|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
b604fcb7 |
| 31-Aug-2021 |
Philip Reames <[email protected]> |
[runtime] Move prolog/epilog block to a post-simplify strategy
The runtime unroller will try to produce a non-loop if the unroll count is 2 and thus the prolog/epilog loop would only run at most one
[runtime] Move prolog/epilog block to a post-simplify strategy
The runtime unroller will try to produce a non-loop if the unroll count is 2 and thus the prolog/epilog loop would only run at most one iteration. The old implementation did this by avoiding loop construction entirely. This patches instead constructs the trivial loop and then explicitly breaks the backedge and simplifies. This does result in some additional code churn when triggered, but a) results in better quality code and b) removes a codepath which didn't work properly for multiple exit epilogs.
One oddity that I want to draw to reviewer attention is that this somehow changes revisit order. The new order looks equivalent to me, but I don't understand how creating and erasing an extra loop here creates this effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108521
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
a95796a3 |
| 26-Jun-2020 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
[NewPM][LoopUnroll] Rename unroll* to loop-unroll*
The legacy pass is called "loop-unroll", but in the new PM it's called "unroll". Also applied to unroll-and-jam and unroll-full.
Fixes various che
[NewPM][LoopUnroll] Rename unroll* to loop-unroll*
The legacy pass is called "loop-unroll", but in the new PM it's called "unroll". Also applied to unroll-and-jam and unroll-full.
Fixes various check-llvm tests when NPM is turned on.
Reviewed By: Whitney, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82590
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
1251cac6 |
| 19-Jun-2019 |
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion
Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized lo
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion
Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized loop is stepped through 4 times and each step through the loop seemed to show a different path. I found two problems here:
A) An incorrect line number on a preheader block (for.body.preheader) instruction causes a step into the loop before it begins. B) Instructions in the middle block have different line numbers which give the impression of another iteration.
In this patch I give all of the middle block instructions the line number of the scalar loop latch terminator branch. This seems to provide the smoothest debugging experience because the vectorized loops will always end on this line before dropping into the scalar loop. To solve problem A I have altered llvm::SplitBlockPredecessors to accommodate loop header blocks.
I have set up a separate review D61933 for a fix which is required for this patch.
Reviewers: samsonov, vsk, aprantl, probinson, anemet, hfinkel, jmorse
Reviewed By: hfinkel, jmorse
Subscribers: jmorse, javed.absar, eraman, kcc, bjope, jmellorcrummey, hfinkel, gbedwell, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60831
> llvm-svn: 363046
llvm-svn: 363786
show more ...
|
| #
a9471563 |
| 12-Jun-2019 |
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <[email protected]> |
Revert "[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion"
This reverts commit 1a0f7a2077b70c9864faa476e15b048686cf1ca7. See phabricator thread f
Revert "[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion"
This reverts commit 1a0f7a2077b70c9864faa476e15b048686cf1ca7. See phabricator thread for D60831.
llvm-svn: 363132
show more ...
|
| #
1a0f7a20 |
| 11-Jun-2019 |
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion
Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized lo
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion
Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized loop is stepped through 4 times and each step through the loop seemed to show a different path. I found two problems here:
A) An incorrect line number on a preheader block (for.body.preheader) instruction causes a step into the loop before it begins. B) Instructions in the middle block have different line numbers which give the impression of another iteration.
In this patch I give all of the middle block instructions the line number of the scalar loop latch terminator branch. This seems to provide the smoothest debugging experience because the vectorized loops will always end on this line before dropping into the scalar loop. To solve problem A I have altered llvm::SplitBlockPredecessors to accommodate loop header blocks.
I have set up a separate review D61933 for a fix which is required for this patch.
Reviewers: samsonov, vsk, aprantl, probinson, anemet, hfinkel, jmorse
Reviewed By: hfinkel, jmorse
Subscribers: jmorse, javed.absar, eraman, kcc, bjope, jmellorcrummey, hfinkel, gbedwell, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60831
llvm-svn: 363046
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
b9c57683 |
| 07-May-2019 |
Kostya Serebryany <[email protected]> |
revert r360162 as it breaks most of the buildbots
llvm-svn: 360190
|
| #
78a6062c |
| 07-May-2019 |
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion
Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized lo
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion
Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized loop is stepped through 4 times and each step through the loop seemed to show a different path. I found two problems here:
A) An incorrect line number on a preheader block (for.body.preheader) instruction causes a step into the loop before it begins. B) Instructions in the middle block have different line numbers which give the impression of another iteration.
In this patch I give all of the middle block instructions the line number of the scalar loop latch terminator branch. This seems to provide the smoothest debugging experience because the vectorized loops will always end on this line before dropping into the scalar loop. To solve problem A I have altered llvm::SplitBlockPredecessors to accommodate loop header blocks.
Reviewers: samsonov, vsk, aprantl, probinson, anemet, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: bjope, jmellorcrummey, hfinkel, gbedwell, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60831
llvm-svn: 360162
show more ...
|
| #
cee313d2 |
| 17-Apr-2019 |
Eric Christopher <[email protected]> |
Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.
Will be re-reverting again.
llvm-svn: 358552
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
2c864551 |
| 09-May-2018 |
Shiva Chen <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label nam
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly. We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block. The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out. The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend. Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
8af1e1cb |
| 26-Dec-2017 |
Zhaoshi Zheng <[email protected]> |
[Unroll][DebugInfo] Propagate loop body's debug location to epilog preheader
NewExit and epilog PreHeader should has the same debug loc as the original loop body, instead of original loop exit.
llv
[Unroll][DebugInfo] Propagate loop body's debug location to epilog preheader
NewExit and epilog PreHeader should has the same debug loc as the original loop body, instead of original loop exit.
llvm-svn: 321465
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
ecd90131 |
| 02-Aug-2017 |
Teresa Johnson <[email protected]> |
[PM] Split LoopUnrollPass and make partial unroller a function pass
Summary: This is largely NFC*, in preparation for utilizing ProfileSummaryInfo and BranchFrequencyInfo analyses. In this patch I a
[PM] Split LoopUnrollPass and make partial unroller a function pass
Summary: This is largely NFC*, in preparation for utilizing ProfileSummaryInfo and BranchFrequencyInfo analyses. In this patch I am only doing the splitting for the New PM, but I can do the same for the legacy PM as a follow-on if this looks good.
*Not NFC since for partial unrolling we lose the updates done to the loop traversal (adding new sibling and child loops) - according to Chandler this is not very useful for partial unrolling, but it also means that the debugging flag -unroll-revisit-child-loops no longer works for partial unrolling.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36157
llvm-svn: 309886
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
ce40fa13 |
| 25-Jan-2017 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
[PM] Teach LoopUnroll to update the LPM infrastructure as it unrolls loops.
We do this by reconstructing the newly added loops after the unroll completes to avoid threading pass manager details thro
[PM] Teach LoopUnroll to update the LPM infrastructure as it unrolls loops.
We do this by reconstructing the newly added loops after the unroll completes to avoid threading pass manager details through all the mess of the unrolling infrastructure.
I've enabled some extra assertions in the LPM to try and catch issues here and enabled a bunch of unroller tests to try and make sure this is sane.
Currently, I'm manually running loop-simplify when needed. That should go away once it is folded into the LPM infrastructure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28848
llvm-svn: 293011
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2 |
|
| #
b2738e41 |
| 02-Aug-2016 |
Michael Zolotukhin <[email protected]> |
[LoopUnroll] Switch the default value of -unroll-runtime-epilog back to its original value.
As agreed in post-commit review of r265388, I'm switching the flag to its original value until the 90% run
[LoopUnroll] Switch the default value of -unroll-runtime-epilog back to its original value.
As agreed in post-commit review of r265388, I'm switching the flag to its original value until the 90% runtime performance regression on SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Bubblesort is addressed.
llvm-svn: 277524
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1 |
|
| #
23ce61b6 |
| 27-Apr-2016 |
Evgeny Stupachenko <[email protected]> |
The patch fixes PR27392. Summary: It is incorrect to compare TripCount (which is BECount + 1) with extraiters (or Count) to check if we should enter unrolled loop or not, because TripCount can p
The patch fixes PR27392. Summary: It is incorrect to compare TripCount (which is BECount + 1) with extraiters (or Count) to check if we should enter unrolled loop or not, because TripCount can potentially overflow (when BECount is max unsigned integer). While comparing BECount with (Count - 1) is overflow safe and therefore correct.
Reviewer: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19256
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <[email protected]> llvm-svn: 267662
show more ...
|
| #
75819aed |
| 15-Apr-2016 |
Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> |
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICom
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation ----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034 <rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
show more ...
|
| #
ea04026c |
| 05-Apr-2016 |
Davide Italiano <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Fix tests so that each subprogram belongs to a CU.
llvm-svn: 265490
|
| #
188de5ae |
| 05-Apr-2016 |
David L Kreitzer <[email protected]> |
Adds the ability to use an epilog remainder loop during loop unrolling and makes this the default behavior.
Patch by Evgeny Stupachenko ([email protected]).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.l
Adds the ability to use an epilog remainder loop during loop unrolling and makes this the default behavior.
Patch by Evgeny Stupachenko ([email protected]).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18158
llvm-svn: 265388
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1 |
|
| #
d4bff303 |
| 05-Nov-2015 |
Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]> |
DI: Reverse direction of subprogram -> function edge.
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for
DI: Reverse direction of subprogram -> function edge.
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap() to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
show more ...
|
| #
814b8e91 |
| 28-Aug-2015 |
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <[email protected]> |
DI: Require subprogram definitions to be distinct
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions (`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler check, a veri
DI: Require subprogram definitions to be distinct
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions (`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.
While working on the testcases, I realized that test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct', precludes that possibility.
I updated almost all the IR with the following script:
git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' | grep -v test/Bitcode | xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'
Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 246327
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1 |
|
| #
770f65ca |
| 11-Jun-2015 |
Alexey Samsonov <[email protected]> |
Set proper debug location for branch added in BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock().
This improves debug locations in passes that do a lot of basic block transformations. Important case is LoopUnroll pass,
Set proper debug location for branch added in BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock().
This improves debug locations in passes that do a lot of basic block transformations. Important case is LoopUnroll pass, the test for correct debug locations accompanies this change.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: dblaikie, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10367
llvm-svn: 239551
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1 |
|
| #
a79ac14f |
| 27-Feb-2015 |
David Blaikie <[email protected]> |
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput import sys import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
show more ...
|
| #
79e6c749 |
| 27-Feb-2015 |
David Blaikie <[email protected]> |
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers, replacing them with a
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers, replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.
This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is still available to the instructions.
* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be handled separately)
* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the in-memory representation will be in separate changes.
* geps of vectors are transformed as: getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ... ->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ... Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look like: getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.
* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type: getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x ->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x Then, eventually: getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x
Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.
update.py: import fileinput import sys import re
ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))") normrep = re.compile( r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
def conv(match, line): if not match: return line line = match.groups()[0] if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0: line += match.groups()[2] line += match.groups()[3] line += ", " line += match.groups()[1] line += "\n" return line
for line in sys.stdin: if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"): if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("): line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line) elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("): line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line) sys.stdout.write(line)
apply.sh: for name in "$@" do python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name" rm -f "$name.tmp" done
The actual commands: From llvm/src: find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh From llvm/src/tools/clang: find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}" From llvm/src/tools/polly: find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld, compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).
The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed sufficient to ignore those cases.
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636
llvm-svn: 230786
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4 |
|
| #
11b279a8 |
| 18-Feb-2015 |
Sanjoy Das <[email protected]> |
Partial fix for bug 22589
Don't spend the entire iteration space in the scalar loop prologue if computing the trip count overflows. This change also gets rid of the backedge check in the prologue l
Partial fix for bug 22589
Don't spend the entire iteration space in the scalar loop prologue if computing the trip count overflows. This change also gets rid of the backedge check in the prologue loop and the extra check for overflowing trip-count.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7715
llvm-svn: 229731
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc1 |
|
| #
0dcae714 |
| 20-Nov-2014 |
Michael Zolotukhin <[email protected]> |
Fix a trip-count overflow issue in LoopUnroll.
Currently LoopUnroll generates a prologue loop before the main loop body to execute first N%UnrollFactor iterations. Also, this loop is used if trip-co
Fix a trip-count overflow issue in LoopUnroll.
Currently LoopUnroll generates a prologue loop before the main loop body to execute first N%UnrollFactor iterations. Also, this loop is used if trip-count can overflow - it's determined by a runtime check.
However, we've been mistakenly optimizing this loop to a linear code for UnrollFactor = 2, not taking into account that it also serves as a safe version of the loop if its trip-count overflows.
llvm-svn: 222451
show more ...
|
| #
fc02e3c3 |
| 29-Sep-2014 |
Kevin Qin <[email protected]> |
Use a loop to simplify the runtime unrolling prologue.
Runtime unrolling will create a prologue to execute the extra iterations which is can't divided by the unroll factor. It generates an if-then-e
Use a loop to simplify the runtime unrolling prologue.
Runtime unrolling will create a prologue to execute the extra iterations which is can't divided by the unroll factor. It generates an if-then-else sequence to jump into a factor -1 times unrolled loop body, like
extraiters = tripcount % loopfactor if (extraiters == 0) jump Loop: if (extraiters == loopfactor) jump L1 if (extraiters == loopfactor-1) jump L2 ... L1: LoopBody; L2: LoopBody; ... if tripcount < loopfactor jump End Loop: ... End:
It means if the unroll factor is 4, the loop body will be 7 times unrolled, 3 are in loop prologue, and 4 are in the loop. This commit is to use a loop to execute the extra iterations in prologue, like
extraiters = tripcount % loopfactor if (extraiters == 0) jump Loop: else jump Prol Prol: LoopBody; extraiters -= 1 // Omitted if unroll factor is 2. if (extraiters != 0) jump Prol: // Omitted if unroll factor is 2. if (tripcount < loopfactor) jump End Loop: ... End:
Then when unroll factor is 4, the loop body will be copied by only 5 times, 1 in the prologue loop, 4 in the original loop. And if the unroll factor is 2, new loop won't be created, just as the original solution.
llvm-svn: 218604
show more ...
|