[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
mem

[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.

Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.

This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.

rdar://74890607

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856

show more ...

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,mo

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix ,

https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers

The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them
all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivale

[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers

The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them
all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivalent.

Reviewed By: shafik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103084

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Remove unused includes in Utility's source files

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Re-land "Extract construction of DataBufferLLVM into FileSystem"

This fixes some UB in isLocal detected by the sanitized bot.

llvm-svn: 346707

Revert "Extract construction of DataBufferLLVM into FileSystem"

It broke the lldb sanitizer bots.

llvm-svn: 346694

Remove comments after header includes.

This patch removes the comments following the header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are of

Remove comments after header includes.

This patch removes the comments following the header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54385

llvm-svn: 346625

show more ...

Extract construction of DataBufferLLVM into FileSystem

This moves construction of data buffers into the FileSystem class. Like
some of the previous refactorings we don't translate the path yet
becau

Extract construction of DataBufferLLVM into FileSystem

This moves construction of data buffers into the FileSystem class. Like
some of the previous refactorings we don't translate the path yet
because the functionality hasn't been landed in LLVM yet.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54272

llvm-svn: 346598

show more ...

Make sure DataBufferLLVM contents are writable

Summary:
We sometimes need to write to the object file we've mapped into memory,
generally to apply relocations to debug info sections. We've had that

Make sure DataBufferLLVM contents are writable

Summary:
We sometimes need to write to the object file we've mapped into memory,
generally to apply relocations to debug info sections. We've had that
ability before, but with the introduction of DataBufferLLVM, we have
lost it, as the underlying llvm class (MemoryBuffer) only supports
read-only mappings.

This switches DataBufferLLVM to use the new llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
class as a back-end, as this one guarantees to return a writable buffer.

This removes the need for the "Private" flag to the DataBufferLLVM
creation functions, as it was really used to mean "writable". The LLVM
function also does not have the NullTerminate flag, so I've modified our
clients to not require this feature and removed that flag as well.

Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham

Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arichardson, krytarowski, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40079

llvm-svn: 321255

show more ...

iwyu fixes on lldbUtility.

This patch makes adjustments to header file includes in
lldbUtility based on recommendations by the iwyu tool
(include-what-you-use). The goal here is to make sure that
a

iwyu fixes on lldbUtility.

This patch makes adjustments to header file includes in
lldbUtility based on recommendations by the iwyu tool
(include-what-you-use). The goal here is to make sure that
all files include the exact set of headers which are needed
for that file only, to eliminate cases of dead includes (e.g.
someone deleted some code but forgot to delete the header
includes that that code necessitated), and to eliminate the
case where header includes are picked up transitively.

llvm-svn: 299676

show more ...

Remove FileSpec::ReadFileContents.

This functionality is subsumed by DataBufferLLVM, which is
also more efficient since it will try to mmap. However, we
don't yet support mmaping writable private s

Remove FileSpec::ReadFileContents.

This functionality is subsumed by DataBufferLLVM, which is
also more efficient since it will try to mmap. However, we
don't yet support mmaping writable private sections, and in
some cases we were using ReadFileContents and then modifying
the buffer. To address that I've added a flag to the
DataBufferLLVM methods that allow you to map privately, which
disables the mmaping path entirely. Eventually we should teach
DataBufferLLVM to use mmap with writable private, but that is
orthogonal to this effort.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30622

llvm-svn: 297095

show more ...

Move DataBuffer / DataExtractor and friends from Core -> Utility.

llvm-svn: 296943