[CodeGen] Move instruction predicate verification to emitInstruction

D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added

[CodeGen] Move instruction predicate verification to emitInstruction

D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.

This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.

The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.

Recommitted with some fixes for the leftover MCII variables in release
builds.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506

show more ...

Revert "Move instruction predicate verification to emitInstruction"

This reverts commit e2fb8c0f4b940e0285ee36c112469fa75d4b60ff as it does
not build for Release builds, and some buildbots are givin

Revert "Move instruction predicate verification to emitInstruction"

This reverts commit e2fb8c0f4b940e0285ee36c112469fa75d4b60ff as it does
not build for Release builds, and some buildbots are giving more warning
than I saw locally. Reverting to fix those issues.

show more ...

Move instruction predicate verification to emitInstruction

D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Targ

Move instruction predicate verification to emitInstruction

D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.

This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.

The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506

show more ...

[Target, CodeGen] Use isImm(), isReg(), etc (NFC)

[MC] De-capitalize SwitchSection. NFC

Add SwitchSection to return switchSection. The API will be removed soon.

[MC] De-capitalize MCStreamer functions

Follow-up to c031378ce01b8485ba0ef486654bc9393c4ac024 .
The class is mostly consistent now.

[NFC] Use Register instead of unsigned

[Target] use range-based for loops (NFC)

[Target] Use range-based for loops (NFC)

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually us

Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC

This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.

This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454

show more ...

[MC] Add MCSubtargetInfo to MCAlignFragment

In preparation for passing the MCSubtargetInfo (STI) through to writeNops
so that it can use the STI in operation at the time, we need to record the
STI i

[MC] Add MCSubtargetInfo to MCAlignFragment

In preparation for passing the MCSubtargetInfo (STI) through to writeNops
so that it can use the STI in operation at the time, we need to record the
STI in operation when a MCAlignFragment may write nops as padding. The
STI is currently unused, a further patch will pass it through to
writeNops.

There are many places that can create an MCAlignFragment, in most cases
we can find out the STI in operation at the time. In a few places this
isn't possible as we are in initialisation or finalisation, or are
emitting constant pools. When possible I've tried to find the most
appropriate existing fragment to obtain the STI from, when none is
available use the per module STI.

For constant pools we don't actually need to use EmitCodeAlign as the
constant pools are data anyway so falling through into it via an
executable NOP is no better than falling through into data padding.

This is a prerequisite for D45962 which uses the STI to emit the
appropriate NOP for the STI. Which can differ per fragment.

Note that involves an interface change to InitSections. It is now
called initSections and requires a SubtargetInfo as a parameter.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45961

show more ...

[XRay] Change mips to use version 2 sled (PC-relative address)

Follow-up to D78590. All targets use PC-relative addresses now.

Reviewed By: atanasyan, dberris

Differential Revision: https://review

[XRay] Change mips to use version 2 sled (PC-relative address)

Follow-up to D78590. All targets use PC-relative addresses now.

Reviewed By: atanasyan, dberris

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87977

show more ...

[MC] De-capitalize MCStreamer::Emit{Bundle,Addrsig}* etc

So far, all non-COFF-related Emit* functions have been de-capitalized.

[MC] De-capitalize another set of MCStreamer::Emit* functions

Emit{ValueTo,Code}Alignment Emit{DTP,TP,GP}* EmitSymbolValue etc

[MC] De-capitalize some MCStreamer::Emit* functions

[AsmPrinter][MCStreamer] De-capitalize EmitInstruction and EmitCFI*

[AsmPrinter] De-capitalize all AsmPrinter::Emit* but EmitInstruction

Similar to rL328848.

[AsmPrinter] De-capitalize some AsmPrinter::Emit* functions

Similar to rL328848.

[AsmPrinter] De-capitalize Emit{Function,BasicBlock]* and Emit{Start,End}OfAsmFile

CMake: Make most target symbols hidden by default

Summary:
For builds with LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF
this change makes all symbols in the target specific libraries hidden
by

CMake: Make most target symbols hidden by default

Summary:
For builds with LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF
this change makes all symbols in the target specific libraries hidden
by default.

A new macro called LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY has been added to mark symbols in these
libraries public, which is mainly needed for the definitions of the
LLVMInitialize* functions.

This patch reduces the number of public symbols in libLLVM.so by about
25%. This should improve load times for the dynamic library and also
make abi checker tools, like abidiff require less memory when analyzing
libLLVM.so

One side-effect of this change is that for builds with
LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON some unittests that
access symbols that are no longer public will need to be statically linked.

Before and after public symbol counts (using gcc 8.2.1, ld.bfd 2.31.1):
nm before/libLLVM-9svn.so | grep ' [A-Zuvw] ' | wc -l
36221
nm after/libLLVM-9svn.so | grep ' [A-Zuvw] ' | wc -l
26278

Reviewers: chandlerc, beanz, mgorny, rnk, hans

Reviewed By: rnk, hans

Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, luismarques, smeenai, ldionne, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, MaskRay, wuzish, echristo, Jim, hiraditya, michaelplatings, chapuni, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, kristina, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54439

show more ...

Handle BUNDLE instructions in MipsAsmPrinter

Summary:
In our CHERI fork we use BUNDLE instructions to ensure that a
three-instruction sequence to generate a program-counter-relative value is
emitted

Handle BUNDLE instructions in MipsAsmPrinter

Summary:
In our CHERI fork we use BUNDLE instructions to ensure that a
three-instruction sequence to generate a program-counter-relative value is
emitted without reordering or insertions (since that would break the 32-bit
offset computation).

Currently MipsAsmPrinter asserts when it encounters a pseudo instruction.
To handle BUNDLE we can simply skip the instruction which will then make
EmitInstruction() process the contents of the bundle in order.

Reviewers: atanasyan

Reviewed By: atanasyan

Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70945

show more ...

[mips] Split long lines in the code. NFC

[Alignment][NFC] Use Align for TargetFrameLowering/Subtarget

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/l

[Alignment][NFC] Use Align for TargetFrameLowering/Subtarget

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68993

llvm-svn: 375084

show more ...

[Alignment][NFC] use llvm::Align for AsmPrinter::EmitAlignment

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail

[Alignment][NFC] use llvm::Align for AsmPrinter::EmitAlignment

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67443

llvm-svn: 371616

show more ...

[Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing

Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.l

[Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing

Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,

This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433

llvm-svn: 371608

show more ...