Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init
# 9df0b254 23-Jul-2022 Nuno Lopes <[email protected]>

[NFC] Switch a few uses of undef to poison as placeholders for unreachable code


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5
# 997ecb00 01-Jun-2022 David Sherwood <[email protected]>

[LoopVectorize] Add FastMathFlags to the select used for reductions with tail-folding

Based on reviewer comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D126692 I've
added FastMathFlags to the select instructio

[LoopVectorize] Add FastMathFlags to the select used for reductions with tail-folding

Based on reviewer comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D126692 I've
added FastMathFlags to the select instruction used when tail-folding
with reductions. These flags can then be used by InstCombine to
decide upon the most optimal floating point identity value for
fadd/fsub. Doing so unlocks further optimisations, such as folding
selects into masked loads.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126778

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2
# a266af72 14-Feb-2022 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[InstCombine] Canonicalize SPF to min/max intrinsics

Now that integer min/max intrinsics have good support in both
InstCombine and other passes, start canonicalizing SPF min/max
to intrinsic min/max

[InstCombine] Canonicalize SPF to min/max intrinsics

Now that integer min/max intrinsics have good support in both
InstCombine and other passes, start canonicalizing SPF min/max
to intrinsic min/max.

Once this sticks, we can stop matching SPF min/max in various
places, and can remove hacks we have for preventing infinite loops
and breaking of SPF canonicalization.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98152

show more ...


# 4517488e 10-Feb-2022 Simon Pilgrim <[email protected]>

[LoopVectorize] Regenerate reduction-predselect.ll test checks


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4
# 80aa7e14 28-Jun-2021 Florian Hahn <[email protected]>

[VPlan] Merge predicated-triangle regions, after sinking.

Sinking scalar operands into predicated-triangle regions may allow
merging regions. This patch adds a VPlan-to-VPlan transform that tries
to

[VPlan] Merge predicated-triangle regions, after sinking.

Sinking scalar operands into predicated-triangle regions may allow
merging regions. This patch adds a VPlan-to-VPlan transform that tries
to merge predicate-triangle regions after sinking.

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100260

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2
# 79b1b4a5 12-Feb-2021 Sanjay Patel <[email protected]>

[Vectorizers][TTI] remove option to bypass creation of vector reduction intrinsics

The vector reduction intrinsics started life as experimental ops, so backend support
was lacking. As part of promot

[Vectorizers][TTI] remove option to bypass creation of vector reduction intrinsics

The vector reduction intrinsics started life as experimental ops, so backend support
was lacking. As part of promoting them to 1st-class intrinsics, however, codegen
support was added/improved:
D58015
D90247

So I think it is safe to now remove this complication from IR.

Note that we still have an IR-level codegen expansion pass for these as discussed
in D95690. Removing that is another step in simplifying the logic. Also note that
x86 was already unconditionally forming reductions in IR, so there should be no
difference for x86.

I spot checked a couple of the tests here by running them through opt+llc and did
not see any asm diffs.

If we do find functional differences for other targets, it should be possible
to (at least temporarily) restore the shuffle IR with the ExpandReductions IR
pass.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96552

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1
# 20b386aa 29-Oct-2020 Nikita Popov <[email protected]>

[LoopUtils] Fix neutral value for vector.reduce.fadd

Use -0.0 instead of 0.0 as the start value. The previous use of 0.0
was fine for all existing uses of this function though, as it is
always gener

[LoopUtils] Fix neutral value for vector.reduce.fadd

Use -0.0 instead of 0.0 as the start value. The previous use of 0.0
was fine for all existing uses of this function though, as it is
always generated with fast flags right now, and thus nsz.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6
# 322d0afd 03-Oct-2020 Amara Emerson <[email protected]>

[llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be first class intrinsics.

This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.

The autoupgrader will handle lega

[llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be first class intrinsics.

This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.

The autoupgrader will handle legacy intrinsics.

Relevant ML thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88787

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3
# bda8fbe2 26-Aug-2020 Sjoerd Meijer <[email protected]>

[LV] Fallback strategies if tail-folding fails

This implements 2 different vectorisation fallback strategies if tail-folding
fails: 1) don't vectorise at all, or 2) vectorise using a scalar epilogue

[LV] Fallback strategies if tail-folding fails

This implements 2 different vectorisation fallback strategies if tail-folding
fails: 1) don't vectorise at all, or 2) vectorise using a scalar epilogue. This
can be controlled with option -prefer-predicate-over-epilogue, that has been
changed to take a numeric value corresponding to the tail-folding preference
and preferred fallback.

Patch by: Pierre van Houtryve, Sjoerd Meijer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79783

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2
# 816097e4 20-Aug-2020 David Green <[email protected]>

[LV] Allow tail folded reduction selects to remain in the loop

The normal scheme for tail folding reductions is to use:

loop:
p = phi(0, a)
mask = ...
x = masked_load(..., mask)
a = add(x,

[LV] Allow tail folded reduction selects to remain in the loop

The normal scheme for tail folding reductions is to use:

loop:
p = phi(0, a)
mask = ...
x = masked_load(..., mask)
a = add(x, p)
s = select(mask, a, p)

This means we need to keep the register p and a alive out of the loop, plus
the mask. On a target with predicated operations we can instead generate
the phi as p = phi(0, s). This ensures the select in the loop and we can
fold select(m, add(a, b), c) to something like a vaddt c, a, b using the
m predicate. This in turn allows us to tail predicate the entire loop.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84741

show more ...


# b8088ada 18-Aug-2020 David Green <[email protected]>

[LV] Predicated reduction tests. NFC