[BasicBlockUtils] Allow critical edge splitting with callbr terminators

After D129205, we support SplitBlockPredecessors() for predecessors
with callbr terminators. This means that it is now also sa

[BasicBlockUtils] Allow critical edge splitting with callbr terminators

After D129205, we support SplitBlockPredecessors() for predecessors
with callbr terminators. This means that it is now also safe to
invoke critical edge splitting for an edge coming from a callbr
terminator. Remove checks in various passes that were protecting
against that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129256

show more ...

Cleanup includes: TransformsUtils

Estimation on the impact on preprocessor output:
before: 1065307662
after: 1064800684

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-

Cleanup includes: TransformsUtils

Estimation on the impact on preprocessor output:
before: 1065307662
after: 1064800684

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120741

show more ...

PGOInstrumentation, GCOVProfiling: Split indirectbr critical edges regardless of PHIs

The `SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges` function was originally designed for
`CodeGenPrepare` and skipped splitting o

PGOInstrumentation, GCOVProfiling: Split indirectbr critical edges regardless of PHIs

The `SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges` function was originally designed for
`CodeGenPrepare` and skipped splitting of edges when the destination
block didn't contain any `PHI` instructions. This only makes sense when
reducing COPYs like `CodeGenPrepare`. In the case of
`PGOInstrumentation` or `GCOVProfiling` it would result in missed
counters and wrong result in functions with computed goto.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120096

show more ...

[SplitEdge] Update SplitCriticalEdge to return a nullptr only when the edge is not critical

Summary:
The function SplitCriticalEdge (called by SplitEdge) can return a nullptr in
cases where the edge

[SplitEdge] Update SplitCriticalEdge to return a nullptr only when the edge is not critical

Summary:
The function SplitCriticalEdge (called by SplitEdge) can return a nullptr in
cases where the edge is a critical. SplitEdge uses SplitCriticalEdge assuming it
can always split all critical edges, which is an incorrect assumption.

The three cases where the function SplitCriticalEdge will return a nullptr is:
1. DestBB is an exception block
2. Options.IgnoreUnreachableDests is set to true and
isa(DestBB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbgOrLifetime()) is not equal to a nullptr
3. LoopSimplify form must be preserved (Options.PreserveLoopSimplify is true)
and it cannot be maintained for a loop due to indirect branches

For each of these situations they are handled in the following way:
1. Modified the function ehAwareSplitEdge originally from
llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroFrame.cpp to handle the cases when the DestBB
is an exception block. This function is called directly in SplitEdge.
SplitEdge does not call SplitCriticalEdge in this case
2. Options.IgnoreUnreachableDests is set to false by default, so this situation
does not apply.
3. Return a nullptr in this situation since the SplitCriticalEdge also returned
nullptr. Nothing we can do in this case.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D94619

show more ...

BreakCriticalEdges: do not split the critical edge from a CallBr indirect successor

Otherwise we'll fail the assertion in SplitBlockPredecessors() related
to splitting the edges from CallBr's.

Fixe

BreakCriticalEdges: do not split the critical edge from a CallBr indirect successor

Otherwise we'll fail the assertion in SplitBlockPredecessors() related
to splitting the edges from CallBr's.

Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1161
Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1252

Reviewed By: void, MaskRay, jyknight

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88438

show more ...

[SplitEdge] Add new parameter to SplitEdge to name the newly created basic block

Summary:
Currently SplitEdge does not support passing in parameter which allows you to
name the newly created BasicBl

[SplitEdge] Add new parameter to SplitEdge to name the newly created basic block

Summary:
Currently SplitEdge does not support passing in parameter which allows you to
name the newly created BasicBlock.

This patch updates the function such that the name of the block can be passed
in, if users of this utility decide to do so.

Reviewed By: Whitney, bmahjour, asbirlea, jamieschmeiser

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94176

show more ...

[Transforms] Use llvm::is_contained (NFC)

BreakCriticalEdges for callbr indirect dests

Summary:
llvm::SplitEdge was failing an assertion that the BasicBlock only had
one successor (for BasicBlocks terminated by CallBrInst, we typically
have

BreakCriticalEdges for callbr indirect dests

Summary:
llvm::SplitEdge was failing an assertion that the BasicBlock only had
one successor (for BasicBlocks terminated by CallBrInst, we typically
have multiple successors). It was surprising that the earlier call to
SplitCriticalEdge did not handle the critical edge (there was an early
return). Removing that triggered another assertion relating to creating
a BlockAddress for a BasicBlock that did not (yet) have a parent, which
is a simple order of operations issue in llvm::SplitCriticalEdge (a
freshly constructed BasicBlock must be inserted into a Function's basic
block list to have a parent).

Thanks to @nathanchance for the report.
Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1018

Reviewers: craig.topper, jyknight, void, fhahn, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: eli.friedman, rnk, efriedma, fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits, nathanchance, srhines

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81607

show more ...

[BreakCritEdges] Add option to opt-out of perserving loop-simplify.

This patch adds a new option to CriticalEdgeSplittingOptions to control
whether loop-simplify form must be preserved. It is them u

[BreakCritEdges] Add option to opt-out of perserving loop-simplify.

This patch adds a new option to CriticalEdgeSplittingOptions to control
whether loop-simplify form must be preserved. It is them used by GVN to
indicate that loop-simplify form does not have to be preserved.

This fixes a crash exposed by 189efe295b6e.

If the critical edge we are splitting goes from a block inside a loop to
a block outside the loop, splitting the edge will create a new exit
block. As a result, the new block will branch to the original exit
block, which will add a non-loop predecessor, breaking loop-simplify
form. To preserve loop-simplify form, the predecessor blocks of the
original exit are split, but that does not work for blocks with
indirectbr terminators. If preserving loop-simplify form is requested,
bail out , before making any changes.

Reviewers: reames, hfinkel, davide, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81582

show more ...

[BrachProbablityInfo] Set edge probabilities at once and fix calcMetadataWeights()

Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabi

[BrachProbablityInfo] Set edge probabilities at once and fix calcMetadataWeights()

Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for all
outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over it is
difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0 because there is
no easy way to know when the user finished setting all
the probabilities.

Related bug is fixed in BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights().
Changing unreachable branch probabilities to raw(1) and distributing
the rest (oldProbability - raw(1)) over the reachable branches could
introduce total probability inaccuracy bigger than 1/numOfBranches.

Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396

show more ...

Revert "[BrachProbablityInfo] Set edge probabilities at once. NFC."

This reverts commit eef95f2746c3347b8dad19091ffb82a88d73acd3.

The new assertion about branch propability sums does not hold.

[BrachProbablityInfo] Set edge probabilities at once. NFC.

Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular
edge and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for
all outgoing

[BrachProbablityInfo] Set edge probabilities at once. NFC.

Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular
edge and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for
all outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over
it is difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0
because there is no easy way to know when the user finished
setting all the probabilities.

Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396

show more ...

SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges: Fix Branch Probability update

Splitting critical edges for indirect branches
the SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges() function may break branch
probabilities if target basic

SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges: Fix Branch Probability update

Splitting critical edges for indirect branches
the SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges() function may break branch
probabilities if target basic block happens to have unset
a probability for any of its successors. That is because in
such cases the getEdgeProbability(Target) function returns
probability 1/NumOfSuccessors and it is called after Target
was split (thus Target has a single successor). As the result
the correspondent successor of the split block gets
probability 100% but 1/NumOfSuccessors is expected (or better
be left unset).

Reviewers: yamauchi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78806

show more ...

Sink all InitializePasses.h includes

This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of reco

Sink all InitializePasses.h includes

This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.

I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h

Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.

Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211

show more ...

[SanitizerCoverage] Avoid splitting critical edges when destination is a basic block containing unreachable

This patch adds a new option to SplitAllCriticalEdges and uses it to avoid splitting criti

[SanitizerCoverage] Avoid splitting critical edges when destination is a basic block containing unreachable

This patch adds a new option to SplitAllCriticalEdges and uses it to avoid splitting critical edges when the destination basic block ends with unreachable. Otherwise if we split the critical edge, sanitizer coverage will instrument the new block that gets inserted for the split. But since this block itself shouldn't be reachable this is pointless. These basic blocks will stick around and generate assembly, but they don't end in sane control flow and might get placed at the end of the function. This makes it look like one function has code that flows into the next function.

This showed up while compiling the linux kernel with clang. The kernel has a tool called objtool that detected the code that appeared to flow from one function to the next. https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/351#issuecomment-461698884

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57982

llvm-svn: 355947

show more ...

BreakCriticalEdges: Update PostDominatorTree

llvm-svn: 354673

[NFC] Rename DontDeleteUselessPHIs --> KeepOneInputPHIs

llvm-svn: 353801

Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction

Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.

This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.

There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.

Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765

llvm-svn: 353563

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[TI removal] Make variables declared as `TerminatorInst` and initialized
by `getTerminator()` calls instead be declared as `Instruction`.

This is the biggest remaining chunk of the usage of `getTerm

[TI removal] Make variables declared as `TerminatorInst` and initialized
by `getTerminator()` calls instead be declared as `Instruction`.

This is the biggest remaining chunk of the usage of `getTerminator()`
that insists on the narrow type and so is an easy batch of updates.
Several files saw more extensive updates where this would cascade to
requiring API updates within the file to use `Instruction` instead of
`TerminatorInst`. All of these were trivial in nature (pervasively using
`Instruction` instead just worked).

llvm-svn: 344502

show more ...

[TI removal] Remove TerminatorInst as an input parameter from all public
LLVM APIs. There weren't very many.

We still have the instruction visitor, and APIs with TerminatorInst as
a return type or a

[TI removal] Remove TerminatorInst as an input parameter from all public
LLVM APIs. There weren't very many.

We still have the instruction visitor, and APIs with TerminatorInst as
a return type or an output parameter.

llvm-svn: 344494

show more ...

[MemorySSA] Update MemoryPhi wiring for block splitting to consider if identical edges were merged.

Summary:
Block splitting is done with either identical edges being merged, or not.
Only critical e

[MemorySSA] Update MemoryPhi wiring for block splitting to consider if identical edges were merged.

Summary:
Block splitting is done with either identical edges being merged, or not.
Only critical edges can be split without merging identical edges based on an option.
Teach the memoryssa updater to take this into account: for the same edge between two blocks only move one entry from the Phi in Old to the new Phi in New.

Reviewers: george.burgess.iv

Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51563

llvm-svn: 341709

show more ...

Update MemorySSA in BasicBlockUtils.

Summary:
Extend BasicBlocksUtils to update MemorySSA.

Subscribers: sanjoy, arsenm, nhaehnle, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://review

Update MemorySSA in BasicBlockUtils.

Summary:
Extend BasicBlocksUtils to update MemorySSA.

Subscribers: sanjoy, arsenm, nhaehnle, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45300

llvm-svn: 340365

show more ...

Transforms: Introduce Transforms/Utils.h rather than spreading the declarations amongst Scalar.h and IPO.h

Fixes layering - Transforms/Utils shouldn't depend on including a Scalar
or IPO header, bec

Transforms: Introduce Transforms/Utils.h rather than spreading the declarations amongst Scalar.h and IPO.h

Fixes layering - Transforms/Utils shouldn't depend on including a Scalar
or IPO header, because Scalar and IPO depend on Utils.

llvm-svn: 328717

show more ...

Use phi ranges to simplify code. No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 321585