[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,mo

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix ,

https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Add 'override' where missing in source/ and tools/

These were found by Clang's new -Wsuggest-override.

This patch doesn't touch any code in unittests/, since much of it intentionally do

[lldb][NFC] Add 'override' where missing in source/ and tools/

These were found by Clang's new -Wsuggest-override.

This patch doesn't touch any code in unittests/, since much of it intentionally doesn't use override to avoid massive warning spam from -Winconsistent-missing-override due to the use of MOCK_*** macros.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83847

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[lldb] Initialize some bitfields in FuncUnwinders.cpp

This got flagged by msan.

[Windows] Use information from the PE32 exceptions directory to construct unwind plans

This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 6

[Windows] Use information from the PE32 exceptions directory to construct unwind plans

This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).

To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.

To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:

- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.

So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola

Reviewed By: jasonmolenda

Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347

llvm-svn: 374528

show more ...

FuncUnwinders: prefer debug_frame over eh_frame

The two sections usually contain the same information, and we rarely
have both kinds of entries for a single function. However, in theory the
debug_fr

FuncUnwinders: prefer debug_frame over eh_frame

The two sections usually contain the same information, and we rarely
have both kinds of entries for a single function. However, in theory the
debug_frame plan can be more complete, whereas eh_frame is only required
to be correct at places where exceptions can be thrown.

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62374

llvm-svn: 361758

show more ...

[FuncUnwinders] Use "symbol file" unwind plans for unwinding

Summary:
Previous patch (r360409) introduced the "symbol file unwind plan"
concept, but that plan wasn't used for unwinding yet. With thi

[FuncUnwinders] Use "symbol file" unwind plans for unwinding

Summary:
Previous patch (r360409) introduced the "symbol file unwind plan"
concept, but that plan wasn't used for unwinding yet. With this patch,
we start to consider the new plan as a possible strategy for both
synchronous and asynchronous unwinding. I also add a test that asserts
that unwinding via breakpad STACK CFI info works end-to-end.

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits, amccarth, markmentovai

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61853

llvm-svn: 361618

show more ...

FuncUnwinders: Add a new "SymbolFile" unwind plan

Summary:
some unwind formats are specific to a single symbol file and so it does
not make sense for their parsing code live in the general Symbol li

FuncUnwinders: Add a new "SymbolFile" unwind plan

Summary:
some unwind formats are specific to a single symbol file and so it does
not make sense for their parsing code live in the general Symbol library
(as is the case with eh_frame for instance). This is the case for the
unwind information in breakpad files, but the same will probably be true
for PDB unwind info (once we are able to parse that).

This patch adds the ability to fetch an unwind plan provided by a symbol
file plugin, as discussed in the RFC at
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-February/014703.html>.
I've kept the set of changes to a minimum, as there is no way to test
them until we have a symbol file which implements this API -- that is
comming in a follow-up patch, which will also implicitly test this
change.

The interesting part here is the introduction of the
"RegisterInfoResolver" interface. The reason for this is that breakpad
needs to be able to resolve register names (which are present as strings
in the file) into register enums so that it can construct the unwind
plan. This is normally done via the RegisterContext class, handing this
over to the SymbolFile plugin would mean that it has full access to the
debugged process, which is not something we want it to have. So instead,
I create a facade, which only provides the ability to query register
names, and hide the RegisterContext behind the facade.

Also note that this only adds the ability to dump the unwind plan
created by the symbol file plugin -- the plan is not used for unwinding
yet -- this will be added in a third patch, which will add additional
tests which makes sure the unwinding works as a whole.

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg

Subscribers: markmentovai, amccarth, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61732

llvm-svn: 360409

show more ...

FuncUnwinders: remove "current_offset" from function arguments

Summary:
This argument was added back in 2010 (r118882) to support the ability to unwind
from functions whose eh_frame entry does not c

FuncUnwinders: remove "current_offset" from function arguments

Summary:
This argument was added back in 2010 (r118882) to support the ability to unwind
from functions whose eh_frame entry does not cover the entire range of
the function.

However, due to the caching happening in FuncUnwinders, this solution is
very fragile. FuncUnwinders will cache the plan it got from eh_frame
regardless of the value of the current_offset, so our ability to unwind
from a given function depended what was the value of "current_offset" the
first time that this function was called.

Furthermore, since the "image show-unwind" command did not know what's
the right offset to pass, this created an unfortunate situation where
"image show-unwind" would show no valid plans for a function, even
though they were available and being used.

In this patch I implement the feature slightly differently. Instead of
giving just a base address to the eh_frame unwinder, I give it the
entire range we are interested in. Then, I change the unwinder to return
the first plan that covers (even partially) that range. This way even a
partial plan will be returned, regardless of the address in the function
where we are stopped at.

This solution is still not 100% correct, as it will not handle a
function which is covered by two independent fde entries. However, I
don't expect anybody will write this kind of functions, and this wasn't
handled by the previous implementation either. If this is ever needed in
the future. The eh_frame unwinder can be extended to return "composite"
unwind plans created by merging sevelar fde entries.

I also create a test which triggers this scenario. As doing this is
virtually impossible without hand-written assembly, the test only works
on x86 linux.

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60829

llvm-svn: 358964

show more ...

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

show more ...

Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)

Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared

Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)

Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990

llvm-svn: 353764

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Simplify ObjectFile::GetArchitecture

Summary:
instead of returning the architecture through by-ref argument and a
boolean value indicating success, we can just return the ArchSpec
directly. Since th

Simplify ObjectFile::GetArchitecture

Summary:
instead of returning the architecture through by-ref argument and a
boolean value indicating success, we can just return the ArchSpec
directly. Since the ArchSpec already has an invalid state, it can be
used to denote the failure without the additional bool.

Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, espindola

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56129

llvm-svn: 350291

show more ...

Simplify Boolean expressions

This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-

Simplify Boolean expressions

This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584

llvm-svn: 349215

show more ...

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue

if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)

continue

if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""

out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197

show more ...

Add debug_frame section support

Summary:
This is a beefed-up version of D33504, which adds support for dwarf 4
debug_frame section format.

The main difference here is that the decision whether to u

Add debug_frame section support

Summary:
This is a beefed-up version of D33504, which adds support for dwarf 4
debug_frame section format.

The main difference here is that the decision whether to use eh_frame or
debug_frame is done on a per-function basis instead of per-object file.
This is necessary because one module can contain both sections (for
example, the start files added by the linker will typically pull in
eh_frame), but we want to be able to access both, for maximum
information.

I also add unit test for parsing various CFI formats (eh_frame,
debug_frame v3 and debug_frame v4).

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg

Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, abidh, lldb-commits, tatyana-krasnukha

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34613

llvm-svn: 306397

show more ...

Fix a race condition in FuncUnwinders where the mutex was being
acquired only after checking if the ivar shared pointer was already
filled in. But when I assign an UnwindPlan object to the shared
po

Fix a race condition in FuncUnwinders where the mutex was being
acquired only after checking if the ivar shared pointer was already
filled in. But when I assign an UnwindPlan object to the shared
pointer, I assign an empty object and then fill it in. That leaves
a window where another thread could get the shared pointer to the
empty (but quickly being-filled-in) object and lead to a crash.

Also two changes from Greg for correctness on the TestMultipleDebuggers
test case.

<rdar://problem/30564102>

llvm-svn: 296084

show more ...

Remove dependencies from Utility to Core and Target.

With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.

Differential Revis

Remove dependencies from Utility to Core and Target.

With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909

llvm-svn: 295088

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Enhance FuncUnwinders::GetUnwindPlanAtNonCallSite to detect when we
may be in a function that is non-ABI conformant, and the eh_frame
instructions correctly describe how to unwind out of this functio

Enhance FuncUnwinders::GetUnwindPlanAtNonCallSite to detect when we
may be in a function that is non-ABI conformant, and the eh_frame
instructions correctly describe how to unwind out of this function,
but the assembly parsing / arch default unwind plans would be
incorrect.

This is to address a problem that Ravitheja Addepally reported in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221 - I wanted to try handling the problem
with this approach which I think may be more generally helpful,
Ravitheja tested it and said it solves the problem on Linux/FreeBSD.
Ravi has a test case in http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221 that will
be committed separately.

Thanks for all the help on this one, Ravi.

llvm-svn: 274700

show more ...

remove use of Mutex in favour of std::{,recursive_}mutex

This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The probl

remove use of Mutex in favour of std::{,recursive_}mutex

This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.

llvm-svn: 269877

show more ...

Add a way for an ObjectFile to indicate that assembly emulation
should not be used for this module -- for use when an ObjectFile
knows that it does not have meaningful or accurate function start
addr

Add a way for an ObjectFile to indicate that assembly emulation
should not be used for this module -- for use when an ObjectFile
knows that it does not have meaningful or accurate function start
addresses.

More commonly, it is not clear that function start addresses are
missing in a module. There are certain cases on Mac OS X where we
can tell that a Mach-O binary has been stripped of this essential
information, and the unwinder can end up emulating many megabytes
of instructions for a single "function" in the binary.

When a Mach-O binary is missing both an LC_FUNCTION_STARTS load
command (very unusual) and an eh_frame section, then we will assume
it has also been stripped of symbols and that instruction emulation
will not be useful on this module.

<rdar://problem/25988067>

llvm-svn: 268475

show more ...

Add support for .ARM.exidx unwind information

.ARM.exidx/.ARM.extab sections contain unwind information used on ARM
architecture from unwinding from an exception.

Differential revision: http://revi

Add support for .ARM.exidx unwind information

.ARM.exidx/.ARM.extab sections contain unwind information used on ARM
architecture from unwinding from an exception.

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13245

llvm-svn: 248903

show more ...

Improve instruction emulation based stack unwinding on ARM

* Add and fix the emulation of several instruction.
* Disable frame pointer usage on Android.
* Specify return address register for the unw

Improve instruction emulation based stack unwinding on ARM

* Add and fix the emulation of several instruction.
* Disable frame pointer usage on Android.
* Specify return address register for the unwind plan instead of explict
tracking the value of RA.
* Replace prologue detection heuristics (unreliable in several cases)
with a logic to follow the branch instructions and restore the CFI
value based on them. The target address for a branch should have the
same CFI as the source address (if they are in the same function).
* Handle symbols in ELF files where the symbol size is not specified
with calcualting their size based on the next symbol (already done
in MachO files).
* Fix architecture in FuncUnwinders with filling up the inforamtion
missing from the object file with the architecture of the target.
* Add code to read register wehn the value is set to "IsSame" as it
meanse the value of a register in the parent frame is the same as the
value in the current frame.

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10447

llvm-svn: 240533

show more ...

Simplify FuncUnwinders::GetEHFrameAugmentedUnwindPlan

Summary:
GetEHFrameAugmentedUnwindPlan duplicated the work of GetEHFrameUnwindPlan in getting the original
plan from DWARF CFI. This changes the

Simplify FuncUnwinders::GetEHFrameAugmentedUnwindPlan

Summary:
GetEHFrameAugmentedUnwindPlan duplicated the work of GetEHFrameUnwindPlan in getting the original
plan from DWARF CFI. This changes the function to call GetEHFrameUnwindPlan instead of doing all
the work itself. A copy constructor is added to UnwindPlan to enable plan copying.

Test Plan: No regressions on linux test suite.

Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9369

llvm-svn: 236607

show more ...