History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/FileCheck/numeric-expression.txt (Results 1 – 25 of 31)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3
# fd941036 28-Aug-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

Fix PR46880: Fail CHECK-NOT with undefined variable

Currently a CHECK-NOT directive succeeds whenever the corresponding
match fails. However match can fail due to an error rather than a lack
of matc

Fix PR46880: Fail CHECK-NOT with undefined variable

Currently a CHECK-NOT directive succeeds whenever the corresponding
match fails. However match can fail due to an error rather than a lack
of match, for instance if a variable is undefined. This commit makes match
error a failure for CHECK-NOT.

Reviewed By: jdenny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86222

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# f9e2a62c 11-Jun-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Add support for hex alternate form in FileCheck

Add printf-style alternate form flag to prefix hex number with 0x when
present. This works on both empty numeric expression (e.g. variable

[FileCheck] Add support for hex alternate form in FileCheck

Add printf-style alternate form flag to prefix hex number with 0x when
present. This works on both empty numeric expression (e.g. variable
definition from input) and when matching a numeric expression. The
syntax is as follows:

[[#%#<precision specifier><format specifier>, ...]

where <precision specifier> and <format specifier> are optional and ...
can be a variable definition or not with an empty expression or not.

This feature was requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D81144#2075532
for llvm/test/MC/ELF/gen-dwarf64.s

Reviewed By: jdenny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97845

show more ...


# 09c35739 15-Dec-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Do not skip end of line in diagnostics

When commit da108b4ed4e6e7267701e76d5fd3b87609c9ab77 introduced
the CHECK-NEXT directive, it added logic to skip to the next line when
printing a d

[FileCheck] Do not skip end of line in diagnostics

When commit da108b4ed4e6e7267701e76d5fd3b87609c9ab77 introduced
the CHECK-NEXT directive, it added logic to skip to the next line when
printing a diagnostic if the current matching position is at the end of
a line. This was fine while FileCheck did not support regular expression
but since it does now it can be confusing when the pattern to match
starts with the expectation of a newline (e.g. CHECK-NEXT: {{\n}}foo).
It is also inconsistent with the column information in the diagnostic
which does point to the end of line.

This commit removes this logic altogether, such that failure to match
diagnostic for such cases would show the end of line and be consistent
with the column information. The commit also adapts all existing
testcases accordingly.

Note to reviewers: An alternative approach would be to restrict the code
to only skip to the next line if the first character of the pattern is
known not to match a whitespace-like character. This would respect the
original intent but keep the inconsistency in terms of column info and
requires more code. I've only chosen this current approach by laziness
and would be happy to restrict the logic instead.

Reviewed By: jdenny, jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93341

show more ...


# c0cea2d9 20-Aug-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[Test][FileCheck] Fix use of undef var

The test related to directives with prefix NUMEXPR-CONSTRAINT-NOMATCH
refers to the numeric variable UNSI which is defined by a directive with
prefix CHECK not

[Test][FileCheck] Fix use of undef var

The test related to directives with prefix NUMEXPR-CONSTRAINT-NOMATCH
refers to the numeric variable UNSI which is defined by a directive with
prefix CHECK not enabled on the lit command-line. Rather than adding the
prefix CHECK to the lit command-line, this commit defined variable UNSI
in a new NUMEXPR-CONSTRAINT-NOMATCH prefixed directive. The directive
needs to contain more than just the variable otherwise the error message
from FileCheck is about the wrong line being matched.

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93346

show more ...


# 998709b7 11-Jun-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Add precision to format specifier

Add printf-style precision specifier to pad numbers to a given number of
digits when matching them if the value is smaller than the given
precision. Thi

[FileCheck] Add precision to format specifier

Add printf-style precision specifier to pad numbers to a given number of
digits when matching them if the value is smaller than the given
precision. This works on both empty numeric expression (e.g. variable
definition from input) and when matching a numeric expression. The
syntax is as follows:

[[#%.<precision><format specifier>, ...]

where <format specifier> is optional and ... can be a variable
definition or not with an empty expression or not. In the absence of a
precision specifier, a variable definition will accept leading zeros.

Reviewed By: jhenderson, grimar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81667

show more ...


# 4b1b09fc 10-Jun-2020 Joel E. Denny <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Add missing %ProtectFileCheckOutput to FileCheck tests

This is a continuation of D65121 (committed at f471eb8e99b5).


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init
# 47934c7c 17-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

FileCheck [11/12]: Add matching constraint specification

This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support for specifying the
ma

FileCheck [11/12]: Add matching constraint specification

This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support for specifying the
matching constraint for a numeric expression, ie. how the value being
matched should relate to the numeric expression.

This commit only adds the equality constraint where the numeric value
matched must be equal to the numeric expression. It is the default
matching constraint used when not specified. It is added to provision
other matching constraint (e.g. inequality relations).

Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60391

show more ...


# 8fd22703 14-May-2020 Paul Walker <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Add function call support to numerical expressions.

This patch extends numerical expressions to allow calls to
predefined functions. These calls can be combined with the
existing numeric

[FileCheck] Add function call support to numerical expressions.

This patch extends numerical expressions to allow calls to
predefined functions. These calls can be combined with the
existing numerical operators, which includes nesting calls.

The call syntax is:

<func>(<args>)

Where <func> is a predefined string literal, currently limited to
one of add, max, min and sub. <arg> is a comma seperated list of
numerical expressions.

Subscribers: arichardson, hiraditya, thopre, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79936

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4
# 23ac16cf 05-Mar-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

FileCheck [10/12]: Add support for signed numeric values

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support signed numer

FileCheck [10/12]: Add support for signed numeric values

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support signed numeric
values, thus allowing negative numeric values.

As such, the patch adds a new class to represent a signed or unsigned
value and add the logic for type promotion and type conversion in
numeric expression mixing signed and unsigned values. It also adds
the %d format specifier to represent signed value.

Finally, it also adds underflow and overflow detection when performing a
binary operation.

Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson

Reviewed By: jhenderson, arichardson

Subscribers: MaskRay, hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60390

show more ...


# 3be5e53f 27-May-2020 Alex Richardson <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Allow parenthesized expressions

With this change it is be possible to write FileCheck expressions such
as [[#(VAR+1)-2]]. Currently, the only supported arithmetic operators are
plus and

[FileCheck] Allow parenthesized expressions

With this change it is be possible to write FileCheck expressions such
as [[#(VAR+1)-2]]. Currently, the only supported arithmetic operators are
plus and minus, so this is not particularly useful yet. However, it our
CHERI fork we have tests that benefit from having multiplication in
FileCheck expressions. Allowing parenthesized expressions is the simplest
way for us to work around the current lack of operator precedence in
FileCheck expressions.

Reviewed By: thopre, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77383

show more ...


# 0c2c6fce 12-May-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[test] Improve FileCheck's numeric-expression.txt

Summary:
Various improvement for FileCheck's numeric-expression.txt test:
- remove unused values in USE DEF FMT IMPL MATCH section
- replace 14 lite

[test] Improve FileCheck's numeric-expression.txt

Summary:
Various improvement for FileCheck's numeric-expression.txt test:
- remove unused values in USE DEF FMT IMPL MATCH section
- replace 14 literal for 0xe and 0xE to have example of hex literals
- rename variable to be more self-descriptive
- move CHECK as comment of the values being matched to help readability
- add conversion tests
- simplify test for use of several numeric variables by using existing
variable
- adjust position of error message check to match the alignment of the
error message wrt. the output matched by the previous check

Reviewed By: jhenderson, jdenny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79820

show more ...


# 9743123a 04-Apr-2020 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Better diagnostic for format conflict

Summary:
Improve error message in case of conflict between several implicit
format to mention the operand that conflict.

Reviewers: jhenderson, jde

[FileCheck] Better diagnostic for format conflict

Summary:
Improve error message in case of conflict between several implicit
format to mention the operand that conflict.

Reviewers: jhenderson, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Reviewed By: jdenny

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77741

show more ...


# 8f8c4950 31-Mar-2020 Joel E. Denny <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Add missing %ProtectFileCheckOutput to FileCheck tests

I'm committing this fixup without review because it's an obvious
continuation of D65121 (committed at f471eb8e99b5).


# 8e96697c 05-Mar-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

FileCheck [9/12]: Add support for matching formats

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support for selecting a
ma

FileCheck [9/12]: Add support for matching formats

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support for selecting a
matching format to match a numeric value against (ie. decimal, hex lower
case letters or hex upper case letters).

This commit allows to select what format a numeric value should be
matched against. The following formats are supported: decimal value,
lower case hex value and upper case hex value. Matching formats impact
both the format of numeric value to be matched as well as the format of
accepted numbers in a definition with empty numeric expression
constraint.

Default for absence of format is decimal value unless the numeric
expression constraint is non null and use a variable in which case the
format is the one used to define that variable. Conclict of format in
case of several variable being used is diagnosed and forces the user to
select a matching format explicitely.

This commit also enables immediates in numeric expressions to be in any
radix known to StringRef's GetAsInteger method, except for legacy
numeric expressions (ie [[@LINE+<offset>]] which only support decimal
immediates.

Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson

Reviewed By: jhenderson, arichardson

Subscribers: daltenty, MaskRay, hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60389

show more ...


# f471eb8e 20-Nov-2019 Joel E. Denny <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Make FILECHECK_OPTS useful for its test suite

Without this patch, `FILECHECK_OPTS` isn't propagated to FileCheck's
test suite so that `FILECHECK_OPTS` doesn't inadvertently affect test
r

[FileCheck] Make FILECHECK_OPTS useful for its test suite

Without this patch, `FILECHECK_OPTS` isn't propagated to FileCheck's
test suite so that `FILECHECK_OPTS` doesn't inadvertently affect test
results by affecting the output of FileCheck calls under test. As a
result, `FILECHECK_OPTS` is useless for debugging FileCheck's test
suite.

In `llvm/test/FileCheck/lit.local.cfg`, this patch provides a new
subsitution, `%ProtectFileCheckOutput`, to address this problem for
both `FILECHECK_OPTS` and the deprecated
`FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE`. The rest of the patch uses
`%ProtectFileCheckOutput` throughout the test suite

Fixes PR40284.

Reviewed By: probinson, thopre

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65121

show more ...


# a291b950 02-Sep-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Forbid using var defined on same line

Summary:
Commit r366897 introduced the possibility to set a variable from an
expression, such as [[#VAR2:VAR1+3]]. While introducing this feature, i

[FileCheck] Forbid using var defined on same line

Summary:
Commit r366897 introduced the possibility to set a variable from an
expression, such as [[#VAR2:VAR1+3]]. While introducing this feature, it
introduced extra logic to allow using such a variable on the same line
later on. Unfortunately that extra logic is flawed as it relies on a
mapping from variable to expression defining it when the mapping is from
variable definition to expression. This flaw causes among other issues
PR42896.

This commit avoids the problem by forbidding all use of a variable
defined on the same line, and removes the now useless logic. Redesign
will be done in a later commit because it will require some amount of
refactoring first for the solution to be clean. One example is the need
for some sort of transaction mechanism to set a variable temporarily and
from an expression and rollback if the CHECK pattern does not match so
that diagnostics show the right variable values.

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66141

llvm-svn: 370663

show more ...


# a83dfd92 24-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck]] Canonicalize caret location testing

Summary:
Testing of caret location in diagnostic message is currently made with
CHECK directive with the following general format:
CHECK: {{^

[FileCheck]] Canonicalize caret location testing

Summary:
Testing of caret location in diagnostic message is currently made with
CHECK directive with the following general format:
CHECK: {{^ \^$}}

James Henderson suggested the following would be more readable:
CHECK: {{^}} ^{{$}}

and when whole lines can be matched (as is the case for command-line
testing where error messages do not include path):
CHECK: ^
using the option --match-full-lines.

This commit implements these 2 changes on all existing caret position
tests. It also aligns the caret to the character it is trying to match
in the above line.

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64923

> llvm-svn: 366861

llvm-svn: 366898

show more ...


# 4cd9b853 24-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

FileCheck [8/12]: Define numeric var from expr

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch lift the restriction for a
numeric

FileCheck [8/12]: Define numeric var from expr

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch lift the restriction for a
numeric expression to either be a variable definition or a numeric
expression to try to match.

This commit allows a numeric variable to be set to the result of the
evaluation of a numeric expression after it has been matched
successfully. When it happens, the variable is allowed to be used on
the same line since its value is known at match time.

It also makes use of this possibility to reuse the parsing code to
parse a command-line definition by crafting a mirror string of the
-D option with the equal sign replaced by a colon sign, e.g. for option
'-D#NUMVAL=10' it creates the string
'-D#NUMVAL=10 (parsed as [[#NUMVAL:10]])' where the numeric expression
is parsed to define NUMVAL. This result in a few tests needing updating
for the location diagnostics on top of the tests for the new feature.

It also enables empty numeric expression which match any number without
defining a variable. This is done here rather than in commit #5 of the
patch series because it requires to dissociate automatic regex insertion
in RegExStr from variable definition which would make commit #5 even
bigger than it already is.

Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, tra, rnk, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60388

> llvm-svn: 366860

llvm-svn: 366897

show more ...


# 5ecb8802 24-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

Revert "FileCheck [8/12]: Define numeric var from expr"

This reverts commit 1b05977538d9487aa845ee2f3bec8b89c63c4f29.

llvm-svn: 366872


# 75299de1 24-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

Revert "[FileCheck]] Canonicalize caret location testing"

This reverts commit ba4e8d791342219c072a5c8de8a3f41fbb53c6be.

llvm-svn: 366871


# ba4e8d79 23-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck]] Canonicalize caret location testing

Summary:
Testing of caret location in diagnostic message is currently made with
CHECK directive with the following general format:
CHECK: {{^

[FileCheck]] Canonicalize caret location testing

Summary:
Testing of caret location in diagnostic message is currently made with
CHECK directive with the following general format:
CHECK: {{^ \^$}}

James Henderson suggested the following would be more readable:
CHECK: {{^}} ^{{$}}

and when whole lines can be matched (as is the case for command-line
testing where error messages do not include path):
CHECK: ^
using the option --match-full-lines.

This commit implements these 2 changes on all existing caret position
tests. It also aligns the caret to the character it is trying to match
in the above line.

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64923

llvm-svn: 366861

show more ...


# 1b059775 23-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

FileCheck [8/12]: Define numeric var from expr

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch lift the restriction for a
numeric

FileCheck [8/12]: Define numeric var from expr

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch lift the restriction for a
numeric expression to either be a variable definition or a numeric
expression to try to match.

This commit allows a numeric variable to be set to the result of the
evaluation of a numeric expression after it has been matched
successfully. When it happens, the variable is allowed to be used on
the same line since its value is known at match time.

It also makes use of this possibility to reuse the parsing code to
parse a command-line definition by crafting a mirror string of the
-D option with the equal sign replaced by a colon sign, e.g. for option
'-D#NUMVAL=10' it creates the string
'-D#NUMVAL=10 (parsed as [[#NUMVAL:10]])' where the numeric expression
is parsed to define NUMVAL. This result in a few tests needing updating
for the location diagnostics on top of the tests for the new feature.

It also enables empty numeric expression which match any number without
defining a variable. This is done here rather than in commit #5 of the
patch series because it requires to dissociate automatic regex insertion
in RegExStr from variable definition which would make commit #5 even
bigger than it already is.

Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, tra, rnk, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60388

llvm-svn: 366860

show more ...


# 70494494 18-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Fix numeric variable redefinition

Summary:
Commit r365249 changed usage of FileCheckNumericVariable to have one
instance of that class per variable as opposed to one instance per
definit

[FileCheck] Fix numeric variable redefinition

Summary:
Commit r365249 changed usage of FileCheckNumericVariable to have one
instance of that class per variable as opposed to one instance per
definition of a given variable as was done before. However, it retained
the safety check in setValue that it should only be called with the
variable unset, even after r365625.

However this causes assert failure when a non-pseudo variable is being
redefined. And while redefinition of @LINE at each CHECK line work in
the general case, it caused problem when a substitution failed (fixed in
r365624) and still causes problem when a CHECK line does not match since
@LINE's value is cleared after substitutions in match() happened but
printSubstitutions also attempts a substitution.

This commit solves the root of the problem by changing setValue to set a
new value regardless of whether a value was set or not, thus fixing all
the aforementioned issues.

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, tra, rnk, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64882

llvm-svn: 366434

show more ...


# 2a7f5204 13-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

FileCheck [7/12]: Arbitrary long numeric expressions

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch extend numeric expression to

FileCheck [7/12]: Arbitrary long numeric expressions

Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch extend numeric expression to
support an arbitrary number of operands, either variable or literals.

Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, tra, rnk, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60387

llvm-svn: 366001

show more ...


# fe7ac170 05-Jul-2019 Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]>

[FileCheck] Don't diagnose undef vars at parse time

Summary:
Diagnosing use of undefined variables takes place in
parseNumericVariableUse() and printSubstitutions() for numeric variables
but only ta

[FileCheck] Don't diagnose undef vars at parse time

Summary:
Diagnosing use of undefined variables takes place in
parseNumericVariableUse() and printSubstitutions() for numeric variables
but only takes place in printSubstitutions() for string variables. The
reason for the split location of diagnostics is that parsing is not
aware of the clearing of variables due to --enable-var-scope and thus
use of variables cleared in this way can only be catched by
printSubstitutions().

Beyond the code level inconsistency, there is also a user facing
inconsistency since diagnostics look different between the two
functions. While the diagnostic in printSubstitutions is more verbose,
doing the diagnostic there allows to diagnose all undefined variables
rather than just the first one and error out.

This patch create dummy variable definition when encountering a use of
undefined variable so that parsing can proceed and be diagnosed by
printSubstitutions() later. Tests that were testing whether parsing
fails in such case are thus modified accordingly.

Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk

Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64228

llvm-svn: 365219

show more ...


12