|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
| #
d30c0221 |
| 17-Jun-2022 |
Jacques Pienaar <[email protected]> |
[mlir] Split MLProgram global load and store to Graph variants
* Split ops into X_graph variants as discussed;
* Remove tokens from non-Graph region variants and rely on side-effect
modelling ther
[mlir] Split MLProgram global load and store to Graph variants
* Split ops into X_graph variants as discussed;
* Remove tokens from non-Graph region variants and rely on side-effect
modelling there while removing side-effect modelling from Graph
variants and relying on explicit ordering there;
* Make tokens required to be produced by Graph variants - but kept
explicit token type specification given previous discussion on this
potentially being configurable in future;
This results in duplicating some code. I considered adding helper
functions but decided against adding an abstraction there early given
size of duplication and creating accidental coupling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127813
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5 |
|
| #
3bb79993 |
| 31-May-2022 |
Stella Laurenzo <[email protected]> |
[mlir] Add global_load and global_store ops to ml_program.
* Adds simple, non-atomic, non-volatile, non-synchronized direct load/store ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126230
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2 |
|
| #
2bb25285 |
| 23-Apr-2022 |
Stella Laurenzo <[email protected]> |
[mlir] Add GlobalOp, GlobalLoadConstOp to ml_program.
The approach I took was to define a dialect 'extern' attribute that a GlobalOp can take as a value to signify external linkage. I think this app
[mlir] Add GlobalOp, GlobalLoadConstOp to ml_program.
The approach I took was to define a dialect 'extern' attribute that a GlobalOp can take as a value to signify external linkage. I think this approach should compose well and should also work with wherever the OpaqueElements work goes in the future (since that is just another kind of attribute). I special cased the GlobalOp parser/printer for this case because it is significantly easier on the eyes.
In the discussion, Jeff Niu had proposed an alternative syntax for GlobalOp that I ended up not taking. I did try to implement it but a) I don't think it made anything easier to read in the common case, and b) it made the parsing/printing logic a lot more complicated (I think I would need a completely custom parser/printer to do it well). Please have a look at the common cases where the global type and initial value type match: I don't think how I have it is too bad. The less common cases seem ok to me.
I chose to only implement the direct, constant load op since that is non side effecting and there was still discussion pending on that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124318
show more ...
|
| #
61352a58 |
| 14-Apr-2022 |
Stella Laurenzo <[email protected]> |
[mlir] Introduce ml_program dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120203
|