[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
mem

[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.

Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.

This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.

rdar://74890607

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856

show more ...

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,mo

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix ,

https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)

Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared

Use std::make_shared in LLDB (NFC)

Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990

llvm-svn: 353764

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility

These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall co

Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility

These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).

The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740

llvm-svn: 339127

show more ...

elf-core: Convert remaining register context to use register set maps

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39681, we started using a map instead
passing a long list of register sets to the ppc64le register

elf-core: Convert remaining register context to use register set maps

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39681, we started using a map instead
passing a long list of register sets to the ppc64le register context.
However, existing register contexts were still using the old method.

This converts the remaining register contexts to use this approach.
While doing that, I've had to modify the approach a bit:
- the general purpose register set is still kept as a separate field,
because this one is always present, and it's parsing is somewhat
different than that of other register sets.
- since the same register sets have different IDs on different operating
systems, but we use the same register context class to represent
different register sets, I've needed to add a layer of indirection to
translate os-specific constants (e.g. NETBSD::NT_AMD64_FPREGS) into more
generic terms (e.g. floating point register set).

While slightly more complicated, this setup allows for better separation
of concerns. The parsing code in ProcessElfCore can focus on parsing
OS-specific core file notes, and can completely ignore
architecture-specific register sets (by just storing any unrecognised
notes in a map). These notes will then be passed on to the
architecture-specific register context, which can just deal with
architecture specifics, because the OS-specific note types are hidden in
a register set description map.

This way, adding an register set, which is already supported on other
OSes, to a new OS, should in most cases be as simple as adding a new
entry into the register set description map.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40133

llvm-svn: 319162

show more ...

Move DataBuffer / DataExtractor and friends from Core -> Utility.

llvm-svn: 296943

[lldb] Fix typos in file headers

This diff fixes typos in file headers (incorrect file names).

Test plan:

Under llvm/tools/lldb/source:
find ./* -type f | grep -e '\(cpp\|h\)$' | while read F; do

[lldb] Fix typos in file headers

This diff fixes typos in file headers (incorrect file names).

Test plan:

Under llvm/tools/lldb/source:
find ./* -type f | grep -e '\(cpp\|h\)$' | while read F; do B=$(basename $F); echo $F head -n 1 $F | grep -v $B | wc -l ; done

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27115

llvm-svn: 287966

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Make sure files include what they use (part 2/2)

This makes lldb still compile on linux after a project-wide clang-format

llvm-svn: 278335

Support Linux on SystemZ as platform

This patch adds support for Linux on SystemZ:
- A new ArchSpec value of eCore_s390x_generic
- A new directory Plugins/ABI/SysV-s390x providing an ABI implementat

Support Linux on SystemZ as platform

This patch adds support for Linux on SystemZ:
- A new ArchSpec value of eCore_s390x_generic
- A new directory Plugins/ABI/SysV-s390x providing an ABI implementation
- Register context support
- Native Linux support including watchpoint support
- ELF core file support
- Misc. support throughout the code base (e.g. breakpoint opcodes)
- Test case updates to support the platform

This should provide complete support for debugging the SystemZ platform.
Not yet supported are optional features like transaction support (zEC12)
or SIMD vector support (z13).

There is no instruction emulation, since our ABI requires that all code
provide correct DWARF CFI at all PC locations in .eh_frame to support
unwinding (i.e. -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is on by default).

The implementation follows existing platforms in a mostly straightforward
manner. A couple of things that are different:

- We do not use PTRACE_PEEKUSER / PTRACE_POKEUSER to access single registers,
since some registers (access register) reside at offsets in the user area
that are multiples of 4, but the PTRACE_PEEKUSER interface only allows
accessing aligned 8-byte blocks in the user area. Instead, we use a s390
specific ptrace interface PTRACE_PEEKUSR_AREA / PTRACE_POKEUSR_AREA that
allows accessing a whole block of the user area in one go, so in effect
allowing to treat parts of the user area as register sets.

- SystemZ hardware does not provide any means to implement read watchpoints,
only write watchpoints. In fact, we can only support a *single* write
watchpoint (but this can span a range of arbitrary size). In LLDB this
means we support only a single watchpoint. I've set all test cases that
require read watchpoints (or multiple watchpoints) to expected failure
on the platform. [ Note that there were two test cases that install
a read/write watchpoint even though they nowhere rely on the "read"
property. I've changed those to simply use plain write watchpoints. ]

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18978

llvm-svn: 266308

show more ...