[X86] Migrate tests to use opaque pointers (NFC)

Test updates were performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only the test updates where the test pas

[X86] Migrate tests to use opaque pointers (NFC)

Test updates were performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only the test updates where the test passed without
further modification (which is almost all of them, as the backend
is largely pointer-type agnostic).

show more ...

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction

Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction

Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794

show more ...

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction

One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction

One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.

This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.

* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
handled separately)

* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
in-memory representation will be in separate changes.

* geps of vectors are transformed as:
getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
like:
getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.

* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
Then, eventually:
getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x

Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.

update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re

ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile( r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")

def conv(match, line):
if not match:
return line
line = match.groups()[0]
if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
line += match.groups()[2]
line += match.groups()[3]
line += ", "
line += match.groups()[1]
line += "\n"
return line

for line in sys.stdin:
if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
sys.stdout.write(line)

apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
rm -f "$name.tmp"
done

The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh

After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).

The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636

llvm-svn: 230786

show more ...

Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap

(The change was landed in r230280 and caused the regression PR22674.
This version contains a fix and a test-case for PR2267

Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap

(The change was landed in r230280 and caused the regression PR22674.
This version contains a fix and a test-case for PR22674).

When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.

This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.

Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic)
manifestation of the bug can be seen in
Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778

llvm-svn: 230533

show more ...

Revert r230280: "Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap"

This caused PR22674, failing this assert:

Instructions.h:2281: llvm::Value* llvm::PHINode::getOperand(unsign

Revert r230280: "Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap"

This caused PR22674, failing this assert:

Instructions.h:2281: llvm::Value* llvm::PHINode::getOperand(unsigned int) const: Assertion `i_nocapture < OperandTraits<PHINode>::operands(this) && "getOperand() out of range!"' failed.

llvm-svn: 230341

show more ...

Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap

When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SC

Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap

When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.

This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.

Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic) manifestation
of the bug can be seen in Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.

NOTE: this change was landed with an incorrect commit message in
rL230275 and was reverted for that reason in rL230279. This commit
message is the correct one.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778

llvm-svn: 230280

show more ...

Revert 230275.

230275 got committed with an incorrect commit message due to a mixup
on my side. Will re-land in a few moments with the correct commit
message.

llvm-svn: 230279

Fix bug 22641

The bug was a result of getPreStartForExtend interpreting nsw/nuw
flags on an add recurrence more strongly than is legal. {S,+,X}<nsw>
implies S+X is nsw only if the backedge of the l

Fix bug 22641

The bug was a result of getPreStartForExtend interpreting nsw/nuw
flags on an add recurrence more strongly than is legal. {S,+,X}<nsw>
implies S+X is nsw only if the backedge of the loop is taken at least
once.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7808

llvm-svn: 230275

show more ...

Fix PR22179.

We were incorrectly inferring nsw for certain SCEVs. We can be more
aggressive here (see Richard Smith's comment on
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22179) but this change just
focu

Fix PR22179.

We were incorrectly inferring nsw for certain SCEVs. We can be more
aggressive here (see Richard Smith's comment on
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22179) but this change just
focuses on correctness.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6914

llvm-svn: 225591

show more ...

[LSR] Canonicalize reg1 + ... + regN into reg1 + ... + 1*regN.

This commit introduces a canonical representation for the formulae.
Basically, as soon as a formula has more that one base register, th

[LSR] Canonicalize reg1 + ... + regN into reg1 + ... + 1*regN.

This commit introduces a canonical representation for the formulae.
Basically, as soon as a formula has more that one base register, the scaled
register field is used for one of them. The register put into the scaled
register is preferably a loop variant.
The commit refactors how the formulae are built in order to produce such
representation.
This yields a more accurate, but still perfectible, cost model.

<rdar://problem/16731508>

llvm-svn: 209230

show more ...

[X86] Implement TargetLowering::getScalingFactorCost hook.
Scaling factors are not free on X86 because every "complex" addressing mode
breaks the related instruction into 2 allocations instead of 1.

[X86] Implement TargetLowering::getScalingFactorCost hook.
Scaling factors are not free on X86 because every "complex" addressing mode
breaks the related instruction into 2 allocations instead of 1.

<rdar://problem/16730541>

llvm-svn: 207301

show more ...