Migrate the Wasmtime CLI to `wasmtime::error` (#12295)

* Migrate wasmtime-cli to `wasmtime::error`

* migrate benches to `wasmtime::error` as well

* Remove new usage of anyhow that snuck in

Run some tests in MIRI on CI (#6332)

* Run some tests in MIRI on CI

This commit is an implementation of getting at least chunks of Wasmtime
to run in MIRI on CI. The full test suite is not possible

Run some tests in MIRI on CI (#6332)

* Run some tests in MIRI on CI

This commit is an implementation of getting at least chunks of Wasmtime
to run in MIRI on CI. The full test suite is not possible to run in MIRI
because MIRI cannot run Cranelift-produced code at runtime (aka it
doesn't support JITs). Running MIRI, however, is still quite valuable if
we can manage it because it would have trivially detected
GHSA-ch89-5g45-qwc7, our most recent security advisory. The goal of this
PR is to select a subset of the test suite to execute in CI under MIRI
and boost our confidence in the copious amount of `unsafe` code in
Wasmtime's runtime.

Under MIRI's default settings, which is to use the [Stacked
Borrows][stacked] model, much of the code in `Instance` and `VMContext`
is considered invalid. Under the optional [Tree Borrows][tree] model,
however, this same code is accepted. After some [extremely helpful
discussion][discuss] on the Rust Zulip my current conclusion is that
what we're doing is not fundamentally un-sound but we need to model it
in a different way. This PR, however, uses the Tree Borrows model for
MIRI to get something onto CI sooner rather than later, and I hope to
follow this up with something that passed Stacked Borrows. Additionally
that'll hopefully make this diff smaller and easier to digest.

Given all that, the end result of this PR is to get 131 separate unit
tests executing on CI. These unit tests largely exercise the embedding
API where wasm function compilation is not involved. Some tests compile
wasm functions but don't run them, but compiling wasm through Cranelift
in MIRI is so slow that it doesn't seem worth it at this time. This does
mean that there's a pretty big hole in MIRI's test coverage, but that's
to be expected as we're a JIT compiler after all.

To get tests working in MIRI this PR uses a number of strategies:

* When platform-specific code is involved there's now `#[cfg(miri)]` for
MIRI's version. For example there's a custom-built "mmap" just for
MIRI now. Many of these are simple noops, some are `unimplemented!()`
as they shouldn't be reached, and some are slightly nontrivial
implementations such as mmaps and trap handling (for native-to-native
function calls).

* Many test modules are simply excluded via `#![cfg(not(miri))]` at the
top of the file. This excludes the entire module's worth of tests from
MIRI. Other modules have `#[cfg_attr(miri, ignore)]` annotations to
ignore tests by default on MIRI. The latter form is used in modules
where some tests work and some don't. This means that all future test
additions will need to be effectively annotated whether they work in
MIRI or not. My hope though is that there's enough precedent in the
test suite of what to do to not cause too much burden.

* A number of locations are fixed with respect to MIRI's analysis. For
example `ComponentInstance`, the component equivalent of
`wasmtime_runtime::Instance`, was actually left out from the fix for
the CVE by accident. MIRI dutifully highlighted the issues here and
I've fixed them locally. Some locations fixed for MIRI are changed to
something that looks similar but is subtly different. For example
retaining items in a `Store<T>` is now done with a Wasmtime-specific
`StoreBox<T>` type. This is because, with MIRI's analyses, moving a
`Box<T>` invalidates all pointers derived from this `Box<T>`. We don't
want these semantics, so we effectively have a custom `Box<T>` to suit
our needs in this regard.

* Some default configuration is different under MIRI. For example most
linear memories are dynamic with no guards and no space reserved for
growth. Settings such as parallel compilation are disabled. These are
applied to make MIRI "work by default" in more places ideally. Some
tests which perform N iterations of something perform fewer iterations
on MIRI to not take quite so long.

This PR is not intended to be a one-and-done-we-never-look-at-it-again
kind of thing. Instead this is intended to lay the groundwork to
continuously run MIRI in CI to catch any soundness issues. This feels,
to me, overdue given the amount of `unsafe` code inside of Wasmtime. My
hope is that over time we can figure out how to run Wasm in MIRI but
that may take quite some time. Regardless this will be adding nontrivial
maintenance work to contributors to Wasmtime. MIRI will be run on CI for
merges, MIRI will have test failures when everything else passes,
MIRI's errors will need to be deciphered by those who have probably
never run MIRI before, things like that. Despite all this to me it seems
worth the cost at this time. Just getting this running caught two
possible soundness bugs in the component implementation that could have
had a real-world impact in the future!

[stacked]: https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md
[tree]: https://perso.crans.org/vanille/treebor/
[discuss]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/269128-miri/topic/Tree.20vs.20Stacked.20Borrows.20.26.20a.20debugging.20question

* Update alignment comment

show more ...

Remove explicit `S` type from component functions (#5722)

I ended up forgetting this as part of #5275.

unsplat component::Linker::func_wrap args (#5065)

* component::Linker::func_wrap: replace IntoComponentFunc with directly accepting a closure

We find that this makes the Linker::func_wrap type si

unsplat component::Linker::func_wrap args (#5065)

* component::Linker::func_wrap: replace IntoComponentFunc with directly accepting a closure

We find that this makes the Linker::func_wrap type signature much easier
to read. The IntoComponentFunc abstraction was adding a lot of weight to
"splat" a set of arguments from a tuple of types into individual
arguments to the closure. Additionally, making the StoreContextMut
argument optional, or the Result<return> optional, wasn't very
worthwhile.

* Fixes for the new style of closure required by component::Linker::func_wrap

* fix fuzzing generator

show more ...

Update wasm-tools dependencies (#4970)

* Update wasm-tools dependencies

This update brings in a number of features such as:

* The component model binary format and AST has been slightly adjust

Update wasm-tools dependencies (#4970)

* Update wasm-tools dependencies

This update brings in a number of features such as:

* The component model binary format and AST has been slightly adjusted
in a few locations. Names are dropped from parameters/results now in
the internal representation since they were not used anyway. At this
time the ability to bind a multi-return function has not been exposed.

* The `wasmparser` validator pass will now share allocations with prior
functions, providing what's probably a very minor speedup for Wasmtime
itself.

* The text format for many component-related tests now requires named
parameters.

* Some new relaxed-simd instructions are updated to be ignored.

I hope to have a follow-up to expose the multi-return ability to the
embedding API of components.

* Update audit information for new crates

show more ...

Upgrade wasm-tools crates, namely the component model (#4715)

* Upgrade wasm-tools crates, namely the component model

This commit pulls in the latest versions of all of the `wasm-tools`
family

Upgrade wasm-tools crates, namely the component model (#4715)

* Upgrade wasm-tools crates, namely the component model

This commit pulls in the latest versions of all of the `wasm-tools`
family of crates. There were two major changes that happened in
`wasm-tools` in the meantime:

* bytecodealliance/wasm-tools#697 - this commit introduced a new API for
more efficiently reading binary operators from a wasm binary. The old
`Operator`-based reading was left in place, however, and continues to
be what Wasmtime uses. I hope to update Wasmtime in a future PR to use
this new API, but for now the biggest change is...

* bytecodealliance/wasm-tools#703 - this commit was a major update to
the component model AST. This commit almost entirely deals with the
fallout of this change.

The changes made to the component model were:

1. The `unit` type no longer exists. This was generally a simple change
where the `Unit` case in a few different locations were all removed.
2. The `expected` type was renamed to `result`. This similarly was
relatively lightweight and mostly just a renaming on the surface. I
took this opportunity to rename `val::Result` to `val::ResultVal` and
`types::Result` to `types::ResultType` to avoid clashing with the
standard library types. The `Option`-based types were handled with
this as well.
3. The payload type of `variant` and `result` types are now optional.
This affected many locations that calculate flat type
representations, ABI information, etc. The `#[derive(ComponentType)]`
macro now specifically handles Rust-defined `enum` types which have
no payload to the equivalent in the component model.
4. Functions can now return multiple parameters. This changed the
signature of invoking component functions because the return value is
now bound by `ComponentNamedList` (renamed from `ComponentParams`).
This had a large effect in the tests, fuzz test case generation, etc.
5. Function types with 2-or-more parameters/results must uniquely name
all parameters/results. This mostly affected the text format used
throughout the tests.

I haven't added specifically new tests for multi-return but I changed a
number of tests to use it. Additionally I've updated the fuzzers to all
exercise multi-return as well so I think we should get some good
coverage with that.

* Update version numbers

* Use crates.io

show more ...

Add support for nested components (#4285)

* Add support for nested components

This commit is an implementation of a number of features of the
component model including:

* Defining nested comp

Add support for nested components (#4285)

* Add support for nested components

This commit is an implementation of a number of features of the
component model including:

* Defining nested components
* Outer aliases to components and modules
* Instantiating nested components

The implementation here is intended to be a foundational pillar of
Wasmtime's component model support since recursion and nested components
are the bread-and-butter of the component model. At a high level the
intention for the component model implementation in Wasmtime has long
been that the recursive nature of components is "erased" at compile time
to something that's more optimized and efficient to process. This commit
ended up exemplifying this quite well where the vast majority of the
internal changes here are in the "compilation" phase of a component
rather than the runtime instantiation phase. The support in the
`wasmtime` crate, the runtime instantiation support, only had minor
updates here while the internals of translation have seen heavy updates.

The `translate` module was greatly refactored here in this commit.
Previously it would, as a component is parsed, create a final
`Component` to hand off to trampoline compilation and get persisted at
runtime. Instead now it's a thin layer over `wasmparser` which simply
records a list of `LocalInitializer` entries for how to instantiate the
component and its index spaces are built. This internal representation
of the instantiation of a component is pretty close to the binary format
intentionally.

Instead of performing dataflow legwork the `translate` phase of a
component is now responsible for two primary tasks:

1. All components and modules are discovered within a component. They're
assigned `Static{Component,Module}Index` depending on where they're
found and a `{Module,}Translation` is prepared for each one. This
"flattens" the recursive structure of the binary into an indexed list
processable later.

2. The lexical scope of components is managed here to implement outer
module and component aliases. This is a significant design
implementation because when closing over an outer component or module
that item may actually be imported or something like the result of a
previous instantiation. This means that the capture of
modules and components is both a lexical concern as well as a runtime
concern. The handling of the "runtime" bits are handled in the next
phase of compilation.

The next and currently final phase of compilation is a new pass where
much of the historical code in `translate.rs` has been moved to (but
heavily refactored). The goal of compilation is to produce one "flat"
list of initializers for a component (as happens prior to this PR) and
to achieve this an "inliner" phase runs which runs through the
instantiation process at compile time to produce a list of initializers.
This `inline` module is the main addition as part of this PR and is now
the workhorse for dataflow analysis and tracking what's actually
referring to what.

During the `inline` phase the local initializers recorded in the
`translate` phase are processed, in sequence, to instantiate a
component. Definitions of items are tracked to correspond to their root
definition which allows seeing across instantiation argument boundaries
and such. Handling "upvars" for component outer aliases is handled in
the `inline` phase as well by creating state for a component whenever a
component is defined as was recorded during the `translate` phase.
Finally this phase is chiefly responsible for doing all string-based
name resolution at compile time that it can. This means that at runtime
no string maps will need to be consulted for item exports and such.
The final result of inlining is a list of "global initializers" which is
a flat list processed during instantiation time. These are almost
identical to the initializers that were processed prior to this PR.

There are certainly still more gaps of the component model to implement
but this should be a major leg up in terms of functionality that
Wasmtime implements. This commit, however leaves behind a "hole" which
is not intended to be filled in at this time, namely importing and
exporting components at the "root" level from and to the host. This is
tracked and explained in more detail as part of #4283.

cc #4185 as this completes a number of items there

* Tweak code to work on stable without warning

* Review comments

show more ...