[NFC] Use Register instead of unsigned

[Target] Use llvm::reverse (NFC)

[llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC)

[llvm] Use drop_begin (NFC)

[MSP430] Update register names

When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything

[MSP430] Update register names

When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything worked well except for seeming inability to clobber r4.

The problem was that MSP430 code generator of LLVM used an obsolete name FP for that register. Things were worse because when `llc` read an unknown register name, it silently ignored it.

That is, I cannot use `fp` register name from the C code because Clang does not accept it (exactly like GCC). But the accepted name `r4` is not recognised by `llc` (it can be used in listings passed to `llvm-mc` and even `fp` is replace to `r4` by `llvm-mc`). So I can specify any of `fp` or `r4` for the string literal of `asm(...)` but nothing in the clobber list.

This patch replaces `MSP430::FP` with `MSP430::R4` in the backend code (even [MSP430 EABI](http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa534/slaa534.pdf) doesn't mention FP as a register name). The R0 - R3 registers, on the other hand, are left as is in the backend code (after all, they have some special meaning on the ISA level). It is just ensured clang is renaming them as expected by the downstream tools. There is probably not much sense in **marking them clobbered** but rename them //just in case// for use at potentially different contexts.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82184

show more ...

Revert "[MSP430] Update register names"

This reverts commit 8f6620f663031da2bb35b788239f4b607271af84.

[MSP430] Update register names

When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything

[MSP430] Update register names

When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything worked well except for seeming inability to clobber r4.

The problem was that MSP430 code generator of LLVM used an obsolete name FP for that register. Things were worse because when `llc` read an unknown register name, it silently ignored it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82184

show more ...

[Alignment][NFC] Use TFL::getStackAlign()

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/1

[Alignment][NFC] Use TFL::getStackAlign()

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551

show more ...

ArrayRef'ize restoreCalleeSavedRegisters. NFCI.

restoreCalleeSavedRegisters can mutate the contents of the
CalleeSavedInfos, so use a MutableArrayRef.

ArrayRef'ize spillCalleeSavedRegisters. NFCI.

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Add "Restored" flag to CalleeSavedInfo

The liveness-tracking code assumes that the registers that were saved
in the function's prolog are live outside of the function. Specifically,
that registers t

Add "Restored" flag to CalleeSavedInfo

The liveness-tracking code assumes that the registers that were saved
in the function's prolog are live outside of the function. Specifically,
that registers that were saved are also live-on-exit from the function.
This isn't always the case as illustrated by the LR register on ARM.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36160

llvm-svn: 310619

show more ...

Add extra operand to CALLSEQ_START to keep frame part set up previously

Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs

Add extra operand to CALLSEQ_START to keep frame part set up previously

Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.

This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.

The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.

The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394

llvm-svn: 302527

show more ...

MachineFunction: Return reference for getFrameInfo(); NFC

getFrameInfo() never returns nullptr so we should use a reference
instead of a pointer.

llvm-svn: 277017

MSP430: Avoid implicit iterator conversions, NFC

Avoid implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIIterator to
MachineInstr* in the MSP430 backend by preferring MachineInstr& over
MachineInstr* whe

MSP430: Avoid implicit iterator conversions, NFC

Avoid implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIIterator to
MachineInstr* in the MSP430 backend by preferring MachineInstr& over
MachineInstr* when a pointer isn't nullable.

llvm-svn: 274933

show more ...

[NFC] Header cleanup

Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.

Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedM

[NFC] Header cleanup

Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.

Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'

Patch by Eugene Kosov <[email protected]>

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219

From: Mehdi Amini <[email protected]>
llvm-svn: 266595

show more ...

Change eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr() to return an iterator

This will become necessary in a subsequent change to make this method
merge adjacent stack adjustments, i.e. it might erase the previous

Change eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr() to return an iterator

This will become necessary in a subsequent change to make this method
merge adjacent stack adjustments, i.e. it might erase the previous
and/or next instruction.

It also greatly simplifies the calls to this function from Prolog-
EpilogInserter. Previously, that had a bunch of logic to resume iteration
after the call; now it just continues with the returned iterator.

Note that this changes the behaviour of PEI a little. Previously,
it attempted to re-visit the new instruction created by
eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(). That code was added in r36625,
but I can't see any reason for it: the new instructions will obviously
not be pseudo instructions, they will not have FrameIndex operands,
and we have already accounted for the stack adjustment.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18627

llvm-svn: 265036

show more ...

[ShrinkWrap] Add (a simplified version) of shrink-wrapping.

This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find

[ShrinkWrap] Add (a simplified version) of shrink-wrapping.

This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.

As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.


** Context **

Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.


** Motivating example **

Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false

true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false

false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}

On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret

With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret

Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.


** Proposed Solution **

This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.

Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.

The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.

Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.


** Design Decisions **

1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210

<rdar://problem/3201744>

llvm-svn: 236507

show more ...

Drop the W postfix on the 16-bit registers.

This ensures the inline assembly register constraints are properly recognised in
TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint.

llvm-svn: 217479

Have MachineFunction cache a pointer to the subtarget to make lookups
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lo

Have MachineFunction cache a pointer to the subtarget to make lookups
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.

Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.

llvm-svn: 214838

show more ...

Remove the TargetMachine forwards for TargetSubtargetInfo based
information and update all callers. No functional change.

llvm-svn: 214781

[C++] Use 'nullptr'. Target edition.

llvm-svn: 207197

[C++11] Replace llvm::next and llvm::prior with std::next and std::prev.

Remove the old functions.

llvm-svn: 202636

Provide the register scavenger to processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized

Add the current PEI register scavenger as a parameter to the
processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized callback.

This change is neces

Provide the register scavenger to processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized

Add the current PEI register scavenger as a parameter to the
processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized callback.

This change is necessary in order to allow the PowerPC target code to
set the register scavenger frame index after the save-area offset
adjustments performed by processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized. Only
after these adjustments have been made is it possible to estimate
the size of the stack frame.

llvm-svn: 177108

show more ...

Move the eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr method from TargetRegisterInfo
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code i

Move the eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr method from TargetRegisterInfo
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.

There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.

The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.

Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.

llvm-svn: 175788

show more ...