|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
611ffcf4 |
| 14-Jul-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Use value instead of getValue (NFC)
|
| #
a7938c74 |
| 26-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
This patch replaces Optional::hasValue with the implicit cast to bool
in conditionals only.
|
| #
3b7c3a65 |
| 25-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
Revert "Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)"
This reverts commit aa8feeefd3ac6c78ee8f67bf033976fc7d68bc6d.
|
| #
aa8feeef |
| 25-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2 |
|
| #
4683a2ef |
| 22-Apr-2022 |
Paul Kirth <[email protected]> |
[llvm][misexpect] Avoid division by 0 when using sample profiling
MisExpect diagnostics should not prevent compilation from succeeding, and the
assertion is insufficient to prevent division by zero
[llvm][misexpect] Avoid division by 0 when using sample profiling
MisExpect diagnostics should not prevent compilation from succeeding, and the
assertion is insufficient to prevent division by zero in release builds.
This patch addresses that by replacing the assert with an early return.
Additionally, it disables MisExpect diagnostics when using sample profiling,
since this is the only known case where this error has manifested.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124302
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
| #
bac6cd5b |
| 01-Apr-2022 |
Paul Kirth <[email protected]> |
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
show more ...
|
| #
46774df3 |
| 29-Mar-2022 |
Paul Kirth <[email protected]> |
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
show more ...
|
| #
2add3fbd |
| 19-Mar-2022 |
Paul Kirth <[email protected]> |
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
show more ...
|
| #
6cf560d6 |
| 18-Mar-2022 |
Paul Kirth <[email protected]> |
Revert "Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics""
I mistakenly reverted my commit, so I'm relanding it.
This reverts commit 10866a1df4a82cdc54187330c509a2d46235455d.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
e7749d47 |
| 09-Mar-2022 |
Paul Kirth <[email protected]> |
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks
[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
5c31b8b9 |
| 31-Oct-2020 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Revert "Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"
This reverts commit 10f2a0d662d8d72eaac48d3e9b31ca8dc90df5a4.
More uint64_t overflows.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 |
|
| #
10f2a0d6 |
| 30-Sep-2020 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64
Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
show more ...
|
| #
2a4e704c |
| 27-Oct-2020 |
Nico Weber <[email protected]> |
Revert "Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"
This reverts commit e5766f25c62c185632e3a75bf45b313eadab774b.
Makes clang assert when building Chromium, see https://crbug.com/1142813
fo
Revert "Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"
This reverts commit e5766f25c62c185632e3a75bf45b313eadab774b.
Makes clang assert when building Chromium, see https://crbug.com/1142813
for a repro.
show more ...
|
| #
e5766f25 |
| 30-Sep-2020 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64
Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
4c1a1d3c |
| 14-Nov-2019 |
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> |
Add missing includes needed to prune LLVMContext.h include, NFC
These are a pre-requisite to removing #include "llvm/Support/Options.h"
from LLVMContext.h: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70280
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5 |
|
| #
7bdad084 |
| 11-Sep-2019 |
Petr Hosek <[email protected]> |
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371635
show more ...
|
| #
394a8ed8 |
| 11-Sep-2019 |
Petr Hosek <[email protected]> |
clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing
clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371584
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
a10802fd |
| 10-Sep-2019 |
Petr Hosek <[email protected]> |
clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing
clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371484
show more ...
|