History log of /wasmtime-44.0.1/cranelift/codegen/src/result.rs (Results 1 – 16 of 16)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: dev, v36.0.9, v44.0.1, v43.0.2, v36.0.8, v24.0.8, v44.0.0, v43.0.1, v42.0.2, v36.0.7, v24.0.7
# 2f7dbd61 31-Mar-2026 Chris Fallin <[email protected]>

PCC: remove proof-carrying code (for now?). (#12800)

In late 2023, we built out an experimental feature called
Proof-Carrying Code (PCC), where we attached "facts" to values in the
CLIF IR and built

PCC: remove proof-carrying code (for now?). (#12800)

In late 2023, we built out an experimental feature called
Proof-Carrying Code (PCC), where we attached "facts" to values in the
CLIF IR and built verification of these facts after lowering to
machine instructions. We also added "memory types" describing layout
of memory and a "checked" flag on memory operations such that we could
verify that any checked memory operation accessed valid memory (as
defined by memory types attached to pointer values via
facts). Wasmtime's Cranelift backend then put appropriate memory types
and facts in its IR such that all accesses to memory (aspirationally)
could be checked, taking the whole mid-end and lowering backend of
Cranelift out of the trusted core that enforces SFI.

This basically worked, at the time, for static memories; but never for
dynamic memories, and then work on the feature lost
prioritization (aka I had to work on other things) and I wasn't able
to complete it and put it in fuzzing/enable it as a production option.

Unfortunately since then it has bit-rotted significantly -- as we add
new backend optimizations and instruction lowerings we haven't kept
the PCC framework up to date.

Inspired by the discussion in #12497 I think it's time to delete
it (hopefully just "for now"?) unless/until we can build it again. And
when we do that, we should probably get it to the point of validating
robust operation on all combinations of memory configurations before
merging. (That implies a big experiment branch rather than a bunch of
eager PRs in-tree, but so it goes.) I still believe it is possible to
build this (and I have ideas on how to do it!) but not right now.

show more ...


Revision tags: v43.0.0, v42.0.1, v41.0.4, v42.0.0, v40.0.4, v36.0.6, v24.0.6, v41.0.3, v41.0.2, v41.0.1, v36.0.5, v40.0.3, v41.0.0, v36.0.4, v39.0.2, v40.0.2, v40.0.1
# 0889323a 03-Jan-2026 SSD <[email protected]>

cranelift-codegen: rename most uses of std to core and alloc (#12237)

* rename most std uses to core and alloc

* cargo fmt


Revision tags: v40.0.0, v39.0.1, v39.0.0, v38.0.4, v37.0.3, v36.0.3, v24.0.5, v38.0.3, v38.0.2, v38.0.1, v37.0.2, v37.0.1, v37.0.0, v36.0.2, v36.0.1, v36.0.0, v35.0.0, v24.0.4, v33.0.2, v34.0.2, v34.0.1, v33.0.1, v24.0.3, v32.0.1, v34.0.0, v33.0.0, v32.0.0, v31.0.0, v30.0.2, v30.0.1, v30.0.0, v29.0.1, v29.0.0, v28.0.1, v28.0.0, v27.0.0, v26.0.1, v25.0.3, v24.0.2, v26.0.0, v21.0.2, v22.0.1, v23.0.3, v25.0.2, v24.0.1, v25.0.1, v25.0.0, v24.0.0, v23.0.2
# a0442ea0 05-Aug-2024 Hamir Mahal <[email protected]>

Enforce `uninlined_format_args` for the workspace (#9065)

* Enforce `uninlined_format_args` for the workspace

* fix: failing `Monolith Checks` job

* fix: formatting


Revision tags: v23.0.1, v23.0.0, v22.0.0, v21.0.1, v21.0.0, v20.0.2, v20.0.1, v20.0.0, v17.0.3, v19.0.2, v18.0.4, v19.0.1, v19.0.0
# acbbf342 15-Mar-2024 Chris Fallin <[email protected]>

PCC: fuzz static (no dynamic checks) case in Wasmtime fuzzers. (#8142)

* Update PCC test to expose failure.

* Reduce test coverage only to fully-static (bounds-check-elided) case.

* Configure PCC

PCC: fuzz static (no dynamic checks) case in Wasmtime fuzzers. (#8142)

* Update PCC test to expose failure.

* Reduce test coverage only to fully-static (bounds-check-elided) case.

* Configure PCC when fuzzing

* Ensure that we panic for pcc errors in the instantiate fuzz target

* Adjust Wasmtime configuration generation: PCC forces static memory configuration.

* Properly force memory config when fuzzing PCC.

---------

Co-authored-by: Trevor Elliott <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: v18.0.3, v18.0.2, v17.0.2, v18.0.1, v18.0.0, v17.0.1, v17.0.0, v16.0.0, v15.0.1, v15.0.0, v14.0.4, v14.0.3, v14.0.2, v13.0.1, v14.0.1, v14.0.0
# f466aa26 06-Oct-2023 Chris Fallin <[email protected]>

Skeleton and initial support for proof-carrying code. (#7165)

* WIP veriwasm 2.0

Co-Authored-By: Chris Fallin <[email protected]>

* PCC: successfully parse some simple facts.

Co-authored-by: Nic

Skeleton and initial support for proof-carrying code. (#7165)

* WIP veriwasm 2.0

Co-Authored-By: Chris Fallin <[email protected]>

* PCC: successfully parse some simple facts.

Co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]>

* PCC: plumb facts through VCode and add framework on LowerBackend to check them.

Co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]>

* PCC: code is carrying some proofs! Very simple test-case.

Co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]>

* PCC: add a `safe` flag for checked memory accesses.

* PCC: add pretty-printing of facts to CLIF output.

* PCC: misc. cleanups.

* PCC: lots of cleanup.

* Post-rebase fixups and some misc. fixes.

* Add serde traits to facts.

* PCC: add succeed and fail tests.

* Review feedback: rename `safe` memflag to `checked`.

* Review feedback.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald <[email protected]>

show more ...


Revision tags: minimum-viable-wasi-proxy-serve, v13.0.0, v12.0.2, v11.0.2, v10.0.2, v12.0.1, v12.0.0, v11.0.1, v11.0.0, v10.0.1, v10.0.0, v9.0.4, v9.0.3, v9.0.2, v9.0.1, v9.0.0, v6.0.2, v7.0.1, v8.0.1, v8.0.0, v7.0.0, v6.0.1, v5.0.1, v4.0.1, v6.0.0, v5.0.0, v4.0.0, v3.0.1, v3.0.0, v1.0.2, v2.0.2, v2.0.1, v2.0.0, v1.0.1, v1.0.0, v0.40.1, v0.40.0
# ff37c9d8 02-Aug-2022 Benjamin Bouvier <[email protected]>

[cranelift] Rejigger the `compile` API (#4540)

* Move `emit_to_memory` to `MachCompileResult`

This small refactoring makes it clearer to me that emitting to memory
doesn't require anything else

[cranelift] Rejigger the `compile` API (#4540)

* Move `emit_to_memory` to `MachCompileResult`

This small refactoring makes it clearer to me that emitting to memory
doesn't require anything else from the compilation `Context`. While it's
a trivial change, it's a small public API change that shouldn't cause
too much trouble, and doesn't seem RFC-worthy. Happy to hear different
opinions about this, though!

* hide the MachCompileResult behind a method

* Add a `CompileError` wrapper type that references a `Function`

* Rename MachCompileResult to CompiledCode

* Additionally remove the last unsafe API in cranelift-codegen

show more ...


Revision tags: v0.39.1, v0.38.3, v0.38.2, v0.39.0, v0.38.1, v0.38.0, v0.37.0, v0.36.0
# a0318f36 14-Apr-2022 Chris Fallin <[email protected]>

Switch Cranelift over to regalloc2. (#3989)

This PR switches Cranelift over to the new register allocator, regalloc2.

See [this document](https://gist.github.com/cfallin/08553421a91f150254fe878f6

Switch Cranelift over to regalloc2. (#3989)

This PR switches Cranelift over to the new register allocator, regalloc2.

See [this document](https://gist.github.com/cfallin/08553421a91f150254fe878f67301801)
for a summary of the design changes. This switchover has implications for
core VCode/MachInst types and the lowering pass.

Overall, this change brings improvements to both compile time and speed of
generated code (runtime), as reported in #3942:

```
Benchmark Compilation (wallclock) Execution (wallclock)
blake3-scalar 25% faster 28% faster
blake3-simd no diff no diff
meshoptimizer 19% faster 17% faster
pulldown-cmark 17% faster no diff
bz2 15% faster no diff
SpiderMonkey, 21% faster 2% faster
fib(30)
clang.wasm 42% faster N/A
```

show more ...


Revision tags: v0.35.3, v0.34.2, v0.35.2, v0.35.1, v0.35.0, v0.33.1, v0.34.1, v0.34.0, v0.33.0, v0.32.1, v0.32.0, v0.31.0, v0.30.0, v0.29.0, v0.28.0, v0.26.1, v0.27.0, v0.26.0
# 82f3ad4f 19-Mar-2021 bjorn3 <[email protected]>

Add comment why thiserror is not used


Revision tags: v0.25.0
# 03fdbadf 16-Mar-2021 bjorn3 <[email protected]>

Remove thiserror dependency from cranelift_codegen


Revision tags: v0.24.0, v0.23.0, v0.22.1, cranelift-v0.69.0, v0.22.0, v0.21.0, v0.20.0, v0.19.0
# a92a31d8 25-Jun-2020 Alex Crichton <[email protected]>

Rename the `master` branch to `main` (#1924)

* This PR is against a branch called `main`
* Internally all docs/CI/etc is updated
* The default branch of the repo is now `main`
* All active PRs ha

Rename the `master` branch to `main` (#1924)

* This PR is against a branch called `main`
* Internally all docs/CI/etc is updated
* The default branch of the repo is now `main`
* All active PRs have been updated to retarget `main`

Closes #1914

show more ...


Revision tags: v0.18.0, v0.17.0, v0.16.0
# 698dc9c4 28-Apr-2020 Benjamin Bouvier <[email protected]>

Fixes #1619: Properly bubble up errors when seeing an unexpected type during lowering.


# 2fb7e9f3 15-Apr-2020 Peter Huene <[email protected]>

Return error for register mapping failure.

This commit removes a panic when a register mapping fails and instead returns
an error from creating the unwind information.


Revision tags: v0.15.0, cranelift-v0.62.0, cranelift-v0.61.0, cranelift-v0.60.0
# 3179dcf6 05-Mar-2020 Alex Crichton <[email protected]>

Update Cranelift's documentation after the merger. (#1238)

Update the documentation for the merger, and also for various changes in
Cranelift. Remove some old obsolete documentation, and convert th

Update Cranelift's documentation after the merger. (#1238)

Update the documentation for the merger, and also for various changes in
Cranelift. Remove some old obsolete documentation, and convert the remaining
Sphinx files to Markdown. Some of the remaining content is still out of
date, but this is a step forward.

show more ...


Revision tags: v0.12.0, v0.11.0, v0.10.0, v0.9.0, v0.8.0, v0.6.0, v0.4.0
# 7e725cf8 30-Oct-2019 Josh Triplett <[email protected]>

Migrate from failure to thiserror

The failure crate invents its own traits that don't use
std::error::Error (because failure predates certain features added to
Error); this prevents using ? on an er

Migrate from failure to thiserror

The failure crate invents its own traits that don't use
std::error::Error (because failure predates certain features added to
Error); this prevents using ? on an error from failure in a function
using Error. The thiserror crate integrates with the standard Error
trait instead.

show more ...


# 9f506692 24-Oct-2019 Peter Huene <[email protected]>

Fix clippy warnings.

This commit fixes the current set of (stable) clippy warnings in the repo.


Revision tags: cranelift-v0.46.1, cranelift-v0.46.0, cranelift-v0.45.0, cranelift-v0.44.0, cranelift-v0.43.1, cranelift-v0.43.0, cranelift-v0.42.0, cranelift-v0.41.0, v0.3.0, v0.2.0, cranelift-v0.40.0, cranelift-v0.39.0, cranelift-v0.37.0, cranelift-v0.36.0, cranelift-v0.35.0, cranelift-v0.34.0, cranelift-v0.33.0, cranelift-v0.32.0, cranelift-v0.31.0
# 747ad3c4 28-Jan-2019 lazypassion <[email protected]>

moved crates in lib/ to src/, renamed crates, modified some files' text (#660)

moved crates in lib/ to src/, renamed crates, modified some files' text (#660)