[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes

Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the
"lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging
inf

[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes

Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the
"lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging
infrastructure). This worked because Log.h included Logging.h, even
though it should.

After the recent refactor, it became impossible the two files include
each other in this direction (the opposite inclusion is needed), so this
patch removes the workaround that was put in place and cleans up all
files to include the right thing. It also renames the file to LLDBLog to
better reflect its purpose.

show more ...

[lldb] Convert "LLDB" log channel to the new API

[lldb] Rename {stop,run}_vote to report_{stop,run}_vote

Rename `stop_vote` and `run_vote` to `report_stop_vote` and `report_run_vote`
respectively. These variables are limited to logic involving (ev

[lldb] Rename {stop,run}_vote to report_{stop,run}_vote

Rename `stop_vote` and `run_vote` to `report_stop_vote` and `report_run_vote`
respectively. These variables are limited to logic involving (event) reporting only.
This naming is intended to make their context more clear.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96917

show more ...

Allow the ThreadPlanStackMap to hold the thread plans for threads
that were not reported by the OS plugin. To facilitate this, move
adding/updating the ThreadPlans for a Thread to the ThreadPlanStac

Allow the ThreadPlanStackMap to hold the thread plans for threads
that were not reported by the OS plugin. To facilitate this, move
adding/updating the ThreadPlans for a Thread to the ThreadPlanStackMap.
Also move dumping thread plans there as well.

Added some tests for "thread plan list" and "thread plan discard" since
I didn't seem to have written any originally.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76814

show more ...

Make ThreadPlans use TID and Process, rather than Thread *.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75711

Don't fail step out if remote server doesn't implement qMemoryRegionInfo

Summary:
The return address validation in D71372 will fail if the memory permissions can't be determined. Many embedded stubs

Don't fail step out if remote server doesn't implement qMemoryRegionInfo

Summary:
The return address validation in D71372 will fail if the memory permissions can't be determined. Many embedded stubs either don't implement the qMemoryRegionInfo packet, or don't have memory permissions at all.

Remove the return from the if clause that calls GetLoadAddressPermissions, so this call failing doesn't cause the step out to abort. Instead, assume that the memory permission check doesn't apply to this type of target.

Reviewers: labath, jingham, clayborg, mossberg

Reviewed By: labath, jingham

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72513

show more ...

Don't fail step out if remote server doesn't implement qMemoryRegionInfo

Summary:
The return address validation in D71372 will fail if the memory permissions can't be determined. Many embedded stubs

Don't fail step out if remote server doesn't implement qMemoryRegionInfo

Summary:
The return address validation in D71372 will fail if the memory permissions can't be determined. Many embedded stubs either don't implement the qMemoryRegionInfo packet, or don't have memory permissions at all.

Remove the return from the if clause that calls GetLoadAddressPermissions, so this call failing doesn't cause the step out to abort. Instead, assume that the memory permission check doesn't apply to this type of target.

Reviewers: labath, jingham, clayborg, mossberg

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72513

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

In 'thread step-out' command, only insert a breakpoint in executable memory.

Previously, if the current function had a nonstandard stack layout/ABI, and had a valid
data pointer in the location wher

In 'thread step-out' command, only insert a breakpoint in executable memory.

Previously, if the current function had a nonstandard stack layout/ABI, and had a valid
data pointer in the location where the return address is usually located, data corruption
would occur when the breakpoint was written. This could lead to an incorrectly reported
crash or silent corruption of the program's state. Now, if the above check fails, the command safely aborts.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71372

show more ...

[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)

This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style for

[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)

This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.

So instead of writing:

if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);

You'd write:

LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);

This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.

find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128

llvm-svn: 366936

show more ...

Include inlined functions when figuring out a contiguous address range

Checking this in for Antonio Afonso:

This diff changes the function LineEntry::GetSameLineContiguousAddressRange so that it al

Include inlined functions when figuring out a contiguous address range

Checking this in for Antonio Afonso:

This diff changes the function LineEntry::GetSameLineContiguousAddressRange so that it also includes function calls that were inlined at the same line of code.

My motivation is to decrease the step over time of lines that heavly rely on inlined functions. I have multiple examples in the code base I work that makes a step over stop 20 or mote times internally. This can easly had up to step overs that take >500ms which I was able to lower to 25ms with this new strategy.

The reason the current code is not extending the address range beyond an inlined function is because when we resolve the symbol at the next address of the line entry we will get the entry line corresponding to where the original code for the inline function lives, making us barely extend the range. This then will end up on a step over having to stop multiple times everytime there's an inlined function.

To check if the range is an inlined function at that line I also get the block associated with the next address and check if there is a parent block with a call site at the line we're trying to extend.

To check this I created a new function in Block called GetContainingInlinedBlockWithCallSite that does exactly that. I also added a new function to Declaration for convinence of checking file/line named CompareFileAndLine.

To avoid potential issues when extending an address range I added an Extend function that extends the range by the AddressRange given as an argument. This function returns true to indicate sucess when the rage was agumented, false otherwise (e.g.: the ranges are not connected). The reason I do is to make sure that we're not just blindly extending complete_line_range by whatever GetByteSize() we got. If for some reason the ranges are not connected or overlap, or even 0, this could be an issue.

I also added a unit tests for this change and include the instructions on the test itself on how to generate the yaml file I use for testing.


Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61292

llvm-svn: 360071

show more ...

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

show more ...

Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)

Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared

Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)

Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990

llvm-svn: 353764

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Add setting to require hardware breakpoints.

When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We
already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them
with `-H`.

Add setting to require hardware breakpoints.

When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We
already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them
with `-H`. However, there's no option to force LLDB to use hardware
breakpoints internally, for example while stepping.

This patch adds a setting target.require-hardware-breakpoint that forces
LLDB to always use hardware breakpoints. Because hardware breakpoints
are a limited resource and can fail to resolve, this patch also extends
error handling in thread plans, where breakpoints are used for stepping.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221

llvm-svn: 346920

show more ...

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdate

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

show more ...

Add support for artificial tail call frames

This patch teaches lldb to detect when there are missing frames in a
backtrace due to a sequence of tail calls, and to fill in the backtrace
with artifici

Add support for artificial tail call frames

This patch teaches lldb to detect when there are missing frames in a
backtrace due to a sequence of tail calls, and to fill in the backtrace
with artificial tail call frames when this happens. This is only done
when the execution history can be determined from the call graph and
from the return PC addresses of calls on the stack. Ambiguous sequences
of tail calls (e.g anything involving tail calls and recursion) are
detected and ignored.

Depends on D49887.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478

llvm-svn: 343900

show more ...

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue

if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)

continue

if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""

out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197

show more ...

Move Log from Core -> Utility.

All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559

llvm-

Move Log from Core -> Utility.

All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559

llvm-svn: 296909

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Remove unused variables.

Patch by Taras Tsugrii

llvm-svn: 280283

Implementation "step out" plans shouldn't gather the return value.

When, for instance, "step-in" steps into a function that it doesn't want
to stop in (e.g. has no debug info) it will push a step-ou

Implementation "step out" plans shouldn't gather the return value.

When, for instance, "step-in" steps into a function that it doesn't want
to stop in (e.g. has no debug info) it will push a step-out plan to implement
the step out so it can then continue stepping. These step out's don't use
the result of the function stepped out of, so they shouldn't spend the time
to compute it.

llvm-svn: 279540

show more ...

Re-apply r257117 (reverted in r257138 temporarily),
with the one change that ThreadPlanStepOut::ThreadPlanStepOut
will now only advance the return address breakpoint to
the end of a source line, if w

Re-apply r257117 (reverted in r257138 temporarily),
with the one change that ThreadPlanStepOut::ThreadPlanStepOut
will now only advance the return address breakpoint to
the end of a source line, if we have source line debug information.
It will not advance to the end of a Symbol if we lack source line
information. This, or the recognition of the LEAVE instruction
in r257209, would have fixed the regression that Siva was seeing.
Both were good changes, so I've made both.

Original commit message:

Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it puts a breakpoint
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,
to skip an extra stop & start of the inferior process.

I changed Process::AdvanceAddressToNextBranchInstruction to not
take an optional InstructionList argument - no callers are providing
a cached InstructionList today, and if this function was going to
do that, the right thing to do would be to fill out / use a
DisassemblerSP which is a disassembler with the InstructionList for
this address range.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D15708
<rdar://problem/23309838>

llvm-svn: 257210

show more ...

Revert r257117 "Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it
puts a breakpoint" it is causing a regression in the TestStepNoDebug
test case on ubuntu 14.04 with gcc 4.9.2. Thanks for the email
Si

Revert r257117 "Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it
puts a breakpoint" it is causing a regression in the TestStepNoDebug
test case on ubuntu 14.04 with gcc 4.9.2. Thanks for the email
Siva. I'll recommit when I've figured out the regression.

llvm-svn: 257138

show more ...

Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it puts a breakpoint
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,

Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it puts a breakpoint
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,
to skip an extra stop & start of the inferior process.

I changed Process::AdvanceAddressToNextBranchInstruction to not
take an optional InstructionList argument - no callers are providing
a cached InstructionList today, and if this function was going to
do that, the right thing to do would be to fill out / use a
DisassemblerSP which is a disassembler with the InstructionList for
this address range.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D15708
<rdar://problem/23309838>

llvm-svn: 257117

show more ...