History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/lib/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 45)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3
# f6774130 04-Mar-2021 Stephen Tozer <[email protected]>

Reapply "[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values"

Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect
reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc

Reapply "[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values"

Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect
reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc; simplifies `spillReg` behaviour
so as to not be dependent on changes elsewhere in the patch stack.

This reverts commit d2000b45d033c06dc7973f59909a0ad12887ff51.

show more ...


# d2000b45 04-Mar-2021 Stephen Tozer <[email protected]>

Revert "[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values"

This reverts commit d07f106f4a48b6e941266525b6f7177834d7b74e.


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3
# d07f106f 11-Sep-2020 gbtozers <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values

This patch adds a new instruction that can represent variadic debug values,
DBG_VALUE_VAR. This patch alone covers

[DebugInfo] Add new instruction and DIExpression operator for variadic debug values

This patch adds a new instruction that can represent variadic debug values,
DBG_VALUE_VAR. This patch alone covers the addition of the instruction and a set
of basic code changes in MachineInstr and a few adjacent areas, but does not
correctly handle variadic debug values outside of these areas, nor does it
generate them at any point.

The new instruction is similar to the existing DBG_VALUE instruction, with the
following differences: the operands are in a different order, any number of
values may be used in the instruction following the Variable and Expression
operands (these are referred to in code as “debug operands”) and are indexed
from 0 so that getDebugOperand(X) == getOperand(X+2), and the Expression in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR must use the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator to pass arguments into the
expression.

The new DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator is only valid in expressions appearing in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR; it takes a single argument and pushes the debug operand at the
index given by the argument onto the Expression stack. For example the
sub-expression `DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0` has the meaning “Push the debug operand at
index 0 onto the expression stack.”

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363

show more ...


# 104a9f99 15-Jan-2021 Alok Kumar Sharma <[email protected]>

[Debuginfo][DW_OP_implicit_pointer] (1/7) Support for DW_OP_LLVM_implicit_pointer

New dwarf operator DW_OP_LLVM_implicit_pointer is introduced (present only in LLVM IR)
This operator is required as

[Debuginfo][DW_OP_implicit_pointer] (1/7) Support for DW_OP_LLVM_implicit_pointer

New dwarf operator DW_OP_LLVM_implicit_pointer is introduced (present only in LLVM IR)
This operator is required as it is different than DWARF operator
DW_OP_implicit_pointer in representation and specification (number
and types of operands) and later can not be used as multiple level.

Reviewed By: aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84113

show more ...


# ad68a8b9 19-Sep-2020 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Cleanup RLE dumping, using a length-constrained DataExtractor rather than carrying the end offset separately


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2
# 91bd9db2 11-Aug-2020 David Stenberg <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Allow GNU macro extension to be read

Allow the GNU .debug_macro extension to be parsed and printed by
llvm-dwarfdump. In an upcoming patch support will be added for emitting
that format

[DebugInfo] Allow GNU macro extension to be read

Allow the GNU .debug_macro extension to be parsed and printed by
llvm-dwarfdump. In an upcoming patch support will be added for emitting
that format also.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82974

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# 9456bbdd 08-Jun-2020 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

[BinaryFormat] Add formatv support for DW_OP constants

The functionality will be used from lldb.


# 4933ab2c 02-Jun-2020 Igor Kudrin <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Report the format of call frame information entries [6/10]

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80523


# 5e296e3d 02-Jun-2020 Igor Kudrin <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Extract a helper function to return the DWARF format name, NFC [1/10]

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80523


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4
# 498e37e7 07-Mar-2020 Sourabh Singh Tomar <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo]: Added DWARFv5 macro header flags and corresponding helper
functions.


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1
# 63b428e3 15-Jan-2020 Hubert Tong <[email protected]>

DWARFDebugLine.cpp: Format unknown line number standard opcodes

Summary:
This patch implements `formatv()` formatting for `dwarf::LineNumberOps`
and makes use of it for the `llvm-dwarfdump --debug-l

DWARFDebugLine.cpp: Format unknown line number standard opcodes

Summary:
This patch implements `formatv()` formatting for `dwarf::LineNumberOps`
and makes use of it for the `llvm-dwarfdump --debug-line` dump.

Previously, unknown line number standard opcodes would lead to undefined
behaviour. The code would attempt to format the data pointer of an empty
`StringRef` (a null pointer) using `%s`. According to the description
for `format()`, use of that interface carries the "risk of `printf`".
Passing a null pointer in place of an array to a C library function
results in undefined behaviour.

Reviewers: jhenderson, daltenty, stevewan

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72369

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1
# f919be33 29-Oct-2019 Adrian Prantl <[email protected]>

[DWARF5] Added support for deleted C++ special member functions.

This patch adds support for deleted C++ special member functions in
clang and llvm. Also added Defaulted member encodings for future

[DWARF5] Added support for deleted C++ special member functions.

This patch adds support for deleted C++ special member functions in
clang and llvm. Also added Defaulted member encodings for future
support for defaulted member functions.

Patch by Sourabh Singh Tomar!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69215

show more ...


# 1ae2d9a2 15-Oct-2019 David Stenberg <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Add a DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operation

Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the num

[DebugInfo] Add a DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operation

Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the number
of bytes that the entry value covers.

At the time of emitting entry values we don't know the emitted size of
the DWARF expression that the entry value will cover. Currently the size
is hardcoded to 1 in DIExpression, and other values causes the verifier
to fail. As the size is 1, that effectively means that we can only have
valid entry values for registers that can be encoded in one byte, which
are the registers with DWARF numbers 0 to 31 (as they can be encoded as
single-byte DW_OP_reg0..DW_OP_reg31 rather than a multi-byte
DW_OP_regx). It is a bit confusing, but it seems like llvm-dwarfdump
will print an operation "correctly", even if the byte size is less than
that, which may make it seem that we emit correct DWARF for registers
with DWARF numbers > 31. If you instead use readelf for such cases, it
will interpret the number of specified bytes as a DWARF expression. This
seems like a limitation in llvm-dwarfdump.

As suggested in D66746, a way forward would be to add an internal
variant of DW_OP_entry_value, DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, whose operand
instead specifies the number of operations that the entry value covers,
and we then translate that into the byte size at the time of emission.

In this patch that internal operation is added. This patch keeps the
limitation that a entry value can only be applied to simple register
locations, but it will fix the issue with the size operand being
incorrect for DWARF numbers > 31.

Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #debug-info, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67492

llvm-svn: 374881

show more ...


# 5841e9af 08-Oct-2019 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Move LLE enum handling to .def to match RLE handling

llvm-svn: 374122


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3
# 57ae3005 13-Aug-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[Dwarf] Complete the list of type tags.

An incorrect verification error revealed that the list of type tags was
incomplete. This patch adds the missing types by adding a tag kind to
the Dwarf.def fi

[Dwarf] Complete the list of type tags.

An incorrect verification error revealed that the list of type tags was
incomplete. This patch adds the missing types by adding a tag kind to
the Dwarf.def file, which is used by the `isType` function.

A test was added for the original verification error.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65914

llvm-svn: 368718

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3
# fb9ce100 17-Jun-2019 Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]>

hwasan: Add a tag_offset DWARF attribute to instrumented stack variables.

The goal is to improve hwasan's error reporting for stack use-after-return by
recording enough information to allow the spec

hwasan: Add a tag_offset DWARF attribute to instrumented stack variables.

The goal is to improve hwasan's error reporting for stack use-after-return by
recording enough information to allow the specific variable that was accessed
to be identified based on the pointer's tag. Currently we record the PC and
lower bits of SP for each stack frame we create (which will eventually be
enough to derive the base tag used by the stack frame) but that's not enough
to determine the specific tag for each variable, which is the stack frame's
base tag XOR a value (the "tag offset") that is unique for each variable in
a function.

In IR, the tag offset is most naturally represented as part of a location
expression on the llvm.dbg.declare instruction. However, the presence of the
tag offset in the variable's actual location expression is likely to confuse
debuggers which won't know about tag offsets, and moreover the tag offset
is not required for a debugger to determine the location of the variable on
the stack, so at the DWARF level it is represented as an attribute so that
it will be ignored by debuggers that don't know about it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63119

llvm-svn: 363635

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1
# b86ce219 19-Mar-2019 Markus Lavin <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_convert

Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an a

[DebugInfo] Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_convert

Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.

The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.

For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.

This is a recommit of r356442 with trivial fixes for the failing tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587

llvm-svn: 356451

show more ...


# ad78768d 19-Mar-2019 Markus Lavin <[email protected]>

Revert "[DebugInfo] Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_convert"

This reverts commit 1cf4b593a7ebd666fc6775f3bd38196e8e65fafe.

Build bots found failing tests not detected locally.

Failing Tests (3):
LLVM :: De

Revert "[DebugInfo] Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_convert"

This reverts commit 1cf4b593a7ebd666fc6775f3bd38196e8e65fafe.

Build bots found failing tests not detected locally.

Failing Tests (3):
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/convert-debugloc.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/convert-inlined.ll
LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/convert-linked.ll

llvm-svn: 356444

show more ...


# cd8a940b 19-Mar-2019 Markus Lavin <[email protected]>

[DebugInfo] Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_convert

Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an a

[DebugInfo] Introduce DW_OP_LLVM_convert

Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.

The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.

For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587

llvm-svn: 356442

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


# ac69af7a 19-Dec-2018 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

llvm-dwarfdump: Improve/fix pretty printing of array dimensions

This is to address post-commit feedback from Paul Robinson on r348954.

The original commit misinterprets count and upper bound as the

llvm-dwarfdump: Improve/fix pretty printing of array dimensions

This is to address post-commit feedback from Paul Robinson on r348954.

The original commit misinterprets count and upper bound as the same thing (I thought I saw GCC producing an upper bound the same as Clang's count, but GCC correctly produces an upper bound that's one less than the count (in C, that is, where arrays are zero indexed)).

I want to preserve the C-like output for the common case, so in the absence of a lower bound the count (or one greater than the upper bound) is rendered between []. In the trickier cases, where a lower bound is specified, a half-open range is used (eg: lower bound 1, count 2 would be "[1, 3)" and an unknown parts use a '?' (eg: "[1, ?)" or "[?, 7)" or "[?, ? + 3)").

Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55721

llvm-svn: 349670

show more ...


# f57d7d82 18-Dec-2018 Luke Cheeseman <[email protected]>

[AArch64] - Return address signing dwarf support

- Reapply changes intially introduced in r343089
- The archtecture info is no longer loaded whenever a DWARFContext is created
- The runtimes librari

[AArch64] - Return address signing dwarf support

- Reapply changes intially introduced in r343089
- The archtecture info is no longer loaded whenever a DWARFContext is created
- The runtimes libraries (santiziers) make use of the dwarf context classes but
do not intialise the target info
- The architecture of the object can be obtained without loading the target info
- Adding a method to the dwarf context to get this information and multiplex the
string printing later on

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55774

llvm-svn: 349472

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3
# 6db3a6a4 23-Nov-2018 Luke Cheeseman <[email protected]>

Revert r347490 as it breaks address sanitizer builds

llvm-svn: 347499


# d6dbd641 23-Nov-2018 Luke Cheeseman <[email protected]>

Revert r343341

- Cannot reproduce the build failure locally and the build logs have
been deleted.

llvm-svn: 347490


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1
# 10981cc8 28-Sep-2018 Luke Cheeseman <[email protected]>

Revert r343317

- asan buildbots are breaking and I need to investigate the issue

llvm-svn: 343341


12