[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
mem

[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.

Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.

This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.

rdar://74890607

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codeba

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.

This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:

```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```

NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.

NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.

Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847

llvm-svn: 361484

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility

These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall co

Move RegisterValue,Scalar,State from Core to Utility

These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).

The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740

llvm-svn: 339127

show more ...

Move DataBuffer / DataExtractor and friends from Core -> Utility.

llvm-svn: 296943

Move Log from Core -> Utility.

All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559

llvm-

Move Log from Core -> Utility.

All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559

llvm-svn: 296909

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Clean up register naming conventions inside lldb.

"gcc" register numbers are now correctly referred to as "ehframe"
register numbers. In almost all cases, ehframe and dwarf register
numbers are i

Clean up register naming conventions inside lldb.

"gcc" register numbers are now correctly referred to as "ehframe"
register numbers. In almost all cases, ehframe and dwarf register
numbers are identical (the one exception is i386 darwin where ehframe
regnums were incorrect).

The old "gdb" register numbers, which I incorrectly thought were
stabs register numbers, are now referred to as "Process Plugin"
register numbers. This is the register numbering scheme that the
remote process controller stub (lldb-server, gdbserver, core file
support, kdp server, remote jtag devices, etc) uses to refer to the
registers. The process plugin register numbers may not be contiguous
- there are remote jtag devices that have gaps in their register
numbering schemes.

I removed all of the enums for "gdb" register numbers that we had
in lldb - these were meaningless - and I put LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM
in all of the register tables for the Process Plugin regnum slot.

This change is almost entirely mechnical; the one actual change in
here is to ProcessGDBRemote.cpp's ParseRegisters() which parses the
qXfer:features:read:target.xml response. As it parses register
definitions from the xml, it will assign sequential numbers as the
eRegisterKindLLDB numbers (the lldb register numberings must be
sequential, without any gaps) and if the xml file specifies register
numbers, those will be used as the eRegisterKindProcessPlugin
register numbers (and those may have gaps). A J-Link jtag device's
target.xml does contain a gap in register numbers, and it only
specifies the register numbers for the registers after that gap.
The device supports many different ARM boards and probably selects
different part of its register file as appropriate.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D12791
<rdar://problem/22623262>

llvm-svn: 247741

show more ...

A messy bit of cleanup: Move towards more descriptive names
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. This is not
complete but it's a step in the right direction. It's almost
entirely mechanical.

A messy bit of cleanup: Move towards more descriptive names
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. This is not
complete but it's a step in the right direction. It's almost
entirely mechanical.

lldb informally uses "gcc register numbering" to mean eh_frame.
Why? Probably because there's a notorious bug with gcc on i386
darwin where the register numbers in eh_frame were incorrect.
In all other cases, eh_frame register numbering is identical to
dwarf.

lldb informally uses "gdb register numbering" to mean stabs.
There are no official definitions of stabs register numbers
for different architectures, so the implementations of gdb
and gcc are the de facto reference source.

There were some incorrect uses of these register number types
in lldb already. I fixed the ones that I saw as I made
this change.

This commit changes all references to "gcc" and "gdb" register
numbers in lldb to "eh_frame" and "stabs" to make it clear
what is actually being represented.

lldb cannot parse the stabs debug format, and given that no
one is using stabs any more, it is unlikely that it ever will.
A more comprehensive cleanup would remove the stabs register
numbers altogether - it's unnecessary cruft / complication to
all of our register structures.

In ProcessGDBRemote, when we get register definitions from
the gdb-remote stub, we expect to see "gcc:" (qRegisterInfo)
or "gcc_regnum" (qXfer:features:read: packet to get xml payload).
This patch changes ProcessGDBRemote to also accept "ehframe:"
and "ehframe_regnum" from these remotes.

I did not change GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS or debugserver
to send these new packets. I don't know what kind of interoperability
constraints we might be working under. At some point in the future
we should transition to using the more descriptive names.

Throughout lldb we're still using enum names like "gcc_r0" and "gdb_r0",
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. These should be cleaned
up eventually too.

The sources link cleanly on macosx native with xcode build. I
don't think we'll see problems on other platforms but please let
me know if I broke anyone.

llvm-svn: 245141

show more ...

Replace uint32_t by lldb::RegisterKing in register context API.

llvm-svn: 212172

Add History subclasses for Thread, Unwind, RegisterContext.
Still working out some of the details of these classes but
I wanted to get the overall structure checked in.
<rdar://problem/15314068>

l

Add History subclasses for Thread, Unwind, RegisterContext.
Still working out some of the details of these classes but
I wanted to get the overall structure checked in.
<rdar://problem/15314068>

llvm-svn: 194245

show more ...