|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5 |
|
| #
2d43955c |
| 25-May-2022 |
Scott Linder <[email protected]> |
[AMDGPU][NFC] Refactor AMDGPUCallingConv.td
Rename CalleeSavedRegs defs to avoid being overly specific:
* CSR_AMDGPU_AGPRs_32_255 => CSR_AMDGPU_AGPRs * CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs_30_31 + CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs_32_
[AMDGPU][NFC] Refactor AMDGPUCallingConv.td
Rename CalleeSavedRegs defs to avoid being overly specific:
* CSR_AMDGPU_AGPRs_32_255 => CSR_AMDGPU_AGPRs * CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs_30_31 + CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs_32_105 => CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs * CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_SGPRs_4_29 + CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_SGPRs_64_105 => CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_SGPRs * CSR_AMDGPU_HighRegs => CSR_AMDGPU * CSR_AMDGPU_HighRegs_With_AGPRs => CSR_AMDGPU_GFX90AInsts * CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_With_AGPRs => CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_GFX90AInsts
Introduce a class RegMask to mark the cases where we use the CalleeSavedRegs class purely as an expedient way to produce a mask. Update the names of these masks to not mention "CSR". Other targets also seem to do this, so a reasonable alternative is to actually update table-gen to include a new class to do this explicitly, but the current approach seems harmless so I opted to just make it more explicit.
Reviewed By: arsenm, sebastian-ne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109008
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
eebe841a |
| 26-Sep-2018 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
RegAlloc: Allow targets to split register allocation
AMDGPU normally spills SGPRs to VGPRs. Previously, since all register classes are handled at the same time, this was problematic. We don't know a
RegAlloc: Allow targets to split register allocation
AMDGPU normally spills SGPRs to VGPRs. Previously, since all register classes are handled at the same time, this was problematic. We don't know ahead of time how many registers will be needed to be reserved to handle the spilling. If no VGPRs were left for spilling, we would have to try to spill to memory. If the spilled SGPRs were required for exec mask manipulation, it is highly problematic because the lanes active at the point of spill are not necessarily the same as at the restore point.
Avoid this problem by fully allocating SGPRs in a separate regalloc run from VGPRs. This way we know the exact number of VGPRs needed, and can reserve them for a second run. This fixes the most serious issues, but it is still possible using inline asm to make all VGPRs unavailable. Start erroring in the case where we ever would require memory for an SGPR spill.
This is implemented by giving each regalloc pass a callback which reports if a register class should be handled or not. A few passes need some small changes to deal with leftover virtual registers.
In the AMDGPU implementation, a new pass is introduced to take the place of PrologEpilogInserter for SGPR spills emitted during the first run.
One disadvantage of this is currently StackSlotColoring is no longer used for SGPR spills. It would need to be run again, which will require more work.
Error if the standard -regalloc option is used. Introduce new separate -sgpr-regalloc and -vgpr-regalloc flags, so the two runs can be controlled individually. PBQB is not currently supported, so this also prevents using the unhandled allocator.
show more ...
|
| #
fae05692 |
| 20-May-2021 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
CodeGen: Print/parse LLTs in MachineMemOperands
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I converted
CodeGen: Print/parse LLTs in MachineMemOperands
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a type.
show more ...
|
| #
3bffb1cd |
| 09-Feb-2021 |
Stanislav Mekhanoshin <[email protected]> |
[AMDGPU] Use single cache policy operand
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope the amoun
[AMDGPU] Use single cache policy operand
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
show more ...
|
| #
a8d9d507 |
| 17-Feb-2021 |
Stanislav Mekhanoshin <[email protected]> |
[AMDGPU] gfx90a support
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96906
|
| #
5ab17021 |
| 10-Nov-2020 |
Stanislav Mekhanoshin <[email protected]> |
[AMDGPU] Remove scratch rsrc from spill pseudos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91110
|
| #
60b1967c |
| 21-Jan-2020 |
Scott Linder <[email protected]> |
[AMDGPU] Add Scratch Wave Offset to Scratch Buffer Descriptor in entry functions
Add the scratch wave offset to the scratch buffer descriptor (SRSrc) in the entry function prologue. This allows us t
[AMDGPU] Add Scratch Wave Offset to Scratch Buffer Descriptor in entry functions
Add the scratch wave offset to the scratch buffer descriptor (SRSrc) in the entry function prologue. This allows us to removes the scratch wave offset register from the calling convention ABI.
As part of this change, allow the use of an inline constant zero for the SOffset of MUBUF instructions accessing the stack in entry functions when a frame pointer is not requested/required. Entry functions with calls still need to set up the calling convention ABI stack pointer register, and reference it in order to address arguments of called functions. The ABI stack pointer register remains unswizzled, but is now wave-relative instead of queue-relative.
Non-entry functions also use an inline constant zero SOffset for wave-relative scratch access, but continue to use the stack and frame pointers as before. When the stack or frame pointer is converted to a swizzled offset it is now scaled directly, as the scratch wave offset no longer needs to be subtracted first.
Update llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst to reflect these changes to the calling convention.
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75138
show more ...
|
| #
40c08052 |
| 01-Jul-2019 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
AMDGPU: Correct properties for adjcallstack* pseudos
These should be SALU writes, and these are lowered to instructions that def SCC.
llvm-svn: 364859
|
| #
5d6ee76c |
| 17-Jun-2019 |
Sander de Smalen <[email protected]> |
Describe stack-id as an enum
This patch changes MIR stack-id from an integer to an enum, and adds printing/parsing support for this in MIR files. The default stack-id '0' is now renamed to 'default'
Describe stack-id as an enum
This patch changes MIR stack-id from an integer to an enum, and adds printing/parsing support for this in MIR files. The default stack-id '0' is now renamed to 'default'.
This should make MIR tests that have stack objects with different stack-ids more descriptive. It also clarifies code operating on StackID.
Reviewers: arsenm, thegameg, qcolombet
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60137
llvm-svn: 363533
show more ...
|
| #
b812b7a4 |
| 05-Jun-2019 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
AMDGPU: Invert frame index offset interpretation
Since the beginning, the offset of a frame index has been consistently interpreted backwards. It was treating it as an offset from the scratch wave o
AMDGPU: Invert frame index offset interpretation
Since the beginning, the offset of a frame index has been consistently interpreted backwards. It was treating it as an offset from the scratch wave offset register as a frame register. The correct interpretation is the offset from the SP on entry to the function, before the prolog. Frame index elimination then should select either SP or another register as an FP.
Treat the scratch wave offset on kernel entry as the pre-incremented SP. Rely more heavily on the standard hasFP and frame pointer elimination logic, and clean up the private reservation code. This saves a copy in most callee functions.
The kernel prolog emission code is still kind of a mess relying on checking the uses of physical registers, which I would prefer to eliminate.
Currently selection directly emits MUBUF instructions, which require using a reference to some register. Use the register chosen for SP, and then ignore this later. This should probably be cleaned up to use pseudos that don't refer to any specific base register until frame index elimination.
Add a workaround for shaders using large numbers of SGPRs. I'm not sure these cases were ever working correctly, since as far as I can tell the logic for figuring out which SGPR is the scratch wave offset doesn't match up with the shader input initialization in the shader programming guide.
llvm-svn: 362661
show more ...
|
| #
a6322941 |
| 30-Apr-2019 |
Stanislav Mekhanoshin <[email protected]> |
[AMDGPU] gfx1010 VMEM and SMEM implementation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61330
llvm-svn: 359621
|
| #
bc6d07ca |
| 14-Mar-2019 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
MIR: Allow targets to serialize MachineFunctionInfo
This has been a very painful missing feature that has made producing reduced testcases difficult. In particular the various registers determined f
MIR: Allow targets to serialize MachineFunctionInfo
This has been a very painful missing feature that has made producing reduced testcases difficult. In particular the various registers determined for stack access during function lowering were necessary to avoid undefined register errors in a large percentage of cases. Implement a subset of the important fields that need to be preserved for AMDGPU.
Most of the changes are to support targets parsing register fields and properly reporting errors. The biggest sort-of bug remaining is for fields that can be initialized from the IR section will be overwritten by a default initialized machineFunctionInfo section. Another remaining bug is the machineFunctionInfo section is still printed even if empty.
llvm-svn: 356215
show more ...
|
| #
dcdf3ddf |
| 26-Nov-2018 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
AMDGPU: Cleanup / relax tests for future changes
llvm-svn: 347576
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
921f7a27 |
| 25-Jun-2018 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
StackSlotColoring: Decide colors per stack ID
I thought I fixed this in r308673, but that fix was very broken. The assumption that any frame index can be used in place of another was more widespread
StackSlotColoring: Decide colors per stack ID
I thought I fixed this in r308673, but that fix was very broken. The assumption that any frame index can be used in place of another was more widespread than I realized. Even when stack slot sharing was disabled, this was still replacing frame index uses with a different ID with a different stack slot.
Really fix this by doing the coloring per-stack ID, so all of the coloring logically done in a separate namespace. This is a lot simpler than trying to figure out how to change the color if the stack ID is different.
llvm-svn: 335488
show more ...
|