Cleanup includes: TransformsUtils

Estimation on the impact on preprocessor output:
before: 1065307662
after: 1064800684

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-

Cleanup includes: TransformsUtils

Estimation on the impact on preprocessor output:
before: 1065307662
after: 1064800684

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120741

show more ...

Revert rG5dd566b7c7b78bd- "PassManager.h - remove unnecessary Function.h/Module.h includes. NFCI."

This reverts commit 5dd566b7c7b78bd385418c72d63c79895be9ae97.

Causing some buildbot failures that

Revert rG5dd566b7c7b78bd- "PassManager.h - remove unnecessary Function.h/Module.h includes. NFCI."

This reverts commit 5dd566b7c7b78bd385418c72d63c79895be9ae97.

Causing some buildbot failures that I'm not seeing on MSVC builds.

show more ...

PassManager.h - remove unnecessary Function.h/Module.h includes. NFCI.

PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.

This exposes a large number o

PassManager.h - remove unnecessary Function.h/Module.h includes. NFCI.

PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.

This exposes a large number of implicit dependencies on various forward declarations/includes in other headers that need addressing.

show more ...

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to LoadInst creation.

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to LoadInst creation.

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172

llvm-svn: 352911

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[IR] Replace `isa<TerminatorInst>` with `isTerminator()`.

This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have
an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the

[IR] Replace `isa<TerminatorInst>` with `isTerminator()`.

This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have
an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the
whole, this seems like a win and at worst a reasonable cost for removing
`TerminatorInst`.

All of this is part of the removal of `TerminatorInst` from the
`Instruction` type hierarchy.

llvm-svn: 340701

show more ...

Move Analysis/Utils/Local.h back to Transforms

Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the
file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original
change onl

Move Analysis/Utils/Local.h back to Transforms

Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the
file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original
change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which
was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a
template/inlined in the header) but not in general)

llvm-svn: 333954

show more ...

Fix a couple of layering violations in Transforms

Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.

Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
r

Fix a couple of layering violations in Transforms

Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.

Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
remove the header and the "createStripGCRelocatesPass" function
declaration (& definition) that is unused and motivated this dependency.

Move Transforms/Utils/Local.h into Analysis because it's used by
Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp.

llvm-svn: 328165

show more ...

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787

show more ...

Allow DataLayout to specify addrspace for allocas.

LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real

Allow DataLayout to specify addrspace for allocas.

LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real way to avoid using alloca, so without this
there is no way to opt out of these assumptions.

The problematic assumptions include:
- That the pointer size used for the stack is the same size as
the code size pointer, which is also the maximum sized pointer.

- That 0 is an invalid, non-dereferencable pointer value.

These are problems for AMDGPU because alloca is used to
implement the private address space, which uses a 32-bit
index as the pointer value. Other pointers are 64-bit
and behave more like LLVM's notion of generic address
space. By changing the address space used for allocas,
we can change our generic pointer type to be LLVM's generic
pointer type which does have similar properties.

llvm-svn: 299888

show more ...

TransformUtils: Remove implicit ilist iterator conversions, NFC

Continuing the work from last week to remove implicit ilist iterator
conversions. First related commit was probably r249767, with som

TransformUtils: Remove implicit ilist iterator conversions, NFC

Continuing the work from last week to remove implicit ilist iterator
conversions. First related commit was probably r249767, with some more
motivation in r249925. This edition gets LLVMTransformUtils compiling
without the implicit conversions.

No functional change intended.

llvm-svn: 250142

show more ...

[WinEHPrepare] Add rudimentary support for the new EH instructions

This adds somewhat basic preparation functionality including:
- Formation of funclets via coloring basic blocks.
- Cloning of polyc

[WinEHPrepare] Add rudimentary support for the new EH instructions

This adds somewhat basic preparation functionality including:
- Formation of funclets via coloring basic blocks.
- Cloning of polychromatic blocks to ensure that funclets have unique
program counters.
- Demotion of values used between different funclets.
- Some amount of cleanup once we have removed predecessors from basic
blocks.
- Verification that we are left with a CFG that makes some amount of
sense.

N.B. Arguments and numbering still need to be done.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11750

llvm-svn: 244558

show more ...

Revert accidentally committed WinEHPrepare changes

This reverts commit r244272, r244273, r244274, and r244275.

llvm-svn: 244278

Handle PHI nodes prefacing EH pads too

llvm-svn: 244274

Drive-by fixes for LandingPad -> EHPad

This change was done as an audit and is by inspection. The new EH
system is still very much a work in progress. NFC for the landingpad
case.

llvm-svn: 243965

Fix a bug in DemoteRegToStack where a reload instruction was inserted into the
wrong basic block.

This would happen when the result of an invoke was used by a phi instruction
in the invoke's normal

Fix a bug in DemoteRegToStack where a reload instruction was inserted into the
wrong basic block.

This would happen when the result of an invoke was used by a phi instruction
in the invoke's normal destination block. An instruction to reload the invoke's
value would get inserted before the critical edge was split and a new basic
block (which is the correct insertion point for the reload) was created. This
commit fixes the bug by splitting the critical edge before all the reload
instructions are inserted.

Also, hoist up the code which computes the insertion point to the only place
that need that computation.

rdar://problem/15978721

llvm-svn: 228566

show more ...

[C++] Use 'nullptr'. Transforms edition.

llvm-svn: 207196

[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to ac

[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364

show more ...

Re-sort all of the includes with ./utils/sort_includes.py so that
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.

Also com

Re-sort all of the includes with ./utils/sort_includes.py so that
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.

Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.

llvm-svn: 198685

show more ...

Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger.
Adds unit tests for it too.

Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the
analysis bits

Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger.
Adds unit tests for it too.

Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the
analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable
into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG.

llvm-svn: 187283

show more ...

[SjLj Prepare] When demoting an invoke instructions to the stack, if the normal
edge is critical, then split it so we can insert the store.
rdar://13126179

llvm-svn: 174418

Make sure we don't emit instructions before a landingpad instruction.
PR14782

llvm-svn: 171846

Move all of the header files which are involved in modelling the LLVM IR
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long

Move all of the header files which are involved in modelling the LLVM IR
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366

show more ...

Use the new script to sort the includes of every file under lib.

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module

Use the new script to sort the includes of every file under lib.

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.

Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]

llvm-svn: 169131

show more ...

Remove redundant comment. Use a more efficient datatype.

llvm-svn: 150780