|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
c34698a8 |
| 03-Feb-2022 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes
Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the "lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging inf
[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes
Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the "lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging infrastructure). This worked because Log.h included Logging.h, even though it should.
After the recent refactor, it became impossible the two files include each other in this direction (the opposite inclusion is needed), so this patch removes the workaround that was put in place and cleans up all files to include the right thing. It also renames the file to LLDBLog to better reflect its purpose.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
a007a6d8 |
| 31-Jan-2022 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Convert "LLDB" log channel to the new API
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
76e47d48 |
| 26-May-2021 |
Raphael Isemann <[email protected]> |
[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers
The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivale
[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers
The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivalent.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103084
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5 |
|
| #
1893065d |
| 18-Mar-2020 |
Jim Ingham <[email protected]> |
Allow the ThreadPlanStackMap to hold the thread plans for threads that were not reported by the OS plugin. To facilitate this, move adding/updating the ThreadPlans for a Thread to the ThreadPlanStac
Allow the ThreadPlanStackMap to hold the thread plans for threads that were not reported by the OS plugin. To facilitate this, move adding/updating the ThreadPlans for a Thread to the ThreadPlanStackMap. Also move dumping thread plans there as well.
Added some tests for "thread plan list" and "thread plan discard" since I didn't seem to have written any originally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76814
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
61e8e688 |
| 10-Mar-2020 |
Jim Ingham <[email protected]> |
Move thread plan stacks into the Process, indexed by TID.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75880
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
80814287 |
| 24-Jan-2020 |
Raphael Isemann <[email protected]> |
[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------
[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
63e5fb76 |
| 24-Jul-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style for
[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log) log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \ sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
cdd4892f |
| 29-Mar-2019 |
Jim Ingham <[email protected]> |
Use the multi-lockable form of std::lock for operator=
For = operators for lists that have mutexes, we were either just taking the locks sequentially or hand-rolling a trick to try to avoid lock inv
Use the multi-lockable form of std::lock for operator=
For = operators for lists that have mutexes, we were either just taking the locks sequentially or hand-rolling a trick to try to avoid lock inversion. Use the std::lock mechanism for this instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59957
llvm-svn: 357276
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
ceff6644 |
| 11-Nov-2018 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Remove header grouping comments.
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdate
Remove header grouping comments.
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
d821c997 |
| 07-Aug-2018 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves overall co
Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
05097246 |
| 30-Apr-2018 |
Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> |
Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r
Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue
if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2)
continue
if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
8db3f7ed |
| 13-Apr-2018 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Re-land "Don't assume backing thread shares protocol ID."
When we're dealing with virtual (memory) threads created by the OS plugins, there's no guarantee that the real thread and the backing thread
Re-land "Don't assume backing thread shares protocol ID."
When we're dealing with virtual (memory) threads created by the OS plugins, there's no guarantee that the real thread and the backing thread share a protocol ID. Instead, we should iterate over the memory threads to find the virtual thread that is backed by the current real thread.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45497
rdar://36485830
The original revision (r329891) was reverted because the associated tests ran into a deadlock on the Linux bots. That problem was resolved by r330002.
llvm-svn: 330005
show more ...
|
| #
a8d916aa |
| 12-Apr-2018 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Revert "Don't assume backing thread shares protocol ID."
This reverts r329891 because the test case is timing out on linux: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/21
Revert "Don't assume backing thread shares protocol ID."
This reverts r329891 because the test case is timing out on linux: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/21834
llvm-svn: 329897
show more ...
|
| #
0045c72f |
| 12-Apr-2018 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Don't assume backing thread shares protocol ID.
When we're dealing with virtual (memory) threads created by the OS plugins, there's no guarantee that the real thread and the backing thread share a p
Don't assume backing thread shares protocol ID.
When we're dealing with virtual (memory) threads created by the OS plugins, there's no guarantee that the real thread and the backing thread share a protocol ID. Instead, we should iterate over the memory threads to find the virtual thread that is backed by the current real thread.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45497
rdar://36485830
llvm-svn: 329891
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
6f9e6901 |
| 03-Mar-2017 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Move Log from Core -> Utility.
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-
Move Log from Core -> Utility.
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
df44988b |
| 01-Feb-2017 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Break some dependencies in lldbUtility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29359
llvm-svn: 293806
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
b5cd6e7b |
| 08-Dec-2016 |
Greg Clayton <[email protected]> |
Fixed a crasher that has been borking out heap for a long time.
ThreadList had an assignment operator that didn't lock the "rhs" thread list object. This means a thread list can be mutated while it
Fixed a crasher that has been borking out heap for a long time.
ThreadList had an assignment operator that didn't lock the "rhs" thread list object. This means a thread list can be mutated while it is being copied.
The copy constructor calls the assignment operator as well. So this fixes the unsafe threaded access to ThreadList which we believe is responsible for a lot of crashes.
<rdar://problem/28075793>
llvm-svn: 289100
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1 |
|
| #
b9c1b51e |
| 06-Sep-2016 |
Kate Stone <[email protected]> |
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging t
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1 |
|
| #
bb19a13c |
| 19-May-2016 |
Saleem Abdulrasool <[email protected]> |
second pass over removal of Mutex and Condition
llvm-svn: 270024
|
| #
8d94ba0f |
| 12-Mar-2016 |
Jim Ingham <[email protected]> |
This change introduces a "ExpressionExecutionThread" to the ThreadList.
Turns out that most of the code that runs expressions (e.g. the ObjC runtime grubber) on behalf of the expression parser was
This change introduces a "ExpressionExecutionThread" to the ThreadList.
Turns out that most of the code that runs expressions (e.g. the ObjC runtime grubber) on behalf of the expression parser was using the currently selected thread. But sometimes, e.g. when we are evaluating breakpoint conditions/commands, we don't select the thread we're running on, we instead set the context for the interpreter, and explicitly pass that to other callers. That wasn't getting communicated to these utility expressions, so they would run on some other thread instead, and that could cause a variety of subtle and hard to reproduce problems.
I also went through the commands and cleaned up the use of GetSelectedThread. All those uses should have been trying the thread in the m_exe_ctx belonging to the command object first. It would actually have been pretty hard to get misbehavior in these cases, but for correctness sake it is good to make this usage consistent.
<rdar://problem/24978569>
llvm-svn: 263326
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1 |
|
| #
e65b2cf2 |
| 15-Dec-2015 |
Eugene Zelenko <[email protected]> |
Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and readability-simplify-boolean-expr warnings in some files in source/Target/.
Simplify smart pointers checks in conditions. Other minor fixes.
llvm-svn: 255598
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1 |
|
| #
8f186f85 |
| 13-Nov-2015 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Change the null check to an assert.
llvm-svn: 253092
|
| #
0ee8282f |
| 13-Nov-2015 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Add a null check against the ThreadPlan
I'm seeing some cases where the ThreadPlan is null. It could be a sign of a valid race condition, but at least we shouldn't crash.
llvm-svn: 253086
|
| #
6e8fbc6f |
| 07-Nov-2015 |
Chaoren Lin <[email protected]> |
Fix TestThreadSpecificBreakpoint.py on Linux after rL252355.
Summary: On Linux, if a thread-specific conditional breakpoint was hit, it won't necessarily be the thread that hit the breakpoint itself
Fix TestThreadSpecificBreakpoint.py on Linux after rL252355.
Summary: On Linux, if a thread-specific conditional breakpoint was hit, it won't necessarily be the thread that hit the breakpoint itself that evaluates the conditional expression, so the thread that hit the breakpoint could still be asked to stop, even though it hasn't been allowed to run since the previous stop.
Reviewers: sivachandra, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14472
llvm-svn: 252391
show more ...
|