|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
611ffcf4 |
| 14-Jul-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Use value instead of getValue (NFC)
|
| #
53dc0f10 |
| 03-Jul-2022 |
Nuno Lopes <[email protected]> |
[NFC] Switch a few uses of undef to poison as placeholders for unreachble code
|
| #
a7938c74 |
| 26-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
This patch replaces Optional::hasValue with the implicit cast to bool in conditionals only.
|
| #
3b7c3a65 |
| 25-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
Revert "Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)"
This reverts commit aa8feeefd3ac6c78ee8f67bf033976fc7d68bc6d.
|
| #
aa8feeef |
| 25-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
| #
129b531c |
| 19-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Use value_or instead of getValueOr (NFC)
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
59630917 |
| 02-Mar-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <[email protected]> |
Cleanup includes: Transform/Scalar
Estimated impact on preprocessor output line: before: 1062981579 after: 1062494547
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cl
Cleanup includes: Transform/Scalar
Estimated impact on preprocessor output line: before: 1062981579 after: 1062494547
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120817
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
5ba11503 |
| 10-Feb-2022 |
Philip Reames <[email protected]> |
[PSE] Remove assumption that top level predicate is union from public interface [NFC*]
Note that this doesn't actually cause the top level predicate to become a non-union just yet.
The * above come
[PSE] Remove assumption that top level predicate is union from public interface [NFC*]
Note that this doesn't actually cause the top level predicate to become a non-union just yet.
The * above comes from a case in the LoopVectorizer where a predicate which is later proven no longer blocks vectorization due to a change from checking if predicates exists to whether the predicate is possibly false.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
452714f8 |
| 24-Sep-2021 |
Anna Thomas <[email protected]> |
[BPI] Keep BPI available in loop passes through LoopStandardAnalysisResults
This is analogous to D86156 (which preserves "lossy" BFI in loop passes). Lossy means that the analysis preserved may not
[BPI] Keep BPI available in loop passes through LoopStandardAnalysisResults
This is analogous to D86156 (which preserves "lossy" BFI in loop passes). Lossy means that the analysis preserved may not be up to date with regards to new blocks that are added in loop passes, but BPI will not contain stale pointers to basic blocks that are deleted by the loop passes.
This is achieved through BasicBlockCallbackVH in BPI, which calls eraseBlock that updates the data structures in BPI whenever a basic block is deleted.
This patch does not have any changes in the upstream pipeline, since none of the loop passes in the pipeline use BPI currently. However, since BPI wasn't previously preserved in loop passes, the loop predication pass was invoking BPI *on the entire function* every time it ran in an LPM. This caused massive compile time in our downstream LPM invocation which contained loop predication.
See updated test with an invocation of a loop-pipeline containing loop predication and -debug-pass turned ON.
Reviewed-By: asbirlea, modimo Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110438
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
6b9524a0 |
| 06-May-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
[NewPM] Don't mark AA analyses as preserved
Currently all AA analyses marked as preserved are stateless, not taking into account their dependent analyses. So there's no need to mark them as preserve
[NewPM] Don't mark AA analyses as preserved
Currently all AA analyses marked as preserved are stateless, not taking into account their dependent analyses. So there's no need to mark them as preserved, they won't be invalidated unless their analyses are.
SCEVAAResults was the one exception to this, it was treated like a typical analysis result. Make it like the others and don't invalidate unless SCEV is invalidated.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102032
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
9ed8e0ca |
| 09-Dec-2020 |
dfukalov <[email protected]> |
[NFC] Reduce include files dependency and AA header cleanup (part 2).
Continuing work started in https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489:
Removed a bunch of includes from "AliasAnalysis.h" and "LoopPassMan
[NFC] Reduce include files dependency and AA header cleanup (part 2).
Continuing work started in https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489:
Removed a bunch of includes from "AliasAnalysis.h" and "LoopPassManager.h".
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92852
show more ...
|
| #
f5fe8493 |
| 14-Dec-2020 |
Philip Reames <[email protected]> |
[LAA] Relax restrictions on early exits in loop structure
his is a preparation patch for supporting multiple exits in the loop vectorizer, by itself it should be mostly NFC. This patch moves the loo
[LAA] Relax restrictions on early exits in loop structure
his is a preparation patch for supporting multiple exits in the loop vectorizer, by itself it should be mostly NFC. This patch moves the loop structure checks from LAA to their respective consumers (where duplicates don't already exist). Moving the checks does end up changing some of the optimization warnings and debug output slightly, but nothing that appears to be a regression.
Why do this? Well, after auditing the code, I can't actually find anything in LAA itself which relies on having all instructions within a loop execute an equal number of times. This patch simply makes this explicit so that if one consumer - say LV in the near future (hopefully) - wants to handle a broader class of loops, it can do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92066
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
89c01242 |
| 15-Oct-2020 |
Florian Hahn <[email protected]> |
[LoopVersion] Unify SCEVChecks and alias check handling (NFC).
This is an initial cleanup of the way LoopVersioning interacts with LAA.
Currently LoopVersioning has 2 ways of initializing things:
[LoopVersion] Unify SCEVChecks and alias check handling (NFC).
This is an initial cleanup of the way LoopVersioning interacts with LAA.
Currently LoopVersioning has 2 ways of initializing things:
1. Passing LAI and passing UseLAIChecks = true 2. Passing UseLAIChecks = false, followed by calling setSCEVChecks and setAliasChecks.
Both ways of initializing lead to the same result and the duplication seems more complicated than necessary.
This patch removes the UseLAIChecks flag from the constructor and the setSCEVChecks & setAliasChecks helpers and move initialization exclusively to the constructor.
This simplifies things, by providing a single way to initialize LoopVersioning and reducing duplication.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84406
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
89c1e35f |
| 22-Sep-2020 |
Stefanos Baziotis <[email protected]> |
[LoopInfo] empty() -> isInnermost(), add isOutermost()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82895
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
2ea4c2c5 |
| 15-Sep-2020 |
Wenlei He <[email protected]> |
[BFI] Make BFI information available through loop passes inside LoopStandardAnalysisResults
~~D65060 uncovered that trying to use BFI in loop passes can lead to non-deterministic behavior when block
[BFI] Make BFI information available through loop passes inside LoopStandardAnalysisResults
~~D65060 uncovered that trying to use BFI in loop passes can lead to non-deterministic behavior when blocks are re-used while retaining old BFI data.~~
~~To make sure BFI is preserved through loop passes a Value Handle (VH) callback is registered on blocks themselves. When a block is freed it now also wipes out the accompanying BFI entry such that stale BFI data can no longer persist resolving the determinism issue. ~~
~~An optimistic approach would be to incrementally update BFI information throughout the loop passes rather than only invalidating them on removed blocks. The issues with that are:~~ ~~1. It is not clear how BFI information should be incrementally updated: If a block is duplicated does its BFI information come with? How about if it's split/modified/moved around? ~~ ~~2. Assuming we can address these problems the implementation here will be a massive undertaking. ~~
~~There's a known need of BFI in LICM analysis which requires correct but not incrementally updated BFI data. A follow-up change can register BFI in all loop passes so this preserved but potentially lossy data is available to any loop pass that wants it.~~
See: D75341 for an identical implementation of preserving BFI via VH callbacks. The previous statements do still apply but this change no longer has to be in this diff because it's already upstream .
This diff also moves BFI to be a part of LoopStandardAnalysisResults since the previous method using getCachedResults now (correctly!) statically asserts (D72893) that this data isn't static through the loop passes.
Testing Ninja check
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86156
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
4dd33272 |
| 04-Jun-2020 |
serge-sans-paille <[email protected]> |
Fix return status of LoopDistribute
Move code that may update the IR after precondition, so that if precondition fail, the IR isn't modified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81225
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
616657b3 |
| 28-Apr-2020 |
Florian Hahn <[email protected]> |
[LAA] Move CheckingPtrGroup/PointerCheck outside class (NFC).
This allows forward declarations of PointerCheck, which in turn reduce the number of times LoopAccessAnalysis needs to be included.
Ult
[LAA] Move CheckingPtrGroup/PointerCheck outside class (NFC).
This allows forward declarations of PointerCheck, which in turn reduce the number of times LoopAccessAnalysis needs to be included.
Ultimately this helps with moving runtime check generation to Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h, without having to include it there.
Reviewers: anemet, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78458
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
05da2fe5 |
| 13-Nov-2019 |
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> |
Sink all InitializePasses.h includes
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it caused lots of reco
Sink all InitializePasses.h includes
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the current checkout: recompiles touches affected_files header 342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h 314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h 307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h 213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h 170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h 162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h 158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h 140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h 137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h 131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
2466ba97 |
| 12-Jun-2019 |
Matt Arsenault <[email protected]> |
LoopDistribute/LAA: Respect convergent
This case is slightly tricky, because loop distribution should be allowed in some cases, and not others. As long as runtime dependency checks don't need to be
LoopDistribute/LAA: Respect convergent
This case is slightly tricky, because loop distribution should be allowed in some cases, and not others. As long as runtime dependency checks don't need to be introduced, this should be OK. This is further complicated by the fact that LoopDistribute partially ignores if LAA says that vectorization is safe, and then does its own runtime pointer legality checks.
Note this pass still does not handle noduplicate correctly, as this should always be forbidden with it. I'm not going to bother trying to fix it, as it would require more effort and I think noduplicate should be removed.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D62607
llvm-svn: 363160
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
| #
72448525 |
| 12-Dec-2018 |
Michael Kruse <[email protected]> |
[Unroll/UnrollAndJam/Vectorizer/Distribute] Add followup loop attributes.
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of thei
[Unroll/UnrollAndJam/Vectorizer/Distribute] Add followup loop attributes.
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable) #pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
is the same as
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable) #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.
This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,
!0 = !{!0, !1, !2} !1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"} !2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3} !3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}
defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.
Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.
For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.
Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.
To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.
With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).
Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288
llvm-svn: 348944
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
d34e60ca |
| 14-May-2018 |
Nicola Zaghen <[email protected]> |
Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG. The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects. The renaming was done as follows: - git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/
Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG. The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects. The renaming was done as follows: - git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g' - git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM - Manual change to APInt - Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
show more ...
|
| #
5f8f34e4 |
| 01-May-2018 |
Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> |
Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments redundant. Since they ar
Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0 |
|
| #
7c35de12 |
| 28-Feb-2018 |
David Green <[email protected]> |
[Dominators] Remove verifyDomTree and add some verifying for Post Dom Trees
Removes verifyDomTree, using assert(verify()) everywhere instead, and changes verify a little to always run IsSameAsFreshT
[Dominators] Remove verifyDomTree and add some verifying for Post Dom Trees
Removes verifyDomTree, using assert(verify()) everywhere instead, and changes verify a little to always run IsSameAsFreshTree first in order to print good output when we find errors. Also adds verifyAnalysis for PostDomTrees, which will allow checking of PostDomTrees it the same way we check DomTrees and MachineDomTrees.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41298
llvm-svn: 326315
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
ff8b8aea |
| 21-Nov-2017 |
Alina Sbirlea <[email protected]> |
Add MemorySSA as loop dependency, disabled by default [NFC].
Summary: First step in adding MemorySSA as dependency for loop pass manager. Adding the dependency under a flag.
New pass manager: MSSA
Add MemorySSA as loop dependency, disabled by default [NFC].
Summary: First step in adding MemorySSA as dependency for loop pass manager. Adding the dependency under a flag.
New pass manager: MSSA pointer in LoopStandardAnalysisResults can be null. Legacy and new pass manager: Use cl::opt EnableMSSALoopDependency. Disabled by default.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40274
llvm-svn: 318772
show more ...
|