History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ProcessElfCore.h (Results 1 – 25 of 48)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init
# 2f9fa9ef 11-Jul-2022 David Spickett <[email protected]>

[lldb][AArch64] Add support for memory tags in core files

This teaches ProcessElfCore to recognise the MTE tag segments.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.html#c

[lldb][AArch64] Add support for memory tags in core files

This teaches ProcessElfCore to recognise the MTE tag segments.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.html#core-dump-support

These segments contain all the tags for a matching memory segment
which will have the same size in virtual address terms. In real terms
it's 2 tags per byte so the data in the segment is much smaller.

Since MTE is the only tag type supported I have hardcoded some
things to those values. We could and should support more formats
as they appear but doing so now would leave code untested until that
happens.

A few things to note:
* /proc/pid/smaps is not in the core file, only the details you have
in "maps". Meaning we mark a region tagged only if it has a tag segment.
* A core file supports memory tagging if it has at least 1 memory
tag segment, there is no other flag we can check to tell if memory
tagging was enabled. (unlike a live process that can support memory
tagging even if there are currently no tagged memory regions)

Tests have been added at the commands level for a core file with
mte and without.

There is a lot of overlap between the "memory tag read" tests here and the unit tests for
MemoryTagManagerAArch64MTE::UnpackTagsFromCoreFileSegment, but I think it's
worth keeping to check ProcessElfCore doesn't cause an assert.

Depends on D129487

Reviewed By: omjavaid

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129489

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2
# 2937b282 01-Dec-2021 David Spickett <[email protected]>

Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"

This reverts commit 0df522969a7a0128052bd79182c8d58e00556e2f.

Additional checks are added to fix the detection of the last mem

Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"

This reverts commit 0df522969a7a0128052bd79182c8d58e00556e2f.

Additional checks are added to fix the detection of the last memory region
in GetMemoryRegions or repeating the "memory region" command when the
target has non-address bits.

Normally you keep reading from address 0, looking up each region's end
address until you get LLDB_INVALID_ADDR as the region end address.
(0xffffffffffffffff)

This is what the remote will return once you go beyond the last mapped region:
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---

Problem is that when we "fix" the lookup address, we remove some bits
from it. On an AArch64 system we have 48 bit virtual addresses, so when
we fix the end address of the [stack] region the result is 0.
So we loop back to the start.

[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---

To fix this I added an additional check for the last range.
If the end address of the region is different once you apply
FixDataAddress, we are at the last region.

Since the end of the last region will be the last valid mappable
address, plus 1. That 1 will be removed by the ABI plugin.

The only side effect is that on systems with non-address bits, you
won't get that last catch all unmapped region from the max virtual
address up to 0xf...f.

[0x0000fffff8000000-0x0000fffffffdf000) ---
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
<ends here>

Though in some way this is more correct because that region is not
just unmapped, it's not mappable at all.

No extra testing is needed because this is already covered by
TestMemoryRegion.py, I simply forgot to run it on system that had
both top byte ignore and pointer authentication.

This change has been tested on a qemu VM with top byte ignore,
memory tagging and pointer authentication enabled.

Reviewed By: omjavaid

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115508

show more ...


# 0df52296 26-Nov-2021 David Spickett <[email protected]>

Revert "Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions""

This reverts commit fac3f20de55769d028bd92220e74f22fa57dd4b2.

I found this has broken how we detect the last memory r

Revert "Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions""

This reverts commit fac3f20de55769d028bd92220e74f22fa57dd4b2.

I found this has broken how we detect the last memory region in
GetMemoryRegions/"memory region" command.

When you're debugging an AArch64 system with pointer authentication,
the ABI plugin will remove the top bit from the end address of the last
user mapped area.

(lldb)
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]

ABI plugin removes anything above the 48th bit (48 bit virtual addresses
by default on AArch64, leaving an address of 0.

(lldb)
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---

You get back a mapping for 0 and get into an infinite loop.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# fac3f20d 03-Nov-2021 David Spickett <[email protected]>

Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"

This reverts commit 5fbcf677347e38718461496d9e9e184a7a30c3fb.

ProcessDebugger is used in ProcessWindows and NativeProcessWindo

Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"

This reverts commit 5fbcf677347e38718461496d9e9e184a7a30c3fb.

ProcessDebugger is used in ProcessWindows and NativeProcessWindows.
I thought I was simplifying things by renaming to DoGetMemoryRegionInfo
in ProcessDebugger but the Native process side expects "GetMemoryRegionInfo".

Follow the pattern that WriteMemory uses. So:
* ProcessWindows::DoGetMemoryRegioninfo calls ProcessDebugger::GetMemoryRegionInfo
* NativeProcessWindows::GetMemoryRegionInfo does the same

show more ...


# 5fbcf677 03-Nov-2021 David Spickett <[email protected]>

Revert "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"

This reverts commit 6f5ce43b433706c3ae5c37022d6c0964b6bfadf8 due to
build failure on Windows.


# 6f5ce43b 03-Nov-2021 David Spickett <[email protected]>

[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions

On AArch64 we have various things using the non address bits
of pointers. This means when you lookup their containing region
you won't f

[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions

On AArch64 we have various things using the non address bits
of pointers. This means when you lookup their containing region
you won't find it if you don't remove them.

This changes Process GetMemoryRegionInfo to a non virtual method
that uses the current ABI plugin to remove those bits. Then it
calls DoGetMemoryRegionInfo.

That function does the actual work and is virtual to be overriden
by Process implementations.

A test case is added that runs on AArch64 Linux using the top
byte ignore feature.

Reviewed By: omjavaid

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102757

show more ...


# 5f4980f0 22-Oct-2021 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

[lldb] Remove ConstString from Process, ScriptInterpreter and StructuredData plugin names


# a3939e15 15-Oct-2021 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

[lldb] Return StringRef from PluginInterface::GetPluginName

There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString.

While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where

[lldb] Return StringRef from PluginInterface::GetPluginName

There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString.

While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where
GetPluginName and GetPluginNameStatic were returning different strings.

I am not changing the return type of GetPluginNameStatic in this patch, as that
would necessitate additional changes, and this patch is big enough as it is.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111877

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3
# b0312676 10-Sep-2021 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

[lldb] Remove PluginInterface::GetPluginVersion

In all these years, we haven't found a use for this function (it has
zero callers). Lets just remove the boilerplate.

Differential Revision: https://

[lldb] Remove PluginInterface::GetPluginVersion

In all these years, we haven't found a use for this function (it has
zero callers). Lets just remove the boilerplate.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109600

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2
# 14f44303 04-Aug-2021 Jan Kratochvil <[email protected]>

[nfc] [lldb] Prevent needless copies of DataExtractor

lldb_private::DataExtractor contains DataBufferSP m_data_sp which is
relatively expensive to copy (due to multi-threading locking).

llvm::DataE

[nfc] [lldb] Prevent needless copies of DataExtractor

lldb_private::DataExtractor contains DataBufferSP m_data_sp which is
relatively expensive to copy (due to multi-threading locking).

llvm::DataExtractor does not have this problem as it uses StringRef
instead.

The copy constructor is explicit as otherwise it is easy to make
unintended modification of a local copy instead of a caller's instance
(D107470 but that is llvm::DataExtractor).

Reviewed By: clayborg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107485

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init
# 4bb62448 22-Jan-2021 Walter Erquinigo <[email protected]>

[ThreadPlan] fix exec on Linux


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1
# 18e4272a 20-Nov-2020 Michał Górny <[email protected]>

[lldb] Prevent 'process connect' from using local-only plugins

Add a 'can_connect' parameter to Process plugin initialization, and use
it to filter plugins to these capable of remote connections. T

[lldb] Prevent 'process connect' from using local-only plugins

Add a 'can_connect' parameter to Process plugin initialization, and use
it to filter plugins to these capable of remote connections. This is
used to prevent 'process connect' from picking up a plugin that can only
be used locally, e.g. the legacy FreeBSD plugin.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91810

show more ...


# fb19f11e 27-Oct-2020 Walter Erquinigo <[email protected]>

[trace][intel-pt] Scaffold the 'thread trace start | stop' commands

Depends on D90490.

The stop command is simple and invokes the new method Trace::StopTracingThread(thread).

On the other hand, th

[trace][intel-pt] Scaffold the 'thread trace start | stop' commands

Depends on D90490.

The stop command is simple and invokes the new method Trace::StopTracingThread(thread).

On the other hand, the start command works by delegating its implementation to a CommandObject provided by the Trace plugin. This is necessary because each trace plugin needs different options for this command. There's even the chance that a Trace plugin can't support live tracing, but instead supports offline decoding and analysis, which means that "thread trace dump instructions" works but "thread trace start" doest. Because of this and a few other reasons, it's better to have each plugin provide this implementation.

Besides, I'm using the GetSupportedTraceType method introduced in D90490 to quickly infer what's the trace plug-in that works for the current process.

As an implementation note, I moved CommandObjectIterateOverThreads to its header so that I can use it from the IntelPT plugin. Besides, the actual start and stop logic for intel-pt is not part of this diff.

Reviewed By: clayborg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90729

show more ...


# 0610a25a 09-Oct-2020 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

[lldb] Delete copy operations on PluginInterface class

This is a polymorphic class, copying it is a bad idea.

This was not a problem because most classes inheriting from it were
deleting their copy

[lldb] Delete copy operations on PluginInterface class

This is a polymorphic class, copying it is a bad idea.

This was not a problem because most classes inheriting from it were
deleting their copy operations themselves. However, this enables us to
delete those explicit deletions, and ensure noone forgets to add them in
the future.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# eaebcbc6 02-Jun-2020 Konrad Kleine <[email protected]>

[lldb] NFC remove DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN

Summary:
This is how I applied my clang-tidy check (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531) in order to remove
`DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN` and have deleted cop

[lldb] NFC remove DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN

Summary:
This is how I applied my clang-tidy check (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531) in order to remove
`DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN` and have deleted copy ctors and deleted
assignment operators instead.

```
lang=bash
grep DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN /opt/notnfs/kkleine/llvm/lldb -r -l | sort | uniq > files

for i in $(cat files);
do
clang-tidy \
--checks="-*,modernize-replace-disallow-copy-and-assign-macro" \
--format-style=LLVM \
--header-filter=.* \
--fix \
-fix-errors \
$i;
done
```

Reviewers: espindola, labath, aprantl, teemperor

Reviewed By: labath, aprantl, teemperor

Subscribers: teemperor, aprantl, labath, emaste, sbc100, aheejin, MaskRay, arphaman, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80543

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3
# cdc514e4 17-Feb-2020 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[lldb] Update header guards to be consistent and compliant with LLVM (NFC)

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pa

[lldb] Update header guards to be consistent and compliant with LLVM (NFC)

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3
# 943faef1 11-Jun-2019 Antonio Afonso <[email protected]>

Add support to read aux vector values

Summary:
This is the second patch to improve module loading in a series that started here (where I explain the motivation and solution): https://reviews.llvm.or

Add support to read aux vector values

Summary:
This is the second patch to improve module loading in a series that started here (where I explain the motivation and solution): https://reviews.llvm.org/D62499

I need to read the aux vector to know where the r_debug map with the loaded libraries are.
The AuxVector class was made generic so it could be reused between the POSIX-DYLD plugin and NativeProcess*. The class itself ended up in the ProcessUtility plugin.

Reviewers: clayborg, xiaobai, labath, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere

Subscribers: emaste, JDevlieghere, mgorny, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62500

llvm-svn: 363098

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1
# 8b3af63b 10-Apr-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


# 0611642f 04-Jan-2019 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

RangeMap.h: merge RangeDataArray and RangeDataVector

Summary:
The main difference between the classes was supposed to be the fact that
one is backed by llvm::SmallVector, and the other by std::vecto

RangeMap.h: merge RangeDataArray and RangeDataVector

Summary:
The main difference between the classes was supposed to be the fact that
one is backed by llvm::SmallVector, and the other by std::vector.
However, over the years, they have accumulated various other differences
too.

This essentially removes the std::vector version, as that is pretty much
identical to llvm::SmallVector<T, 0>, and combines their interfaces. It
does not attempt to do a more significant refactoring, even though there
is still a lot of duplication in this file, as it is hard to tell which
quirk of some API is depended on by somebody (and, a previous, more
ambitious attempt at this in D16769 has failed).

I also add some tests, including one which demonstrates one of the
quirks/bugs of the API I have noticed in the process.

Reviewers: clayborg, teemperor, tberghammer

Subscribers: mgorny, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56170

llvm-svn: 350380

show more ...


# 5ea7ecdb 12-Dec-2018 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

ELF: Simplify program header iteration

Instead of GetProgramHeaderCount+GetProgramHeaderByIndex, expose an
ArrayRef of all program headers, to enable range-based iteration.
Instead of GetSegmentData

ELF: Simplify program header iteration

Instead of GetProgramHeaderCount+GetProgramHeaderByIndex, expose an
ArrayRef of all program headers, to enable range-based iteration.
Instead of GetSegmentDataByIndex, expose GetSegmentData, taking a
program header (reference).

This makes the code simpler by enabling range-based loops and also
allowed to remove some null checks, as it became locally obvious that
some pointers can never be null.

llvm-svn: 348928

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3
# ceff6644 11-Nov-2018 Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]>

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdate

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2
# bc8cc867 28-Nov-2017 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

elf-core: Convert remaining register context to use register set maps

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39681, we started using a map instead
passing a long list of register sets to the ppc64le register

elf-core: Convert remaining register context to use register set maps

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39681, we started using a map instead
passing a long list of register sets to the ppc64le register context.
However, existing register contexts were still using the old method.

This converts the remaining register contexts to use this approach.
While doing that, I've had to modify the approach a bit:
- the general purpose register set is still kept as a separate field,
because this one is always present, and it's parsing is somewhat
different than that of other register sets.
- since the same register sets have different IDs on different operating
systems, but we use the same register context class to represent
different register sets, I've needed to add a layer of indirection to
translate os-specific constants (e.g. NETBSD::NT_AMD64_FPREGS) into more
generic terms (e.g. floating point register set).

While slightly more complicated, this setup allows for better separation
of concerns. The parsing code in ProcessElfCore can focus on parsing
OS-specific core file notes, and can completely ignore
architecture-specific register sets (by just storing any unrecognised
notes in a map). These notes will then be passed on to the
architecture-specific register context, which can just deal with
architecture specifics, because the OS-specific note types are hidden in
a register set description map.

This way, adding an register set, which is already supported on other
OSes, to a new OS, should in most cases be as simple as adding a new
entry into the register set description map.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40133

llvm-svn: 319162

show more ...


# cef4119c 23-Nov-2017 Pavel Labath <[email protected]>

elf-core: Split up parsing code into os-specific functions

Summary:
We've had a single function responsible for splitting a core segment
into notes, and parsing the notes themselves, bearing in mind

elf-core: Split up parsing code into os-specific functions

Summary:
We've had a single function responsible for splitting a core segment
into notes, and parsing the notes themselves, bearing in mind variations
between 4 supported OS types. This commit splits that code into 5
pieces:
- (os-independent) code for splitting a segment into individual notes
- per-os function for parsing the notes into thread information

Reviewers: clayborg, krytarowski, emaste, alexandreyy, kettenis

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40311

llvm-svn: 318903

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1
# 3887ba8d 19-Sep-2017 Adrian McCarthy <[email protected]>

Re-land r313210 - Fix for bug 34532 - A few rough corners related to post-mortem debugging (core/minidump)

The main change is to avoid setting the process state as running when
debugging core/minidu

Re-land r313210 - Fix for bug 34532 - A few rough corners related to post-mortem debugging (core/minidump)

The main change is to avoid setting the process state as running when
debugging core/minidumps (details in the bug). Also included a few small,
related fixes around how the errors propagate in this case.

Fixed the FreeBSD/Windows break: the intention was to keep
Process::WillResume() and Process::DoResume() "in-sync", but this had the
unfortunate consequence of breaking Process sub-classes which don't override
WillResume().

The safer approach is to keep Process::WillResume() untouched and only
override it in the minidump and core implementations.

patch by lemo

Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34532

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37651

llvm-svn: 313655

show more ...


12