|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
e92891f8 |
| 11-Mar-2022 |
Johannes Doerfert <[email protected]> |
[Attributor] Allow not to default initialize AAs for live internal functions
Outside users of the Attributor, e.g., OpenMP-opt, want to seed AAs themselves. We should not seed all default AAs one an
[Attributor] Allow not to default initialize AAs for live internal functions
Outside users of the Attributor, e.g., OpenMP-opt, want to seed AAs themselves. We should not seed all default AAs one an internal function becomes live. That said, there should be a callback such that they can do lazy seeding as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121489
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
05392466 |
| 24-Sep-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661. Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bi
Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661. Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits. We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
show more ...
|
| #
569346f2 |
| 06-Oct-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Revert "Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB"
This reverts commit 8d64314ffea55f2ad94c1b489586daa8ce30f451.
|
| #
8d64314f |
| 24-Sep-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661. Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bi
Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661. Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits. We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
show more ...
|
| #
72cf8b60 |
| 06-Oct-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Revert "[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB"
This reverts commit df84c1fe78130a86445d57563dea742e1b85156a.
Breaks some bots
|
| #
df84c1fe |
| 24-Sep-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661. Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are
[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661. Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits. We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
423d34f7 |
| 22-Sep-2021 |
Shilei Tian <[email protected]> |
[OpenMP][Offloading] Change `bool IsSPMD` to `int8_t Mode` in `__kmpc_target_init` and `__kmpc_target_deinit`
This is a follow-up of D110029, which uses bitset to indicate execution mode. This patch
[OpenMP][Offloading] Change `bool IsSPMD` to `int8_t Mode` in `__kmpc_target_init` and `__kmpc_target_deinit`
This is a follow-up of D110029, which uses bitset to indicate execution mode. This patches makes the changes in the function call.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110279
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
564d85e0 |
| 26-Aug-2021 |
Roman Lebedev <[email protected]> |
The maximal representable alignment in LLVM IR is 1GiB, not 512MiB
In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`, which is `3
The maximal representable alignment in LLVM IR is 1GiB, not 512MiB
In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`, which is `30`, not `29`. And indeed, alignment of `1073741824` roundtrips IR serialization-deserialization.
While this doesn't seem all that important, this doubles the maximal supported alignment from 512MiB to 1GiB, and there's actually one noticeable use-case for that; On X86, the huge pages can have sizes of 2MiB and 1GiB (!).
So while this doesn't add support for truly huge alignments, which i think we can easily-ish do if wanted, i think this adds zero-cost support for a not-trivially-dismissable case.
I don't believe we need any upgrade infrastructure, and since we don't explicitly record the IR version, we don't need to bump one either.
As @craig.topper speculates in D108661#2963519, this might be an artificial limit imposed by the original implementation of the `getAlignment()` functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108661
show more ...
|
| #
64009188 |
| 10-Aug-2021 |
Joseph Huber <[email protected]> |
[OpenMP] AlwaysInline __kmpc_parallel_51 to improve inlining hueristics
This patch adds the `AlwaysInline` attribute to the `__kmpc_parallel_51` device runtime call. This improves inlining heuristic
[OpenMP] AlwaysInline __kmpc_parallel_51 to improve inlining hueristics
This patch adds the `AlwaysInline` attribute to the `__kmpc_parallel_51` device runtime call. This improves inlining heuristics which encourages the indirect function pointer arguemnt to also be inlined. This greatly improves performance for a few applications whose outlined regions were not inlined otherwise.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107839
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init |
|
| #
e97e0a4f |
| 27-Jul-2021 |
Shilei Tian <[email protected]> |
[AbstractAttributor] Fold __kmpc_parallel_level if possible
Similar to D105787, this patch tries to fold `__kmpc_parallel_level` if possible. Note that `__kmpc_parallel_level` doesn't take activenes
[AbstractAttributor] Fold __kmpc_parallel_level if possible
Similar to D105787, this patch tries to fold `__kmpc_parallel_level` if possible. Note that `__kmpc_parallel_level` doesn't take activeness into consideration, based on current `deviceRTLs`, its return value can be such as 0, 1, 2, instead of 0, 129, 130, etc. that also indicate activeness.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106154
show more ...
|