[lldb][NFC] Remove all uses of StringRef::withNullAsEmpty in LLDB

A long time ago LLDB wanted to start using StringRef instead of
C-Strings/ConstString but was blocked by the fact that the StringRef

[lldb][NFC] Remove all uses of StringRef::withNullAsEmpty in LLDB

A long time ago LLDB wanted to start using StringRef instead of
C-Strings/ConstString but was blocked by the fact that the StringRef constructor
that takes a C-string was asserting that the C-string isn't a nullptr. To
workaround this, D24697 introduced a special function called `withNullAsEmpty`
and that's what LLDB (and only LLDB) started to use to build StringRefs from
C-strings.

A bit later it seems that `withNullAsEmpty` was declared too awkward to use and
instead the assert in the StringRef constructor got removed (see D24904). The
rest of LLDB was then converted to StringRef by just calling the now perfectly
usable implicit constructor.

However, all the calls to `withNullAsEmpty` just remained and are now just
strange artefacts in the code base that just look out of place. It's also
curiously a LLDB-exclusive function and no other project ever called it since
it's introduction half a decade ago.

This patch removes all uses of `withNullAsEmpty`. The follow up will be to
remove the function from StringRef.

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102597

show more ...

Fix a warning about named return value not being moved-from.

The use of an rvalue reference here was using reference lifetime
extension needlessly - the code is simpler and more efficient without
it.

[lldb/Interpreter] Fix deep copying for OptionValue classes

Some implementations of the DeepCopy function called the copy constructor that copied m_parent member instead of setting a new parent. Oth

[lldb/Interpreter] Fix deep copying for OptionValue classes

Some implementations of the DeepCopy function called the copy constructor that copied m_parent member instead of setting a new parent. Others just leaved the base class's members (m_parent, m_callback, m_was_set) empty.
One more problem is that not all classes override this function, e.g. OptionValueArgs::DeepCopy produces OptionValueArray instance, and Target[Process/Thread]ValueProperty::DeepCopy produces OptionValueProperty. This makes downcasting via static_cast invalid.

The patch implements idiom "virtual constructor" to fix these issues.
Add a test that checks DeepCopy for correct copying/setting all data members of the base class.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96952

show more ...

[lldb] Remove redundant WithFormat suffixes (NFC)

Replace calls to FooWithFormat() with calls to Foo() when only one
argument is provided and the given string doesn't need to be formatted.

Add an option (-y) to "break set" and "source list" that uses the same
file:line:column form that we use to print out locations. Since we
print them this way it makes sense we also accept that form.

Add an option (-y) to "break set" and "source list" that uses the same
file:line:column form that we use to print out locations. Since we
print them this way it makes sense we also accept that form.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83975

show more ...

[lldb] Replace calls to new with std::make_shared<> (NFC)

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Remove WordComplete mode, make result array indexed from 0 and remove any undocumented/redundant return values

Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the inte

[lldb][NFC] Remove WordComplete mode, make result array indexed from 0 and remove any undocumented/redundant return values

Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:

* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.

I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.

A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:

* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.

Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).

* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).

* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).

This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.

For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).

I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536

llvm-svn: 369624

show more ...

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codeba

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.

This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:

```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```

NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.

NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.

Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847

llvm-svn: 361484

show more ...

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdate

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

show more ...

Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only.

Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problem

Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only.

Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:

Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.

Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.

This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:

1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.

Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.

Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.

The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.

Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath

Reviewed By: davide

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322

llvm-svn: 338151

show more ...

Replaced more boilerplate code with CompletionRequest (NFC)

Summary:
As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old
completion API style with a single C

Replaced more boilerplate code with CompletionRequest (NFC)

Summary:
As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old
completion API style with a single CompletionRequest. In some cases we also pass an option
vector/index, but as we don't always have this information, it currently is not part of the
CompletionRequest class.

The constructor of the CompletionRequest is now also more sensible. You only pass the
user input, cursor position and your list of matches to the request and the rest will be
inferred (using the same code we used before to calculate this). You also have to pass these
match window parameters to it, even though they are unused right now.

The patch shouldn't change any behavior.

Reviewers: jingham

Reviewed By: jingham

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48976

llvm-svn: 337031

show more ...

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to r

Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue

if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)

continue

if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""

out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197

show more ...

Rename Error -> Status.

This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that h

Rename Error -> Status.

This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.

llvm-svn: 302872

show more ...

Move StringList from Core -> Utility.

llvm-svn: 298412

Rewrite all Property related functions in terms of StringRef.

This was a bit tricky, especially for things like
OptionValueArray and OptionValueDictionary since they do some
funky string parsing. R

Rewrite all Property related functions in terms of StringRef.

This was a bit tricky, especially for things like
OptionValueArray and OptionValueDictionary since they do some
funky string parsing. Rather than try to re-write line-by-line
I tried to make the StringRef usage idiomatic, even though
it meant often re-writing from scratch large blocks of code
in a different way while keeping true to the original intent.

The finished code is a big improvement though, and often much
shorter than the original code. All tests and unit tests
pass on Windows and Linux.

llvm-svn: 287242

show more ...

Convert AutoComplete related code to StringRef.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26721

llvm-svn: 287188

Update the prompt related functions to use StringRefs.

llvm-svn: 282269

Update OptionGroup::SetValue to take StringRef.

Then deal with all the fallout.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24847

llvm-svn: 282265

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Add an OptionValueLanguage class

llvm-svn: 230046

Refactor OptionValue::SetValueFromCString to use llvm::StringRef

Reviewers: clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7676

llvm-svn: 230005

Get rid of Debugger::FormatPrompt() and replace it with the new FormatEntity class.

Why? Debugger::FormatPrompt() would run through the format prompt every time and parse it and emit it piece by pie

Get rid of Debugger::FormatPrompt() and replace it with the new FormatEntity class.

Why? Debugger::FormatPrompt() would run through the format prompt every time and parse it and emit it piece by piece. It also did formatting differently depending on which key/value pair it was parsing.

The new code improves on this with the following features:
1 - Allow format strings to be parsed into a FormatEntity::Entry which can contain multiple child FormatEntity::Entry objects. This FormatEntity::Entry is a parsed version of what was previously always done in Debugger::FormatPrompt() so it is more efficient to emit formatted strings using the new parsed FormatEntity::Entry.
2 - Allows errors in format strings to be shown immediately when setting the settings (frame-format, thread-format, disassembly-format
3 - Allows auto completion by implementing a new OptionValueFormatEntity and switching frame-format, thread-format, and disassembly-format settings over to using it.
4 - The FormatEntity::Entry for each of the frame-format, thread-format, disassembly-format settings only replaces the old one if the format parses correctly
5 - Combines all consecutive string values together for efficient output. This means all "${ansi.*}" keys and all desensitized characters like "\n" "\t" "\0721" "\x23" will get combined with their previous strings
6 - ${*.script:} (like "${var.script:mymodule.my_var_function}") have all been switched over to use ${script.*:} "${script.var:mymodule.my_var_function}") to make the format easier to parse as I don't believe anyone was using these format string power user features.
7 - All key values pairs are defined in simple C arrays of entries so it is much easier to add new entries.

These changes pave the way for subsequent modifications where we can modify formats to do more (like control the width of value strings can do more and add more functionality more easily like string formatting to control the width, printf formats and more).

llvm-svn: 228207

show more ...