[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
mem

[lldb] Refactor DataBuffer so we can map files as read-only

Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.

Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.

This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.

rdar://74890607

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856

show more ...

[LLDB] Replace use of double underscore in identifiers

Identifiers with __ anywhere are reserved. I picked this up via the
bugprone-reserved-identifier clang-tidy check but -Wreserved-identifier wil

[LLDB] Replace use of double underscore in identifiers

Identifiers with __ anywhere are reserved. I picked this up via the
bugprone-reserved-identifier clang-tidy check but -Wreserved-identifier will
also flag these uses as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119915

show more ...

[lldb] Fix NSDate test after Scalar change

The formatter was requesting an unsigned integer from the ValueObject,
but CFAbsoluteTime is a signed double, so in the NSDate test the formatter
actually

[lldb] Fix NSDate test after Scalar change

The formatter was requesting an unsigned integer from the ValueObject,
but CFAbsoluteTime is a signed double, so in the NSDate test the formatter
actually just printed the 'error value' date which is the Cocoa epoch. This
started failing after the recent Scalar changes.

This patch just changes the logic to use a signed value which fits to the data
we try to read and avoids this issue.

show more ...

[lldb] Move clang-based files out of Symbol

Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSyst

[lldb] Move clang-based files out of Symbol

Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h

This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik

Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Rename ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang

Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the Type

[lldb][NFC] Rename ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang

Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).

I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.

Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai

Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai

Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684

show more ...

[LanguageRuntime] Move ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin

Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compne

[LanguageRuntime] Move ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin

Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg

Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763

llvm-svn: 366148

show more ...

[Target] Remove Process::GetObjCLanguageRuntime

Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
ch

[Target] Remove Process::GetObjCLanguageRuntime

Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052

llvm-svn: 362981

show more ...

[LanguageRuntime] Introduce LLVM-style casts

Summary:
Using llvm-style rtti gives us stronger guarantees around casting
LanguageRuntimes.

As discussed in D62755

Differential Revision: https://revi

[LanguageRuntime] Introduce LLVM-style casts

Summary:
Using llvm-style rtti gives us stronger guarantees around casting
LanguageRuntimes.

As discussed in D62755

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62934

llvm-svn: 362884

show more ...

Allow direct comparison of ConstString against StringRef

Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn

Allow direct comparison of ConstString against StringRef

Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.

However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```

Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.

I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.

This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.

This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.

Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth

Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667

llvm-svn: 359281

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Simplify Boolean expressions

This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-

Simplify Boolean expressions

This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584

llvm-svn: 349215

show more ...

Rename Error -> Status.

This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that h

Rename Error -> Status.

This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.

llvm-svn: 302872

show more ...

Move DataBuffer / DataExtractor and friends from Core -> Utility.

llvm-svn: 296943

Remove dependencies from Utility to Core and Target.

With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.

Differential Revis

Remove dependencies from Utility to Core and Target.

With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909

llvm-svn: 295088

show more ...

Move classes from Core -> Utility.

This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.

ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString

The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state w

Move classes from Core -> Utility.

This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.

ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString

The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427

llvm-svn: 293941

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Remove what I believe are the last known instances of formatters that run code

llvm-svn: 265865

Change Target::EvaluateExpression to take an ExecutionContextScope * rather than a
StackFrame * (StackFrame is an ExecutionContextScope.) That allows you to call an
expression on a particular Thread

Change Target::EvaluateExpression to take an ExecutionContextScope * rather than a
StackFrame * (StackFrame is an ExecutionContextScope.) That allows you to call an
expression on a particular Thread, but not using the context of any particular frame.
That in turn is useful for injecting utility functions that don't actually depend on
locals/self/etc of the current frame.

I also had to include StackFrame.h in a couple of places so the compiler knew
how to downcast StackFrame to ExecutionContextScope.

<rdar://problem/22852953>

llvm-svn: 251564

show more ...

This is the work I was building up to with my patches yesterday

Introduce the notion of Language-based formatter prefix/suffix
This is meant for languages that share certain data types but present t

This is the work I was building up to with my patches yesterday

Introduce the notion of Language-based formatter prefix/suffix
This is meant for languages that share certain data types but present them in syntatically different ways, such that LLDB can now have language-based awareness of which of the syntax variations it has to present to the user when formatting those values

This is goodness for new languages and interoperability, but is NFC for existing languages. As such, existing tests cover this

llvm-svn: 249587

show more ...

Move Objective-C data formatters to the Objective-C language plugin where they belong

llvm-svn: 247627