[NFC] Fix wrong comment.

Cleanup codegen includes

This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-in

Cleanup codegen includes

This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681

show more ...

Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"

This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https:/

Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"

This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

show more ...

Cleanup codegen includes

after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

[AMDGPU] Move call clobbered return address registers s[30:31] to callee saved range

Currently the return address ABI registers s[30:31], which fall in the call
clobbered register range, are added a

[AMDGPU] Move call clobbered return address registers s[30:31] to callee saved range

Currently the return address ABI registers s[30:31], which fall in the call
clobbered register range, are added as a live-in on the function entry to
preserve its value when we have calls so that it gets saved and restored
around the calls.

But the DWARF unwind information (CFI) needs to track where the return address
resides in a frame and the above approach makes it difficult to track the
return address when the CFI information is emitted during the frame lowering,
due to the involvment of understanding the control flow.

This patch moves the return address ABI registers s[30:31] into callee saved
registers range and stops adding live-in for return address registers, so that
the CFI machinery will know where the return address resides when CSR
save/restore happen during the frame lowering.

And doing the above poses an issue that now the return instruction uses undefined
register `sgpr30_sgpr31`. This is resolved by hiding the return address register
use by the return instruction through the `SI_RETURN` pseudo instruction, which
doesn't take any input operands, until the `SI_RETURN` pseudo gets lowered to the
`S_SETPC_B64_return` during the `expandPostRAPseudo()`.

As an added benefit, this patch simplifies overall return instruction handling.

Note: The AMDGPU CFI changes are there only in the downstream code and another
version of this patch will be posted for review for the downstream code.

Reviewed By: arsenm, ronlieb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114652

show more ...

AMDGPU: Add second emergency slot for SGPR to vmem for large frames

In a future change, we will sometimes use a VGPR offset for doing
spills to memory, in which case we need 2 free VGPRs to do the S

AMDGPU: Add second emergency slot for SGPR to vmem for large frames

In a future change, we will sometimes use a VGPR offset for doing
spills to memory, in which case we need 2 free VGPRs to do the SGPR
spill. In most cases we could spill the VGPR along with the SGPR being
spilled, but we don't have any free lanes for SGPR_1024 in wave32 so
we could still potentially need a second scavenging slot.

show more ...

[NFC] Use Register instead of unsigned

[AMDGPU] Do not reserve any VGPR for SGPR spills

After the split register allocation changes in eebe841a47cb it is no
longer necessary to reserve a VGPR before RA. This can also create bugs
when IPR

[AMDGPU] Do not reserve any VGPR for SGPR spills

After the split register allocation changes in eebe841a47cb it is no
longer necessary to reserve a VGPR before RA. This can also create bugs
when IPRA is enabled since we cannot predict that a called function may
not reserve any register if it does not have any SGPR spills. If that
happens those functions may override reserved registers that are
normally callee saved. Added a test to show this.

Fixes: SWDEV-309900

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115551

show more ...

Revert "[AMDGPU] Move call clobbered return address registers s[30:31] to callee saved range"

This reverts commit 9075009d1fd5f2bf9aa6c2f362d2993691a316b3.

Failed amdgpu runtime buildbot # 3514

[AMDGPU] Move call clobbered return address registers s[30:31] to callee saved range

Currently the return address ABI registers s[30:31], which fall in the call
clobbered register range, are added a

[AMDGPU] Move call clobbered return address registers s[30:31] to callee saved range

Currently the return address ABI registers s[30:31], which fall in the call
clobbered register range, are added as a live-in on the function entry to
preserve its value when we have calls so that it gets saved and restored
around the calls.

But the DWARF unwind information (CFI) needs to track where the return address
resides in a frame and the above approach makes it difficult to track the
return address when the CFI information is emitted during the frame lowering,
due to the involvment of understanding the control flow.

This patch moves the return address ABI registers s[30:31] into callee saved
registers range and stops adding live-in for return address registers, so that
the CFI machinery will know where the return address resides when CSR
save/restore happen during the frame lowering.

And doing the above poses an issue that now the return instruction uses undefined
register `sgpr30_sgpr31`. This is resolved by hiding the return address register
use by the return instruction through the `SI_RETURN` pseudo instruction, which
doesn't take any input operands, until the `SI_RETURN` pseudo gets lowered to the
`S_SETPC_B64_return` during the `expandPostRAPseudo()`.

As an added benefit, this patch simplifies overall return instruction handling.

Note: The AMDGPU CFI changes are there only in the downstream code and another
version of this patch will be posted for review for the downstream code.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114652

show more ...

[AMDGPU][NFC] Fix typos

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113672

[AArch64, AMDGPU] Use make_early_inc_range (NFC)

[AMDGPU] Remove unused VirtRegMap analysis. NFC.

[AMDGPU] Remove dead frame indices after sgpr spill.

All those frame indices which are dead after sgpr spill should be removed from
the function frame. Othewise, there is a side effect such as re-ma

[AMDGPU] Remove dead frame indices after sgpr spill.

All those frame indices which are dead after sgpr spill should be removed from
the function frame. Othewise, there is a side effect such as re-mapping of free
frame index ids by the later pass(es) like "stack slot coloring" which in turn
could mess-up with the book keeping of "frame index to VGPR lane".

Reviewed By: cdevadas

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111150

show more ...

[MachineInstr] Move MIParser's DBG_VALUE RegState::Debug invariant into MachineInstr::addOperand

Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are
invariably treated as RegState::

[MachineInstr] Move MIParser's DBG_VALUE RegState::Debug invariant into MachineInstr::addOperand

Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are
invariably treated as RegState::Debug operands. This change enforces
this invariant as part of MachineInstr::addOperand so that all passes
emit this flag consistently.

RegState::Debug is inconsistently set on DBG_VALUE registers throughout
LLVM. This runs the risk of a filtering iterator like
MachineRegisterInfo::reg_nodbg_iterator to process these operands
erroneously when not parsed from MIR sources.

This issue was observed in the development of the llvm-mos fork which
adds a backend that relies on physical register operands much more than
existing targets. Physical RegUnit 0 has the same numeric encoding as
$noreg (indicating an undef for DBG_VALUE). Allowing debug operands into
the machine scheduler correlates $noreg with RegUnit 0 (i.e. a collision
of register numbers with different zero semantics). Eventually, this
causes an assert where DBG_VALUE instructions are prohibited from
participating in live register ranges.

Reviewed By: MatzeB, StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110105

show more ...

RegAlloc: Allow targets to split register allocation

AMDGPU normally spills SGPRs to VGPRs. Previously, since all register
classes are handled at the same time, this was problematic. We don't
know a

RegAlloc: Allow targets to split register allocation

AMDGPU normally spills SGPRs to VGPRs. Previously, since all register
classes are handled at the same time, this was problematic. We don't
know ahead of time how many registers will be needed to be reserved to
handle the spilling. If no VGPRs were left for spilling, we would have
to try to spill to memory. If the spilled SGPRs were required for exec
mask manipulation, it is highly problematic because the lanes active
at the point of spill are not necessarily the same as at the restore
point.

Avoid this problem by fully allocating SGPRs in a separate regalloc
run from VGPRs. This way we know the exact number of VGPRs needed, and
can reserve them for a second run. This fixes the most serious
issues, but it is still possible using inline asm to make all VGPRs
unavailable. Start erroring in the case where we ever would require
memory for an SGPR spill.

This is implemented by giving each regalloc pass a callback which
reports if a register class should be handled or not. A few passes
need some small changes to deal with leftover virtual registers.

In the AMDGPU implementation, a new pass is introduced to take the
place of PrologEpilogInserter for SGPR spills emitted during the first
run.

One disadvantage of this is currently StackSlotColoring is no longer
used for SGPR spills. It would need to be run again, which will
require more work.

Error if the standard -regalloc option is used. Introduce new separate
-sgpr-regalloc and -vgpr-regalloc flags, so the two runs can be
controlled individually. PBQB is not currently supported, so this also
prevents using the unhandled allocator.

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Free reserved VGPR if no SGPR spill

I met some code generation behavior change when I tried to remove
the hasStackObject() check when reserving VGPR for SGPR spill.
For example, the functio

[AMDGPU] Free reserved VGPR if no SGPR spill

I met some code generation behavior change when I tried to remove
the hasStackObject() check when reserving VGPR for SGPR spill.
For example, the function `callee_no_stack_no_fp_elim_all` in the lit
test file `callee-frame-setup.ll`.
The generated code changed from:
```
s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) expcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
s_mov_b32 s4, s33
s_mov_b32 s33, s32
s_mov_b32 s33, s4
s_setpc_b64 s[30:31]
```

into something like:
```
s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) expcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
v_writelane_b32 v63, s33, 0
s_mov_b32 s33, s32
v_readlane_b32 s33, v63, 0
s_setpc_b64 s[30:31]
```

I think we still prefer the old version where only scalar instructions are needed.
The idea here is free the reserved VGPR if no SGPR spills. So we will very likely
to use a free SGPR for fp/sp spill.

Reviewed by: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98344

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Always create Stack Object for reserved VGPR

As we may overwrite inactive lanes of a caller-save-vgpr, we should
always save/restore the reserved vgpr for sgpr spill.

Reviewed by: arsenm

[AMDGPU] Always create Stack Object for reserved VGPR

As we may overwrite inactive lanes of a caller-save-vgpr, we should
always save/restore the reserved vgpr for sgpr spill.

Reviewed by: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98319

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Fix the dead frame indices during custom spill lowering.

AMDGPU target tries to handle the SGPR and VGPR spills in a
custom pass before the actual frame lowering pass. Once they
are handled

[AMDGPU] Fix the dead frame indices during custom spill lowering.

AMDGPU target tries to handle the SGPR and VGPR spills in a
custom pass before the actual frame lowering pass. Once they
are handled and the respective frames are eliminated in the
custom pass, certain uses of them still remain. For instance,
the DBG_VALUE instructions inserted by the allocator alongside
the spill instruction will use the corresponding frame index.
They become dead later during PEI and causes a crash while trying to
replace the frame indices. We should possibly avoid this custom pass.
For now, replacing such dead references with null register value.

Reviewed By: arsenm, scott.linder

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98038

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Do not attempt sgpr spills to vgpr, when it is disabled

This covers a path missed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95768.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D

[AMDGPU] Do not attempt sgpr spills to vgpr, when it is disabled

This covers a path missed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95768.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98013

show more ...

AMDGPU: Fix verifier error with argument passed in CSR SGPR

We need to avoid setting the kill flag on the CSR spill if there's an
additional use of the register after the spill.

This does rely on c

AMDGPU: Fix verifier error with argument passed in CSR SGPR

We need to avoid setting the kill flag on the CSR spill if there's an
additional use of the register after the spill.

This does rely on consistency between the entry block liveins and the
MRI's function live ins, which is not something the verifier checks
now.

show more ...

[NFC][AMDGPU] Split AMDGPUSubtarget.h to R600 and GCN subtargets

... to reduce headers dependency.

Reviewed By: rampitec, arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95036

[Target] Use llvm::find_if (NFC)

[NFC][AMDGPU] Reduce include files dependency.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93813

AMDGPU: Use Register