[lldb] Support gdbserver signals

GDB and LLDB use different signal models. GDB uses a predefined set
of signal codes, and maps platform's signos to them. On the other hand,
LLDB has historically s

[lldb] Support gdbserver signals

GDB and LLDB use different signal models. GDB uses a predefined set
of signal codes, and maps platform's signos to them. On the other hand,
LLDB has historically simply passed native signos.

In order to improve compatibility between LLDB and gdbserver, the GDB
signal model should be used. However, GDB does not provide a mapping
for all existing signals on Linux and unsupported signals are passed
as 'unknown'. Limiting LLDB to this behavior could be considered
a regression.

To get the best of both worlds, use the LLDB signal model when talking
to lldb-server, and the GDB signal model otherwise. For this purpose,
new versions of lldb-server indicate "native-signals+" via qSupported.
At the same time, we also detect older versions of lldb-server
via QThreadSuffixSupported for backwards compatibility. If neither test
succeeds, we assume gdbserver or another implementation using GDB model.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108078

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdate

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Refactor Unix signals.

Summary:
- Consolidate Unix signals selection in UnixSignals.
- Make Unix signals available from platform.
- Add jSignalsInfo packet to retrieve Unix signals from remote platf

Refactor Unix signals.

Summary:
- Consolidate Unix signals selection in UnixSignals.
- Make Unix signals available from platform.
- Add jSignalsInfo packet to retrieve Unix signals from remote platform.
- Get a copy of the platform signal for each remote process.
- Update SB API for signals.
- Update signal utility in test suite.

Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg

Subscribers: chaoren, jingham, labath, emaste, tberghammer, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11094

llvm-svn: 242101

show more ...