|
Revision tags: llvmorg-20.1.0, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-20.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
459cfa5e |
| 20-Jul-2022 |
Slava Gurevich <[email protected]> |
[LLDB][NFC][Reliability] Fix uninitialized variables from Coverity scan
Improve LLDB reliability by fixing the following "uninitialized variables" static code inspection warnings from scan.coverity.
[LLDB][NFC][Reliability] Fix uninitialized variables from Coverity scan
Improve LLDB reliability by fixing the following "uninitialized variables" static code inspection warnings from scan.coverity.com:
1094796 1095721 1095728 1095737 1095741 1095756 1095779 1095789 1095805 1214552 1229457 1232475 1274006 1274010 1293427 1364800 1364802 1364804 1364812 1364816 1374902 1374909 1384975 1399312 1420451 1431704 1454230 1454554 1454615 1454579 1454594 1454832 1457759 1458696 1461909 1467658 1487814 1487830 1487845
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130098
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init |
|
| #
fd2433e1 |
| 02-Jul-2021 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;
Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;
$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,mo
[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;
Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;
$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix ,
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
76e47d48 |
| 26-May-2021 |
Raphael Isemann <[email protected]> |
[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers
The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivale
[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers
The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivalent.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103084
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
8f2f9a82 |
| 18-Nov-2020 |
Michał Górny <[email protected]> |
[lldb] [Process/Utility] Declare register overlaps between ST and MM
Explicitly declare register overlaps/invalidation between ST(i) and MMi registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.o
[lldb] [Process/Utility] Declare register overlaps between ST and MM
Explicitly declare register overlaps/invalidation between ST(i) and MMi registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91728
show more ...
|
| #
d8ff269f |
| 15-Nov-2020 |
Michał Górny <[email protected]> |
[lldb] Add explicit 64-bit fip/fdp registers on x86_64
The FXSAVE/XSAVE data can have two different layouts on x86_64. When called as FXSAVE/XSAVE..., the Instruction Pointer and Address Pointer re
[lldb] Add explicit 64-bit fip/fdp registers on x86_64
The FXSAVE/XSAVE data can have two different layouts on x86_64. When called as FXSAVE/XSAVE..., the Instruction Pointer and Address Pointer registers are reported using a 16-bit segment identifier and a 32-bit offset. When called as FXSAVE64/XSAVE64..., they are reported using a complete 64-bit offsets instead.
LLDB has historically followed GDB and unconditionally used to assume the 32-bit layout, with the slight modification of possibly using a 32-bit segment register (i.e. extending the register into the reserved 16 upper bits). When the underlying operating system used FXSAVE64/XSAVE64..., the pointer was split into two halves, with the upper half repored as the segment registers. While reconstructing the full address was possible on the user end (and e.g. the FPU register tests did that), it certainly was not the most convenient option.
Introduce a two additional 'fip' and 'fdp' registers that overlap with 'fiseg'/'fioff' and 'foseg'/'foff' respectively, and report the complete 64-bit address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91497
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
6c455329 |
| 17-Jun-2020 |
Muhammad Omair Javaid <[email protected]> |
Remove code duplication from RegisterContextPOSIX_*
Summary: This patch aims to remove multiple copies of GetByteOrder() and ConvertRegisterKindToRegisterNumber used in various versions of RegisterC
Remove code duplication from RegisterContextPOSIX_*
Summary: This patch aims to remove multiple copies of GetByteOrder() and ConvertRegisterKindToRegisterNumber used in various versions of RegisterContextPOSIX_*.
Both register implementations are move to RegisterContext class which is parent of RegisterContextPOSIX_* classes.
Built and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf targets.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, kristof.beyls, kbarton, atanasyan, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80104
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
80814287 |
| 24-Jan-2020 |
Raphael Isemann <[email protected]> |
[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------
[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
88058292 |
| 21-Jun-2019 |
Michal Gorny <[email protected]> |
[lldb] [Process] Introduce common helpers to split/recombine YMM data
Introduce two common helpers to take care of splitting and recombining YMM registers to/from XSAVE-like data. Since FreeBSD, Li
[lldb] [Process] Introduce common helpers to split/recombine YMM data
Introduce two common helpers to take care of splitting and recombining YMM registers to/from XSAVE-like data. Since FreeBSD, Linux and NetBSD all use XSAVE-like data structures but with potentially different field layouts, the function takes two pointers -- to XMM register and to YMM high bits, and copies the data from/to YMMReg type.
While at it, remove support for big endian. To mine and Pavel Labath's combined knowledge, there is no such thing on x86. Furthermore, assuming that the YMM register data would be swapped for big endian seems to be a weird assumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63610
llvm-svn: 364042
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
248a1305 |
| 23-May-2019 |
Konrad Kleine <[email protected]> |
[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr
Summary: NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codeba
[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr
Summary: NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using `nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
``` run-clang-tidy.py \ -header-filter='.*' \ -checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \ -fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \ -format \ -style LLVM \ -p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc ```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
d5b44036 |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers, before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by unique
Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers, before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to ::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
| #
a6682a41 |
| 15-Dec-2018 |
Jonas Devlieghere <[email protected]> |
Simplify Boolean expressions
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-
Simplify Boolean expressions
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
d821c997 |
| 07-Aug-2018 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves overall co
Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
05097246 |
| 30-Apr-2018 |
Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> |
Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r
Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue
if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2)
continue
if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
a0e3c6f6 |
| 18-Dec-2017 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
Reduce x86 register context boilerplate.
Summary: The x86 FPR struct was defined as a struct containing a union between two members: XSAVE and FXSAVE. This patch makes FPR a union directly to remove
Reduce x86 register context boilerplate.
Summary: The x86 FPR struct was defined as a struct containing a union between two members: XSAVE and FXSAVE. This patch makes FPR a union directly to remove one layer of indirection when trying to access the members.
The initial layout of these two structs is identical, which is recognised by the fact that XSAVE has FXSAVE as its first member, so we also considered removing one more layer and leave FPR identical to XSAVE struct, but stopped short of doing that, as the FPR may be used to store different layouts in the future (e.g., ones generated by the FSAVE instruction).
Reviewers: clayborg, krytarowski
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41245
llvm-svn: 320966
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
11edb4ee |
| 01-Dec-2017 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
Kill struct IOVEC
struct iovec is used as an interface to system (posix) api's. As such, we shouldn't be using it in os-independent code, and we shouldn't be defining our own iovec replacements.
Fo
Kill struct IOVEC
struct iovec is used as an interface to system (posix) api's. As such, we shouldn't be using it in os-independent code, and we shouldn't be defining our own iovec replacements.
Fortunately, its usage was not very widespread, so the removal was very easy -- I simply moved a couple declarations into os-specific code.
llvm-svn: 319536
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4 |
|
| #
666cc0b2 |
| 04-Mar-2017 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Move DataBuffer / DataExtractor and friends from Core -> Utility.
llvm-svn: 296943
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
01c3243f |
| 14-Feb-2017 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Remove dependencies from Utility to Core and Target.
With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be standalone.
Differential Revis
Remove dependencies from Utility to Core and Target.
With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be standalone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909
llvm-svn: 295088
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2 |
|
| #
6d2497d4 |
| 30-Nov-2016 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
Remove a spurious reference to ProcessElfCore
We were referencing a the process class from a register context, which seems intuitively wrong. Also, the comment above that code is now definitely inco
Remove a spurious reference to ProcessElfCore
We were referencing a the process class from a register context, which seems intuitively wrong. Also, the comment above that code is now definitely incorrect, as ProcessElfCore now does support floating point registers. Also, the code wasn't really doing anything, as it was just skipping a zero-initialization of a field that was most likely zero-initialized anyway. Linux elf core FPR test still passes after this.
llvm-svn: 288237
show more ...
|
| #
27469faa |
| 30-Nov-2016 |
Pavel Labath <[email protected]> |
Remove an x86-ism from RegisterInfoInterface
Summary: While adding FPR support to x86 elf core files (D26300), we ended up adding a very x86-specific function to the general RegisterInfoInterface cl
Remove an x86-ism from RegisterInfoInterface
Summary: While adding FPR support to x86 elf core files (D26300), we ended up adding a very x86-specific function to the general RegisterInfoInterface class, which I didn't catch in review. This removes that function. The only reason we needed it was to find the offset of the FXSAVE area. This is the same as the offset of the first register within that area, so we might as well use that.
Reviewers: clayborg, dvlahovski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27222
llvm-svn: 288236
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1 |
|
| #
a228c46c |
| 20-Nov-2016 |
Dimitar Vlahovski <[email protected]> |
ELF core: Adding parsing of the floating-point and SSE registers on x86 32/64 bit elf core files
Summary: The floating-point and SSE registers could be present in the elf-core file in the note NT_FP
ELF core: Adding parsing of the floating-point and SSE registers on x86 32/64 bit elf core files
Summary: The floating-point and SSE registers could be present in the elf-core file in the note NT_FPREGSET for 64 bit ones, and in the note NT_PRXFPREG for 32 bit ones.
The entire note is a binary blob matching the layout of the x87 save area that gets generated by the FXSAVE instruction (see Intel developers manual for more information).
This CL mainly modifies the RegisterRead function in RegisterContextPOSIXCore_x86_64 for it to return the correct data both for GPR and FPR/SSE registers, and return false (meaning "this register is not available") for other registers.
I added a test to TestElfCore.py that tests reading FPR/SSE registers both from a 32 and 64 bit elf-core file and I have inluded the source which I used to generate the core files.
I tried to also add support for the AVX registers, because this info could also be present in the elf-core file (note NT_X86_XSTATE - that is the result of the newer XSAVE instruction). Parsing the contents from the file is easy. The problem is that the ymm registers are split into two halves and they are in different places in the note. For making this work one would either make a "hacky" approach, because there won't be any other way with the current state of the register contexts - they assume that "this register is of size N and at offset M" and don't have the notion of discontinuos registers.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26300
llvm-svn: 287506
show more ...
|
| #
b9c1b51e |
| 06-Sep-2016 |
Kate Stone <[email protected]> |
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging t
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc1 |
|
| #
7f013bcd |
| 21-Nov-2014 |
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> |
Rename lldb registers to contain lldb_ prefix.
LLDB supports many different register numbering schemes, and these are typically prefixed with an indicator that lets the user know what numbering sche
Rename lldb registers to contain lldb_ prefix.
LLDB supports many different register numbering schemes, and these are typically prefixed with an indicator that lets the user know what numbering scheme is used. The gcc numbering scheme is prefixed with gcc, and there are similar ones for dwarf, gdb, and gcc_dwarf.
LLDB also contains its own internal numbering scheme, but the enum for LLDB's numbering scheme was prefixed differently. This patch changes the names of these enums to use the same naming scheme for the enum values as the rest of the register kinds by removing gpr_ and fpu_ prefixes, and instead using lldb_ prefixes for all enum values.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6351 Reviewed by: Greg Clayton
llvm-svn: 222495
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.0, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc1 |
|
| #
e7c7c3de |
| 02-Jul-2014 |
Jean-Daniel Dupas <[email protected]> |
Replace uint32_t by lldb::RegisterKing in register context API.
llvm-svn: 212172
|
| #
be03c36e |
| 14-Jun-2014 |
Todd Fiala <[email protected]> |
Properly terminated POSIX register sets with LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM.
RegisterSets are assumed to be terminated by this value. Loops over register set values would fail without LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM term
Properly terminated POSIX register sets with LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM.
RegisterSets are assumed to be terminated by this value. Loops over register set values would fail without LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM terminating the list. This change adjusts the static check to account for the size of the register set regnum list being one larger than the expected valid register set count.
llvm-svn: 210964
show more ...
|