|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
| #
d5d83663 |
| 10-Jun-2022 |
Joseph Huber <[email protected]> |
[Libomptarget] Add test config for compiling in LTO-mode
We are planning on making LTO the default compilation mode for
offloading. In order to make sure it works we should run these tests on
the te
[Libomptarget] Add test config for compiling in LTO-mode
We are planning on making LTO the default compilation mode for
offloading. In order to make sure it works we should run these tests on
the test suite. AMDGPU already uses the LTO compilation path for its
linking, but in LTO mode it also links the static library late.
Performing LTO requires the static library to be built, if we make the
change this will be a hard requirement and the old bitcode library will
go away. This means users will need to use either a two-step build or a
runtimes build for libomptarget.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127512
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2 |
|
| #
80787213 |
| 19-Apr-2022 |
Joseph Huber <[email protected]> |
[Libomptarget] Fix test using old unsupported lit string
Summary:
One test had an old "unsupported" string that used the old `newDriver`
string which was removed. This test should be updated to use
[Libomptarget] Fix test using old unsupported lit string
Summary:
One test had an old "unsupported" string that used the old `newDriver`
string which was removed. This test should be updated to use the
`oldDriver` one instead.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
| #
95eac472 |
| 29-Mar-2022 |
Ron Lieberman <[email protected]> |
[libomptarget] x86 offloading fails map_back_race.cpp intermittently
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122658
|
| #
b803f069 |
| 29-Mar-2022 |
Johannes Doerfert <[email protected]> |
[OpenMP] The test does not have check lines
|
| #
b309bdb9 |
| 29-Mar-2022 |
Johannes Doerfert <[email protected]> |
[OpenMP][FIX] Use clang++ for the C++ test case
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
b3161268 |
| 02-Mar-2022 |
Johannes Doerfert <[email protected]> |
[OpenMP][FIX] Avoid races in the handling of to be deleted mapping entries
If we decided to delete a mapping entry we did not act on it right away
but first issued and waited for memory copies. In t
[OpenMP][FIX] Avoid races in the handling of to be deleted mapping entries
If we decided to delete a mapping entry we did not act on it right away
but first issued and waited for memory copies. In the meantime some
other thread might reuse the entry. While there was some logic to avoid
colliding on the actual "deletion" part, there were two races happening:
1) The data transfer back of the thread deleting the entry and
the data transfer back of the thread taking over the entry raced.
2) The update to the shadow map happened regardless if the entry was
actually reused by another thread which left the shadow map in a
inconsistent state.
To fix both issues we will now update the shadow map and delete the
entry only if we are sure the thread is responsible for deletion, hence
no other thread took over the entry and reused it. We also wait for a
potential former data transfer from the device to finish before we issue
another one that would race with it.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54216
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121058
show more ...
|