[ubsan] Using metadata instead of prologue data for function sanitizer

Information in the function `Prologue Data` is intentionally opaque.
When a function with `Prologue Data` is duplicated. The se

[ubsan] Using metadata instead of prologue data for function sanitizer

Information in the function `Prologue Data` is intentionally opaque.
When a function with `Prologue Data` is duplicated. The self (global
value) references inside `Prologue Data` is still pointing to the
original function. This may cause errors like `fatal error: error in backend: Cannot represent a difference across sections`.

This patch detaches the information from function `Prologue Data`
and attaches it to a function metadata node.

This and D116130 fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49689.

Reviewed By: pcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115844

show more ...

[CSSPGO] Pseudo probe encoding and emission.

This change implements pseudo probe encoding and emission for CSSPGO. Please see RFC here for more context: https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdY

[CSSPGO] Pseudo probe encoding and emission.

This change implements pseudo probe encoding and emission for CSSPGO. Please see RFC here for more context: https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdYbL93s

Pseudo probes are in the form of intrinsic calls on IR/MIR but they do not turn into any machine instructions. Instead they are emitted into the binary as a piece of data in standalone sections. The probe-specific sections are not needed to be loaded into memory at execution time, thus they do not incur a runtime overhead. 

**ELF object emission**

The binary data to emit are organized as two ELF sections, i.e, the `.pseudo_probe_desc` section and the `.pseudo_probe` section. The `.pseudo_probe_desc` section stores a function descriptor for each function and the `.pseudo_probe` section stores the actual probes, each fo which corresponds to an IR basic block or an IR function callsite. A function descriptor is stored as a module-level metadata during the compilation and is serialized into the object file during object emission.

Both the probe descriptors and pseudo probes can be emitted into a separate ELF section per function to leverage the linker for deduplication. A `.pseudo_probe` section shares the same COMDAT group with the function code so that when the function is dead, the probes are dead and disposed too. On the contrary, a `.pseudo_probe_desc` section has its own COMDAT group. This is because even if a function is dead, its probes may be inlined into other functions and its descriptor is still needed by the profile generation tool.

The format of `.pseudo_probe_desc` section looks like:

```
.section .pseudo_probe_desc,"",@progbits
.quad 6309742469962978389 // Func GUID
.quad 4294967295 // Func Hash
.byte 9 // Length of func name
.ascii "_Z5funcAi" // Func name
.quad 7102633082150537521
.quad 138828622701
.byte 12
.ascii "_Z8funcLeafi"
.quad 446061515086924981
.quad 4294967295
.byte 9
.ascii "_Z5funcBi"
.quad -2016976694713209516
.quad 72617220756
.byte 7
.ascii "_Z3fibi"
```

For each `.pseudoprobe` section, the encoded binary data consists of a single function record corresponding to an outlined function (i.e, a function with a code entry in the `.text` section). A function record has the following format :

```
FUNCTION BODY (one for each outlined function present in the text section)
GUID (uint64)
GUID of the function
NPROBES (ULEB128)
Number of probes originating from this function.
NUM_INLINED_FUNCTIONS (ULEB128)
Number of callees inlined into this function, aka number of
first-level inlinees
PROBE RECORDS
A list of NPROBES entries. Each entry contains:
INDEX (ULEB128)
TYPE (uint4)
0 - block probe, 1 - indirect call, 2 - direct call
ATTRIBUTE (uint3)
reserved
ADDRESS_TYPE (uint1)
0 - code address, 1 - address delta
CODE_ADDRESS (uint64 or ULEB128)
code address or address delta, depending on ADDRESS_TYPE
INLINED FUNCTION RECORDS
A list of NUM_INLINED_FUNCTIONS entries describing each of the inlined
callees. Each record contains:
INLINE SITE
GUID of the inlinee (uint64)
ID of the callsite probe (ULEB128)
FUNCTION BODY
A FUNCTION BODY entry describing the inlined function.
```

To support building a context-sensitive profile, probes from inlinees are grouped by their inline contexts. An inline context is logically a call path through which a callee function lands in a caller function. The probe emitter builds an inline tree based on the debug metadata for each outlined function in the form of a trie tree. A tree root is the outlined function. Each tree edge stands for a callsite where inlining happens. Pseudo probes originating from an inlinee function are stored in a tree node and the tree path starting from the root all the way down to the tree node is the inline context of the probes. The emission happens on the whole tree top-down recursively. Probes of a tree node will be emitted altogether with their direct parent edge. Since a pseudo probe corresponds to a real code address, for size savings, the address is encoded as a delta from the previous probe except for the first probe. Variant-sized integer encoding, aka LEB128, is used for address delta and probe index.

**Assembling**

Pseudo probes can be printed as assembly directives alternatively. This allows for good assembly code readability and also provides a view of how optimizations and pseudo probes affect each other, especially helpful for diff time assembly analysis.

A pseudo probe directive has the following operands in order: function GUID, probe index, probe type, probe attributes and inline context. The directive is generated by the compiler and can be parsed by the assembler to form an encoded `.pseudoprobe` section in the object file.

A example assembly looks like:

```
foo2: # @foo2
# %bb.0: # %bb0
pushq %rax
testl %edi, %edi
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 1 0 0
je .LBB1_1
# %bb.2: # %bb2
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 6 2 0
callq foo
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 3 0 0
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 4 0 0
popq %rax
retq
.LBB1_1: # %bb1
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 5 1 0
callq *%rsi
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 2 0 0
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 4 0 0
popq %rax
retq
# -- End function
.section .pseudo_probe_desc,"",@progbits
.quad 6699318081062747564
.quad 72617220756
.byte 3
.ascii "foo"
.quad 837061429793323041
.quad 281547593931412
.byte 4
.ascii "foo2"
```

With inlining turned on, the assembly may look different around %bb2 with an inlined probe:

```
# %bb.2: # %bb2
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 3 0
.pseudoprobe 6699318081062747564 1 0 @ 837061429793323041:6
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 4 0
popq %rax
retq
```

**Disassembling**

We have a disassembling tool (llvm-profgen) that can display disassembly alongside with pseudo probes. So far it only supports ELF executable file.

An example disassembly looks like:

```
00000000002011a0 <foo2>:
2011a0: 50 push rax
2011a1: 85 ff test edi,edi
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 1 Type: Block
2011a3: 74 02 je 2011a7 <foo2+0x7>
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 3 Type: Block
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 4 Type: Block
[Probe]: FUNC: foo Index: 1 Type: Block Inlined: @ foo2:6
2011a5: 58 pop rax
2011a6: c3 ret
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 2 Type: Block
2011a7: bf 01 00 00 00 mov edi,0x1
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 5 Type: IndirectCall
2011ac: ff d6 call rsi
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 4 Type: Block
2011ae: 58 pop rax
2011af: c3 ret
```

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91878

show more ...

Revert "[CSSPGO] Pseudo probe encoding and emission."

This reverts commit b035513c06d1cba2bae8f3e88798334e877523e1.

Reason: Broke the ASan buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/5/builds/

Revert "[CSSPGO] Pseudo probe encoding and emission."

This reverts commit b035513c06d1cba2bae8f3e88798334e877523e1.

Reason: Broke the ASan buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/5/builds/2269

show more ...

[CSSPGO] Pseudo probe encoding and emission.

This change implements pseudo probe encoding and emission for CSSPGO. Please see RFC here for more context: https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdY

[CSSPGO] Pseudo probe encoding and emission.

This change implements pseudo probe encoding and emission for CSSPGO. Please see RFC here for more context: https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdYbL93s

Pseudo probes are in the form of intrinsic calls on IR/MIR but they do not turn into any machine instructions. Instead they are emitted into the binary as a piece of data in standalone sections. The probe-specific sections are not needed to be loaded into memory at execution time, thus they do not incur a runtime overhead. 

**ELF object emission**

The binary data to emit are organized as two ELF sections, i.e, the `.pseudo_probe_desc` section and the `.pseudo_probe` section. The `.pseudo_probe_desc` section stores a function descriptor for each function and the `.pseudo_probe` section stores the actual probes, each fo which corresponds to an IR basic block or an IR function callsite. A function descriptor is stored as a module-level metadata during the compilation and is serialized into the object file during object emission.

Both the probe descriptors and pseudo probes can be emitted into a separate ELF section per function to leverage the linker for deduplication. A `.pseudo_probe` section shares the same COMDAT group with the function code so that when the function is dead, the probes are dead and disposed too. On the contrary, a `.pseudo_probe_desc` section has its own COMDAT group. This is because even if a function is dead, its probes may be inlined into other functions and its descriptor is still needed by the profile generation tool.

The format of `.pseudo_probe_desc` section looks like:

```
.section .pseudo_probe_desc,"",@progbits
.quad 6309742469962978389 // Func GUID
.quad 4294967295 // Func Hash
.byte 9 // Length of func name
.ascii "_Z5funcAi" // Func name
.quad 7102633082150537521
.quad 138828622701
.byte 12
.ascii "_Z8funcLeafi"
.quad 446061515086924981
.quad 4294967295
.byte 9
.ascii "_Z5funcBi"
.quad -2016976694713209516
.quad 72617220756
.byte 7
.ascii "_Z3fibi"
```

For each `.pseudoprobe` section, the encoded binary data consists of a single function record corresponding to an outlined function (i.e, a function with a code entry in the `.text` section). A function record has the following format :

```
FUNCTION BODY (one for each outlined function present in the text section)
GUID (uint64)
GUID of the function
NPROBES (ULEB128)
Number of probes originating from this function.
NUM_INLINED_FUNCTIONS (ULEB128)
Number of callees inlined into this function, aka number of
first-level inlinees
PROBE RECORDS
A list of NPROBES entries. Each entry contains:
INDEX (ULEB128)
TYPE (uint4)
0 - block probe, 1 - indirect call, 2 - direct call
ATTRIBUTE (uint3)
reserved
ADDRESS_TYPE (uint1)
0 - code address, 1 - address delta
CODE_ADDRESS (uint64 or ULEB128)
code address or address delta, depending on ADDRESS_TYPE
INLINED FUNCTION RECORDS
A list of NUM_INLINED_FUNCTIONS entries describing each of the inlined
callees. Each record contains:
INLINE SITE
GUID of the inlinee (uint64)
ID of the callsite probe (ULEB128)
FUNCTION BODY
A FUNCTION BODY entry describing the inlined function.
```

To support building a context-sensitive profile, probes from inlinees are grouped by their inline contexts. An inline context is logically a call path through which a callee function lands in a caller function. The probe emitter builds an inline tree based on the debug metadata for each outlined function in the form of a trie tree. A tree root is the outlined function. Each tree edge stands for a callsite where inlining happens. Pseudo probes originating from an inlinee function are stored in a tree node and the tree path starting from the root all the way down to the tree node is the inline context of the probes. The emission happens on the whole tree top-down recursively. Probes of a tree node will be emitted altogether with their direct parent edge. Since a pseudo probe corresponds to a real code address, for size savings, the address is encoded as a delta from the previous probe except for the first probe. Variant-sized integer encoding, aka LEB128, is used for address delta and probe index.

**Assembling**

Pseudo probes can be printed as assembly directives alternatively. This allows for good assembly code readability and also provides a view of how optimizations and pseudo probes affect each other, especially helpful for diff time assembly analysis.

A pseudo probe directive has the following operands in order: function GUID, probe index, probe type, probe attributes and inline context. The directive is generated by the compiler and can be parsed by the assembler to form an encoded `.pseudoprobe` section in the object file.

A example assembly looks like:

```
foo2: # @foo2
# %bb.0: # %bb0
pushq %rax
testl %edi, %edi
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 1 0 0
je .LBB1_1
# %bb.2: # %bb2
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 6 2 0
callq foo
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 3 0 0
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 4 0 0
popq %rax
retq
.LBB1_1: # %bb1
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 5 1 0
callq *%rsi
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 2 0 0
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 4 0 0
popq %rax
retq
# -- End function
.section .pseudo_probe_desc,"",@progbits
.quad 6699318081062747564
.quad 72617220756
.byte 3
.ascii "foo"
.quad 837061429793323041
.quad 281547593931412
.byte 4
.ascii "foo2"
```

With inlining turned on, the assembly may look different around %bb2 with an inlined probe:

```
# %bb.2: # %bb2
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 3 0
.pseudoprobe 6699318081062747564 1 0 @ 837061429793323041:6
.pseudoprobe 837061429793323041 4 0
popq %rax
retq
```

**Disassembling**

We have a disassembling tool (llvm-profgen) that can display disassembly alongside with pseudo probes. So far it only supports ELF executable file.

An example disassembly looks like:

```
00000000002011a0 <foo2>:
2011a0: 50 push rax
2011a1: 85 ff test edi,edi
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 1 Type: Block
2011a3: 74 02 je 2011a7 <foo2+0x7>
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 3 Type: Block
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 4 Type: Block
[Probe]: FUNC: foo Index: 1 Type: Block Inlined: @ foo2:6
2011a5: 58 pop rax
2011a6: c3 ret
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 2 Type: Block
2011a7: bf 01 00 00 00 mov edi,0x1
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 5 Type: IndirectCall
2011ac: ff d6 call rsi
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 4 Type: Block
2011ae: 58 pop rax
2011af: c3 ret
```

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91878

show more ...

Revert "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the imp

Revert "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the implementation is known-broken for certain inputs,
the bugreport was up for a significant amount of timer,
and there has been no activity to address it.
Therefore, just completely rip out all of misexpect handling.

I suspect, fixing it requires redesigning the internals of MD_misexpect.
Should anyone commit to fixing the implementation problem,
starting from clean slate may be better anyways.

This reverts commit 7bdad08429411e7d0ecd58cd696b1efe3cff309e,
and some of it's follow-ups, that don't stand on their own.

show more ...

Revert "Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"

This reverts commit 10f2a0d662d8d72eaac48d3e9b31ca8dc90df5a4.

More uint64_t overflows.

Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t

CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64

Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t

CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.

Reviewed By: davidxl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609

show more ...

Revert "Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"

This reverts commit e5766f25c62c185632e3a75bf45b313eadab774b.
Makes clang assert when building Chromium, see https://crbug.com/1142813
fo

Revert "Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"

This reverts commit e5766f25c62c185632e3a75bf45b313eadab774b.
Makes clang assert when building Chromium, see https://crbug.com/1142813
for a repro.

show more ...

Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t

CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64

Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t

CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.

Reviewed By: davidxl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609

show more ...

Avoid unnecessary uses of `MDNode::getTemporary`, NFC

This is a long-delayed follow-up to
5e5b85098dbeaea2cfa5d01695b5d2982634d7dd.

`TempMDNode` includes a bunch of machinery for RAUW, and should o

Avoid unnecessary uses of `MDNode::getTemporary`, NFC

This is a long-delayed follow-up to
5e5b85098dbeaea2cfa5d01695b5d2982634d7dd.

`TempMDNode` includes a bunch of machinery for RAUW, and should only be
used when necessary. RAUW wasn't being used in any of these cases... it
was just a placeholder for a self-reference.

Where the real node was using `MDNode::getDistinct`, just replace the
temporary argument with `nullptr`.

Where the real node was using `MDNode::get`, the `replaceOperandWith`
call was "promoting" the node to a distinct one implicitly due to
self-reference detection in `MDNode::handleChangedOperand`. The
`TempMDNode` was serving a purpose by delaying uniquing, but it's way
simpler to just call `MDNode::getDistinct` in the first place.

Note that using a self-reference at all in these places is a hold-over
from before `distinct` metadata existed. It was an old trick to create
distinct nodes. It would be intrusive to change, including bitcode
upgrades, etc., and it's harmless so I'm not sure there's much value in
removing it from existing schemas. After this commit it still has a tiny
memory cost (in the extra metadata operand) but no more overhead in
construction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90079

show more ...

[MDBuilder] Don't use stable sort for sorting integers.

Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by

Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300

We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.

We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.

A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.

In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect

Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324

llvm-svn: 371635

show more ...

Revert "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

This reverts commit r371584. It introduced a dependency from compiler-rt
to llvm/include/ADT, which is problema

Revert "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

This reverts commit r371584. It introduced a dependency from compiler-rt
to llvm/include/ADT, which is problematic for multiple reasons.

One is that it is a novel dependency edge, which needs cross-compliation
machinery for llvm/include/ADT (yes, it is true that right now
compiler-rt included only header-only libraries, however, if we allow
compiler-rt to depend on anything from ADT, other libraries will
eventually get used).

Secondly, depending on ADT from compiler-rt exposes ADT symbols from
compiler-rt, which would cause ODR violations when Clang is built with
the profile library.

llvm-svn: 371598

show more ...

clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM

This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing

clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM

This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300

We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.

We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.

A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.

In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect

Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324

llvm-svn: 371584

show more ...

Revert "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM"

This reverts commit r371484: this broke sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast bot.

llvm-svn: 371488

clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM

This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing

clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM

This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300

We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.

We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.

A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.

In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect

Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324

llvm-svn: 371484

show more ...

Use llvm::stable_sort

While touching the code, simplify if feasible.

llvm-svn: 358996

[NFC] Fix unused variable warnings in Release builds

llvm-svn: 351641

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

AbstractCallSite -- A unified interface for (in)direct and callback calls

An abstract call site is a wrapper that allows to treat direct,
indirect, and callback calls the same. If an abstract ca

AbstractCallSite -- A unified interface for (in)direct and callback calls

An abstract call site is a wrapper that allows to treat direct,
indirect, and callback calls the same. If an abstract call site
represents a direct or indirect call site it behaves like a stripped
down version of a normal call site object. The abstract call site can
also represent a callback call, thus the fact that the initially
called function (=broker) may invoke a third one (=callback callee).
In this case, the abstract call side hides the middle man, hence the
broker function. The result is a representation of the callback call,
inside the broker, but in the context of the original instruction that
invoked the broker.

Again, there are up to three functions involved when we talk about
callback call sites. The caller (1), which invokes the broker
function. The broker function (2), that may or may not invoke the
callback callee. And finally the callback callee (3), which is the
target of the callback call.

The abstract call site will handle the mapping from parameters to
arguments depending on the semantic of the broker function. However,
it is important to note that the mapping is often partial. Thus, some
arguments of the call/invoke instruction are mapped to parameters of
the callee while others are not. At the same time, arguments of the
callback callee might be unknown, thus "null" if queried.

This patch introduces also !callback metadata which describe how a
callback broker maps from parameters to arguments. This metadata is
directly created by clang for known broker functions, provided through
source code attributes by the user, or later deduced by analyses.

For motivation and additional information please see the corresponding
talk (slides/video)
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#talk20
as well as the LCPC paper
http://compilers.cs.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert/par_opt_lcpc18.pdf

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54498

llvm-svn: 351627

show more ...

[Metadata] Replace a SmallVector with an array; NFC

MDNode::get takes an ArrayRef, so these should be equivalent.

llvm-svn: 339824

Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.

We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they ar

Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.

We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.

Patch produced by

for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290

llvm-svn: 331272

show more ...

[IR] Fix creating mutable versions of TBAA access tags

Due to a typo in D41565, mutable TBAA tags created with
createMutableTBAAAccessTag() lose their base types. This patch
fixes that typo and upda

[IR] Fix creating mutable versions of TBAA access tags

Due to a typo in D41565, mutable TBAA tags created with
createMutableTBAAAccessTag() lose their base types. This patch
fixes that typo and updates tests respectively.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42364

llvm-svn: 325008

show more ...

[Transforms] Support making mutable versions of new-format TBAA access tags

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41565

llvm-svn: 322650

Add a pass to generate synthetic function entry counts.

Summary:
This pass synthesizes function entry counts by traversing the callgraph
and using the relative block frequencies of the callsites. Th

Add a pass to generate synthetic function entry counts.

Summary:
This pass synthesizes function entry counts by traversing the callgraph
and using the relative block frequencies of the callsites. The intended
use of these counts is in inlining to determine hot/cold callsites in
the absence of profile information.

The pass is split into two files with the code that propagates the
counts in a callgraph in a Utils file. I plan to add support for
propagation in the thinlto link phase and the propagation code will be
shared and hence this split. I did not add support to the old PM since
hot callsite determination in inlining is not possible in old PM
(although we could use hot callee heuristic with synthetic counts in the
old PM it is not worth the effort tuning it)

Reviewers: davidxl, silvas

Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41604

llvm-svn: 322110

show more ...