|
Revision tags: dev, v36.0.9, v44.0.1, v43.0.2, v36.0.8, v24.0.8, v44.0.0, v43.0.1, v42.0.2, v36.0.7, v24.0.7, v43.0.0 |
|
| #
7a4f53a3 |
| 04-Mar-2026 |
Piotr Sikora <[email protected]> |
Fix build without `wat` feature. (#12706)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <[email protected]>
|
|
Revision tags: v42.0.1, v41.0.4, v42.0.0, v40.0.4, v36.0.6, v24.0.6, v41.0.3, v41.0.2, v41.0.1, v36.0.5, v40.0.3, v41.0.0, v36.0.4, v39.0.2, v40.0.2 |
|
| #
c3a6060b |
| 13-Jan-2026 |
Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]> |
Polyfill `ToWasmtimeResult` and add eventually-necessary call sites (#12308)
* Polyfill `ToWasmtimeResult` and add eventually-necessary call sites
This commit polyfills `wasmtime_internal_error::To
Polyfill `ToWasmtimeResult` and add eventually-necessary call sites (#12308)
* Polyfill `ToWasmtimeResult` and add eventually-necessary call sites
This commit polyfills `wasmtime_internal_error::ToWasmtimeResult` in `wasmtime_environ`, adds the cargo feature plumbing that will eventually connect to the `"wasmtime_internal_error/anyhow"` cargo feature but for now just configures this polyfill, and adds uses of the polyfill at all the sites that will be necessary once we swap out `anyhow` for `wasmtime_internal_error`. Currently, the polyfill is just an identity function, because `wasmtime::Result`/`wasmtime_environ::error::Result` is just another name for `anyhow::Result`. Once we do move away from `anyhow`, however, that will no longer be the case, and these uses will do the necessary conversion.
My goal with landing this as an incremental commit is to make it so that the actual commit that does the error crate swap out can be as close to _just_ the `Cargo.toml` dependency change, without any other code changes as much as possible. This, in turn, means that swap out should be super easy to revert, if necessary.
* Add a couple more `.to_wasmtime_result()` invocations in fuzz code
* Revert "Add a couple more `.to_wasmtime_result()` invocations in fuzz code"
This reverts commit b33696e5f63f7eed731ca9dad10fec5e55a550d3.
* Move cranelift fuzz targets back to anyhow
* Fix cargo feature enablement for explorer
show more ...
|
| #
ff33e949 |
| 09-Jan-2026 |
Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]> |
Do not re-export `anyhow!` in the `wasmtime::prelude` (#12298)
We are trying to move to `format_err!` instead.
|
|
Revision tags: v40.0.1, v40.0.0, v39.0.1, v39.0.0, v38.0.4, v37.0.3, v36.0.3, v24.0.5, v38.0.3 |
|
| #
e069bdd3 |
| 23-Oct-2025 |
Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]> |
`CodeBuilder` APIs for defining compile-time builtins (#11918)
* `CodeBuilder` APIs for defining compile-time builtins
Compile-time builtins, as described in [the RFC](https://github.com/bytecodeal
`CodeBuilder` APIs for defining compile-time builtins (#11918)
* `CodeBuilder` APIs for defining compile-time builtins
Compile-time builtins, as described in [the RFC](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/rfcs/blob/main/accepted/wasmtime-compile-time-builtins.md), are effectively the sum of three parts:
1. Function inlining 2. Unsafe intrinsics 3. Component composition
The first two have already been implemented in Wasmtime. This commit implements the final part, leveraging `wasm-compose` to link host-defined compile-time builtin components with guest-defined main components. It exposes Wasmtime's unsafe intrinsics only to the host-defined compile-time builtins, not the guest-defined main Wasm component.
Why `wasm-compose` and not `wac`? Because it is in the same repo as the rest of the `wasm-tools` crates, and therefore it is easy to depend on without bringing in duplicate copies of that family of crates into our workspace and builds. Also its programmatic API is somewhat easier to use, and is not spread across multiple crates.
* Fix unused lifetime in `cfg(not(feature = "compile-time-builtins"))`
* Fix an unused warning when `cfg(not(feature = "compile-time-builtins"))`
* Add cargo vet audit for `fixedbitset` version `0.4.2`
* Add cargo vet audit for `bitmaps` version 2.10.0
* Add cargo vet audit for `sized-chunks` diff `0.6.5 -> 0.7.0`
* Add/tweak cargo vet exemptions for some deps
These all have >10,000 daily downloads, and so are okay to exempt per our policy: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-coding-guidelines.html#policy-for-adding-cargo-vet-entries
* Add cargo vet audit for `wasm-compose` diff `0.236.0 -> 0.238.1`
Don't know why I have to do this certification even though we have a wildcard audit for this crate because it is authored by the Bytecode Alliance...
* Fix visibility of type
* Move compile-time builtins methods to module to cut down on `cfg`s
* Skip checking `heck` in `cargo deny`
Until https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-tools/pull/2359 is merged, released, and updated in this tree.
* Always read compile-time inputs
* Tighten up parse loop and level tracking
* as_deref instead of clone
* Remove 'b lifetime from CodeBuilder
* fix `cfg(not(feature = "compile-time-builtins"))` build
* Ignore tests that run wasm when in MIRI
show more ...
|