
13#
14
15
16set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
17source $testdir/tester.tcl
18set ::testprefix orderby6
19
20# Run all tests twice.  Once with a normal table and a second time
21# with a WITHOUT ROWID table
22#
23foreach {tn rowidclause} {1 {} 2 {WITHOUT ROWID}} {
24
25  # Construct a table with 1000 rows and a split primary key
26  #
27  reset_db
28  do_test $tn.1 {
29    db eval "CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,PRIMARY KEY(b,c)) $rowidclause;"
30    db eval {
31      WITH RECURSIVE
32       cnt(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM cnt WHERE x<1000)
33     INSERT INTO t1 SELECT x, x%40, x/40 FROM cnt;
34    }
35  } {}
36
37  # Run various ORDER BY queries that can benefit from block-sort.
38  # Compare the output to the same output using a full-sort enforced
39  # by adding + to each term of the ORDER BY clause.
40  #
41  do_execsql_test $tn.2 {
42    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b,a,c;
43  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b,+a,+c}]
44  do_execsql_test $tn.3 {
45    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b,c DESC,a;
46  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b,+c DESC,+a}]
47  do_execsql_test $tn.4 {
48    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC,c,a;
49  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c,+a}]
50  do_execsql_test $tn.5 {
51    SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC,a,c;
52  } [db eval {SELECT b,a,c FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC,+a,+c}]
53
54  # LIMIT and OFFSET clauses on block-sort queries.
55  #
56  do_execsql_test $tn.11 {
57    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
58  } {840 880 920 960 1000 1 41 81 121 161}
59  do_execsql_test $tn.11x {
60    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
61  } {840 880 920 960 1000 1 41 81 121 161}
62
63  do_execsql_test $tn.12 {
64    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
65  } {839 879 919 959 999 38 78 118 158 198}
66  do_execsql_test $tn.12 {
67    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
68  } {839 879 919 959 999 38 78 118 158 198}
69
70  do_execsql_test $tn.13 {
71    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a DESC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
72  } {161 121 81 41 1 962 922 882 842 802}
73  do_execsql_test $tn.13x {
74    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b, a DESC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
75  } {161 121 81 41 1 962 922 882 842 802}
76
77  do_execsql_test $tn.14 {
78    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
79  } {838 878 918 958 998 37 77 117 157 197}
80  do_execsql_test $tn.14x {
81    SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY +b DESC, a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 45;
82  } {838 878 918 958 998 37 77 117 157 197}
83
84  # Many test cases where the LIMIT+OFFSET window is in various
85  # alignments with block-sort boundaries.
86  #
87  foreach {tx limit offset orderby} {
88     1  10 24 {+b,+a}
89     2  10 25 {+b,+a}
90     3  10 26 {+b,+a}
91     4  10 39 {+b,+a}
92     5  10 40 {+b,+a}
93     6  10 41 {+b,+a}
94     7  27 24 {+b,+a}
95     8  27 49 {+b,+a}
96     11 10 24 {+b DESC,+a}
97     12 10 25 {+b DESC,+a}
98     13 10 26 {+b DESC,+a}
99     14 10 39 {+b DESC,+a}
100     15 10 40 {+b DESC,+a}
101     16 10 41 {+b DESC,+a}
102     17 27 24 {+b DESC,+a}
103     18 27 49 {+b DESC,+a}
104     21 10 24 {+b,+a DESC}
105     22 10 25 {+b,+a DESC}
106     23 10 26 {+b,+a DESC}
107     24 10 39 {+b,+a DESC}
108     25 10 40 {+b,+a DESC}
109     26 10 41 {+b,+a DESC}
110     27 27 24 {+b,+a DESC}
111     28 27 49 {+b,+a DESC}
112     31 10 24 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
113     32 10 25 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
114     33 10 26 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
115     34 10 39 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
116     35 10 40 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
117     36 10 41 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
118     37 27 24 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
119     38 27 49 {+b DESC,+a DESC}
120  } {
121    set sql1 "SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY $orderby LIMIT $limit OFFSET $offset;"
122    set sql2 [string map {+ {}} $sql1]
123    # puts $sql2\n$sql1\n[db eval $sql2]
124    do_test $tn.21.$tx {db eval $::sql2} [db eval $sql1]
125  }
126
127  ########################################################################
128  # A second test table, t2, has many columns open to sorting.
129  do_test $tn.31 {
130    db eval "CREATE TABLE t2(a,b,c,d,e,f,PRIMARY KEY(b,c,d,e,f)) $rowidclause;"
131    db eval {
132      WITH RECURSIVE
133       cnt(x) AS (VALUES(0) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM cnt WHERE x<242)
134     INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x,  x%3, (x/3)%3, (x/9)%3, (x/27)%3, (x/81)%3
135                      FROM cnt;
136    }
137  } {}
138
139  do_execsql_test $tn.32 {
140    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f;
141  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
142  do_execsql_test $tn.33 {
143    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,+f;
144  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
145  do_execsql_test $tn.34 {
146    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,+e,+f;
147  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
148  do_execsql_test $tn.35 {
149    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,+d,+e,+f;
150  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
151  do_execsql_test $tn.36 {
152    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,+c,+d,+e,+f;
153  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
154
155  do_execsql_test $tn.37 {
156    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f DESC;
157  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f DESC;}]
158  do_execsql_test $tn.38 {
159    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e DESC,f;
160  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e DESC,+f;}]
161  do_execsql_test $tn.39 {
162    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d DESC,e,f;
163  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d DESC,+e,+f;}]
164  do_execsql_test $tn.40 {
165    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c DESC,d,e,f;
166  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c DESC,+d,+e,+f;}]
167  do_execsql_test $tn.41 {
168    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b DESC,c,d,e,f;
169  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c,+d,+e,+f;}]
170
171  do_execsql_test $tn.42 {
172    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b DESC,c DESC,d,e,f LIMIT 31;
173  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b DESC,+c DESC,+d,+e,+f LIMIT 31}]
174  do_execsql_test $tn.43 {
175    SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY b,c,d,e,f DESC LIMIT 8 OFFSET 7;
176  } [db eval {SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY +b,+c,+d,+e,+f DESC LIMIT 8 OFFSET 7}]
177
178
179}
180
181
182
183finish_test
184