[lldb] Improve error message when --func-regex parameter for the breakpoint command is invalid

Summary:
Currently the breakpoint command is prompting the user to file a bug report if the provided re

[lldb] Improve error message when --func-regex parameter for the breakpoint command is invalid

Summary:
Currently the breakpoint command is prompting the user to file a bug report if the provided regex is invalid:
```
(lldb) rbreak *foo
error: Function name regular expression could not be compiled: "Inconvertible error value. An error has occurred that could not be converted to a known std::error_code. Please file a bug. repetition-operator operand invalid"
```

The reason is simply that we are using the wrong StringError constructor (the one with the error code as the first parameter
is also printing the string version of the error code, and the inconvertible error code is just an invalid place holder code with
that description). Switching the StringError constructor parameters will only print the error message we get from the regex
engine when we convert the error into a string.

I checked the rest of the code base and I couldn't find the same issue anywhere else.

Fixes rdar://62233561

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78808

show more ...

Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit.

This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.

This is mostly m

Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit.

This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.

This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.

This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[lldb] Use the new Regex::isValid() with no parameter

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66463

llvm-svn: 369398

[lldb] D66174 `RegularExpression` cleanup

I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI
as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the
re

[lldb] D66174 `RegularExpression` cleanup

I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI
as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the
regex.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66392

llvm-svn: 369352

show more ...

[Utility] Reimplement RegularExpression on top of llvm::Regex

Originally I wanted to remove the RegularExpression class in Utility and
replace it with llvm::Regex. However, during that transition I

[Utility] Reimplement RegularExpression on top of llvm::Regex

Originally I wanted to remove the RegularExpression class in Utility and
replace it with llvm::Regex. However, during that transition I noticed
that there are several places where need the regular expression string.
So instead I propose to keep the RegularExpression class and make it a
thin wrapper around llvm::Regex.

This patch also removes the workaround for empty regular expressions.
The result is that we are now (more or less) POSIX conformant.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66174

llvm-svn: 369153

show more ...

[Utility] Remove unused function 'GetMatchSpanningIndices'

llvm-svn: 368243

[lldb] Make sure RegularExpression constructors always initialize member variables

The copy constructor of RegularExpression doesn't initialize m_comp_err. This causes an use-of-initialized-value er

[lldb] Make sure RegularExpression constructors always initialize member variables

The copy constructor of RegularExpression doesn't initialize m_comp_err. This causes an use-of-initialized-value error when a RegularExpression is copied: the copy constructor calls Compile, which calls Free to free the existing regex if needed, which in turn reads m_comp_err to check if there's any regex to be freed.

This change calls the default constructor from the other constructors to make sure members are always initialized with sensible values. This also avoids duplicating init logic, like the RegularExpression(llvm:StringRef) constructor does, which is error prone.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62334

llvm-svn: 361546

show more ...

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue

if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)

continue

if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""

out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197

show more ...

iwyu fixes on lldbUtility.

This patch makes adjustments to header file includes in
lldbUtility based on recommendations by the iwyu tool
(include-what-you-use). The goal here is to make sure that
a

iwyu fixes on lldbUtility.

This patch makes adjustments to header file includes in
lldbUtility based on recommendations by the iwyu tool
(include-what-you-use). The goal here is to make sure that
all files include the exact set of headers which are needed
for that file only, to eliminate cases of dead includes (e.g.
someone deleted some code but forgot to delete the header
includes that that code necessitated), and to eliminate the
case where header includes are picked up transitively.

llvm-svn: 299676

show more ...

Fix a couple of corner cases in NameMatches

Summary:
I originally set out to move the NameMatches closer to the relevant
function and add some unit tests. However, in the process I've found a
couple

Fix a couple of corner cases in NameMatches

Summary:
I originally set out to move the NameMatches closer to the relevant
function and add some unit tests. However, in the process I've found a
couple of bugs in the implementation:
- the early exits where not always correct:
- (test==pattern) does not mean the match will always suceed because
of regular expressions
- pattern.empty() does not mean the match will fail because the "" is
a valid prefix of any string

So I cleaned up those and added some tests. The only tricky part here
was that regcomp() implementation on darwin did not recognise the empty
string as a regular expression and returned an REG_EMPTY error instead.
The simples fix here seemed to be to replace the empty expression with
an equivalent non-empty one.

Reviewers: clayborg, zturner

Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30094

llvm-svn: 295651

show more ...

Move classes from Core -> Utility.

This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.

ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString

The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state w

Move classes from Core -> Utility.

This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.

ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString

The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427

llvm-svn: 293941

show more ...