History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/lib/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 232)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6
# 0916d96d 21-Jun-2022 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)


# 129b531c 19-Jun-2022 Kazu Hirata <[email protected]>

[llvm] Use value_or instead of getValueOr (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.5
# 557efc9a 04-Jun-2022 Fangrui Song <[email protected]>

[llvm] Remove unneeded cl::ZeroOrMore for cl::opt options. NFC

Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the err

[llvm] Remove unneeded cl::ZeroOrMore for cl::opt options. NFC

Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.

Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.4
# 2740c187 29-Apr-2022 Wolfgang Pieb <[email protected]>

[NFC][Metadata] Refactor allocation, initalization and deletion of MDNodes.

This patch is refactoring the allocation, initialization and deletion
of MDNodes. It is intended as a preparatory patch fo

[NFC][Metadata] Refactor allocation, initalization and deletion of MDNodes.

This patch is refactoring the allocation, initialization and deletion
of MDNodes. It is intended as a preparatory patch for the upcoming
addition of dynamic resizability of MDNodes. It is fundamentally NFC,
but removes the necessity for suppressing the memory sanitizer for
MDNode's operator delete.

Reviewers: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125489

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# eab6e94f 06-Apr-2022 Chih-Ping Chen <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Add a TargetFuncName field in DISubprogram for
specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature
of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.

Differential Revi

[DebugInfo] Add a TargetFuncName field in DISubprogram for
specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature
of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123697

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3
# 1712254b 08-Mar-2022 Rong Xu <[email protected]>

[SampleFDO] Allow multiple of --enable-fs-discrimintor option [NFC]

Allow users to use multiple of --enable-fs-discriminator option.
When this option is specified multiple times, the last instance w

[SampleFDO] Allow multiple of --enable-fs-discrimintor option [NFC]

Allow users to use multiple of --enable-fs-discriminator option.
When this option is specified multiple times, the last instance wins.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1
# ffe8720a 02-Feb-2022 serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>

Reduce dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h

This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location
where dwarf-specific information were not needed.

More specifically,

Reduce dependencies on llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h

This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location
where dwarf-specific information were not needed.

More specifically, this commit suppresses the dependencies on
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h in two headers: llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h and
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h. As these headers (esp. the former) are widely used,
this has a decent impact on number of preprocessed lines generated during
compilation of LLVM, as showcased below.

This is achieved by moving some definitions back to the .cpp file, no
performance impact implied[0].

As a consequence of that patch, downstream user may need to manually some extra
files:

llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h

In some situations, codes maybe relying on the fact that
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h was including llvm/ADT/Triple.h, this hidden
dependency now needs to be explicit.

$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
after: 10978519
before: 11245451

Related Discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
[0] https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=fa7145dfbf94cb93b1c3e610582c495cb806569b&to=995d3e326ee1d9489145e20762c65465a9caeab4&stat=instructions

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118781

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init
# e188aae4 31-Jan-2022 serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>

Cleanup header dependencies in LLVMCore

Based on the output of include-what-you-use.

This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avo

Cleanup header dependencies in LLVMCore

Based on the output of include-what-you-use.

This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/

I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:

- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h

And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after: 6189948

200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)

Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3
# 28bfa57a 18-Jan-2022 Chih-Ping Chen <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Add stringLocationExp field to DIStringType

DIStringType is used to encode the debug info of a character object
in Fortran. A Fortran deferred-length character object is typically
implem

[DebugInfo] Add stringLocationExp field to DIStringType

DIStringType is used to encode the debug info of a character object
in Fortran. A Fortran deferred-length character object is typically
implemented as a pair of the following two pieces of info: An address
of the raw storage of the characters, and the length of the object.
The stringLocationExp field contains the DIExpression to get to the
raw storage.

This patch also enables the emission of DW_AT_data_location attribute
in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info entry based on stringLocationExp
in DIStringType.

A test is also added to ensure that the bitcode reader is backward
compatible with the old DIStringType format.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117586

show more ...


# f15014ff 26-Jan-2022 Benjamin Kramer <[email protected]>

Revert "Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17"

This reverts commit ef8206320769ad31422a803a0d6de6077fd231d2.

- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLEx

Revert "Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17"

This reverts commit ef8206320769ad31422a803a0d6de6077fd231d2.

- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat

show more ...


# ef820632 26-Jan-2022 serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>

Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17

As a conquence move llvm::array_lengthof from STLExtras.h to
STLForwardCompat.h (which is included by STLExtras.h so no buil

Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17

As a conquence move llvm::array_lengthof from STLExtras.h to
STLForwardCompat.h (which is included by STLExtras.h so no build
breakage expected).

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 665b4138 11-Nov-2021 Luís Ferreira <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] run clang-format on some unformatted files

This trivial patch runs clang-format on some unformatted files before
doing logic changes and prevent hard to review diffs.

Differential Revis

[DebugInfo] run clang-format on some unformatted files

This trivial patch runs clang-format on some unformatted files before
doing logic changes and prevent hard to review diffs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113572

show more ...


# 05963a3d 09-Nov-2021 Arthur Eubanks <[email protected]>

Revert "[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes"

This reverts commit ee7652569854af567ba83e5255d70e80cc8619a1.

Causes crashes, see comments in D104827.


# ee765256 04-Nov-2021 Scott Linder <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes

Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:

* DI

[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes

Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:

* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
`distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
support.

The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.

The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.

A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:

!named = !{!0}
!0 = !DIExpression()

Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:

!named = !{!DIExpression()}

This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:

!named = !{!0}
; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
!0 = distinct !DIExpression()

Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.

Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827

show more ...


# 7c3fa527 26-Oct-2021 Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Skip ODRUniquing for mismatched tags

Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes
to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad
DWARF.

- Add

[DebugInfo] Skip ODRUniquing for mismatched tags

Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes
to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad
DWARF.

- Add a Verifier check that when a 'scope:' operand is an ODR type that is not an enum.
- Makes ODRUniquing apply to only ODR types with the same tag so that the debuginfo/DWARF is well-formed.

Reviewed By: probinson, aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111770

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3
# a5b72abc 07-Sep-2021 Alok Kumar Sharma <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Enhance DIImportedEntity to accept children entities

New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing
list of aliased entities.
This is needed to dump optimized debuggi

[DebugInfo] Enhance DIImportedEntity to accept children entities

New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing
list of aliased entities.
This is needed to dump optimized debugging information where all names
in a module are imported, but a few names are imported with overriding
aliases.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109343

show more ...


# badcd585 31-Aug-2021 Teresa Johnson <[email protected]>

[DIArgList] Re-unique after changing operands to fix non-determinism

We have a large compile showing occasional non-deterministic behavior
that is due to DIArgList not being properly uniqued in some

[DIArgList] Re-unique after changing operands to fix non-determinism

We have a large compile showing occasional non-deterministic behavior
that is due to DIArgList not being properly uniqued in some cases. I
tracked this down to handleChangedOperands, for which there is a custom
implementation for DIArgList, that does not take care of re-uniquing
after updating the DIArgList Args, unlike the default version of
handleChangedOperands for MDNode.

Since the Args in the DIArgList form the key for the store, this seems
to be occasionally breaking the lookup in that DenseSet. Specifically,
when invoking DIArgList::get() from replaceVariableLocationOp, very
occasionally it returns a new DIArgList object, when one already exists
having the same exact Args pointers. This in turn causes a subsequent
call to Instruction::isIdenticalToWhenDefined on those two otherwise
identical DIArgList objects during a later pass to return false, leading
to different IR in those rare cases.

I modified DIArgList::handleChangedOperands to perform similar
re-uniquing as the MDNode version used by other metadata node types.
This also necessitated a change to the context destructor, since in some
cases we end up with DIArgList as distinct nodes: DIArgList is the only
metadata node type to have a custom dropAllReferences, so we need to
invoke that version on DIArgList in the DistinctMDNodes store to clean
it up properly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108968

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init
# 1bebc31c 19-Jul-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for func parameters

Generate btf_tag annotations for function parameters.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DILocalVariable, and
annotations are represe

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for func parameters

Generate btf_tag annotations for function parameters.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DILocalVariable, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "info",, arg: 1, ..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106620

show more ...


# 30c28848 19-Jul-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable

Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIGlobalVariable, and
annotations are represen

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable

Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIGlobalVariable, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DIGlobalVariable(..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106619

show more ...


# d383df32 19-Jul-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types

Generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DISubprogram, and
annotations are represen

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types

Generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DISubprogram, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DISubprogram(..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106618

show more ...


# 430e2238 19-Jul-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIDerived types

Generate btf_tag annotations for DIDrived types. More specifically,
clang frontend generates the btf_tag annotations for record
fields. T

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIDerived types

Generate btf_tag annotations for DIDrived types. More specifically,
clang frontend generates the btf_tag annotations for record
fields. The annotations are represented as an DINodeArray
in DebugInfo. The following example illustrate how
annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_member, ..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106616

show more ...


# 0b32dca1 19-Jul-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

Reland [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types

Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "an

Reland [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types

Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates
how annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.

Reland with additional fixes for llvm/unittests/IR/DebugTypeODRUniquingTest.cpp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615

show more ...


# c1169b8b 19-Aug-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

Revert "[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types"

This reverts commit 2fded193e7a8fb5bd8fb339f00fd9de686390530.

Builtbot reports some test failures. Revert now so I can take t

Revert "[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types"

This reverts commit 2fded193e7a8fb5bd8fb339f00fd9de686390530.

Builtbot reports some test failures. Revert now so I can take time
to fix the issues.

show more ...


# 2fded193 19-Jul-2021 Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types

Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "annotatio

[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types

Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates
how annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615

show more ...


# 75aa3d52 27-Jul-2021 Paul Robinson <[email protected]>

Add a DIExpression const-folder to prevent silly expressions.

It's entirely possible (because it actually happened) for a bool
variable to end up with a 256-bit DW_AT_const_value. This came about
w

Add a DIExpression const-folder to prevent silly expressions.

It's entirely possible (because it actually happened) for a bool
variable to end up with a 256-bit DW_AT_const_value. This came about
when a local bool variable was initialized from a bitfield in a
32-byte struct of bitfields, and after inlining and constant
propagation, the variable did have a constant value. The sequence of
optimizations had it carrying "i256" values around, but once the
constant made it into the llvm.dbg.value, no further IR changes could
affect it.

Technically the llvm.dbg.value did have a DIExpression to reduce it
back down to 8 bits, but the compiler is in no way ready to emit an
oversized constant *and* a DWARF expression to manipulate it.
Depending on the circumstances, we had either just the very fat bool
value, or an expression with no starting value.

The sequence of optimizations that led to this state did seem pretty
reasonable, so the solution I came up with was to invent a DWARF
constant expression folder. Currently it only does convert ops, but
there's no reason it couldn't do other ops if that became useful.

This broke three tests that depended on having convert ops survive
into the DWARF, so I added an operator that would abort the folder to
each of those tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106915

show more ...


12345678910