|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6 |
|
| #
0916d96d |
| 21-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
|
| #
129b531c |
| 19-Jun-2022 |
Kazu Hirata <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Use value_or instead of getValueOr (NFC)
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5 |
|
| #
557efc9a |
| 04-Jun-2022 |
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> |
[llvm] Remove unneeded cl::ZeroOrMore for cl::opt options. NFC
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!` error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the err
[llvm] Remove unneeded cl::ZeroOrMore for cl::opt options. NFC
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!` error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed, cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4 |
|
| #
2740c187 |
| 29-Apr-2022 |
Wolfgang Pieb <[email protected]> |
[NFC][Metadata] Refactor allocation, initalization and deletion of MDNodes.
This patch is refactoring the allocation, initialization and deletion of MDNodes. It is intended as a preparatory patch fo
[NFC][Metadata] Refactor allocation, initalization and deletion of MDNodes.
This patch is refactoring the allocation, initialization and deletion of MDNodes. It is intended as a preparatory patch for the upcoming addition of dynamic resizability of MDNodes. It is fundamentally NFC, but removes the necessity for suppressing the memory sanitizer for MDNode's operator delete.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125489
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
| #
eab6e94f |
| 06-Apr-2022 |
Chih-Ping Chen <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Add a TargetFuncName field in DISubprogram for specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.
Differential Revi
[DebugInfo] Add a TargetFuncName field in DISubprogram for specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123697
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
1712254b |
| 08-Mar-2022 |
Rong Xu <[email protected]> |
[SampleFDO] Allow multiple of --enable-fs-discrimintor option [NFC]
Allow users to use multiple of --enable-fs-discriminator option. When this option is specified multiple times, the last instance w
[SampleFDO] Allow multiple of --enable-fs-discrimintor option [NFC]
Allow users to use multiple of --enable-fs-discriminator option. When this option is specified multiple times, the last instance wins.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
ffe8720a |
| 02-Feb-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <[email protected]> |
Reduce dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location where dwarf-specific information were not needed.
More specifically,
Reduce dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location where dwarf-specific information were not needed.
More specifically, this commit suppresses the dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h in two headers: llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h and llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h. As these headers (esp. the former) are widely used, this has a decent impact on number of preprocessed lines generated during compilation of LLVM, as showcased below.
This is achieved by moving some definitions back to the .cpp file, no performance impact implied[0].
As a consequence of that patch, downstream user may need to manually some extra files:
llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
In some situations, codes maybe relying on the fact that llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h was including llvm/ADT/Triple.h, this hidden dependency now needs to be explicit.
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l after: 10978519 before: 11245451
Related Discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup [0] https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=fa7145dfbf94cb93b1c3e610582c495cb806569b&to=995d3e326ee1d9489145e20762c65465a9caeab4&stat=instructions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118781
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
e188aae4 |
| 31-Jan-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <[email protected]> |
Cleanup header dependencies in LLVMCore
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code unless they took a lot of care in avo
Cleanup header dependencies in LLVMCore
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/
I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:
- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h - llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h - llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h - llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h - llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h - llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h - llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h
And the usual count of preprocessed lines: $ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l before: 6400831 after: 6189948
200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
28bfa57a |
| 18-Jan-2022 |
Chih-Ping Chen <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Add stringLocationExp field to DIStringType
DIStringType is used to encode the debug info of a character object in Fortran. A Fortran deferred-length character object is typically implem
[DebugInfo] Add stringLocationExp field to DIStringType
DIStringType is used to encode the debug info of a character object in Fortran. A Fortran deferred-length character object is typically implemented as a pair of the following two pieces of info: An address of the raw storage of the characters, and the length of the object. The stringLocationExp field contains the DIExpression to get to the raw storage.
This patch also enables the emission of DW_AT_data_location attribute in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info entry based on stringLocationExp in DIStringType.
A test is also added to ensure that the bitcode reader is backward compatible with the old DIStringType format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117586
show more ...
|
| #
f15014ff |
| 26-Jan-2022 |
Benjamin Kramer <[email protected]> |
Revert "Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17"
This reverts commit ef8206320769ad31422a803a0d6de6077fd231d2.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLEx
Revert "Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17"
This reverts commit ef8206320769ad31422a803a0d6de6077fd231d2.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now never be called. - Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
show more ...
|
| #
ef820632 |
| 26-Jan-2022 |
serge-sans-paille <[email protected]> |
Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17
As a conquence move llvm::array_lengthof from STLExtras.h to STLForwardCompat.h (which is included by STLExtras.h so no buil
Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17
As a conquence move llvm::array_lengthof from STLExtras.h to STLForwardCompat.h (which is included by STLExtras.h so no build breakage expected).
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
665b4138 |
| 11-Nov-2021 |
Luís Ferreira <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] run clang-format on some unformatted files
This trivial patch runs clang-format on some unformatted files before doing logic changes and prevent hard to review diffs.
Differential Revis
[DebugInfo] run clang-format on some unformatted files
This trivial patch runs clang-format on some unformatted files before doing logic changes and prevent hard to review diffs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113572
show more ...
|
| #
05963a3d |
| 09-Nov-2021 |
Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]> |
Revert "[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes"
This reverts commit ee7652569854af567ba83e5255d70e80cc8619a1.
Causes crashes, see comments in D104827.
|
| #
ee765256 |
| 04-Nov-2021 |
Scott Linder <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:
* DI
[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:
* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it. * Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for `distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to DIExpression in this patch. * DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this support.
The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.
The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to be `distinct`.
A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:
!named = !{!0} !0 = !DIExpression()
Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:
!named = !{!DIExpression()}
This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:
!named = !{!0} ; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression() !0 = distinct !DIExpression()
Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes where applicable.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
show more ...
|
| #
7c3fa527 |
| 26-Oct-2021 |
Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Skip ODRUniquing for mismatched tags
Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad DWARF.
- Add
[DebugInfo] Skip ODRUniquing for mismatched tags
Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad DWARF.
- Add a Verifier check that when a 'scope:' operand is an ODR type that is not an enum. - Makes ODRUniquing apply to only ODR types with the same tag so that the debuginfo/DWARF is well-formed.
Reviewed By: probinson, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111770
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
a5b72abc |
| 07-Sep-2021 |
Alok Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] Enhance DIImportedEntity to accept children entities
New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing list of aliased entities. This is needed to dump optimized debuggi
[DebugInfo] Enhance DIImportedEntity to accept children entities
New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing list of aliased entities. This is needed to dump optimized debugging information where all names in a module are imported, but a few names are imported with overriding aliases.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109343
show more ...
|
| #
badcd585 |
| 31-Aug-2021 |
Teresa Johnson <[email protected]> |
[DIArgList] Re-unique after changing operands to fix non-determinism
We have a large compile showing occasional non-deterministic behavior that is due to DIArgList not being properly uniqued in some
[DIArgList] Re-unique after changing operands to fix non-determinism
We have a large compile showing occasional non-deterministic behavior that is due to DIArgList not being properly uniqued in some cases. I tracked this down to handleChangedOperands, for which there is a custom implementation for DIArgList, that does not take care of re-uniquing after updating the DIArgList Args, unlike the default version of handleChangedOperands for MDNode.
Since the Args in the DIArgList form the key for the store, this seems to be occasionally breaking the lookup in that DenseSet. Specifically, when invoking DIArgList::get() from replaceVariableLocationOp, very occasionally it returns a new DIArgList object, when one already exists having the same exact Args pointers. This in turn causes a subsequent call to Instruction::isIdenticalToWhenDefined on those two otherwise identical DIArgList objects during a later pass to return false, leading to different IR in those rare cases.
I modified DIArgList::handleChangedOperands to perform similar re-uniquing as the MDNode version used by other metadata node types. This also necessitated a change to the context destructor, since in some cases we end up with DIArgList as distinct nodes: DIArgList is the only metadata node type to have a custom dropAllReferences, so we need to invoke that version on DIArgList in the DistinctMDNodes store to clean it up properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108968
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init |
|
| #
1bebc31c |
| 19-Jul-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for func parameters
Generate btf_tag annotations for function parameters. A field "annotations" is introduced to DILocalVariable, and annotations are represe
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for func parameters
Generate btf_tag annotations for function parameters. A field "annotations" is introduced to DILocalVariable, and annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how annotations are encoded in IR: distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "info",, arg: 1, ..., annotations: !10) !10 = !{!11, !12} !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"} !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106620
show more ...
|
| #
30c28848 |
| 19-Jul-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable. A field "annotations" is introduced to DIGlobalVariable, and annotations are represen
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable. A field "annotations" is introduced to DIGlobalVariable, and annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how annotations are encoded in IR: distinct !DIGlobalVariable(..., annotations: !10) !10 = !{!11, !12} !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"} !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106619
show more ...
|
| #
d383df32 |
| 19-Jul-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types
Generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types. A field "annotations" is introduced to DISubprogram, and annotations are represen
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types
Generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types. A field "annotations" is introduced to DISubprogram, and annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how annotations are encoded in IR: distinct !DISubprogram(..., annotations: !10) !10 = !{!11, !12} !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"} !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106618
show more ...
|
| #
430e2238 |
| 19-Jul-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIDerived types
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIDrived types. More specifically, clang frontend generates the btf_tag annotations for record fields. T
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIDerived types
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIDrived types. More specifically, clang frontend generates the btf_tag annotations for record fields. The annotations are represented as an DINodeArray in DebugInfo. The following example illustrate how annotations are encoded in IR: distinct !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_member, ..., annotations: !10) !10 = !{!11, !12} !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"} !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106616
show more ...
|
| #
0b32dca1 |
| 19-Jul-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
Reland [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types. A field "an
Reland [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types. A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how annotations are encoded in IR: distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10) !10 = !{!11, !12} !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"} !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"} Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of meta strings. Each record may have more than one btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.
Reland with additional fixes for llvm/unittests/IR/DebugTypeODRUniquingTest.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
show more ...
|
| #
c1169b8b |
| 19-Aug-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
Revert "[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types"
This reverts commit 2fded193e7a8fb5bd8fb339f00fd9de686390530.
Builtbot reports some test failures. Revert now so I can take t
Revert "[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types"
This reverts commit 2fded193e7a8fb5bd8fb339f00fd9de686390530.
Builtbot reports some test failures. Revert now so I can take time to fix the issues.
show more ...
|
| #
2fded193 |
| 19-Jul-2021 |
Yonghong Song <[email protected]> |
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types. A field "annotatio
[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types. A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how annotations are encoded in IR: distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10) !10 = !{!11, !12} !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"} !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"} Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of meta strings. Each record may have more than one btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
show more ...
|
| #
75aa3d52 |
| 27-Jul-2021 |
Paul Robinson <[email protected]> |
Add a DIExpression const-folder to prevent silly expressions.
It's entirely possible (because it actually happened) for a bool variable to end up with a 256-bit DW_AT_const_value. This came about w
Add a DIExpression const-folder to prevent silly expressions.
It's entirely possible (because it actually happened) for a bool variable to end up with a 256-bit DW_AT_const_value. This came about when a local bool variable was initialized from a bitfield in a 32-byte struct of bitfields, and after inlining and constant propagation, the variable did have a constant value. The sequence of optimizations had it carrying "i256" values around, but once the constant made it into the llvm.dbg.value, no further IR changes could affect it.
Technically the llvm.dbg.value did have a DIExpression to reduce it back down to 8 bits, but the compiler is in no way ready to emit an oversized constant *and* a DWARF expression to manipulate it. Depending on the circumstances, we had either just the very fat bool value, or an expression with no starting value.
The sequence of optimizations that led to this state did seem pretty reasonable, so the solution I came up with was to invent a DWARF constant expression folder. Currently it only does convert ops, but there's no reason it couldn't do other ops if that became useful.
This broke three tests that depended on having convert ops survive into the DWARF, so I added an operator that would abort the folder to each of those tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106915
show more ...
|