[lldb] Mark expressions that couldn't be parsed or executed as failed expressions

Summary:
LLDB keeps statistics of how many expression evaluations are 'successful' and 'failed'
which are updated af

[lldb] Mark expressions that couldn't be parsed or executed as failed expressions

Summary:
LLDB keeps statistics of how many expression evaluations are 'successful' and 'failed'
which are updated after each expression evaluation (assuming statistics are enabled).
From what I understand the idea is that this could be used to define how well LLDB's
expression evaluator is working.

Currently all expressions are considered successful unless the user passes an explicit
positive element counting to the expression command (with the `-Z` flag) and then passes
an expression that successfully evaluates to a type that doesn't support element counting.
Expressions that fail to parse, execute or any other outcome are considered successful
at the moment which means we nearly always have a 100% expression evaluation
success rate.

This patch makes that expressions that fail to parse or execute to count as failed
expressions.

We can't know whether the expression failed because of an user error
of because LLDB couldn't correctly parse/compile it, but I would argue that this is
still an improvement. Assuming that the percentage of valid user expressions stays
mostly constant over time (which seems like a reasonable assumption), then this
way we can still see if we are doing relatively better/worse from release to release.

Reviewers: davide, aprantl, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: abidh

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76280

show more ...

[lldb] Ptrs->refs in CommandObjectExpression::EvaluateExpression parameters

The error_stream and result parameter were inconsistently checked for
being null, so we might as well make them references

[lldb] Ptrs->refs in CommandObjectExpression::EvaluateExpression parameters

The error_stream and result parameter were inconsistently checked for
being null, so we might as well make them references instead of crashing
in case someone passes a nullptr and hits one of the code paths that are
currently not doing a nullptr check on those parameters. Also change
output_stream for consistency.

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Refactor our option generation out of EvaluateExpression

[lldb] Update header guards to be consistent and compliant with LLVM (NFC)

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pa

[lldb] Update header guards to be consistent and compliant with LLVM (NFC)

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Remove unnecessary includes in source/Commands

Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed a

[lldb][NFC] Remove unnecessary includes in source/Commands

Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed all the bogus reports from IWYU. Patch is tested on Linux and macOS.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: krytarowski, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71489

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Remove WordComplete mode, make result array indexed from 0 and remove any undocumented/redundant return values

Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the inte

[lldb][NFC] Remove WordComplete mode, make result array indexed from 0 and remove any undocumented/redundant return values

Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:

* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.

I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.

A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:

* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.

Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).

* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).

* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).

This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.

For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).

I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536

llvm-svn: 369624

show more ...

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codeba

[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.

This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:

```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```

NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.

NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.

Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847

llvm-svn: 361484

show more ...

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base

[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from comments

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdate

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

show more ...

Clean-up usage of OptionDefinition arrays

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52604

llvm-svn: 343348

Added initial code completion support for the `expr` command

Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.

We now have a completion handler in the expression Comm

Added initial code completion support for the `expr` command

Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.

We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.

The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).

This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.

Reviewers: jingham, teemperor

Reviewed By: teemperor

Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465

llvm-svn: 341086

show more ...

Get rid of the C-string parameter in DoExecute

Summary:
This patch gets rid of the C-string parameter in the RawCommandObject::DoExecute function,
making the code simpler and less memory unsafe.

Th

Get rid of the C-string parameter in DoExecute

Summary:
This patch gets rid of the C-string parameter in the RawCommandObject::DoExecute function,
making the code simpler and less memory unsafe.

There seems to be a assumption in some command objects that this parameter could be a nullptr,
but from what I can see the rest of the API doesn't actually allow this (and other command
objects and related code pieces dereference this parameter without any checks).

Especially CommandObjectRegexCommand has error handling code for a nullptr that is now gone.

Reviewers: davide, jingham, teemperor

Reviewed By: teemperor

Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49207

llvm-svn: 336955

show more ...

Rename Error -> Status.

This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that h

Rename Error -> Status.

This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.

llvm-svn: 302872

show more ...

Make Options::SetOptionValue take a StringRef.

llvm-svn: 286723

Update OptionGroup::SetValue to take StringRef.

Then deal with all the fallout.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24847

llvm-svn: 282265

Convert option tables to ArrayRefs.

This change is very mechanical. All it does is change the
signature of `Options::GetDefinitions()` and `OptionGroup::
GetDefinitions()` to return an `ArrayRef<Op

Convert option tables to ArrayRefs.

This change is very mechanical. All it does is change the
signature of `Options::GetDefinitions()` and `OptionGroup::
GetDefinitions()` to return an `ArrayRef<OptionDefinition>`
instead of a `const OptionDefinition *`. In the case of the
former, it deletes the sentinel entry from every table, and
in the case of the latter, it removes the `GetNumDefinitions()`
method from the interface. These are no longer necessary as
`ArrayRef` carries its own length.

In the former case, iteration was done by using a sentinel
entry, so there was no knowledge of length. Because of this
the individual option tables were allowed to be defined below
the corresponding class (after all, only a pointer was needed).
Now, however, the length must be known at compile time to
construct the `ArrayRef`, and as a result it is necessary to
move every option table before its corresponding class. This
results in this CL looking very big, but in terms of substance
there is not much here.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24834

llvm-svn: 282188

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Decoupled Options from CommandInterpreter.

Options used to store a reference to the CommandInterpreter instance
in the base Options class. This made it impossible to parse options
independent of a

Decoupled Options from CommandInterpreter.

Options used to store a reference to the CommandInterpreter instance
in the base Options class. This made it impossible to parse options
independent of a CommandInterpreter.

This change removes the reference from the base class. Instead, it
modifies the options-parsing-related methods to take an
ExecutionContext pointer, which the options may inspect if they need
to do so.

Closes https://reviews.llvm.org/D23416
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham

llvm-svn: 278440

show more ...

[LLDB] Added support for PHI nodes to IR interpreter

This allows expressions such as 'i == 1 || i == 2` to be executed using the IR interpreter, instead of relying on JIT code injection (which may n

[LLDB] Added support for PHI nodes to IR interpreter

This allows expressions such as 'i == 1 || i == 2` to be executed using the IR interpreter, instead of relying on JIT code injection (which may not be available on some platforms).

Patch by cameron314

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19124

llvm-svn: 269340

show more ...

Fixed multiline expressions, and removed some dead code.

IOHandlerLinesUpdated() does nothing, and IOHandlerIsInputComplete should be
implemented but isn't. This means that multiline expressions do

Fixed multiline expressions, and removed some dead code.

IOHandlerLinesUpdated() does nothing, and IOHandlerIsInputComplete should be
implemented but isn't. This means that multiline expressions don't work. This
patch fixes that. Test case to follow in the next commit.

llvm-svn: 268970

show more ...

Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.

Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression

Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.

Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression
to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present.

<rdar://problem/25351938>

llvm-svn: 264793

show more ...

Expose top-level Clang expressions via the command line and the API.

Top-level Clang expressions are expressions that act as new translation units,
and define their own symbols. They do not have fu

Expose top-level Clang expressions via the command line and the API.

Top-level Clang expressions are expressions that act as new translation units,
and define their own symbols. They do not have function wrappers like regular
expressions do, and declarations are persistent regardless of use of the dollar
sign in identifiers. Names defined by these are given priority over all other
symbol lookups.

This patch adds a new expression option, '-p' or '--top-level,' which controls
whether the expression is treated this way. It also adds a flag controlling
this to SBExpressionOptions so that this API is usable externally. It also adds
a test that validates that this works. (The test requires a fix to the Clang
AST importer which I will be committing shortly.)

<rdar://problem/22864976>

llvm-svn: 264662

show more ...

Use Clang's FixItHints to correct expressions with "trivial" mistakes (e.g. "." for "->".)
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions se

Use Clang's FixItHints to correct expressions with "trivial" mistakes (e.g. "." for "->".)
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions setting. FixIt's are only applied to UserExpressions, not UtilityFunctions,
those you have to get right when you make them.

This is just a first stage. At present the fixits are applied silently. The next step
is to tell the user about the applied fixit.

<rdar://problem/25351938>

llvm-svn: 264379

show more ...

Added support to the expression command for dropping into the REPL at will.

"expr -r" does this. It also returns to a REPL if the LLDB command interpreter
is neseted inside it, for example in cases

Added support to the expression command for dropping into the REPL at will.

"expr -r" does this. It also returns to a REPL if the LLDB command interpreter
is neseted inside it, for example in cases where a REPL command resulted in a
breakpoint being hit or a crash.

llvm-svn: 250780

show more ...