|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
c4b1a63a |
| 25-Feb-2022 |
Jameson Nash <[email protected]> |
mark getTargetTransformInfo and getTargetIRAnalysis as const
Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.
Reviewed By: wsmoses
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1
mark getTargetTransformInfo and getTargetIRAnalysis as const
Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.
Reviewed By: wsmoses
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120518
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
d7696007 |
| 03-Feb-2022 |
Simon Pilgrim <[email protected]> |
XCoreTargetMachine.h - replace unnecessary StringRef include with forward declaration
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
26d11ca4 |
| 22-Dec-2017 |
Sanjoy Das <[email protected]> |
(Re-landing) Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function
Re-land r321234. It had to be reverted because it broke the shared library build. The shared library build broke because there
(Re-landing) Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function
Re-land r321234. It had to be reverted because it broke the shared library build. The shared library build broke because there was a missing LLVMBuild dependency from lib/Passes (which calls TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis) to lib/Target. As far as I can tell, this problem was always there but was somehow masked before (perhaps because TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis was a virtual function).
Original commit message:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a dependency from Analysis to Target.
See discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html
I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.
Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464
llvm-svn: 321375
show more ...
|
| #
747d1114 |
| 21-Dec-2017 |
Sanjoy Das <[email protected]> |
Revert "Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function"
This reverts commit r321234. It breaks the -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON build.
llvm-svn: 321243
|
| #
0c3de350 |
| 21-Dec-2017 |
Sanjoy Das <[email protected]> |
Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function
Summary: This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a d
Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function
Summary: This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a dependency from Analysis to Target.
See discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html
I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.
Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464
llvm-svn: 321234
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
bb8507e6 |
| 12-Oct-2017 |
Matthias Braun <[email protected]> |
Revert "TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine"
Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
Revert "TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine"
Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the lldb bots.
This reverts commit r315633.
llvm-svn: 315637
show more ...
|
| #
3a9c114b |
| 12-Oct-2017 |
Matthias Braun <[email protected]> |
TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine but not LLVMTargetMach
TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine but not LLVMTargetMachine. - It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen - This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
llvm-svn: 315633
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
79e238af |
| 03-Aug-2017 |
Rafael Espindola <[email protected]> |
Delete Default and JITDefault code models
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle Default or if has already b
Delete Default and JITDefault code models
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
6bda14b3 |
| 06-Jun-2017 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every line
Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately) or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
8c6ed0f3 |
| 24-Jan-2017 |
Eugene Zelenko <[email protected]> |
[XCore] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize and Include What You Use warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 292988
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1 |
|
| #
8c34dd82 |
| 18-May-2016 |
Rafael Espindola <[email protected]> |
Delete Reloc::Default.
Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct from the others?
This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in places where we hav
Delete Reloc::Default.
Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct from the others?
This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in places where we have a user input that still hasn't been maped to the default value, which is now clear has no be one of the remaining 3 options.
llvm-svn: 269988
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1 |
|
| #
3e5de88d |
| 11-Jun-2015 |
Daniel Sanders <[email protected]> |
Replace string GNU Triples with llvm::Triple in TargetMachine. NFC.
Summary: For the moment, TargetMachine::getTargetTriple() still returns a StringRef.
This continues the patch series to eliminate
Replace string GNU Triples with llvm::Triple in TargetMachine. NFC.
Summary: For the moment, TargetMachine::getTargetTriple() still returns a StringRef.
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: ted, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10362
llvm-svn: 239554
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1 |
|
| #
4d0f35a9 |
| 21-Mar-2015 |
Eric Christopher <[email protected]> |
Remove the target independent TargetMachine::getSubtarget and TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl routines.
This keeps the target independent code free of bare subtarget calls while the remainder of the
Remove the target independent TargetMachine::getSubtarget and TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl routines.
This keeps the target independent code free of bare subtarget calls while the remainder of the backends are migrated, or not if they don't wish to support per-function subtargets as would be needed for function multiversioning or LTO of disparate cpu subarchitecture types, e.g.
clang -msse4.2 -c foo.c -emit-llvm -o foo.bc clang -c bar.c -emit-llvm -o bar.bc llvm-link foo.bc bar.bc -o baz.bc llc baz.bc
and get appropriate code for what the command lines requested.
llvm-svn: 232885
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1 |
|
| #
93e1ea16 |
| 12-Mar-2015 |
Mehdi Amini <[email protected]> |
Move the DataLayout to the generic TargetMachine, making it mandatory.
Summary: I don't know why every singled backend had to redeclare its own DataLayout. There was a virtual getDataLayout() on the
Move the DataLayout to the generic TargetMachine, making it mandatory.
Summary: I don't know why every singled backend had to redeclare its own DataLayout. There was a virtual getDataLayout() on the common base TargetMachine, the default implementation returned nullptr. It was not clear from this that we could assume at call site that a DataLayout will be available with each Target.
Now getDataLayout() is no longer virtual and return a pointer to the DataLayout member of the common base TargetMachine. I plan to turn it into a reference in a future patch.
The only backend that didn't have a DataLayout previsouly was the CPPBackend. It now initializes the default DataLayout. This commit is NFC for all the other backends.
Test Plan: clang+llvm ninja check-all
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jfb, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8243
From: Mehdi Amini <[email protected]> llvm-svn: 231987
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3 |
|
| #
8b04c0d2 |
| 01-Feb-2015 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
[multiversion] Switch all of the targets over to use the TargetIRAnalysis access path directly rather than implementing getTTI.
This even removes getTTI from the interface. It's more efficient for e
[multiversion] Switch all of the targets over to use the TargetIRAnalysis access path directly rather than implementing getTTI.
This even removes getTTI from the interface. It's more efficient for each target to just register a precise callback that creates their specific TTI.
As part of this, all of the targets which are building their subtargets individually per-function now build their TTI instance with the function and thus look up the correct subtarget and cache it. NVPTX, R600, and XCore currently don't leverage this functionality, but its trivial for them to add it now.
llvm-svn: 227735
show more ...
|
| #
93dcdc47 |
| 31-Jan-2015 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that T
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well.
llvm-svn: 227685
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2 |
|
| #
8b770651 |
| 26-Jan-2015 |
Eric Christopher <[email protected]> |
Move DataLayout back to the TargetMachine from TargetSubtargetInfo derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine.
Move DataLayout back to the TargetMachine from TargetSubtargetInfo derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc1 |
|
| #
357600ea |
| 20-Nov-2014 |
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> |
Add out of line virtual destructors to all LLVMTargetMachine subclasses
These recently all grew a unique_ptr<TargetLoweringObjectFile> member in r221878. When anyone calls a virtual method of a cla
Add out of line virtual destructors to all LLVMTargetMachine subclasses
These recently all grew a unique_ptr<TargetLoweringObjectFile> member in r221878. When anyone calls a virtual method of a class, clang-cl requires all virtual methods to be semantically valid. This includes the implicit virtual destructor, which triggers instantiation of the unique_ptr destructor, which fails because the type being deleted is incomplete.
This is just part of the ongoing saga of PR20337, which is affecting Blink as well. Because the MSVC ABI doesn't have key functions, we end up referencing the vtable and implicit destructor on any virtual call through a class. We don't actually end up emitting the dtor, so it'd be good if we could avoid this unneeded type completion work.
llvm-svn: 222480
show more ...
|
| #
a2719329 |
| 13-Nov-2014 |
Aditya Nandakumar <[email protected]> |
This patch changes the ownership of TLOF from TargetLoweringBase to TargetMachine so that different subtargets could share the TLOF effectively
llvm-svn: 221878
|
| #
0bb041b5 |
| 18-Sep-2014 |
Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> |
Reverting NFC changes from r218050. Instead, the warning was disabled for GCC in r218059, so these changes are no longer required.
llvm-svn: 218062
|
| #
11fa97fa |
| 18-Sep-2014 |
Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> |
Fixing a bunch of -Woverloaded-virtual warnings due to hiding getSubtargetImpl from the base class. NFC.
llvm-svn: 218050
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.0, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc3 |
|
| #
a7c40ef0 |
| 13-Aug-2014 |
Benjamin Kramer <[email protected]> |
Canonicalize header guards into a common format.
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we deci
Canonicalize header guards into a common format.
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.0-rc2 |
|
| #
d913448b |
| 04-Aug-2014 |
Eric Christopher <[email protected]> |
Remove the TargetMachine forwards for TargetSubtargetInfo based information and update all callers. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 214781
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.0-rc1 |
|
| #
1b1cef23 |
| 02-Jul-2014 |
Eric Christopher <[email protected]> |
Move the subtarget dependent features from XCoreTargetMachine down to the subtarget.
llvm-svn: 212147
|