|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
61fc10d6 |
| 14-Sep-2020 |
Mircea Trofin <[email protected]> |
[ThinLTO] add post-thinlto-merge option to -lto-embed-bitcode
This will embed bitcode after (Thin)LTO merge, but before optimizations.
In the case the thinlto backend is called from clang, the .llvm
[ThinLTO] add post-thinlto-merge option to -lto-embed-bitcode
This will embed bitcode after (Thin)LTO merge, but before optimizations.
In the case the thinlto backend is called from clang, the .llvmcmd
section is also produced. Doing so in the case where the caller is the
linker doesn't yet have a motivation, and would require plumbing through
command line args.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87636
show more ...
|
| #
9a2bab5e |
| 10-Sep-2020 |
Mircea Trofin <[email protected]> |
[ThinLTO] Make -lto-embed-bitcode an enum
The current behavior of -lto-embed-bitcode is not quite the same as that
of -fembed-bitcode. While both populate .llvmbc with bitcode, the latter
populates
[ThinLTO] Make -lto-embed-bitcode an enum
The current behavior of -lto-embed-bitcode is not quite the same as that
of -fembed-bitcode. While both populate .llvmbc with bitcode, the latter
populates it with pre-optimized bitcode(*), while the former with
post-optimized. The scenarios driving them are different - the latter's
goal is to allow re-compilation, while the former, IIUC, is execution.
I plan to add a third mode for thinlto cases, closely-related to
-fembed-bitcode's scenario: adding the bitcode pre-optimization, but
post-merging. This would allow re-compilation without requiring the
other .bc files that were merged (akin to how -fembed-bitcode allows
recompilation without all the .h files)
The third mode can't co-exist with the current -lto-embed-bitcode mode,
because the latter would overwrite it. For clarity, we change
-lto-embed-bitcode to be an enum.
(*) That's the compiler semantics. The driver splits compilation in 2
phases, so if -fembed-bitcode is given to the driver, the .llvmbc is
optimized bitcode; if the option is passed to the compiler (after -cc1),
the section is pre-optimized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87477
show more ...
|
| #
82d07497 |
| 25-Aug-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[TargetLoweringObjectFileImpl] Make .llvmbc and .llvmcmd non-SHF_ALLOC
There are two ways .llvmbc can be produced:
* clang -c -fembed-bitcode=all (which also produces .llvmcmd)
* LTO backend: ld.ll
[TargetLoweringObjectFileImpl] Make .llvmbc and .llvmcmd non-SHF_ALLOC
There are two ways .llvmbc can be produced:
* clang -c -fembed-bitcode=all (which also produces .llvmcmd)
* LTO backend: ld.lld -mllvm -lto-embed-bitcode or -plugin-opt=-lto-embed-bitcode
.llvmbc and .llvmcmd have the SHF_ALLOC flag, so they can be dropped by
--gc-sections.
This patch sets SectionKind::Metadata to drop the SHF_ALLOC flag. This
is conceptually correct: the two sections are not part of the process
image, so SHF_ALLOC is not appropriate.
`test/LTO/X86/embed-bitcode.ll`: changed `llvm-objcopy -O binary --only-section` to
`llvm-objcopy --dump-section`. `-O binary` does not dump non-SHF_ALLOC sections.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86374
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init |
|
| #
c8e0bb3b |
| 12-Dec-2019 |
Teresa Johnson <[email protected]> |
[LTO] Support for embedding bitcode section during LTO
Summary:
This adds support for embedding bitcode in a binary during LTO. The libLTO gains supports the `-lto-embed-bitcode` flag. The option al
[LTO] Support for embedding bitcode section during LTO
Summary:
This adds support for embedding bitcode in a binary during LTO. The libLTO gains supports the `-lto-embed-bitcode` flag. The option allows users of the LTO library to embed a bitcode section. For example, LLD can pass the option via `ld.lld -mllvm=-lto-embed-bitcode`.
This feature allows doing something comparable to `clang -c -fembed-bitcode`, but on the (LTO) linker level. Having bitcode alongside native code has many use-cases. To give an example, the MacOS linker can create a `-bitcode_bundle` section containing bitcode. Also, having this feature built into LLVM is an alternative to 3rd party tools such as [[ https://github.com/travitch/whole-program-llvm | wllvm ]] or [[ https://github.com/SRI-CSL/gllvm | gllvm ]]. As with these tools, this feature simplifies creating "whole-program" llvm bitcode files, but in contrast to wllvm/gllvm it does not rely on a specific llvm frontend/driver.
Patch by Josef Eisl <[email protected]>
Reviewers: #llvm, #clang, rsmith, pcc, alexshap, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, aheejin, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, #llvm, #clang
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68213
show more ...
|