History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/Transforms/OpenMP/parallel_level_fold.ll (Results 1 – 10 of 10)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4
# e92891f8 11-Mar-2022 Johannes Doerfert <[email protected]>

[Attributor] Allow not to default initialize AAs for live internal functions

Outside users of the Attributor, e.g., OpenMP-opt, want to seed AAs
themselves. We should not seed all default AAs one an

[Attributor] Allow not to default initialize AAs for live internal functions

Outside users of the Attributor, e.g., OpenMP-opt, want to seed AAs
themselves. We should not seed all default AAs one an internal function
becomes live. That said, there should be a callback such that they can
do lazy seeding as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121489

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 05392466 24-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB

Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bi

Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB

Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.

This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.

The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.

Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451

show more ...


# 569346f2 06-Oct-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Revert "Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB"

This reverts commit 8d64314ffea55f2ad94c1b489586daa8ce30f451.


# 8d64314f 24-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB

Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bi

Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB

Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.

This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.

The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.

Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451

show more ...


# 72cf8b60 06-Oct-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Revert "[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB"

This reverts commit df84c1fe78130a86445d57563dea742e1b85156a.

Breaks some bots


# df84c1fe 24-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB

Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are

[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB

Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.

This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.

The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.

Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4
# 423d34f7 22-Sep-2021 Shilei Tian <[email protected]>

[OpenMP][Offloading] Change `bool IsSPMD` to `int8_t Mode` in `__kmpc_target_init` and `__kmpc_target_deinit`

This is a follow-up of D110029, which uses bitset to indicate execution mode. This patch

[OpenMP][Offloading] Change `bool IsSPMD` to `int8_t Mode` in `__kmpc_target_init` and `__kmpc_target_deinit`

This is a follow-up of D110029, which uses bitset to indicate execution mode. This patches makes the changes in the function call.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110279

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2
# 564d85e0 26-Aug-2021 Roman Lebedev <[email protected]>

The maximal representable alignment in LLVM IR is 1GiB, not 512MiB

In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide
But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`,
which is `3

The maximal representable alignment in LLVM IR is 1GiB, not 512MiB

In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide
But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`,
which is `30`, not `29`. And indeed, alignment of `1073741824`
roundtrips IR serialization-deserialization.

While this doesn't seem all that important, this doubles
the maximal supported alignment from 512MiB to 1GiB,
and there's actually one noticeable use-case for that;
On X86, the huge pages can have sizes of 2MiB and 1GiB (!).

So while this doesn't add support for truly huge alignments,
which i think we can easily-ish do if wanted, i think this adds
zero-cost support for a not-trivially-dismissable case.

I don't believe we need any upgrade infrastructure,
and since we don't explicitly record the IR version,
we don't need to bump one either.

As @craig.topper speculates in D108661#2963519,
this might be an artificial limit imposed by the original implementation
of the `getAlignment()` functions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108661

show more ...


# 64009188 10-Aug-2021 Joseph Huber <[email protected]>

[OpenMP] AlwaysInline __kmpc_parallel_51 to improve inlining hueristics

This patch adds the `AlwaysInline` attribute to the `__kmpc_parallel_51`
device runtime call. This improves inlining heuristic

[OpenMP] AlwaysInline __kmpc_parallel_51 to improve inlining hueristics

This patch adds the `AlwaysInline` attribute to the `__kmpc_parallel_51`
device runtime call. This improves inlining heuristics which encourages
the indirect function pointer arguemnt to also be inlined. This greatly
improves performance for a few applications whose outlined regions were
not inlined otherwise.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107839

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init
# e97e0a4f 27-Jul-2021 Shilei Tian <[email protected]>

[AbstractAttributor] Fold __kmpc_parallel_level if possible

Similar to D105787, this patch tries to fold `__kmpc_parallel_level` if possible.
Note that `__kmpc_parallel_level` doesn't take activenes

[AbstractAttributor] Fold __kmpc_parallel_level if possible

Similar to D105787, this patch tries to fold `__kmpc_parallel_level` if possible.
Note that `__kmpc_parallel_level` doesn't take activeness into consideration,
based on current `deviceRTLs`, its return value can be such as 0, 1, 2, instead
of 0, 129, 130, etc. that also indicate activeness.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106154

show more ...