Cleanup codegen includes

This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-in

Cleanup codegen includes

This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681

show more ...

Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"

This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https:/

Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"

This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

show more ...

Cleanup codegen includes

after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

[WebAssembly] Make EH/SjLj vars unconditionally thread local

This makes three thread local variables (`__THREW__`, `__threwValue`,
and `__wasm_lpad_context`) unconditionally thread local. If the tar

[WebAssembly] Make EH/SjLj vars unconditionally thread local

This makes three thread local variables (`__THREW__`, `__threwValue`,
and `__wasm_lpad_context`) unconditionally thread local. If the target
doesn't support TLS, they will be downgraded to normal variables in
`stripThreadLocals`. This makes the object not linkable with other
objects using shared memory, which is what we intend here; these
variables should be thread local when used with shared memory. This is
what we initially tried in D88262.

But D88323 changed this: It only created these variables when threads
were supported, because `__THREW__` and `__threwValue` were always
generated even if Emscripten EH/SjLj was not used, making all objects
built without threads not linkable with shared memory, which was too
restrictive. But sometimes this is not safe. If we build an object using
variables such as `__THREW__` without threads, it can be linked to other
objects using shared memory, because the original object's `__THREW__`
was not created thread local to begin with.

So this CL basically reverts D88323 with some additional improvements:
- This checks each of the functions and global variables created within
`LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj` pass and removes it if it's not used at the
end of the pass. So only modules using those variables will be
affected.
- Moves `CoalesceFeaturesAndStripAtomics` and `AtomicExpand` passes
after all other IR pasess that can create thread local variables. It
is not sufficient to move them to the end of `addIRPasses`, because
`__wasm_lpad_context` is created in `WasmEHPrepare`, which runs inside
`addPassesToHandleExceptions`, which runs before `addISelPrepare`. So
we override `addISelPrepare` and move atomic/TLS stripping and
expanding passes there.

This also removes merges `TLS` and `NO-TLS` FileCheck lines into one
`CHECK` line, because in the bitcode level we always create them as
thread local. Also some function declarations are deleted `CHECK` lines
because they are unused.

Reviewed By: tlively, sbc100

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120013

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Make __wasm_lpad_context thread-local

This makes `__wasm_lpad_context`, a struct that is used as a
communication channel between compiler-generated code and personality
function in lib

[WebAssembly] Make __wasm_lpad_context thread-local

This makes `__wasm_lpad_context`, a struct that is used as a
communication channel between compiler-generated code and personality
function in libunwind, thread local. The library code will be changed to
thread local in the emscripten side.

Reviewed By: sbc100, tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119803

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Extract longjmp handling in EmSjLj to a function (NFC)

Emscripten SjLj and (soon-to-be-added) Wasm SjLj transformation share
many steps:
1. Initialize `setjmpTable` and `setjmpTableSiz

[WebAssembly] Extract longjmp handling in EmSjLj to a function (NFC)

Emscripten SjLj and (soon-to-be-added) Wasm SjLj transformation share
many steps:
1. Initialize `setjmpTable` and `setjmpTableSize` in the entry BB
2. Handle `setjmp` callsites
3. Handle `longjmp` callsites
4. Cleanup and update SSA

1, 3, and 4 are identical for Emscripten SjLj and Wasm SjLj. Only the
step 2 is different. This CL extracts the current Emscripten SjLj's
longjmp callsites handling into a function. The reason to make this a
separate CL is, without this, the diff tool cannot compare things well
in the presence of moved code and added code in the followup Wasm SjLj
CL, and it ends up mixing them together, making the diff unreadable.

Also fixes some typos and variable names. So far we've been calling the
buffer argument to `setjmp` and `longjmp` `jmpbuf`, but the name used in
the man page for those functions is `env`, so updated them to be
consistent.

Reviewed By: tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108728

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Rename wasm.catch.exn intrinsic back to wasm.catch

The plan was to use `wasm.catch.exn` intrinsic to catch exceptions and
add `wasm.catch.longjmp` intrinsic, that returns two values (s

[WebAssembly] Rename wasm.catch.exn intrinsic back to wasm.catch

The plan was to use `wasm.catch.exn` intrinsic to catch exceptions and
add `wasm.catch.longjmp` intrinsic, that returns two values (setjmp
buffer and return value), later to catch longjmps. But because we
decided not to use multivalue support at the moment, we are going to use
one intrinsic that returns a single value for both exceptions and
longjmps. And even if it's not for that, I now think the naming of
`wasm.catch.exn` is a little weird, because the intrinsic can still take
a tag immediate, which means it can be used for anything, not only
exceptions, as long as that returns a single value.

This partially reverts D107405.

Reviewed By: tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108683

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Misc. cosmetic changes in EH (NFC)

- Rename `wasm.catch` intrinsic to `wasm.catch.exn`, because we are
planning to add a separate `wasm.catch.longjmp` intrinsic which
returns two v

[WebAssembly] Misc. cosmetic changes in EH (NFC)

- Rename `wasm.catch` intrinsic to `wasm.catch.exn`, because we are
planning to add a separate `wasm.catch.longjmp` intrinsic which
returns two values.
- Rename several variables
- Remove an unnecessary parameter from `canLongjmp` and `isEmAsmCall`
from LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass
- Add `-verify-machineinstrs` in a test for a safety measure
- Add more comments + fix some errors in comments
- Replace `std::vector` with `SmallVector` for cases likely with small
number of elements
- Renamed `EnableEH`/`EnableSjLj` to `EnableEmEH`/`EnableEmSjLj`: We are
soon going to add `EnableWasmSjLj`, so this makes the distincion
clearer

Reviewed By: tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107405

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Remove dominator dependency in WasmEHPrepare (NFC)

Dominator trees were previously used for an optimization related to
`wasm.lsda` but the optimization was removed in D97309. Currently

[WebAssembly] Remove dominator dependency in WasmEHPrepare (NFC)

Dominator trees were previously used for an optimization related to
`wasm.lsda` but the optimization was removed in D97309. Currently
dominators are not doing anything in this pass. Also removes some
`include` lines without which it compiles.

Reviewed By: tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106811

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Disable uses of __clang_call_terminate

Background:

Wasm EH, while using Windows EH (catchpad/cleanuppad based) IR, uses
Itanium-based libraries and ABIs with some modifications.

`__c

[WebAssembly] Disable uses of __clang_call_terminate

Background:

Wasm EH, while using Windows EH (catchpad/cleanuppad based) IR, uses
Itanium-based libraries and ABIs with some modifications.

`__clang_call_terminate` is a wrapper generated in Clang's Itanium C++
ABI implementation. It contains this code, in C-style pseudocode:
```
void __clang_call_terminate(void *exn) {
__cxa_begin_catch(exn);
std::terminate();
}
```
So this function is a wrapper to call `__cxa_begin_catch` on the
exception pointer before termination.

In Itanium ABI, this function is called when another exception is thrown
while processing an exception. The pointer for this second, violating
exception is passed as the argument of this `__clang_call_terminate`,
which calls `__cxa_begin_catch` with that pointer and calls
`std::terminate` to terminate the program.

The spec (https://libcxxabi.llvm.org/spec.html) for `__cxa_begin_catch`
says,
```
When the personality routine encounters a termination condition, it
will call __cxa_begin_catch() to mark the exception as handled and then
call terminate(), which shall not return to its caller.
```

In wasm EH's Clang implementation, this function is called from
cleanuppads that terminates the program, which we also call terminate
pads. Cleanuppads normally don't access the thrown exception and the
wasm backend converts them to `catch_all` blocks. But because we need
the exception pointer in this cleanuppad, we generate
`wasm.get.exception` intrinsic (which will eventually be lowered to
`catch` instruction) as we do in the catchpads. But because terminate
pads are cleanup pads and should run even when a foreign exception is
thrown, so what we have been doing is:
1. In `WebAssemblyLateEHPrepare::ensureSingleBBTermPads()`, we make sure
terminate pads are in this simple shape:
```
%exn = catch
call @__clang_call_terminate(%exn)
unreachable
```
2. In `WebAssemblyHandleEHTerminatePads` pass at the end of the
pipeline, we attach a `catch_all` to terminate pads, so they will be in
this form:
```
%exn = catch
call @__clang_call_terminate(%exn)
unreachable
catch_all
call @std::terminate()
unreachable
```
In `catch_all` part, we don't have the exception pointer, so we call
`std::terminate()` directly. The reason we ran HandleEHTerminatePads at
the end of the pipeline, separate from LateEHPrepare, was it was
convenient to assume there was only a single `catch` part per `try`
during CFGSort and CFGStackify.

---

Problem:

While it thinks terminate pads could have been possibly split or calls
to `__clang_call_terminate` could have been duplicated,
`WebAssemblyLateEHPrepare::ensureSingleBBTermPads()` assumes terminate
pads contain no more than calls to `__clang_call_terminate` and
`unreachable` instruction. I assumed that because in LLVM very limited
forms of transformations are done to catchpads and cleanuppads to
maintain the scoping structure. But it turned out to be incorrect;
passes can merge cleanuppads into one, including terminate pads, as long
as the new code has a correct scoping structure. One pass that does this
I observed was `SimplifyCFG`, but there can be more. After this
transformation, a single cleanuppad can contain any number of other
instructions with the call to `__clang_call_terminate` and can span many
BBs. It wouldn't be practical to duplicate all these BBs within the
cleanuppad to generate the equivalent `catch_all` blocks, only with
calls to `__clang_call_terminate` replaced by calls to `std::terminate`.

Unless we do more complicated transformation to split those calls to
`__clang_call_terminate` into a separate cleanuppad, it is tricky to
solve.

---

Solution (?):

This CL just disables the generation and use of `__clang_call_terminate`
and calls `std::terminate()` directly in its place.

The possible downside of this approach can be, because the Itanium ABI
intended to "mark" the violating exception handled, we don't do that
anymore. What `__cxa_begin_catch` actually does is increment the
exception's handler count and decrement the uncaught exception count,
which in my opinion do not matter much given that we are about to
terminate the program anyway. Also it does not affect info like stack
traces that can be possibly shown to developers.

And while we use a variant of Itanium EH ABI, we can make some
deviations if we choose to; we are already different in that in the
current version of the EH spec we don't support two-phase unwinding. We
can possibly consider a more complicated transformation later to
reenable this, but I don't think that has high priority.

Changes in this CL contains:
- In Clang, we don't generate a call to `wasm.get.exception()` intrinsic
and `__clang_call_terminate` function in terminate pads anymore; we
simply generate calls to `std::terminate()`, which is the default
implementation of `CGCXXABI::emitTerminateForUnexpectedException`.
- Remove `WebAssembly::ensureSingleBBTermPads() function and
`WebAssemblyHandleEHTerminatePads` pass, because terminate pads are
already `catch_all` now (because they don't need the exception
pointer) and we don't need these transformations anymore.
- Change tests to use `std::terminate` directly. Also removes tests that
tested `LateEHPrepare::ensureSingleBBTermPads` and
`HandleEHTerminatePads` pass.
- Drive-by fix: Add some function attributes to EH intrinsic
declarations

Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13582.

Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97834

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Disable wasm.lsda() optimization in WasmEHPrepare

In every catchpad except `catch (...)`, we add a call to
`_Unwind_CallPersonality`, which is a wapper to call the personality
function

[WebAssembly] Disable wasm.lsda() optimization in WasmEHPrepare

In every catchpad except `catch (...)`, we add a call to
`_Unwind_CallPersonality`, which is a wapper to call the personality
function. (In most of other Itanium-based architectures the call is done
from libunwind, but in wasm we don't have the control over the VM.)
Because the personatlity function is called to figure out whether the
current exception is a type we should catch, such as `int` or
`SomeClass&`, `catch (...)` does not need the personality function call.
For the same reason, all cleanuppads don't need it.

When we call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`, we store some necessary info in
a data structure called `__wasm_lpad_context` of type
`_Unwind_LandingPadContext`, which is defined in the wasm's port of
libunwind in Emscripten. Also the personality wrapper function returns
some info (selector and the caught pointer) in that data structure, so
it is used as a medium for communication.

One of the info we need to store is the address for LSDA info for the
current function. `wasm.lsda()` intrinsic returns that address. (This
intrinsic will be lowered to a symbol that points to the LSDA address.)
The simpliest thing is call `wasm.lsda()` every time we need to call
`_Unwind_CallPersonality` and store that info in `__wasm_lpad_context`
data structure. But we tried to be better than that (D77423 and some
more previous CLs), so if catchpad A dominates catchpad B and catchpad A
is not `catch (...)`, we didn't insert `wasm.lsda()` call in catchpad B,
thinking that the LSDA address is the same for a single function and we
already visited catchpad A and `__wasm_lpad_context.lsda` field would
already have that value.

But this can be incorrect if there is a call to another function, which
also can have the personality function and LSDA, between catchpad A and
catchpad B, because `__wasm_lpad_context` is a globally defined
structure and the callee function will overwrite its `lsda` field.

So in this CL we don't try to do any optimizaions on adding
`wasm.lsda()` call; we store the result of `wasm.lsda()` every time we
call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`. We can do some complicated analysis,
like checking if there is a function call between the dominating
catchpad and the current catchpad, but at this time it seems overkill.

This deletes three tests because they all tested `wasm.ldsa()` call
optimization.

Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13548.

Reviewed By: tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97309

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Rename methods in WasmEHFuncInfo (NFC)

This renames variable and method names in `WasmEHFuncInfo` class to be
simpler and clearer. For example, unwind destinations are EH pads by
defin

[WebAssembly] Rename methods in WasmEHFuncInfo (NFC)

This renames variable and method names in `WasmEHFuncInfo` class to be
simpler and clearer. For example, unwind destinations are EH pads by
definition so it doesn't necessarily need to be included in every method
name. Also I am planning to add the reverse mapping in a later CL,
something like `UnwindDestToSrc`, so this renaming will make meanings
clearer.

Reviewed By: dschuff

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97173

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Update WasmEHPrepare for the new spec

Clang generates `wasm.get.exception` and `wasm.get.ehselector`
intrinsics, which respectively return a caught exception value (a
pointer to some C

[WebAssembly] Update WasmEHPrepare for the new spec

Clang generates `wasm.get.exception` and `wasm.get.ehselector`
intrinsics, which respectively return a caught exception value (a
pointer to some C++ exception struct) and a selector (an integer value
that tells which C++ `catch` clause the current exception matches, or
does not match any).

WasmEHPrepare is a pass that does some IR-level preparation before
instruction selection. Previously one of things we did in this pass was
to convert `wasm.get.exception` intrinsic calls to
`wasm.extract.exception` intrinsics. Their semantics were the same
except `wasm.extract.exception` did not have a token argument. We
maintained these two separate intrinsics with the same semantics because
instruction selection couldn't handle token arguments. This
`wasm.extract.exception` intrinsic was later converted to
`extract_exception` instruction in instruction selection, which was a
pseudo instruction to implement `br_on_exn`. Because `br_on_exn` pushed
an extracted value onto the value stack after the `end` instruction of a
`block`, but LLVM does not have a way of modeling that kind of behavior,
so this pseudo instruction was used to pull an extracted value out of
thin air, like this:
```
block $l0
...
br_on_exn $cpp_exception $l0
...
end
extract_exception ;; pushes values onto the stack
```

In the new spec, we don't need this pseudo instruction anymore because
`catch` itself returns a value and we don't have `br_on_exn` anymore. In
the spec `catch` returns multiple values (like `br_on_exn`), but here we
assume it only returns a single i32, which is sufficient to support C++.

So this renames `wasm.get.exception` intrinsic to `wasm.catch`. Because
this CL does not yet contain instruction selection for `wasm.catch`
intrinsic, all `RUN` lines in exception.ll, eh-lsda.ll, and
cfg-stackify-eh.ll, and a single `RUN` line in wasm-eh.cpp (which is an
end-to-end test from C++ source to assembly) fail. So this CL
temporarily disables those `RUN` lines, and for those test files without
any valid remaining `RUN` lines, adds a dummy `RUN` line to make them
pass. These tests will be reenabled in later CLs.

Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94039

show more ...

[CodeGen] Construct SmallVector with iterator ranges (NFC)

[CodeGen] Delete 4 unused declarations

[CodeGen] Use pred_empty (NFC)

[IR] Replace all uses of CallBase::getCalledValue() with getCalledOperand().

This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOpe

[IR] Replace all uses of CallBase::getCalledValue() with getCalledOperand().

This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().

I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix a sanitizer error in WasmEHPrepare

Summary:
D77423 started using a dominator tree in WasmEHPrepare, but we deleted
BBs in `prepareThrows` before we used the domtree in `prepareEHPa

[WebAssembly] Fix a sanitizer error in WasmEHPrepare

Summary:
D77423 started using a dominator tree in WasmEHPrepare, but we deleted
BBs in `prepareThrows` before we used the domtree in `prepareEHPads`,
and those CFG changes were not reflected in the domtree. This uses
`DomTreeUpdater` to make sure we update the domtree every time we delete
BBs from the CFG. This fixes ubsan/msan/expensive_check errors caught in
LLVM buildbots.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77465

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix wasm.lsda() optimization in WasmEHPrepare

Summary:
When we insert a call to the personality function wrapper
(`_Unwind_CallPersonality`) for a catch pad, we store some necessary
in

[WebAssembly] Fix wasm.lsda() optimization in WasmEHPrepare

Summary:
When we insert a call to the personality function wrapper
(`_Unwind_CallPersonality`) for a catch pad, we store some necessary
info in `__wasm_lpad_context` struct and pass it. One of the info is the
LSDA address for the function. For this, we insert a call to
`wasm.lsda()`, which will be lowered down to the address of LSDA, and
store it in a field in `__wasm_lpad_context`.

There are exceptions to this personality call insertion: catchpads for
`catch (...)` and cleanuppads (for destructors) don't need personality
function calls, because we don't need to figure out whether the current
exception should be caught or not. (They always should.)

There was a little optimization to `wasm.lsda()` call insertion. Because
the LSDA address is the same throughout a function, we don't need to
insert a store of `wasm.lsda()` return value in every catchpad. For
example:
```
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// wasm.lsda() call and a store are inserted here, like, in
// pseudocode,
// %lsda = wasm.lsda();
// store %lsda to a field in __wasm_lpad_context
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// We don't need to insert the wasm.lsda() and store again, because
// to arrive here, we have already stored the LSDA address to
// __wasm_lpad_context in the outer catch.
}
}
```
So the previous algorithm checked if the current catch has a parent EH
pad, we didn't insert a call to `wasm.lsda()` and its store.

But this was incorrect, because what if the outer catch is `catch (...)`
or a cleanuppad?
```
try {
foo();
} catch (...) {
// wasm.lsda() call and a store are NOT inserted here
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// We need wasm.lsda() here!
}
}
```
In this case we need to insert `wasm.lsda()` in the inner catchpad,
because the outer catchpad does not have one.

To minimize the number of inserted `wasm.lsda()` calls and stores, we
need a way to figure out whether we have encountered `wasm.lsda()` call
in any of EH pads that dominates the current EH pad. To figure that
out, we now visit EH pads in BFS order in the dominator tree so that we
visit parent BBs first before visiting its child BBs in the domtree.

We keep a set named `ExecutedLSDA`, which basically means "Do we have
`wasm.lsda()` either in the current EH pad or any of its parent EH
pads in the dominator tree?". This is to prevent scanning the domtree up
to the root in the worst case every time we examine an EH pad: each EH
pad only needs to examine its immediate parent EH pad.

- If any of its parent EH pads in the domtree has `wasm.lsda()`, this
means we don't need `wasm.lsda()` in the current EH pad. We also insert
the current EH pad in `ExecutedLSDA` set.
- If none of its parent EH pad has `wasm.lsda()`
- If the current EH pad is a `catch (...)` or a cleanuppad, done.
- If the current EH pad is neither a `catch (...)` nor a cleanuppad,
add `wasm.lsda()` and the store in the current EH pad, and add the
current EH pad to `ExecutedLSDA` set.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77423

show more ...

[IR] Split out target specific intrinsic enums into separate headers

This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build

[IR] Split out target specific intrinsic enums into separate headers

This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build of 'all'. This is 3.03% of 7,332.7MB of
object file size.
- Incremental step towards decoupling target intrinsics.

The enums are still compact, so adding and removing a single
target-specific intrinsic will trigger a rebuild of all of LLVM.
Assigning distinct target id spaces is potential future work.

Part of PR34259

Reviewers: efriedma, echristo, MaskRay

Reviewed By: echristo, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71320

show more ...

Sink all InitializePasses.h includes

This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of reco

Sink all InitializePasses.h includes

This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.

I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h

Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.

Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Make rethrow take an except_ref type argument

Summary:
In the new wasm EH proposal, `rethrow` takes an `except_ref` argument.
This change was missing in r352598.

This patch adds `llvm

[WebAssembly] Make rethrow take an except_ref type argument

Summary:
In the new wasm EH proposal, `rethrow` takes an `except_ref` argument.
This change was missing in r352598.

This patch adds `llvm.wasm.rethrow.in.catch` intrinsic. This is an
intrinsic that's gonna eventually be lowered to wasm `rethrow`
instruction, but this intrinsic can appear only within a catchpad or a
cleanuppad scope. Also this intrinsic needs to be invokable - otherwise
EH pad successor for it will not be correctly generated in clang.

This also adds lowering logic for this intrinsic in
`SelectionDAGBuilder::visitInvoke`. This routine is basically a
specialized and simplified version of
`SelectionDAGBuilder::visitTargetIntrinsic`, but we can't use it
because if is only for `CallInst`s.

This deletes the previous `llvm.wasm.rethrow` intrinsic and related
tests, which was meant to be used within a `__cxa_rethrow` library
function. Turned out this needs some more logic, so the intrinsic for
this purpose will be added later.

LateEHPrepare takes a result value of `catch` and inserts it into
matching `rethrow` as an argument.

`RETHROW_IN_CATCH` is a pseudo instruction that serves as a link between
`llvm.wasm.rethrow.in.catch` and the real wasm `rethrow` instruction. To
generate a `rethrow` instruction, we need an `except_ref` argument,
which is generated from `catch` instruction. But `catch` instrutions are
added in LateEHPrepare pass, so we use `RETHROW_IN_CATCH`, which takes
no argument, until we are able to correctly lower it to `rethrow` in
LateEHPrepare.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59352

llvm-svn: 356316

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Delete ThrowUnwindDest map from WasmEHFuncInfo

Summary:
Before when we implemented the first EH proposal, 'catch <tag>'
instruction may not catch an exception so there were multiple EH

[WebAssembly] Delete ThrowUnwindDest map from WasmEHFuncInfo

Summary:
Before when we implemented the first EH proposal, 'catch <tag>'
instruction may not catch an exception so there were multiple EH pads an
exception can unwind to. That means a BB could have multiple EH pad
successors.

Now after we switched to the new proposal, every 'catch' instruction
catches an exception, and there is only one catchpad per catchswitch, so
we at most have one EH pad successor, making `ThrowUnwindDest` map in
`WasmEHInfo` unnecessary.

Keeping `ThrowUnwindDest` map in `WasmEHInfo` has its own problems,
because other optimization passes can split a BB that contains possibly
throwing calls (previously invokes), and we have to update the map every
time that happens, which is not easy for common CodeGen passes.

This also correctly updates successor info in LateEHPrepare when we add
a rethrow instruction.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58486

llvm-svn: 355296

show more ...

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to LoadInst creation.

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to LoadInst creation.

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172

llvm-svn: 352911

show more ...

[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it.

Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.

Original Message:
The Func

[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it.

Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.

Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.

Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.

One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.

However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)

Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315

llvm-svn: 352827

show more ...