|
Revision tags: dev, v36.0.9, v44.0.1, v43.0.2, v36.0.8, v24.0.8, v44.0.0, v43.0.1, v42.0.2, v36.0.7, v24.0.7, v43.0.0, v42.0.1, v41.0.4, v42.0.0, v40.0.4, v36.0.6, v24.0.6, v41.0.3 |
|
| #
c09aa380 |
| 03-Feb-2026 |
Joel Dice <[email protected]> |
deprecate `[Typed]Func::post_return[_async]` and make them no-ops (#12498)
* deprecate `[Typed]Func::post_return[_async]` and make them no-ops
With the advent of the Component Model concurrency ABI
deprecate `[Typed]Func::post_return[_async]` and make them no-ops (#12498)
* deprecate `[Typed]Func::post_return[_async]` and make them no-ops
With the advent of the Component Model concurrency ABI and it's `task.return` intrinsic, post-return functions have been informally deprecated and are expected to be removed for WASI 1.0 and the corresponding stable edition of the Component Model. Consequently, it does not make sense anymore to require embedders to explicitly call the post-return function after using `[Typed]Func::call[_async]`.
As of this commit, `[Typed]Func::post_return[_async]` are no-ops. Instead, the post-return function is called automatically as part of `[Typed]Func::call[_async]` if present, which is how `[Typed]Func::call_concurrent` has worked all along. In addition, this commit fixes and tests a couple of cases where the task and/or thread was being disposed of before the post-return function was called.
* address review feedback
* test post-return function in more scenarios
Specifically, I've split the `invoke_post_return` test into multiple tests:
- using `TypedFunc::call` - using `TypedFunc::call_async` with concurrency support enabled - using `TypedFunc::call_async` with concurrency support disabled - using `Func::call_async` with concurrency support disabled - using `TypedFunc::call_concurrent`
* remove GCC/clang-specific deprecation attribute
This broke the MSVC build.
* bless bindgen output
* remove obsolete post-return functions and fields
Now that post-return calls are handled internally without requiring explicit action by the embedder, we can avoid unnecessary bookkeeping.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v41.0.2, v41.0.1, v36.0.5, v40.0.3 |
|
| #
cc8d04f4 |
| 23-Jan-2026 |
Alex Crichton <[email protected]> |
Remove need for explicit `Config::async_support` knob (#12371)
* Refactor component model host function definitions
Push the `async`-ness down one layer.
* Remove need for explicit `Config::async
Remove need for explicit `Config::async_support` knob (#12371)
* Refactor component model host function definitions
Push the `async`-ness down one layer.
* Remove need for explicit `Config::async_support` knob
This commit is an attempt to step towards reconciling "old async" and "new async" in Wasmtime. The old async style is the original async support in Wasmtime with `call_async`, `func_wrap_async`, etc, where the main property is that the store is "locked" during an async operation. Put another way, a store can only execute at most one async operation at a time. This is in contrast to "new async" support in Wasmtime with the component-model-async (WASIp3) support, where stores can have more than one async operation in flight at once.
This commit does not fully reconcile these differences, but it does remove one hurdle along the way: `Config::async_support`. Since the beginning of Wasmtime this configuration knob has existed to explicitly demarcate a config/engine/store as "this thing requires `async` stuff internally." This has started to make less and less sense over time where the line between sync and async has become more murky with WASIp3 where the two worlds comingle. The goal of this commit is to deprecate `Config::async_support` and make the function not actually do anything.
In isolation this can't simply be done, however, because there are many load-bearing aspects of Wasmtime that rely on this `async_support` knob. For example once epochs + yielding are enabled it's required that all Wasm is executed on a fiber lest it hit an epoch and not know how to yield. That means that this commit is not a simple removal of `async_support` but instead a refactoring/rearchitecting of how async is used internally within Wasmtime. The high-level ideas within Wasmtime now are:
* A `Store` has a "requires async" boolean stored within it. * All configuration options which end up requiring async, such as yielding with epochs, turn this boolean on. * Creation of host functions which use async (e.g. `func_wrap_{async,concurrent}`) will also turn this option on. * Synchronous API entrypoints into Wasmtime ensure that this boolean is disabled. * Asynchronous APIs are usable at any time.
This means that the concept of an async store vs a sync store is now gone. All stores are equally capable of executing sync/async, and the change now is that dynamically some stores will require that async is used with certain configuration. Additionally all panicking conditions around `async_support` have been converted to errors instead. All relevant APIs already returned an error and things are murky enough now that it's not necessarily trivial to get this right at the embedder level. In the interest of avoiding panics all detected async mismatches are now first-class `wasmtime::Error` values.
The end result of this commit is that `Config::async_support` is a deprecated `#[doc(hidden)]` function that does nothing. While many internal changes happened as well as having new tests for all this sort of behavior this is not expected to have a great impact on external consumers. In general a deletion of `async_support(true)` is in theory all that's required. This is intended to make it easier to think about async/sync/etc in the future with WASIp3 and eventually reconcile `func_wrap_async` and `func_wrap_concurrent` for example. That's left for future refactorings however.
prtest:full
* Review comments
* Fix CI failures
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v41.0.0, v36.0.4, v39.0.2, v40.0.2 |
|
| #
94740588 |
| 09-Jan-2026 |
Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]> |
Migrate the Wasmtime CLI to `wasmtime::error` (#12295)
* Migrate wasmtime-cli to `wasmtime::error`
* migrate benches to `wasmtime::error` as well
* Remove new usage of anyhow that snuck in
|
|
Revision tags: v40.0.1, v40.0.0, v39.0.1, v39.0.0, v38.0.4, v37.0.3, v36.0.3, v24.0.5, v38.0.3, v38.0.2, v38.0.1, v37.0.2, v37.0.1, v37.0.0, v36.0.2, v36.0.1, v36.0.0, v35.0.0, v24.0.4, v33.0.2, v34.0.2 |
|
| #
804060c8 |
| 11-Jul-2025 |
Joel Dice <[email protected]> |
add Component Model async ABI tests (#11136)
* add Component Model async ABI tests
This pulls in the tests from the `wasip3-prototyping` repo, minus the ones requiring WASIp3 support in `wasmtime-w
add Component Model async ABI tests (#11136)
* add Component Model async ABI tests
This pulls in the tests from the `wasip3-prototyping` repo, minus the ones requiring WASIp3 support in `wasmtime-wasi[-http]`, which will be PR'd separately.
* add audits and exemptions for new `component-async-tests` deps
In order to convince `cargo vet` that we only needed these deps to be `safe-to-run` (not necessarily `safe-to-deploy`, since it's test code), I've moved the `wasm-compose` dep to the `dev-dependencies` section of the `Cargo.toml` file, which required rearranging some code.
I've exempted `wasm-compose` since it's a BA project, and also exempted all but one of the remaining new deps since they each get well over 10,000 downloads per day from crates.io. I've audited and certified the remaining dep, `im-rc`, which came in a bit shy of the 10,000-per-day mark.
Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <[email protected]>
* simplify `component_async_tests::util::sleep`
Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <[email protected]>
---------
Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <[email protected]>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v34.0.1, v33.0.1, v24.0.3, v32.0.1, v34.0.0, v33.0.0 |
|
| #
90ac295e |
| 19-May-2025 |
Alex Crichton <[email protected]> |
Update Wasmtime to the 2024 Rust Edition (#10806)
* Update Wasmtime to the 2024 Rust Edition
Now that our MSRV supports the 2024 edition it's possible to make this switch. This commit moves Wasmtim
Update Wasmtime to the 2024 Rust Edition (#10806)
* Update Wasmtime to the 2024 Rust Edition
Now that our MSRV supports the 2024 edition it's possible to make this switch. This commit moves Wasmtime to the 2024 Edition to keep up-to-date with Rust idioms and access many of the edition features exclusive to the 2024 edition.
prtest:full
* Reformat with the 2024 edition
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v32.0.0, v31.0.0, v30.0.2, v30.0.1, v30.0.0, v29.0.1, v29.0.0, v28.0.1, v28.0.0, v27.0.0, v26.0.1, v25.0.3, v24.0.2, v26.0.0, v21.0.2, v22.0.1, v23.0.3, v25.0.2, v24.0.1, v25.0.1, v25.0.0 |
|
| #
0ba29075 |
| 05-Sep-2024 |
Trevor Elliott <[email protected]> |
Use the CallHook::CallingHost and ReturningFromHost with components (#9196)
* Use the CallHook::CallingHost and ReturningFromHost with components
We never implemented calling the CallingHost and Re
Use the CallHook::CallingHost and ReturningFromHost with components (#9196)
* Use the CallHook::CallingHost and ReturningFromHost with components
We never implemented calling the CallingHost and ReturningFromHost hooks for component host calls.
co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
* Add tests
* Run hooks under `catch_unwind_and_longjmp`
* Cleanup the imports
* Remove todo
* Ensure that returning hooks are run
* Appease clippy
* Suggestions from code review
* Reuse infrastructure from the core-wasm call-hook test
* Remove redundant test
* Add a realloc test
* Switch the realloc test to handle returning a string
* Rework the realloc test to check that we're tracking host reallocs
* Use the call hook in the realloc host call
* Unnecessary pub mod
* Add a post-return test
* Remove unnecessary assertions
* Format
* Remove incorrect hook calls for realloc uses
---------
Co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
show more ...
|