|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
853a2649 |
| 06-Feb-2021 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[AsmPrinter] __patchable_function_entries: Set SHF_LINK_ORDER for binutils 2.36 and above
This matches GCC behavior when the configure-time binutils is new. GNU ld<2.36
did not support mixed SHF_LIN
[AsmPrinter] __patchable_function_entries: Set SHF_LINK_ORDER for binutils 2.36 and above
This matches GCC behavior when the configure-time binutils is new. GNU ld<2.36
did not support mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER and non-SHF_LINK_ORDER sections in an
output section, so we conservatively disable SHF_LINK_ORDER for <2.36.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
f554e272 |
| 15-Feb-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[AsmPrinter] Omit unique ID for __patchable_function_entries sections
Follow-up for D74006.
When the integrated assembler is used, we use SHF_LINK_ORDER. The
linked-to symbol is part of ELFSection
[AsmPrinter] Omit unique ID for __patchable_function_entries sections
Follow-up for D74006.
When the integrated assembler is used, we use SHF_LINK_ORDER. The
linked-to symbol is part of ELFSectionKey, thus we can omit the unique
ID.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
0fbe2215 |
| 04-Feb-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[MC][ELF] Make linked-to symbol name part of ELFSectionKey
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44775
This rule has been implemented by GNU as https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2020-02/msg00028.h
[MC][ELF] Make linked-to symbol name part of ELFSectionKey
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44775
This rule has been implemented by GNU as https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2020-02/msg00028.html (binutils >= 2.35)
It allows us to simplify
```
.section .foo,"o",foo,unique,0
.section .foo,"o",bar,unique,1 # different section
```
to
```
.section .foo,"o",foo
.section .foo,"o",bar # different section
```
We consider the two `.foo` different even if the linked-to symbols foo and bar
are defined in the same section. This is a deliberate choice so that we don't
need to know the section where foo and bar are defined beforehand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74006
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
22467e25 |
| 20-Jan-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
Add function attribute "patchable-function-prefix" to support -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M where M>0
Similar to the function attribute `prefix` (prefix data),
"patchable-function-prefix" inserts d
Add function attribute "patchable-function-prefix" to support -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M where M>0
Similar to the function attribute `prefix` (prefix data),
"patchable-function-prefix" inserts data (M NOPs) before the function
entry label.
-fpatchable-function-entry=2,1 (1 NOP before entry, 1 NOP after entry)
will look like:
```
.type foo,@function
.Ltmp0: # @foo
nop
foo:
.Lfunc_begin0:
# optional `bti c` (AArch64 Branch Target Identification) or
# `endbr64` (Intel Indirect Branch Tracking)
nop
.section __patchable_function_entries,"awo",@progbits,get,unique,0
.p2align 3
.quad .Ltmp0
```
-fpatchable-function-entry=N,0 + -mbranch-protection=bti/-fcf-protection=branch has two reasonable
placements (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01185.html):
```
(a) (b)
func: func:
.Ltmp0: bti c
bti c .Ltmp0:
nop nop
```
(a) needs no additional code. If the consensus is to go for (b), we will
need more code in AArch64BranchTargets.cpp / X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73070
show more ...
|
| #
d232c215 |
| 20-Jan-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[AsmPrinter] Don't emit __patchable_function_entries entry if "patchable-function-entry"="0"
Add improve tests
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init |
|
| #
7fa5290d |
| 12-Jan-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
__patchable_function_entries: don't use linkage field 'unique' with -no-integrated-as
.section name, "flags"G, @type, GroupName[, linkage]
As of binutils 2.33, linkage cannot be 'unique'. For inte
__patchable_function_entries: don't use linkage field 'unique' with -no-integrated-as
.section name, "flags"G, @type, GroupName[, linkage]
As of binutils 2.33, linkage cannot be 'unique'. For integrated
assembler, we use both 'o' flag and 'unique' linkage to support
--gc-sections and COMDAT with lld.
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-11/msg00266.html
show more ...
|
| #
4d1e23e3 |
| 03-Jan-2020 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[AArch64] Add function attribute "patchable-function-entry" to add NOPs at function entry
The Linux kernel uses -fpatchable-function-entry to implement DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
for arm64 and parisc.
[AArch64] Add function attribute "patchable-function-entry" to add NOPs at function entry
The Linux kernel uses -fpatchable-function-entry to implement DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
for arm64 and parisc. GCC 8 implemented
-fpatchable-function-entry, which can be seen as a generalized form of
-mnop-mcount. The N,M form (function entry points before the Mth NOP) is
currently only used by parisc.
This patch adds N,0 support to AArch64 codegen. N is represented as the
function attribute "patchable-function-entry". We will use a different
function attribute for M, if we decide to implement it.
The patch reuses the existing patchable-function pass, and
TargetOpcode::PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTER which is currently used by XRay.
When the integrated assembler is used, __patchable_function_entries will
be created for each text section with the SHF_LINK_ORDER flag to prevent
--gc-sections (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93197) and
COMDAT (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195) issues.
Retrospectively, __patchable_function_entries should use a PC-relative
relocation type to avoid the SHF_WRITE flag and dynamic relocations.
"patchable-function-entry"'s interaction with Branch Target
Identification is still unclear (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92424 for GCC discussions).
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72215
show more ...
|